Paper ID #19304STEM Education RedefinedMr. David Dylan John, Georgia Southern University A Masters of Science in Applied Engineering with an emphasis in Construction Management candidate at Georgia Southern University, Dylan John is an active student leader within multiple student organizations and serves the institution of 20,000+ students as Student Government President for the 2016/17 academic year. His research interests include Building Information Modelling (BIM), Sustainable Construction, Productivity & Efficiency in the Construction Industry and Construction Education. He is mentored by Dr.Yunfeng (Cindy
pathwayfor the specific form of cancer chosen with the pathway progressing from the onset of the diseaseto the death of the patient. The students then came to class with their pathways and formedteams with the goal of creating a master, draft disease pathway. This pathway was termed the“Do Nothing” disease pathway as specific treatments or interventions were not considered. Inthe next assignment, each student created an annotated slide that displayed the student’s final“Do Nothing” pathway along with detailed information about five student-selected steps of thepathway. Additionally, to seed thoughts for the next assignment related to device-basedinterventions, students were required to identify five common interventional points where adiagnostic or
earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Washington, in Seattle, and the Master of Science and Ph.D. degrees in Chemical Engineering, both from the University of Michigan. He teaches a number of alternative energy courses at Lawrence Tech. Dr. Fletcher and his student research team is focusing on energy usage and efficiencies of several traditional and alternative energy systems.Dr. Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart, Ph.D. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. He is a Fellow of the Engineering Society of Detroit. He
appropriate mastery of the knowledge,techniques, skills and modern tools of their disciplines; b) an ability to apply current knowledgeand adapt to emerging applications of mathematics, science, engineering and technology; c)design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints; h) understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context; and k) use techniques, skills, and tools in engineering practice. Required andrecommended textbooks are: G. M. Masters, Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems,B.K. Hodge, Alternative Energy Systems and Applications, and instructor lecture notes.Other alternative energy power generation sources (e.g., geothermal, marine energy
://energy.mit.edu/minor/) and Duke’s new minor in Energy Engineering(http://energy.pratt.duke.edu/minor-requirements). In the energy technology area there areadditional options, including Thomas Edison State University’s BS in Energy SystemsTechnology (http://www.tesu.edu/ast/bsast/Energy-Systems-Technology.cfm), and OregonInstitute of Technology’s BS in Renewable Energy Engineering(http://www.oit.edu/wilsonville/academics/degrees/renewable-energy-engineering).The options for graduate-level education related to energy systems are significant and diverse,including professional masters programs in Energy Systems Engineering at Lehigh(http://www.lehigh.edu/~inesei/degree/index.html ), Michigan(http://isd.engin.umich.edu/degree-programs/energy-systems
paper, was about cooking and heating efficiently in rural areas of developing countries.The procedure of the Challenge was developed in the first project year and has been used andimproved ever since: by communicating with local partners in developing countries, existingproblems are identified by EWB and the project coordinators. Since the groups of students needto be interdisciplinary, the course, the Challenge is integrated in, is interdisciplinary and opento a range of diverse master courses. So far, students from diverse engineering fields like civilengineering or environmental engineering have been participating, but also students who studynatural sciences such as biology and students who study social sciences like political scienceshave
University. Dr. Aleksandr Sergeyev earned his bachelor degree in Electrical Engineering at Moscow University of Electronics and Automation in 1995. He obtained the Master degree in Physics from Michigan Technological University in 2004 and the PhD degree in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Technological University in 2007. Dr. Aleksandr Sergeyev’s research interests include high energy laser propagation through the turbulent atmosphere, developing advanced control algorithms for wavefront sensing and mitigating effects of the turbulent atmosphere, digital inline holography, digital signal processing, and laser spectroscopy. Dr. Sergeyev is a member of ASEE, IEEE, SPIE and is actively involved in promoting engineering
classroom why the activities integrated into the gamificationplatform are important to their personal and professional growth.Our study investigated whether student academic motivation towards homework in a freshmanengineering design course was influenced by the integration of a gamification platform. In thiscourse, engineering students of all disciplines learn about fundamentals of engineering such asstatistics, economics, ethics, etc. It is important for students to master these basic engineeringprinciples early in their curriculum in order to succeed in future classes within their degreeprograms. The gamification platform 3D GameLab was implemented in a semester long study inthe Spring semester of 2016.This study addressed the following research
teaching. ● Students benefit by making sure they actually mastered the basics and can perform programming tasks before moving on to more complex concepts and courses. ● Implementation requires additional resources, such as trained TAs and helpers.The CT process and results have made it clear that we need to focus our attention onfundamental programming concepts and avoid covering too many topics until students are firmlygrounded.5. ConclusionsThe ECE 102 Engineering Computation course has evolved over time in both content andteaching philosophy. It was always meant to provide students with practical problem solvingskills while at the same time teaching them the basics of programming and electricalengineering. In 2015 we started
/group/design_education/cgi-bin/mediawiki/index.php/Engineering_Majors_Survey.Dungs, C.C. 2016. “Design Thinking and (Extra) Curricular Activities: A Way to FosterStudent’s Innovation Self-Effic’acy and Career Goals in Entrepreneurship andInnovation? (Master’s Thesis).” Munich, Germany: Technical University of Munich.Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. M. (2011a). The DNA of Disruptive Innovators:The five discovery skills that enable innovative leaders to "think different". In J. Dyer, H.Gregersen, & C. M. Christensen (Eds.), The Innovator's DNA: Mastering the Five Skills ofDisruptive Innovation (pp. 1–28).Gilmartin, S.K., Chen, H.L., Schar, M.F., Jin, Q., Toye, G., Harris, A., Cao, E., Costache, E.,Reithmann, M., & Sheppard
understand the material and master solving theproblems assigned to be worked during class. The frequent testing, one exam every week, wasan implementation artifact from a more traditionally taught class. In a more traditionally taughtclass it is easy for students to postpone any studying until just before an exam. Providingfrequent assessment, in the form of a weekly test, helps keep students on-track. What theinstructor realized was that in the flipped class, students were genuinely working on the materialin every class meeting, and possibly didn’t need the extra motivation of weekly exams.Therefore, the instructor reduced the number of test by 50% by having an exam every two weeksinstead of every week
Paper ID #19770Fluidic channels in the classroom: Fabrication and integration in fluid me-chanicsMegan Miller, Montana State University Megan is a sophomore in Chemical Engineering at Montana State University. Her research interests include MEMS fabrication, microfluidics, and sputtering of thin film alloys.Mr. Chung-Hsuan Benjamin Huang, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Montana StateUniversity Benjamin C.H. Huang received the Master of Science degrees from Drexel University in Philadelphia in 2014. Benjamin Huang is currently Microfluidics Scientist and Lithography Specialist at Montana State Univer
; Institute for Integra-tive Neuroscience, Purdue University Brandon received his bachelors degree in electrical engineering from Saint Louis University in 2012 and his masters in electrical and computer engineering from Purdue University in 2014. He is currently a PhD student in biomedical engineering at Purdue University under the guidance of Edward Bartlett, PhD. His research interests include optical neural stimulation, computational and systems neuroscience, and novel neural engineering technologies.Abdel-Rahman Hassan, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Abdel-Rahman Hassan is a PhD candidate at the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue Uni- versity. Abdel-Rahman obtained his
Paper ID #20398Horizontal Integration of the Same Design Project in Multiple Structural En-gineering CoursesDr. Benjamin Z. Dymond, University of Minnesota Duluth Ben Dymond obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech before obtaining his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities. Ben is currently an assistant professor of structural engineering at the University of Minnesota Duluth.Dr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matt Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T then worked as a bridge designer at
, no. 4, pp. 397-399, 1990.[3] J. Lowman, Mastering the techniques of teaching, 2nd Ed, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984.[4] D. G. Schmucker, "Models, models, models: The use of physical models to enhance the structural engineering experience," in Proceedings of the 1988 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, (pp. 3.413.1-9). 1998.[5] M. Campbell, "Oh, now I get it!," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 4, p. 381, 1999.[6] William J. Straits and R. Russell Wilke, "Interactive demonstrations: Examples from biology lectures," Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 58-59, 2006.[7] W. M. Roth, C. J. McRobbie, K. B. Lucas & S. Boutonné, "Why
engineering talent through innovative curricular and co-curricular experiences. Jennifer has always explored broad, multi-disciplinary engineering solutions earning her Doctorate and Masters in Materials Science and Engineering from The Johns Hopkins University study- ing nondestructive electromagnetic techniques for materials characterization. Dr. Schlegel received a strong engineering foundation graduating from Virginia Tech in 1992 with an Engineering Science and Mechanics degree. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Implementing an Entrepreneurial Mindset Design Project in an Introductory Engineering CourseAbstractAt Florida Institute of Technology (FIT
preference to comprehend the information presented. Contrary to our expectations, undergraduate students (as opposed to graduate students) had higher average linear saccade, percentage fixations per ROI, percentage duration per ROI. Consequently, undergraduate students demonstrated higher fault detection effectiveness and efficiency (not by a big margin though). These results hold true with the previous study at Microsoft [32] where higher level of technical education (i.e. Bachelors vs. Masters vs. Doctorate) was inversely correlated with inspection performance. Hence, it is necessary to train students with higher technical knowledge on reading requirement document from a customer’s perspective as not bog down with more design
Manufacturing Systems and others. He has been serving as a principle investigator of many research projects, funded by NSF, NASA, DoEd, KSEF and LMC. He is currently serving as an editor of Journal of Computer Standards & Interfaces.Mr. Shraman Kadapa, Drexel University (Mechanical Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Shraman Kadapa completed his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Purdue University, West Lafayette. He is currently pursuing a masters’ degree in mechanical engineering and mechanics at Drexel University. He is a research and teaching assistant in the mechanical and mechatronics lab at Drexel. He is also a researcher in Scalable Autonomous Systems Lab. His research interests are mainly in robotics which
social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stan- ford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder.Dr. Chris Swan, Tufts University Chris Swan is an associate professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts University. He has additional appointments in the Department of Education, Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current
particularly masterful Theremin player was able to take requests during thepresentation and play passable versions of the songs suggested. After the program theTheremins remained at Carnegie Mellon University. For many years they sat in a glass displaycase in a physics lab, with informational fliers posted behind them, educating countlessundergraduates on the concept of a Theremin. Figure 4 measuring the frequency response as a function of distance from the antenna. Figure 5 A graph of the frequency response of a commercial Theremin measured by students 15 At the PGSS program, the most commonly used Theremin designs for the projects havebeen Arthur Harrison’s 145 Theremin (or its predecessor, the 144 Theremin)14 and the
explanation of Bluetooth networking. The detailsof the Bluetooth protocol are not discussed, but its distinguishing features are explained in asimple manner. Specifically, the use of Bluetooth in short range, low power applications and ahigh-level discussion of its master-slave communication structure. Students are provided withfunctions for advertising their microcontroller as well as for transmitting and receiving data. Atthis point, before the GUI is fully developed, students are asked to simply advertise their device.An example of the Bluetooth advertisement from multiple student groups being picked up by a smartphone is show in figure 10. Students are asked
and graduate courses in ET Masters program. Also, she introduced the first experiential activity for Applied Mechanics courses. She is coordinator and advisor for capstone projects for Engineering Technology.Mr. M. Eric Carr, Drexel University Mr. Eric Carr is an Instructor with Drexel University’s Department of Engineering Technology. A grad- uate of Old Dominion University’s Computer Engineering Technology program and Drexel’s College of Engineering, Eric enjoys finding innovative ways to use microcontrollers and other technologies to en- hance Drexel’s Engineering Technology course offerings. Eric is currently pursuing a Ph.D in Computer Engineering at Drexel, and is an author of several technical papers in the
. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sus- tainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. Prior to joining the WFU faculty, she led the junior capstone design sequence at James Madison University, was the inaugural director of the NAE Grand Challenges Program at JMU, and developed first-year coursework.Mr. Charles McDonald Cowan II, Wake Forest University Mack Cowan is a recent graduate of James Madison University’s
Paper ID #25844Student Perspectives on Using Hands-on Discovery Activities in a CriticalSystems Thinking CourseMs. Yilin Feng, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette Yilin Feng is a doctoral student at the School of Aviation and Transportation Technology at Purdue Uni- versity. She received her master and bachelor degree in Aeronautic engineering at Beihang University. Her research interest is in airport sustainability and management. She won the first place at the ACRP University Design Competition in 2018.Ms. Lorraine E. Holtaway, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Lorraine E. Holtaway is a Ph.D. student in the School
appreciation for how large scale some of these projects can get, ...The diversity of people working on the project too has also made it less intimidating for me toget into as it shows me that any and all can help contribute to the project." •Additionally group work was discovered to be advantageous • and community factored intosuccess. One students reported "What I learned from this course is how beneficial working withgroups and in a community can be …I always thought that there was this stigma that you hadto become this master coder and be able to do anything and everything to do with computersby yourself. That if a hard problem had arisen, you and solely you had to figure out thesolution
for Master-Degree or Ph.D. candidate students and has not beentaught for undergraduate engineering students. Even though the FEM theory and FEAcommercial software are extremely complicated, most FEA commercial software has user-friendly interfaces and is easy to use. There were many ways to introduce FEA software tostudents. One of the common ways was to let students gradually learn FEA software, includingintroducing the FEA software during engineering statics in their sophomore year [8,9], mechanicsof materials in their sophomore year [9, 10,11] and design of machine elements in their junior year[12, 13,14] . Finally, a full course in finite element analysis was offered for junior or seniorengineering students [1~7].There were
President and Provost for Special Projects at a Old Dominion University. Her experience as a Commissioner on the Indiana Commission for Higher Education has allowed her to embrace a broader perspective of the nuances of higher education and business & industry. In addition, Gwen has served as the board chair for the Indiana Minority Health Coalition—a grassroots legislated non-profit organization that promoted advocacy and education across the state with 19 local coalitions. As a full-time tenure track assistant professor and an adjunct faculty, Gwen has helped Master and PhD students understand and navigate the subtleties of organizational culture to negotiate their professional success. Gwen received her bachelor’s
Paper ID #25055Testing a Reflective Judgement Scale for Suitability with First-Year StudentReflective ResponsesMs. Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Tech Natalie Van Tyne is an Associate Professor of Practice at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univer- sity, where she teaches first year engineering design as a foundation courses for Virginia Tech’s under- graduate engineering degree programs. She holds bachelors and masters degrees from Rutgers University, Lehigh University and Colorado School of Mines, and studies best practices in pedagogy, reflective learn- ing and critical thinking as aids to enhanced student
also include the mining of data to provide acontrol for students' performance in Thermodynamics I, with the expectation that a studentachieving a grade of C- would not have mastered (and retained) material at the same level as astudent who achieved an A even if the same amount of time has elapsed. Additional data that canbe uncovered might include the number of times that Thermodynamics I was taken (andrepeated) before obtaining a grade of C-.Thermodynamics I and the Pre-requisite Exam in Thermodynamics II Thermodynamics I (ME 236) is a mandatory 3-credit course in mechanical engineering,offered at the authors’ University, and similarly for mechanical engineering programs across theglobe. Prerequisite(s) for this course at this
existingMentor throughout M-C activities for one year to gain first-hand understanding of the differencebetween the roles of an ATE PI and an ATE Mentor. The project provides numerous aids andtechnical support throughout the process as knowledge from the more experienced mentor istransferred to mentee teams and to Mentor Fellows. Mentors become masterful in helpingmentees learn ATE project and proposal development skills, develop STEM faculty leadershipskills, and understand the grant submission process. Mentors learn to balance giving suggestionswith letting mentees drive their projects [2].The HSI ATE Hub leadership team is encouraging ATE PIs from HSIs or ATE PIs who areHispanic to apply to the Mentor Fellows program. The project is assuming that