Paper ID #30032 She is currently a Member-at-Large for the Pre-college Division of ASEE. Dr. Carrico’s consulting com- pany specializes in research, research evaluations, and industry consulting. Dr. Carrico received her B.S. in chemical engineering from Virginia Tech, Masters of Engineering from North Carolina State Univer- sity, MBA from King University, and PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Dr. Carrico is a certified project management professional (PMP) and licensed professional engineer (P.E.).Ms. Holly Larson Lesko Holly Larson Lesko is the Program Director for the VT PEERS (Partnering with Educators and Engineer- ing in Rural Schools) program at Virginia Tech. This NSF funded program is housed
Paper ID #31070Choose Your Own Adventure: Introducing Student Choice into a First YearExperience CourseStacie Edington, University of Michigan Stacie Edington is the Director of Honors and Engagement Programs within the University of Michigan, College of Engineering. She received her Bachelor of Arts in Sociology from the University of Michigan and her Master of Science in Executive Leadership from the University of San Diego. In addition to serv- ing on the instructional team for ”Engineering 110: Design Your Engineering Experience”, she teaches the Engineering Honors Seminar, directs the College of Engineering Honors
. Beth Lin Hartmann, Iowa State University Beth Lin Hartmann is a teaching professor in construction engineering at Iowa State University. A retired U.S. Navy Civil Engineer Corps officer (O-5), she has taught a design-build capstone course for civil and construction engineering students, project management for civil engineers, engineering leadership courses, and the construction engineering learning community. Hartmann received her Bachelor of Arts in Architecture in 1989 from Iowa State University. She received her Master of Science and PhD in Civil Engineering with an emphasis in Construction Engineering and Management from Iowa State university in 1996 and 2016, respectively.Dr. Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University
Paper ID #31552Co-creation of a systemic models to support community engagement projectsMr. Camilo Andr´es Navarro Forero P.E., Camilo Andr´es Navarro Forero PHD Engineering student of the Universidad de los Andes in Bogot´a DC Colombia, Peace Building Master’s degree student of the same university. Master of Science in industrial engineering with mayor in organizational management, industrial engineer from the Universidad de los Andes Colombia with complementary studies in Ing´enieur de Gesti´on BA2 from the the Solvay Business School of Management and Economics in Bruxelles Belgique. Active member of Ingenieros sin
mastered clear and direct importance of having an open communication and of communication earlier, it sharing ideas. However, this category does not include would have been easier at the cases when they mention communication with the end. professionals or mentors. Responsibility When students talk about the importance of assuming We all participated and (20, 9.42%) responsibility for the group project; when they talk held responsibility for about holding each other accountable
the bedside manner of new doctors and to help build a dialogue around consent and sexual assault. She attended the Lee Strasberg Theatre and Film Institute (NYC), HB Studios (NYC) and holds a Masters of the Arts in Education from the Harvard Graduate School of Education (HGSE). She has created dynamic theatre-based programming at the Lower East Side Tenement Museum and continues to act professionally, while teaching ESL full-time. Berke presented on her use of theatre-integrated language instruction at the International Colloquium on Languages, Culture, Identity in Schools and Society in Soria, Spain in 2019 and has led trainings for ESL teachers in the Boston Public Schools. She was a 2018 Manton Fellow at the
. The partner serves as both a local point ofcontact and a competition facilitator. In this case, the partner led meetings with districtleadership to inform them about the program and associated resources. In addition, local professional development workshops were offered, instead ofsuggesting that teachers attend trainings in a larger metropolitan area of the state, which loweredthe financial and time barriers to entry. The training sessions were led by Master Teachers whoshared experiences and perspectives on how to teach the K12 InVenture Prize program contentand mentor a successful invention team. A regional competition was organized to select teams for the state finals competition. Thecompetition location and timing allowed
were also connected back to the mindsets that were discussed during the Summer18 training. Mentor+ advisors were given other guidelines such as reducing the intimidation that students might feel by sharing a bit about their personal journey to success or a challenge that they had to overcome, and/or a turning point when they first started to feel like they mastered their craft. At the end of the training, Mentor+ advisors outlined talking points to cover in their initial and subsequent meetings, as well as homework to give their mentee to help them get to know students. Mentor+ advisors were asked to record their observations after every meeting with each mentee. As continuous development of the mentor training, the
Bachelor’s degree from Department of Industrial Engineering at University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez. Industrial Engineer in Amgen Manufacturing Limited at Operational Excellence Department.Pursuing a Master degree in Supply Chain & Material Management.Nolgie Oquendo-Colon, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Nolgie Oquendo is a Graduate Student (MSE) in the Department of Industrial Engineering at the Univer- sity of Puerto Rico-Mayag¨uez. He holds a BS in Industrial Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez. He is seeking to pursue a PhD in Engineering Education. Research interests include Diversity and Inclusion, Design and Evaluation, and Data Analytics.Dr. Maria Angelica Velazquez, Montana
. 0.87 This course is more difficult than I expected. 0.84 The tasks required in this course are challenging for me. 0.83Expectancies of course I can meet the goals set out for me in this course. 0.96 0.93success I can satisfy the objectives for this course. 0.91(5) I can successfully earn credit for this course. 0.87 I can pass this course. 0.85 I can master the knowledge and skills taught in this course
– Les universities francaises et le cas des masters en sciences humaines et sociales’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Provence, France.[15] B. Bernstein. Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis, 1996.[16] M.A.K. Halliday and J.R. Martin. Writing Science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press, 1993.[17] D. Rose and J.R Martin. Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge, and pedagogy in the Sydney school. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd., 2012.[18] C. Bazerman. “Modern evolution of the experimental report in physics: Spectroscopic articles in Physics Review, 1893-1980.” Social Studies of Science, vol. 14, pp. 163-196
-based Learning, vol. 10, no. 2, 2016.[16] D. H. Jonassen, "Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving," Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 63-85, 2000.[17] K. Dorst and N. Cross, "Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem- solution," Design Studies, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 425-437, 2001.[18] P. Tracy, "Design and Problem Finding in High Schools: A Study of Students and Their Teacher in One Queensland School," Masters, Education, Griffith University, 2005.[19] S. Schrader, W. M. Riggs, and R. P. Smith, "Choice over uncertainty and ambiguity in technical problem solving," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 73-99, 1993.[20] A
practices.Pedagogical Approach and Course DeliveryThe intersection of engineering and social science where natural hazards occur has become asignificant component of vulnerability assessments and the development of resilient engineeringsolutions for communities and federal facilities. This can be seen in the American Society ofCivil Engineers (ASCE) Natural Hazards Review [3], “The 2017 Disasters: SociotechnicalPerspectives” and various resilience master planning reports which incorporate numerousstakeholder meetings to brainstorm engineered solutions that are economically and sociallyviable. It’s this sociotechnical approach that the diverse group of faculty leading this course havetaken to develop the Coastal Resiliency course. With civilian and military
/expanding the educational methods used in the formation of engineers.Dr. Nathan E Canney P.E., CYS Structural Engineers Inc. Dr. Canney conducts research focused on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sus- tainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder.Dr. Benjamin V Fell P.E., California State University, Sacramento Professor Fell joined Sacramento State
partial credit on a statically indeterminate torsionproblem even if they never recognize it as a statically indeterminate problem, simply by writingsome equilibrium equations and some angular deflection equations. As faculty, it’s frustrating tosee students leave our courses without ever solving a core problem correctly.An ideal class structure might put significant course staff effort towards providing timely expertfeedback on student problem solving attempts and significant student effort on deliberate practiceto the point of being able to solve new problems correctly from start to finish. Minimal studenttime should be spent practicing skills they have already mastered and no course staff time shouldbe spent writing feedback that students never
design. IEuses narrative to engage learners’ imaginations; helps them master the cognitive tools necessaryfor progressing to higher levels of understanding; and helps them structure what they learn inmeaningful ways. Included in the paper is an introduction to IE pedagogy and the use oftransmedia in education; an overview of the online learning environment called Through MyWindow (TMW) that we have developed for middle school children; and a detailed look at alearning adventure on engineering design called Trapped in Time. Assessment data collected byexternal evaluators shows that TMW positively impacted student interest in engineering andincreased STEM identity. Preliminary results for the Trapped in Time learning adventureindicate improved
division,upper division, masters, doctoral, and postdoctoral. Hoke and Gentile [14] discussed the financialsupport and strategies taken by University of Richmond, a private liberal arts college, to engageundergraduate students in research in their freshmen and sophomore levels, the challenges facedin the process, and the success measures. It was reported that early engagement ofundergraduates in research in the STEM field is possible and has several advantages includingincreased retention rate. It was also reported that the success of early involvement ofundergraduates requires funding, close faculty mentoring, and programmatic features to addresseach student’s level of coursework. It was also mentioned that the internal grants fromuniversities
System.” Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, 2016.[2] V. Tinto, Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2012.[3] B. L. Berkelaar, L. G. Kisselburgh, and P. M. Buzzanell, “Locating and Disseminating Effective Messages: Enhancing Gender Representation in Computing Majors and Careers,” in Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Doctoral Consortium and Research, New York, NY, USA, 2008, pp. 106–108.[4] S. Cheryan, A. Master, and A. N. Meltzoff, “Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes,” Front. Psychol., vol
using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies.Dr. Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech Cheryl Carrico is a research faculty member for Virginia Tech. Her current research focus relates to STEM career pathways (K-12 through early career) and conceptual understanding of core engineering principles. Dr. Carrico owns a research and consulting company specializing in research evaluations and industry consulting. Dr. Carrico received her B.S. in chemical engineering from Virginia Tech, Masters of Engineering from North Carolina State University
]Psychological empowerment (PE) has been conceptualized with three components: intrapersonal,interactional, and behavioral. Collectively, these three components come together as shown inFigure 1, which is used as a framework to interpret the data within this research [5]. PE is rootedin a social action framework that includes community change, capacity building, and collectivity[7-9]. The intrapersonal component refers to how people think about their capacity to influencethe social and political systems important to them. The interactional component refers to thetransactions between individuals and environments that enable them to successfully master socialor political systems. It includes knowledge about the resources needed to achieve goals (i.e
, pp. 1–27.[19] E. Regan and J. DeWitt, “Attitudes, Interest and Factors Influencing STEM Enrolment Behaviour: An Overview of Relevant Literature,” in Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education, no. November, E. karoline Henriksen, J. Ryder, and J. Dillon, Eds. Springer Netherlands, 2015, pp. 203–217.[20] S. Cheryan, A. Master, and A. N. Meltzoff, “Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes,” Front. Psychol., vol. 6, no. February, pp. 1–8, 2015.[21] C. E. Brawner, M. M. Camacho, S. M. Lord, R. A. Long, and A. W. Ohland, “Women in industrial engineering: Stereotypes, persistence, and perspectives
Six Sigma Master Black Belt.Dr. Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Tom James is presently a Professor of Entrepreneurship at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. His major interests are new product development and global business ventures. He currently teaches courses in accounting, finance, and entrepreneurial studies. In addition to teaching, Dr. James directs the ES- CALATE program, a living-learning community focused on integrating entrepreneurship and technical disciplines. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering and an Executive MBA from Marquette University. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and is a registered Profes- sional Engineer (PE). Dr
infected estimated50,000 to 100,000 computer worldwide [6, 3]. The Stuxnet attack has shown that the isolation ofthe SCADA system from the internet is not an ultimately effective defense method. Existingtechnologies would have difficulty defending against this attack [16, 8]. There are two maincomponents of the SCADA system; control center and field sites. Field sites are based on RemoteTerminal Unit (RTU) and Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) and field sites send fieldequipment information to the control center. The control center is the hub of the SCADA system.Also, it has three components such as Human Machine Interface (HMI), database managementsystem (Historian) and Master Terminal Unit (MTU). The MTU has initiated all communicationand
(OOP) languages like Java or C++, it challenges students to master programmaticoverhead before programming itself. Finally, researchers also assert that traditional programmingcourses fail to connect computing concepts with young students’ diverse interests [2, 3].To ease the process of learning programming and making it engaging and accessible to a broaderpopulation many visual programming tools, especially block-based languages, have beendeveloped [17]. In the category of block-based languages, MIT App Inventor (AI) has been usedby educators, developers, and/or hobbyists, to develop mobile applications for personal use,recreation, learning, or social good [13]. Additionally, academics have successfully used AI intheir courses to introduce
level of conceptual coherence to support meaningful, in-depth student learning, (b) issufficient instructional time allocated for students to achieve the desired level of conceptunderstanding and mastery for the key core ideas, (c) what procedural knowledge and skills mustbe mastered in support of thinking mathematically in the problem solving process, (d) what is theidentifiable pre-requisite prior knowledge students need to be successful in the course, and (e)what in-class tasks and take home assignments best support the desired course learning outcomesfor students?Across each learning session, faculty begin and end with whole group discussions of coreconcepts and sub-concepts within and across the courses. Collectively, the group
1. Lectures / Presentations 2. Activities and Assignments 3. Supporting Materials 2. Development a. Template Unit b. Content Development & Media Production c. Weekly Meetings 3. Implementation a. Course Launch b. Course Run c. Course Close 4. Evaluation and Debrief a. Review Final Course Evaluations b. Debrief Meeting c. Notes for future iterations d. Master shell in LMSAnalysis and designAs stated earlier, initial interest in using a new direction for MSE 598 was expressed in Fall2016. At that point, GOEE’s instructional designer contacted
Paper ID #24533Icarus: The Development of a Voluntary Research Program to Increase En-gineering Students’ EngagementMr. Homero Gregorio Murzi, Virginia Tech Homero Murzi is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at Vir- ginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive ped- agogical practices, environmental, ethics and humanitarian engineering, and non-traditional knowledge transfer. Homero has been recognized as a Fulbright scholar and was inducted
ofEngineering (level 8), Masters (level 9) and finally, PhD (level 10). As a result, the school has avery broad student demographic. Many students who cannot gain direct entry to a universityprogram join this technical institute at a lower point on the ladder, work their way up, andeventually sit beside those who entered directly from high school.Academic staff members are employed to teach and typically have 18 hours of classroom activityper week. Although research is encouraged, and the School has several highly regarded researchgroups, the majority of staff members devote most of their time to teaching—both in the classroomand the laboratory. Laboratory groups of 16 students per staff member facilitate close contact andallow staff and students to
Paper ID #22201A New Course for Teaching Internet of Things: A Practical, Hands-on, andSystems-level ApproachMr. Nicholas Barendt, Case Western Reserve University Nick Barendt is an Adjunct Senior Instructor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Case Western Reserve University, in Cleveland, Ohio. He earned his Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics at Case Western Reserve University, in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1995 and 1998, respectively. He has worked in a variety of industries, including Industrial Automation, Robotics, Data Acquisition, and
heterogeneous population profile in a regional university masksdifferences apparent in population subsets [6]. In the analysis of student success in an introductoryCEE 2110 engineering mechanics course, the population of students in the course was divided intothe following four mutually exclusive categories based on ACT scores. Core Students with ACT scores ≥ 25 who are adequately prepared to begin engineering degree coursework. Mission Specific Students with ACT scores ≥ 22 and < 25 who, with mentoring, should be able to complete engineering degree requirements. At-Risk Students with ACT scores < 22 who may have difficulty mastering a college of engineering curriculum. Unknown-Risk Students who are transfer students