Paper ID #9983Hands on Made4Me: Hands-on Machining, Analysis and Design Experiencesfor Mechanical EngineersMr. Jeremy John Vaillant, University of Massachusetts Lowell Jeremy Vaillant is a Mechanical Engineering Masters Degree candidate at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. He is interested in the development and use of low-cost CNC machines for educational deploy- ment.Prof. Christopher Hansen, University of Massachusetts, LowellProf. Jonathan D. Stolk, Franklin W. Olin College of EngineeringDr. Stephen Johnston, University of Massachusetts, LowellDr. Sammy G. Shina, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Sammy G. Shina
focus. The constraints play the role of the closed world condition (CWC) of the ASITand the most crucial constraint is the main problem factor. The constraint partition is an act ofdivision and multiplication. The constraint revision leads to unification and the constraintintroduction may break symmetry.Both TRIZ and ASIT have been criticized due to the significant time required to master themethods. Furthermore, a sophisticated product which requires investigation will not be easilygenerated by either TRIZ or ASIT. On the other hand, knowledge-based creative design toolsaim to accumulate, formulate and manage knowledge so that the knowledge is easily extractedand clearly presented for problem solving. Data mining, global optimization
of 3-4 to develop a poster on a topic of their choice based on the materials learnedthroughout the mini project course. At the end of the course, the College of Engineering alsohosts a poster competition where the posters developed are presented to a group of audience andjudges. Alongside this poster presentation, students certainly garner the ability for improvingpublic speaking and professional skills a good engineer should practice.Identification of Multidisciplinary Engineering Components This freshman mini project focuses on many fundamental skillsets any engineer shouldhave regardless of their engineering discipline. These important skillsets which any engineershould master includes understanding the use of mathematical
USC (A) 18 12/6 10/8 Session Junior and business A Technion 18 Senior 18/0 Engineering 15/3 Aachen 18 Master 18/0 Engineering 15/3 Sophomore and Engineering USC (B) 18 14/4 9/9 Session Junior and business B PKU 18 Senior 6/12 All majors
apprenticeship American Association for Engineering Education Draft Paper for Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN 2014 is successfully completed, the apprentice will receive a "Completion of RegisteredApprenticeship" certificate, an industry-issued, nationally recognized credential that identifiesproficiency in an apprentice occupation.39In a typical apprenticeship program, apprentices work about 32 hours per week under thesupervision of a master tradesperson, and spend another 8 hours in classroom training doingcourse work that includes math, verbal and occupation-specific content, all the while receivingpay and benefits. In general, apprenticeship programs are free, with minimal fees for booksand/or tools. The majority of U.S
masters programs and sixPh.D. programs including one through the CUNY system’s graduate school. CUNY stands forCity University of New York, of which CCNY is one of the eleven senior colleges. Under thepressure of increased demand for an affordable well-regarded education in engineering, and as aresult of a retention study, the GSOE gradually raised its admissions criteria, starting in fall of2006. After an initial drop in enrollment, present enrollment levels are almost back to fall 2004levels. Retention and graduation rates have improved significantly, to the point that at present itis a challenge to meet the demand for upper level engineering courses.Table 1 shows the numbers of new entrants and total enrollment in the Grove School
2009 2010 2011 2012 Undergrad 1 0 0 0 Masters 6 2 3 5 PhD 24 11 17 30 Postdoc 1 3 1 4 Faculty 13 7 6 9 Non Faculty 3 3
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationtime). Because of this important factor excellent or first class performance in the project lookslike highly competent performance when taken out of context and would be inappropriate ifapplied to the dissertation phase of a masters degree for instance.Looking back over the development process a number of generic process steps have been takenand together with observations these are summarized in the following list. For the approach to beused in a different school or with different number of students the list serves as a suggestedchecklist for implementation: 1. The learning students are
distribute PowerPoint templates that replace Microsoft’s defaultswith defaults for the alternative slide design. This distribution has been successfully used both inprofessional workshops and in large courses at Virginia Tech and the University of Illinois(Academic 2003). These templates are readily available on the web at the number 3 site,according to Google (2004), for the topic of presentation slides. Nevertheless, users have tomake significant investments of time in order to master the new approach. Many engineers feelthat time pressures make it difficult for them to make those investments. Probing Deeper into the Resistance. The objections outlined in the precedingsubsection are the ones that people most frequently and easily
attempt to remove the artificial barriers and to reinforcekey foundational concepts. Integration of the curriculum begins by identifying commonfoundational themes within and between courses, and highlighting these to students as the topicalcoverage warrants. Deliberate integration of the curriculum is accomplished by not onlyidentifying the foundational themes through conceptual abstraction, but also, by design ofcommon exemplars. Reinforcing these concepts through recurring common examples helps thestudent better understand and master these concepts while simultaneously understanding thelinkages between courses.While many foundational concepts and threads can be identified within the electrical engineeringdiscipline, we have selected one example
Mahal, Ankor Wat, the Great Wall of China, and the Forbidden City, learningabout the culture of Japan while visiting such cities as Kyoto, Nara, and Hiroshima.This experience provided the motivation to create a true program for engineering students thatwould enable them to fulfill both the letter and spirit of ABET 3.h (understanding the impact ofengineering solutions in a global and societal context) as well as 3.j (knowledge of contemporaryissues). This would also provide an opportunity to master the other four ABET professionalskills (e.g., multidisciplinary teams, ethical and professional responsibilities, communication,and life long learning).Working in conjunction with the University of Pittsburgh’s International Business Center (whichhad
collaborationbetween the mentee and mentor. The environment of collaboration now turns the learning taskinto a challenge to be mastered by the mentee with the help of the mentor. The collaboratingalso prevents the task from becoming one that the mentor forces upon the mentee.When the mentor explores the mentee’s representation of knowledge, the mentee’s intelligenceand value are directly acknowledged. Acknowledging the mentee further builds trust andopenness in the interactions. Enabling the mentee to build on and refine his or her representationfurther reinforces trust. All of these ways of showing respect for the mentee’s intelligence areconducive to high-level achievement against difficult challenges
African, one Asian and one white American)and six male (one Asian, and five white American) students. Three were sophomores, five werejuniors, and one senior; and six were pursuing an undergraduate degree in Civil Engineering, onein Electrical Engineering, one in Chemical Engineering, and one in Physics and Pre-Engineering.Eight of the students came from Ph.D. granting institutions, and one came from an institutionwith a Masters degree as the terminal degree. The nine students were divided into three groupswith three students in each, and each group worked on a separate project under the supervision ofFaculty Mentors and a Graduate Student Mentor. The three projects selected for the Site dealtwith understanding the behavior of building frame
“Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education” Session 3215faculty members, it stresses the fact that they need to advise, support, and tutor the students.They need to be a master, a sponsor, and a model to follow. It gives guidance on how facultymembers can help ensure success in all these aspects of a URP.Nagda et al. [6] talk about how student research teams can affect student morale and studentretention. They highlight the value of having students to work with students, to becomeprofessional peers. For example, they report how students
no problem standing in front of a class and lecturing.” White female, 2nd year mechanical engineering Masters student “The STEP program has changed my career objectives. I now want to, ultimately, use my Ph.D. to develop educational programs for high schools. I want to create partnerships between industry and high schools. Don’t ask me how just yet; my thoughts are still evolving.” Black male, 5th year physics Ph.D. Page 9.980.14 student. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American
team. [This is evaluated by performance as part of a group while solving the semester long design project.] First Four Competency Areas sa a ad d sd a. These competencies were made clear to me at the beginning of the semester.b. I was tested on these competencies with straightforward exams. c. I had ample opportunity through multiple exams to demonstrate that I had successfully mastered each competency.d. My grades on the competency exams accurately reflect the knowledge I gained in each area. e. These competencies matched with what was taught in the course
of college graduates are Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education staffing businesses, teaching children, providing critical social services, and even winning admittance to graduate and professional schools without having mastered college-level skills or knowledge. With four out of five students graduating with GPA's of B-minus or better, with a college degree ensuring neither knowledge of subject matter nor basic skills, em- ployers and graduate schools have had to rely on other measures to sift applicants. Standardized
Associate Editor of the Journal of Research in Science Teaching and co-PI ofNSF programs to enhance opportunities for students in science, math, engineering, and technology.CHERYL G. GENGLERCheryl G. Gengler is an instructional specialist for the Chandler Unified School District. She earned a Bachelor ofArts in Education from Arizona State University and a Master of Secondary Education from Northern ArizonaUniversity. She has 12 years experience teaching high school level mathematics.STEPHEN J. KRAUSEStephen J. Krause is Professor and Associate Chair of the Chemical and Materials Engineering Department at ASU.His teaches in the areas of materials engineering, polymer science, characterization of materials, and design. Hisresearch interests are in
after an attempt but wanes between attempts or experiences.According to Reynolds, students will master teaming and communication skills only after repeatedexposure to projects that include these elements. Others have reported this as well (Seat, 1999).An important distinction between VITDP and more typical in-class projects is the exposure to allelements of design and teamwork including those beyond their immediate competency. Studentssee the overall, ‘big-picture’ by participating in the project each year, but they will comprehendmore and more aspects with repeated exposure. Constructivism suggests that students will usetheir memories from prior projects (both positive and negative experiences) to constructknowledge while simultaneously
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationengineering education and suggests a new course of the social engineering. The ultimate goal ofthe paper is the curriculum development of engineering education to integrate the socialdimension and to train students to use the basic tools of research as an integrated interactive toolto formulate, analyze and address solutions to the social problems.Engineering education for the next generation should direct students to master the basics of thescientific method in an integrated way to deal with engineering as well as social phenomena.Hence, it is necessary in the 21st century to widen and deepen the role of
credited to an activity that the WaltDisney Company refers to as imagineering. This term refers to an entire spectrum of activitiesranging from master-planning and creative development to video production, audio/lightingdesign, and on-board vehicle performance. In addition, traditional engineering analyses such as Page 8.259.1those exploring the impact of layout on customer flow through the attraction were of critical Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education