. Systematic review techniques have recentlygained traction in the field of engineering education. A systematic review performed over aspecific area of practice can consolidate results from many studies into a synthesis of bestpractices.This paper presents the best practices for teaching introductory circuits which were identifiedthrough a systematic review of prior research. Relevant publications were identified andappraised with a set of coding criteria generated by the researchers. The coding results wereexamined and used to write a mixed-methods synthesis of consensus, disagreement, quality, andlimitations amongst studies identified by the systematic literature review. The results of thereview may inform educational techniques employed in post
research lab will serve as the training site on health and safety issues of nanomaterials. Dr. Tate is a mechanical engineer by training and has 16-plus years of academic and two years of industry experience. His research areas include developing, manufacturing; and characterizing the high-performance polymeric nanocomposites for rocket ablatives, fire-retardant interior structures of mass transit and aircraft, lighter and damage-tolerant wind turbine blades, and replacement of traditional composites using bio-based materials. He has mentored under- graduate African-American students under NASA-PAIR at NC A&T University, an HBCU, and Hispanic students under H-LSAMP at Texas State. He is a member of AIAA, ASME, ACMA
- neering Education and Future Professoriate. MiguelAndr´es’s research includes sustainable infrastructure design and planning, smart and resilient cities, and the development of engineers who not only have strong technical and practical knowledge but the social awareness and agency to address global humanitarian, environmental, and social justice challenges. For him, social justice is a concept that should always be involved in discussions on infrastructure. Related to STEM education, Miguel Andr´es is in developing and applying contemporary pedagogies for STEM courses, teaching empathy studies in engineering as a tool for innovation, and assessing engineering students’ agency to address climate change. Currently
to cultivate and evaluate supportive teaching and learning networks in engineering departments and colleges. He received his doctoral degree in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where he was a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. His dissertation studied the teaching practices of engineering instructors during game-based learning activities, and how these practices affected student motivation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Evaluating the impacts of an integrated, project-based approach to biomedical engineering laboratory teachingIntroductionEngineering laboratory courses serve as a vital component of the engineering
engineeringstudent engagement in out-of-class activities can help guide actions of program administratorsand educators to restructure and promote activities to improve engagement and enhance studentlearning both inside and outside of the classroom. In this section, we introduce the BuildingUndergraduate Interventions for Learning and Development (BUILD) Model, a framework. TheBUILD model is based on existing frameworks, models, and effective practices for the design oflearning environments and interventions in out-of-class activities. Prior research has provided thenecessary insight into specific elements of learning environment[45], institutional elements [46],and best practices [47,48] that can be combined to create a comprehensive framework useful
responsibility (c) design to meet desired needs within realistic constraints (h) understand the social impact of engineering (d) function on multidisciplinary teams (i) need for life-long learning (e) identify, formulate, and solve problems (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (g) communicate effectively (k) use the techniques, skills, and tools necessary for Note: Text has been condensed for formatting engineering practice. purposesExisting Assessment InstrumentsExisting assessment tools for design ability rely on self-assessment and analyze student gradesfrom design reports, presentations, and logbooks4-5. This type of assessment relies on studentsproviding
14.1170.2This study is one of a series of investigations that our “Technology Education Teaching andLearning Project” has been engaged in over the past three years, for the purpose of studyingTechnology Education teaching practices and student learning outcomes. This work is framed bytwo seemingly simple questions: 1) What does technology education teaching look like? 2) Whatare technology education students learning? We charted this path because of the dearth ofresearch on Technology Education teaching and learning. In the early 1990s, Zuga conducted acomprehensive review of Technology Education research and concluded the vast majority ofresearch and scholarship in the field to that point had focused either on curriculum developmentor on teacher
] I. Chan, A. Liu, and R. Fellows, “Role of leadership in fostering an innovation climate in construction firms,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 30, no. 6, p. 6014003, 2014.[29] D. R. Simmons, N. A. Clegorne, and T. Woods-Wells, “Leadership paradigms in construction: Critical review to inform research and practice,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 33, no. 4, p. 2517001, 2017.[30] J. Nagaoka, C. A. Farrington, S. B. Ehrlich, and R. D. Heath, “Foundations for young adult success: A development framework,” no. June, pp. 1–110, 2015.[31] Handley, M.H. “Interpersonal behaviors of early-career engineers identified by engineering leaders across three engineering disciplines,” Penn State University, 2017.
University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity
of leaders and change-agents in engineering education who can conduct high impact research. We will design and conduct three Engineering Education Institutes (at the University of Washington, Stanford University and Howard University) where engineering faculty and graduate students will 1) learn research methods, 2) define and conduct research studies linked to the ongoing scholarship in the Center, 3) create resources for dissemination, and 4) refine leadership skills.In the Scholarship on Learning Engineering program we are developing an understanding of howstudents come to engineering and what leads them to leave or stay. Halpern (2002) advocatesthat reform efforts should embrace what we know about how people think, how they learn
development course, asenior capstone design course sequence, and a graduate level course in product development. Inall cases, the students started the task of setting functional requirements and target specificationsfor the product after following a structured methodology to identify the customer needs. In thispaper, the process followed, an assessment of the results obtained and suggestions for futureimprovement are discussed presenting examples taken from different projects carried out bystudents.IntroductionAt the present time many undergraduate engineering programs in the US include one or moredesign courses aimed at better preparing students for the “real world” practice of the profession.In addition to the traditional Senior Design Project or
Paper ID #37448Using the Kolb Cycle to Enhance Undergraduate Research ExperiencesDr. Daniel D. Jensen, Westmont College Dr Jensen received a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering Science from the University of Colorado, Boulder. He is the founding professor for the Westmont College Engineering Program. He was a Professor of Engi- neering Mechanics at the US Air Force Academy for 21 years (now retired) where he ran the mechanical design program. He was a Scholar in Residence at the University of Colorado in Denver and is a Fellow at the International Design Center which is the largest design research center in the world. This
specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program (ITLL) and the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center in CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from the Louisiana State University, and an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in coun- seling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of retention, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering education. His current duties in- clude assessment, evaluation and research for the ITL Program’s and BOLD Center’s hands-on initiatives.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder
Paper ID #43552Harnessing the Strengths of Neurodiverse Students in Graduate STEM Fields:The Central Role of Advisor-Advisee CommunicationMs. Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut Connie Syharat is a Ph.D. student and Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered NSF-funded projects, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation” and Innovations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) ”Encouraging the Participation of Neurodiverse Students in STEM Graduate Programs to Radically Enhance the Creativity
engineering ethics and critical thinking: a systematic and cross-cultural education approach using problem-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 377-390.15. Choulier, D., Picard, F., & Weite, P. A. (2007). Reflective practice in a pluri-disciplinary innovative design course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 115-124.16. Davis, R. E. (2010). Intentional, Integrated Learning for Engineering Students. In Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments, 2010 IEEE (pp. 1-14). IEEE.17. Doel, S. (2009). Fostering student reflection during engineering internships. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 10(3), 163-177.18
. Page 14.127.14 Appendix A Electronic Grading Instructions For Students in Engineering Exploration (EngE1024)Motivation As you are aware, the ENGE 1024 course will be piloting electronic grading for allstudent homework this fall. The College of Engineering at Virginia Tech is dedicated to usingthe latest technological innovations including Tablet PCs and DyKnow to enhance the learningexperiences of students while maintaining an awareness of the global impact of the courses theyteach. Over the years our students have used countless amounts of paper in submitting theirassignments. Also, while the best efforts have been used to keep track of all papers, anoccasional student assignment has been misplaced. Under the old system of
areimportant to the careers of the practicing engineers. (add industry-centered approach) Results ofthe evaluation will be available during the spring of 2001 and presented subsequently.Course Module ScopeCourse modules developed within the pedagogical arena described above are generally subsets ofcomplete college courses in engineering design and various disciplinary areas normallyencountered in engineering design. As an example, one might consider breaking a 3 credit-hourfinite element analysis course into 4 course modules that combine to form the total course. Themotivation for a modular structure resides in the fact that students who enroll in off-campuscourses cannot always schedule sufficient contiguous uninterrupted time to allow completion of
a pathway from their undergraduate experience to graduateschool enrollment and ultimately graduate degree attainment [9], [10], and the STEM workforce[11], [12]. These areas of growth are often not the focus of STEM curricula but can have alasting impact on positive workplace outcomes [13].Further, the URFP partners with the university career center to align its objectives with theNational Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) Career Readiness Competencies toprovide opportunities for growth in STEM professional skills [14]. Fellows engage in activitiesto improve in the following areas: communication; critical thinking; equity & inclusion;leadership; professionalism; teamwork; and technology.Project ApproachThis project builds on
Medicine released their report onNew Directions for Chemical Engineering [1]. In this report, a section on curricular reformincluded recommendations “that would help students understand how individual core conceptsmerge into the practice of chemical engineering” and “include earlier and more frequentexperiential learning through physical laboratories and virtual simulations” as well as otherrecommendations.However, implementation of curricular reform can be challenging. A paper by Davis andJacobsen, which focused on mentoring undergraduate research projects, provided faculty insightsto barriers to curricular innovation [2]. This paper identified three main barriers: preparation,time constraints, and demands related to the promotion and tenure
engineering educators and socialscientists are needed to assess climates of DEI effectively.Need for Collaboration in Assessing DEI in EngineeringA report commissioned by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation titled “Assessing the Landscape forDiversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts in U.S. STEM Graduate Education” calls thesecollaborations research-practice partnerships. This systematic review of 228 recently publishedresearch manuscripts identifies these partnerships as necessary to address the skill gap strikingDEI innovation in engineering education. “The people designing programs and change initiativesare often STEM community insiders, but the people best equipped with knowledge about thedynamics of inequality and power are often outside of STEM” [10
design process, and the importance of teamwork6. Reformers have tried and, thus far,have failed to significantly influence students’ beliefs concerning engineering when theintervention occurs at a secondary level6. Secondary education may be too late to significantlyinfluence the subjects that students’ value. It is now time to examine the impact of such programswhen these programs are implemented at a younger level.This paper describes an engineering outreach program that is being implemented at anelementary level between the Colorado School of Mines and elementary schools in AdamsCounty District 50. Our program has been developed based on best practices from othersuccessful engineering outreach programs for pre-college schools, such as the
. Von Kotzebue, and B. J. Neuhaus, “Effects of Cognitive Activation in Biology Lessons on Students’ Situational Interest and Achievement,” Res Sci Educ, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 559–578, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11165016-9517-y.[18] S. L. Eddy and K. A. Hogan, “Getting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work?,” LSE, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 453–468, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050.[19] K. S. Cooper, “Eliciting engagement in the high school classroom: A mixed-methods examination of teaching practices,” American educational research journal, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 363–402, 2014.[20] J. Sawyer and R. Obeid, “Cooperative and collaborative learning: Getting the best of both words,” How we
, students are informed about thenature and intent of the survey, general explanation of the procedure, risks and discomforts,benefits, and confidentiality. The data collected offers valuable insights for engineering educators,helping them identify potential gaps and design targeted training and resources to better preparestudents for industry demands upon graduation. The survey begins with a consent form to ensureparticipants' informed participation. The following questions are asked in the survey. 1. Consent Form [Read] 2. Do you wish to participate in this survey? [Yes / No] 3. What is your age: [Open Ended] 4. What is your major: [Open Ended] 5. What is your year in college: [Open Ended] 6. Have you used generative AI
team the advantages and disadvantages of using Java for this particularproject. These techniques reduce cognitive bias by moderating the cognitive impact of previousexperiences, which cognition tends to bring to mind first, even though the previous experiencemay be irrelevant or invalid in the current situation.Group cognition is a coordinated, distributed cognitive process, the objective of which is tocreate a shared, distributed understanding of a problem at a team level20. Though the importanceof this area of research is increasing, information technologies are frequently not designed withthe requirements of such teams in mind and they suffer accordingly. Nosek calls the cognitiveactions and interchanges that occur during collaborative
• Overview: This workshop discussed best practices for high-quality research posters, including design and presentation. Internal and external opportunities to present a posted were discussed. • Area: Undergraduate Research • Guests: Co-Director of VECTOR8. Support through the Office of Prestigious Awards & Fellowships • Overview: In this workshop, the Office of Prestigious Awards shared their framework of support (including workshops, one-on-one meetings, and mock interviews) as well as discussed current opportunities that may be of interest to aspiring and active undergraduate researchers. This workshop also covered tips for building strong relationships so that impactful recommendation
Trefny Institute for Educational Innovation, and the Director of the Center for Assessment in STEM at the Colorado School of Mines and an Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education. Her research interests are educational project assessment and evaluation, K-12 Outreach and gender equity in STEM.Alka R Harriger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alka Harriger joined the faculty of the Computer and Information Technology Department (CIT) in 1982 and is currently a Professor of CIT and Assistant Department Head. Professor Harriger is leading the $1.2 million NSF-ITEST funded project called Surprising Possibilities Imagined and Realized through Information Technology (SPIRIT), which has offered three sets
opportunities for discussion andpresentations related to student success (e.g., time management, effective communication),research topics, and more from various campus student support centers, engineering research anddesign team projects (students and faculty), and industry. Students participate in a wide range ofactivities, including seminars designed to build their portfolio, review students’ resume, andenhance required skills such as research, presentation, and interview skills.3. Program Impact on Scholars and MentorsScholar AccomplishmentsThe program recruited 12 students for Cohort 1 and 17 students for Cohort 2. As of Spring 2022,the program retained 7 out of 12 Cohort 1 scholars and 15 of 17 Cohort 2 scholars. As for Cohort1, the program lost
Dean for research and graduate studies for the College of Technology (2009-2010) and returned to full-time faculty in fall 2010. He was Director of the Center for Technology Literacy (2006-2010), and a member (2006- 2011) and Chair (2007-2009) of the Executive Council of the Texas Manufacturing Assistance Center. In Jan. 2012, he joined the University of North Texas as professor and Chair of the Department of Engineer- ing Technology, College of Engineering. His teaching and research interests are in the control systems engineering technology area. He is a member of the ASEE and a senior member of the IEEE - Control Systems Society.Dr. Vassilios Tzouanas, University of Houston, Downtown Vassilios Tzouanas is an
) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Engaging undergraduate researchers: Contextualizing beliefs and identities about smartness in engineeringIntroductionUndergraduate research is considered a high-impact practice (Zydney et al., 2002). It providesstudents with the opportunity to improve their critical thinking and personal communicationskills and offers the opportunity to build mentoring relationships with faculty, increasing thelikelihood of graduate school attendance (Zydney et al., 2002). Additionally, researchers haveshown that participating in undergraduate research can build confidence (Reisel et al., 2015) andenhance the undergraduate
GTP content and impart skills to faculty teams from these institutions inorder to strengthen their capacities and arm them with additional resources to support theirefforts in recruiting and retaining students in STEM programs offered at their institutions.The objectives are as follows:Objective #1: Increase the number of STEM faculty from San Antonio College with enhancedprofessional development experiences via the proposed trainings in green energy andsustainability topics as well as best practices in pedagogy and culturally effective instruction. Activity 1.1: Design and develop a permanent renewable energy research and education lab at the Eco Centro. Activity 1.2: Provide training workshops for the faculty, staff, and selected