Paper ID #24808Board 40: Understanding Industry’s Expectations of Engineering Communi-cation SkillsDr. Lilian Maria de Souza Almeida, Utah State University Dr. Lilian Almeida is a Ph.D. Research Assistant at Utah State University.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects
approach proved to be very challenging for various reasons, including the following: (1) thecoordinating faculty did not necessarily have the required expertise in all the areas covered byselected student projects; (2) having only four months to complete the senior design project,from idea to product, was not sufficient for students to produce a quality work, prepare therequired documentations, and demonstrate their understanding of engineering knowledge andapply it to practical problems; (3) in many cases, due to lack of time the students had to choose aproject from the existing project pool rather than generating an innovative project idea of theirown.As the result, the Department decided to change the capstone course structure and split it
supervised have encompassed a wide variety of products, most of them falling into one ofthe following categories:• Projects sponsored by a company or a local entrepreneur.• Design competitions.• Products tied to a funded research project. Page 13.1152.4An example of a project sponsored by a company was the development of a hard tonneau coverfor the Ford Thunderbird that was carried out at UDM with the support of Ford Motor Co. Anexample of a project sponsored by a local entrepreneur was the development of an advancedfootball training system that was carried out at SDSM&T.In the case of the design competitions, the Center of Excellence for
looking for”: An intersectional collaborative autoethnography exploring pathways to engineering design doctoral programsAbstractThis research paper used a collaborative autoethnographic approach to explore the two authors’respective pathways to engineering design doctoral programs. Prior work has highlighted variousways that access to engineering graduate school is inequitable. Through our collaborativeautoethnography, we investigated how existing inequities harm and impede access for studentswith multiple marginalized identities, such as the first author (KC), while simultaneouslyproviding advantages to students with more privileged identities, such as the second author (RL).As part of our collaborative autoethnography
been assigned specific roles or functions to perform and who have a limited life span of membership [1]. Over the past few years, at the University of Oklahoma, a graduate course titled AME5740 Designing for Open Innovation has been designed, course content and assignments developed and a learner centric paradigm instantiated. Different facets of this course have been described in several publications – most recently in [2], [3]. In these papers, the authors explore the key question: How can we foster learning how to learn and develop competencies? In this paper we document our initial findings as to how far we have succeeded in facilitating students learning how to learn and develop competencies within this course
Maple, and anintroduction to shop practices and use of power and hand tools are covered to help studentscomplete these projects. In the final design project, students are given a list of design criteria anda budget. Students work in groups of five or six to generate ideas, which must conform to thedesign criteria and budget. Upon completion of the final project, students submit reports thatinclude engineering drawings, assembly instructions, calculations, project management chartsand tables. A full-day, on-campus design competition is organised for students to present theirdesigns in front of their fellow students and judging panels, which consist of faculty members,engineers from industry, senior and/or graduate students. One example of the
ADHD and the shortcomings of the current education system that puts thispopulation of students with significant potential for innovation at a substantial risk of academicfailure and disinterest in pursuing higher education. Overall, the major observations from thisREU were that: given the right environment, i.e. niche, students with ADHD can thrive;engineering research can be a stimulating and ideal environment for students with ADHD; andthe opportunity to learn and interact with peers with ADHD can provide a rich and meaningfulexperience and help their confidence and ability as learners. It was noted that the educationsystem needs to move from the idea of ‘accommodating’ for some, to differentiating for all.Dissemination of these impactful
AC 2011-1565: FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF TERMINOLOGY ON ENGI-NEERING EXAMINATIONSChirag Variawa, University of Toronto Chirag Variawa is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto. His research interests include maximizing inclusivity, accessibility and usability of engineering education via universal instructional design and innovative instructional methods. He is an active Canadian member of the SCC division of ASEE, co-chair of the Leaders of Tomorrow (Graduate) program and teaching assistant in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. He received his B.A.Sc. (2009) from the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of
), American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), ASEE, ASME). Dr. Richard has authored or co-authored about 35 technical articles (about 30 of which are refereed publications). Dr. Richard teaches courses ranging from first-year engineering design, fluid mechanics, to space plasma propulsion.Dr. Charles Patrick Jr, Texas A&M University Charles Patrick Jr. is a Professor of Practice in the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A & M University (TAMU). He is also a teaching and research fellow at the Institute for Engineering Education Innovation, TAMU and a member of the Engineering Education Faculty, TAMU. He has worked in higher education for more than 30 years at state and private universities
Paper ID #37815Developing Post-pandemic Learning Community on an Urban CommuterCampusProf. Lily R. Liang, University of the District of Columbia Dr. Lily R. Liang is a Professor of Computer Science and the Director of the Master of Science in Com- puter Science Program at the University of the District of Columbia. Her research areas include computer science education, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and digital image processing. She has mentored dozens of graduate and undergraduate students in research and K-12 outreach activities. She is a fellow of the Center for the Advancement of STEM Leadership program (CASL
,mechatronics and computer science, the curriculum design that emerges from this paper willserve as a multidisciplinary educational tool.IntroductionEngineering education has been largely the same for decades: students sit for a lecture, dohomework, and then take an exam. However, as technological advancements bring attention tonew methods of teaching and learning, many fields have begun to re-evaluate how to best impartknowledge to ensure that graduates are competent and well-prepared for their role in theworkforce. Significant declines in enrollment over previous years have also indicated a need forreform. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has presented a unique challenge for engineeringcurricula that rely heavily on lecture-based content delivery
within chemically modified, biomimetic hydrogels and was awarded the Distinguished Master’s Thesis Award by the university’s graduate office for her work. After graduating, she continued her research in a tissue engineering/ biomaterials laboratory until accepting a teaching position at Marian University where she currently teaches Physics I, Physics II, Biophysics, and will soon be developing courses related to biomaterials. In addition to teaching, Tanja also plays a large role in the community outreach of the E.S. WSOE through directing events such as the Central Indi- ana Regional Science and Engineering Fair and the annual INnovation Through Engineering Residential Summer Camp. Through her efforts, Ms. Greene
using student interviews offaculty to introduce a best practice for faculty members and compare this to an email distributionapproach. Participants for this project were 34 students enrolled in the Food, Agricultural, andBiological Engineering (FABE) 810 College Teaching in Engineering class. Students in theclass include graduate students and undergraduates from across the College of Engineering. Thefirst step of the project was accomplished by students interviewing faculty who agreed to the Page 22.693.3process and then doing a written summary of their interview as a class assignment. Theseinterview reports were summarized and results were
(US based) and(International based) will need to work together. Now, more than twenty Universities from US,Germany, Switzerland, Japan, China, countries of Latin America are part of ME310community. It is unique opportunity to work on real challenges from Industry. ME310 projecthas length 9 months, mostly graduate level oriented and provided significant interculturalexperience for participants. ME310 course dynamic characteristics are also part of researchconducted at Stanford DesignX Lab, conducted at ME310 loft and Design Observatory (DO) atCenter for Design Research [9]. Design Observatory is a core instrument for conductingresearch in the field of design theory and methodology and created with the goal of conductingdesigner’s information
Kaneohe Marine Corps Air Station after graduating with his B.S.E.E. Upon completing his M.S.E.E., he was an electrical engineer with the National Bureau of Standards in Boulder, Colorado designing hardware for precision fiber optic measurements. He then entered the commercial sector as a staff engineer with Burroughs Corporation in San Diego, California developing fiber optic LAN systems. He left Burroughs for Tacan/IPITEK Corporation as Manager of Electro-Optic Systems developing fiber optic CATV hardware and systems. In 1990 he joined the faculty of the University of San Diego. He remains an active consultant in radio frequency and analog circuit design, and teaches review coursed
biomedicine. He is a recipient of UCSB’s Center for Control, Dynamical Systems, and Computation Best PhD Thesis award and a UCI Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Research Mentorship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An Investigation of Psychological Safety in Student-Led Undergraduate Engineering Design Projects through Student InterviewsAbstractTo supplement classroom learning and prepare students to transition from school to industry,many undergraduate engineering students participate in team-based design projects, both indesign-focused courses and as extracurricular activities. These projects can be largely organizedand
Texas (UT) at Austin, and served as a postdoctoral fellow in theCollege of Pharmacy at UT Austin. Prior to joining Rice University, she worked at Boehringer Ingel-heim on innovative drug delivery systems and she was an Assistant Professor in Diagnostic Radiologyat UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, where she conducted research on nonviral gene therapy systems.At Rice University she has developed and taught courses in The Department of Bioengineering includ-ing Numerical Methods, Pharmaceutical Engineering, Systems Physiology, Biomaterials and Advancesin BioNanotechnology. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Using Science Concepts in a Mathematics ProfessionalDevelopment Program to
outreachprograms will be presented. The organizational structure and method of operation will also bediscussed, including impact on organization employees, organizational structure philosophiesutilized, and the 10, 20, 30 40 rule that have enabled the organization to provide balancedoutreach at all grade levels. Lessons learned will also be presented. The overall purpose of thispaper is to document what a large STEM outreach organization may look like, so that otherorganizations can gain insight for their growth or sustainability.Index Terms - Active Learning; Classroom; Education, Engineer; Invention; Innovation; Science;STEM; Outreach; Picatinny Arsenal; Volunteering; WorkshopsI. IntroductionThe importance of conducting Science, Technology, Engineering
taught a year-long, design-based engineering course for seniors. Forbes earned her PhD in civil engineering, with an engineering education research focus.Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado - Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the ABET assessment coordinator for the department. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Aca- demic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering
in the School of Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. Her research area is based on systems thinking in K-12 education. She graduated from Stevens Institute of Technology with a Masters degree in Computer Engineering, and then she worked with Lucent Technologies as a software developer first in embedded systems and then she held a position as a software designer/architect for CDMA2000 project where she participated in numerous projects developing several features to enhance the existing software system. She is now participating in a project to create a model curriculum in software engineering.Lawrence Bernstein, Stevens Institute of Technology
Consortium. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE.Dr. Bruce R Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn Bruce R. Maxim has worked as a software engineer, project manager, professor, author, and consultant for more than forty years. His research interests include software engineering, human computer interaction, game design, virtual reality, AIXiaohong Yuan, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Yuan is a professor in the Department of Computer Science at NCA&T. Her research interests include AI and machine learning, anomaly detection, software security, cyber identity, and cyber security education. Her research has been funded by the National Security Agency, the National Centers of Academic Excellence in
Paper ID #10585Leading by Example for Engineering Design (LEED) to Meet Next Genera-tion Science Standards in Middle and High School Science and Math ClassesDr. Evan C. Lemley, University of Central OklahomaMr. Bob Melton, Putnam City Schools Bob Melton is the Assessment Coordinator/ STEM Facilitator for Putnam City Schools. Mr. Melton began his career in 1974 at Putnam City West High School, taught at Edmond Memorial High School, and was the Science Curriculum Coordinator for Putnam City Schools from 1993 to 2013. From1999 through 2003 he served as project director of a USDOE program to research the effective- ness of
, some taught undergraduate and graduate engineering courses, andone held an administrative assignment in his Provost’s Office. All participants were White, male,and retired from the same doctoral-granting university with very high research activityrepresenting various engineering disciplines such as aerospace, biomedical, chemical, industrialsystems, and mechanical. All of the emeriti faculty had participated in the Increasing MinorityPresence within Academia through Continuous Training (IMPACT) mentoring program, whichpaired emeriti and URM early- and mid-career engineering faculty for career mentorship. TheIMPACT program is sponsored by a NSF INCLUDES Design and Developments Launch Pilotaward (17-4458).Chatbot responses were drawn from one-on
and practice. A distinctive strength of thesepapers was their description of research approaches that can be used to discover and articulatethe mental models used by engineering students, faculty, and practitioners to locate theirenterprises within larger social contexts. The LEES nominee for PIC 3 Best Paper, “Examiningthe Relationships Between How Students Construct Stakeholders and the Ways StudentConceptualize Harm from Engineering Design” was presented in this session and exemplifies theinvention and integration that were common throughout the LEES program. The authors of thispaper (Alexis Papek, Ayush Gupta, and Chandra Turpen), all faculty at the University ofMaryland, College Park, are integrative individuals. All three completed
.; Computer, Information and Control Engineering, University of Michigan, 1985 B.S.; Computer Engineering, Uni- versity of Michigan, 1983 Academic Positions Held Strecker Dean of Engineering, College of Engineering, Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity, 2020-present. Professor, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 2020-present. Interim Director, Discovery Partners Institute (DPI), University of Illinois System, 2018-2019. Founding director for DPI, which is a joint education, research, and innovation institute led by the University of Illinois System (U of I System) and its three universities, and is backed by a $500M appropriation from the State of Illinois. DPI’s mission is to
immediately in competitiveenvironments with system engineering, information technology, and soft (communication,leadership and team) skills in addition to traditional engineering fundamentals 2,3. Such skills areparticularly relevant for Industrial Engineers who often serve as a facilitator of technical andbusiness interactions4,5.A number of efforts to increase these skills have been undertaken, the most common being thecapstone senior design projects. Curriculum designers are increasingly more aware ofdeveloping courses that combine skills from several prior courses to practice such skills.Especially innovative approaches introduce students to systems thinking early and continuouslythrough their program, stressing both engineering and business
industrial engineering,engineering quality management, project management, concurrent / simultaneous greenproduct / process design, visual lean factory management, and continuous professionaleducation. 557IntroductionMillennial generation students are interested in an integrated, simultaneously analytical,computational, interactive, as well as practical, real-world-focused, customized education.They expect a large number of choices, because they understand the power of simulation.They are very visually focused, because this is the video gaming generation. They wantpersonalized, customized products, processes and service, and their education process isnot an exception. They look for technical details, and want
minimizethe impact of this disturbing trend, a priority must be set to establish a strong academicfoundation for students pursuing an education in the field of engineering.One method that has proven successful at some schools in the recruitment of engineeringstudents is the offering of engineering summer camps [7,8]. Within these camps,students are introduced to and work with Lego Robotics in addition to sharpeningpreparatory skills for science, technology, engineering, and math. The use of theseprograms create more opportunities to educate students about the fundamentals ofengineering using innovative, fun and exciting projects.Prairie View A&M University held the Electrical and Computer Engineering Leadership(ExCEL) Summer Program in June 2007
merelystudying engineering concepts; and how middle/high school science, math, and technologyinstructors should teach engineering practice remain open debates in the Engineering Educationliterature [13]. To provide clarity for our project, we identified two attributes we feel uniquelydefine high-quality middle/high school engineering practice instruction: 1) using a formalengineering design process and 2) conveying the complexity and interconnectivity associatedwith engineering practice. While there are variations, the formal engineering design processrecommended for use in middle/high schools is proposed by Hynes et al, and it contains thefollowing steps: 1) Identify the problem, 2) Research the problem, 3) Develop possible solutions,4) Down-Select the
. Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University Lance White is a Ph.D. student at Texas A&M University in Interdisciplinary Engineering with a thrust in Engineering Education. He is working as a graduate research assistant at the Institute of Engineering Education and Innovation at the Texas EngineerinDr. Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University Dr. Hammond is Director of the Texas A&M University Institute for Engineering Education & Innovation and also the chair of the Engineering Education Faculty. She is also Director of the Sketch Recognition Lab and Professor in the Department of Computer Science & Engineering. She is a member of the Center for Population and Aging, the Center for Remote