freshman engineering program. Dr. Bursic has done research and published work in the areas of Engineering and Project Management and Engineering Education. She is a member of IIE and ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Pennsylvania.Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academics and Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former senior editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Dr. Shuman is the
engineering course through a course project that focused on mobile sourceemissions. Six of the eight students enrolled in the course were third and fourth year mechanicalengineering students. Two graduate students from other engineering schools were also enrolled. To formulate my ideas for the project, I collaborated with staff at the City of ChicagoDepartment of the Environment, the Region 5 EPA office, and EPA headquarters. The resultingproject had two elements. Both originally focused on Pilsen, a Chicago neighborhood that isboth a trucking hub and a population center for working class families. As part of the firstelement, students assumed the role of fleet managers of small trucking firms in Pilsen seeking tojoin EPA’s SmartWay Transport
Research Assistant in Dr Colleen Josephson’s j-Lab in Smart Sensing. Matthew has mentored students throughout the last four years, serving roles as a tutor and student-instructor, finding that the best way to truly learn a concept is by teaching to others. Matthew is expected to graduate in the summer of 2024 after completing his senior thesis in the development of a solar-powered sensor utilizing Visible Light Communication (VLC).Mr. Khanh Tran, University of California, Santa Cruz Khanh Tran is a 3rd year Electrical Engineering undergraduate at the University of California, Santa Cruz. He is the vice president of the UCSC Rocket Team, serving as a technical lead, mentoring undergraduate students and designing rockets
outset that the course strive for more than merely turningstudents into kit builders, though that may certainly be one of the outcomes. Here are theofficial course objectives of Aero 572, Aircraft Manufacturing and Fabrication, that is offeredtwo quarters of every academic year: “The objectives of this course are to provide a hands-on demonstration and practice of the techniques used in aircraft manufacturing and fabrication. This may include, but is not limited to, seminar topics, field trips to aircraft designers, and actual construction of an aircraft. The primary purpose of the course is to compliment the capstone aircraft design sequence and give selected students significant exposure to aircraft fabrication techniques. By its nature this
others are Mathematical Modelling, Engineering Mechanics,Engineering Design, Biology and Chemistry for Engineers, Engineering Computation andSoftware Development, and Materials Science. Selection and study in a specific engineeringdiscipline is not undertaken until all first-year courses are completed.MethodologyAn action-research methodology seemed appropriate for an iterative, reflective process thatwould allow for inquiry and discussion as components of the “research”. Commonly thosewho apply an action-research approach are practitioners who wish to improve understandingof their own practice. Although the naming and number of the steps involved can vary,action research always involves a series of cycles, sometimes envisioned as a spiral 7
students.Prof. Kurt Paterson P.E., Michigan Technological University Kurt Paterson, Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, is also Director of Michigan Tech’s D80 Center. D80 has the mission to develop contribution-based learning, research, and service opportunities for all students and staff to partner with the poorest 80% of humanity, together creating solutions that matter. As Director of several international programs at the undergraduate and graduate levels, Paterson, his colleagues, and his students have conducted numerous community-inspired research and design projects. Paterson is an educational innovator, recently adding courses for first-year students, Great Ideas, and graduate students
decreasing rampup time. Proprietary research. Consulting services for universities providing information about the job readiness of their engineering graduates. Consulting services for industry providing assistance in improving their onboarding practices. Grant monies investigating new areas of interest.This business plan describes the initial set up and operation of the proposed coalition, whichwould occur over a time frame of 1 – 1.5 years.1 The authors are actively seeking other colleges of engineering who want to collaborate with Boise State University to set up the proposed coalition
that involved combining fiveeducation best practices of recruitment, formal mentoring through peer mentors, summer campengineering math preparation and workshops, academic year stipends, and summer internships atlocal and regional companies.The Just in Time Math (JITM) strategy was implemented to increase the interaction betweenfreshmen and engineering faculty and peers during the first semesters of study. As a result, moreengineering students have shown greater enthusiasm for the field of engineering which resultedin better retention and graduation rates. The JITM course included lecture, lab and recitationcomponents and an application-oriented, hands-on approach. The JITM course addressed mathtopics specifically used in the core entry-level
. The new degree program was launched in the Autumn of 2020 at the OhioState University. Offered by the regional campuses which have traditionally been feeder campusesto the central campus, this employer-driven program will prepare graduates for high-demandmanufacturing occupations that require strong technical and management skills.The curriculum for the four-year degree program was based on industry needs that will allowgraduates of the program to help the state build the manufacturing workforce needed to competeand thrive. The curriculum is driven by a rigorous assessment process and foundational skills formathematics, physics, engineering, and management skills including the following: problem-solving, innovation, leadership, and change
as an assistant professor in 1991, the same year he received a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Princeton University. He also holds an M.A. (Princeton, 1981) and a B.S. (Rice, 1980) in chemical engineering. Jim has received the Arizona Mortar Board Senior Honor Society award for outstanding faculty service and the College of Engineering Award for Excellence at the Student Interface. In 1997, he was awarded an International Research Fellowship by the National Science Foundation for study at the University of Melbourne. Jim is head of the ENGR 102 HS team that was recognized in 2014 by ASEE for best practices in K-12 University partnerships. He is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Tau Beta Pi and Phi Lambda Upsilon
: • Department/College-level creation, implementation, and dissemination of Best Practices and Professional Development Models Page 26.162.108 • Leadership-in-Action type grants designed to support grass-roots efforts, organizational development, website construction, research to inform change, or other self-identified areas of need • Sponsorship of keynote speakers and workshops on topics such as building transparency, negotiating dual-career hires, the changing funding environment, establishing career goals, network development, unconscious bias, best practices in recruiting, and broader impact issues5. CONNECT GRANTS
). They concluded that the use of theseassessments in practice is likely a waste of resources, though solely based on the “meshing,” oralignment of teaching with learning style preference, hypothesis at the center of their review.However, a reason these learning style models are popular among faculty is they provide aheuristic basis for varying teaching methods, such as in-class activities, assignments, andassessments. No research has been conducted to demonstrate increased student performance as aresult of application of the Felder and Soloman (n.d.) learning styles model to teaching, but othermodels have demonstrated evidence of improved performance (Kolb 1984, Brokaw and Merz2000). One study in particular examined the effect of designing
to the country’s schools where they had studied.In this way, in this paper we show through diverse situations the influence that experiencedmethodologies can have on a student, and how through these same methodologies we can changethese opinions and make them favorable towards methodologies based on active learning.IntroductionIn recent years there has been a growing interest for changing pedagogical practices in theteaching of engineering1 2. This tendency responds to the necessities of economic globalization,rapid advances in technology and cognitive science3 4. In addition, in many of the world’scountries it has been observed that the graduation rate of engineers has fallen in relation to theprojected demand for these professionals5. This
thecourse around the Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition for the following reasons: it ishighly interdisciplinary; it affords undergraduate and graduate research opportunities; andit forces students to work under the pressure of a deadline. The course runs from Januaryto August, with the actual competition occurs in June. Subsequent to the event, lecturesfocus upon the competition as a case study and apply topics such as legal concerns andeconomic cost analysis. Due to the nature of the competition, a shift towards the systemlevel of design has occurred. The present work seeks to add to the ongoing discussion focused upon multi-disciplinary capstone design. Several key differences exist between the present work andthat described by
and dynamics of machinery for undergraduate engineering programs. He has advised on over forty (40) Senior Design Projects and his teams of students have received five (5) National Championships and three Best Design Awards. In the recent years, he has challenged himself with the creation of an effective methodology for successful Invention and Innovation. He was part of a 14 member multi-disciplinary team to design and create the ”Society, Ethics, and Technology (SET)” course at TCNJ in 1994 and has c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27214taught multiple regular and Honors sections
Professor. He comes with rich industrial experience in software design. Prior to ASU, he worked at SAP as a Senior Design Expert for several years, where he helped design and develop complex software products using User Center Design- (UCD) and other design methodologies. He was instrumental in developing new SAP Design Guidelines as well as multiple software design meth- ods and tools. He received SAP innovation awards for some of his work. Prior to SAP, he worked at other multinational companies including IBM and Johnson & Johnson. Page 26.471.1 c American Society for Engineering
studyaddresses is to what extent student survey responses and focus group comments provide supportfor the presence of the best-practice factors in education. These factors include higher levels ofstudent interaction other students and with faculty, cooperative and active learning, usefulfeedback and guidance, and accommodation of diverse learning needs. This paper will presentthe views of students engaged in engineering education at this institution. In addition, we willpresent some implications for engineering education. We proceed with a brief overview of thestudy design.Study Design, Methods, and ImplementationThis study was an extension of the Academic Pathways Study (APS) developed by the Center forthe Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE
University. She is currently a Program Director at the National Science Foundation in the Divi- sion of Undergraduate Education. Her expertise and interests focus on diversity and inclusion, engineer identity, PBL, innovative learning-centered pedagogies, assessment of student learning, engineering de- sign, capstone design, etc. She also conducts research in cardiovascular fluid mechanics and sustainable energy technologies. She holds a BS and MS in Engineering Mechanics and a PhD in Biomedical Engi- neering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Robin D. Anderson, James Madison University Robin D. Anderson serves as the Academic Unit Head for the Department of Graduate Psychology at James Madison University. She holds a doctorate in
Paper ID #12643Renewable Energy Technician Education: Lessons from the German En-ergiewendeMary Slowinski, M.Ed., CREATE NSF-ATE Center Mary Slowinski received her M.Ed. in Learning Science from the University of Washington where she will complete her PhD in the same. She has worked extensively with the National Science Foundation’s Advanced Technological Education program in a variety of consulting capacities including serving as learning coordinator for two international faculty learning projects, participating as an Innovation Coach for a ”scaling-up innovations” project, developing curriculum and learning materials
within the context of a PD project centered on robotics-integratedscience and math education. Our research team invited only the middle school teachers who hadparticipated in a prior summer PD (2016 or 2017) to participate. In the prior PD, teachersexperienced and practiced effective approaches for integrating robotics-based science and mathlessons in their classrooms. For a more successful integration of robotics into classrooms, theresearch team updated the PD workshop by adapting from extensive research documented inexisting literature regarding the best practices for PD, learning theories, the engineering designprocess, and use of robotics in STEM education. The PD of the current study was conducted duringthe course of three weeks in the
, engineering and math education agenda: an update of state actions. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices.[16] Eagan, M. K., Stolzenberg, E. B., Berdan Lozano, J., Aragon, M. C., Suchard, M. R. & Hurtado, S. (2014). Undergraduate teaching faculty: The 2013–2014 HERI Faculty Survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA. Available: http://www.heri.ucla.edu/monographs/HERI-FAC2014- monograph.pdf[17] Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010, July). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 185-207.[18] Lord S, & Camacho, M
- ing and the Council for Advancement and Support of Education. His research focuses on creating K-16 learning environments that support the growth of learners’ imaginations and their capacity for engaging in collaborative knowledge work.Ms. Isabel Huff, Springfield Technical Community College After participating in the instructional design of Through My Window during her four years as an under- graduate, Huff is now its outreach coordinator. She graduated summa cum laude from Smith College with a double major in Economics and Spanish in Spring 2014 and now works on the Springfield Technical Community College side of the Through My Window National Science Foundation grant.Mr. Al Rudnitsky, Smith College Al Rudnitsky
, Canada in Educational Psychology (Learning Sciences stream), and Psychology, respectively. Her research interests include using multimodal data to examine self-regulated learning across contexts and populations. She is the current Associate Editor for the International Journal of Learning and Instruction and the International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education and serves on the Editorial Board for the International Journal of Metacognition and Learning. She is Co-PI on the NSF-supported HSI Implementation and Evaluation Project: Enhancing Student Success in Engineering Curriculum through Active e-Learning and High Impact Teaching Practices (ESSEnCe). Sierra Outerbridge, M.Ed., is a graduate research
Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic in- terdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineer- ing, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering education, the pro- fessional formation of engineers, the role of empathy
framework[11] thatidentified skills and dispositions of engineering knowledge and practice for K-12 curricularframeworks[12]. Multiple researchers report from their findings that engineering can be theintegration vehicle for the STEM disciplines [13], resulting in improved student learning andmotivation. These benefits are not without challenges, however, and two of the most influentialfactors challenging science and engineering integration are #1) the lack of guidance for teacherson how to integrate the subjects[11], [13] and #2) the limited knowledge and experience base inengineering of K-12 teachers who, as a result, need scaffolding and support when preparing toteach concepts for their grade levels[1], [14]. The Engineering Design Process (EDP
and Technology (ABET) Question for the FutureIn late 2017, CoE successfully received an Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) re-accreditation for its Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering and Bachelor ofScience in Computer Engineering for six years with no interim reports. According to theUniversity Dean for the College of Engineering, this is the best ABET accreditation that anengineering college can receive. As a result of the visit, CoE also intends to address the ABETquestion, paraphrased as: where to do you see your graduates three to five years beyondgraduation?To help address the above ABET question, CoE’s long-term vision is to graduate students whohave visionary leadership to create value and innovative
ASME Design Engineering Conferences September 12-15, 1999, Las Vegas, Nevada.JOHN FELAND is a Research Associate at the Stanford Center for Design Research. A former Assistant Professorof Engineering Mechanics at the United States Air Force Academy, he has returned to Stanford to finish his PhD inMechanical Engineering. He has published in the areas of design education, systems engineering requirementcreation and management, risk management systems, innovation, entrepreneurship education, and team building.1 Katz, Susan M. The Entry-Level Engineer: Problems in Transition from Student to Professional. Journal of Engineering Education. 82(3), July
the lifecycle of an engineering education grant, the phase where best practices are sustainedand disseminated is perhaps the most crucial stage for maximizing impact. Yet this transitionphase often receives the least attention as project team enthusiasm can wane, while fundingtapers off, and faculty priorities are pulled in other directions. There are numerous obstaclesassociated with sustaining program changes, even those perceived as very valuable. Typicalchallenges are: What happens when the funding runs out? What grant-developed programsshould be sustained by the university? Does the institution need to internally allocate resources inan annual budget large enough to replace the grant?Ultimately, sustaining successful programmatic
Page 24.1261.9available advanced chemical technology to reprocess the fuel. At this point of the project,students are well-informed on the issues and gaps in the research and can makerecommendations for further work and study. The Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) is one of the most attractive reactor concepts included inthe family of Generation IV reactors due to its inherently safe design, innovative liquid fuelformat, online fuel reprocessing capabilities, short doubling times and ease of small modularconstruction. MSRs are a type of high-temperature, salt-cooled reactor used for producingelectricity, burning actinides and producing hydrogen but also for breeding fissionable species,such as the MSBR [16]. MSRs have a strong negative
Paper ID #29381Characterizing Engineering Outreach Ambassadors’ Teaching Moves duringEngineering Design Activities (Fundamental)Ms. Elizabeth Ann Moison, Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and OutreachMs. Karen Miel, Tufts University Karen Miel is a PhD student in STEM Education at Tufts University. Karen served as the Director of Research and Innovation at the science center CuriOdyssey and the Education Director of the Palo Alto Junior Museum and Zoo after teaching elementary and middle school. Her research focuses on elementary students’ reasoning and decision-making in collaborative engineering design.Dr