thecompetitive position of the School for applied research opportunities in the current environmentfor research and development; helps promote the general economic development of the region;expedites and simplifies the acquisition and utilization of research contracts; improvestechnology transfer; and links applied scientific research and technological advancements togrowth in the industries that employ graduates of the School.Examples:SET and its Center enhance Institutional Outreach through ongoing efforts to connect its mostcreative ideas and share its best practices with the industries it serves, the professional societies itsupports, the competitions it enters, and the region it respects in an engaging partnership formutual improvement. There have
AC 2009-526: A PRACTICAL GLOBAL DESIGN COMPETITIONLawrence Whitman, Wichita State University Lawrence E. Whitman is the Director of Engineering Education for the College of Engineering and an Associate Professor of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering at Wichita State University. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees from Oklahoma State University. His Ph.D. from The University of Texas at Arlington is in Industrial Engineering. He also has 10 years experience in the aerospace industry. His research interests are in enterprise engineering, engineering education and lean manufacturing.Zulma Toro-Ramos, Wichita State University Zulma Toro-Ramos serves as Dean of the College of Engineering
between U.S.engineering graduate education and the creative practice of engineering ─ has contributedto a long-term underdevelopment of the nation’s graduate engineers for technologydevelopment and innovation, reflected in a long-term decline of our core competence forengineering innovation of new technology which has been a contributing factor to thenation’s long-term decline of U.S. competitiveness. It is now evident that one-size ofgraduate education for the nation’s academic scientific researchers, who are pursuingcareers of scientific discovery and inquiry at research universities, and that of graduateeducation for the nation’s graduate engineers who are pursuing professional careers ofadvanced engineering practice for technological
States invested wisely in research-oriented graduate education and has become preeminent in basic university research that advances science and benefits the scientific workforce for discovery. But a parallel investment and balanced emphasis has not been made in professional graduate engineering education during this same time frame to support the continued development of the U.S. engineering workforce in industry for technology development and innovation. One-size in graduate education doesn’t fit all. Excellence in basic research and in the practice of engineering for world-class technology development and innovation are two very different pursuits. A disconnect has existed between U.S. graduate engineering education and
classes.Multidisciplinary engineering courses could stimulate faculty and students to approach otherdepartments to conduct multidisciplinary research and conduct collaborative design projects.Multidisciplinary projects are highly encouraged by the departments and help the studentsbecome more knowledgeable and valuable in their future positions. Describing the advantagesand limitations of the mechatronics course as a multidisciplinary teaching endeavor provides acatalyst for the development of other courses.The short term goals are to evaluate the existing course content and integrate more labs anddemonstrations that could make an immediate impact on the students’ learning. For instance,student feedback has indicated the second lab with the Sumobot on the balance
undergraduate and experienced graduate students who have a demonstrated interest in issues of sustainable development. 2) Integrating the research experience into education initiatives that are focused on sustainable development. 3) Ensuring the research experience focuses on appropriate technology (defined here as the use of materials and technology that are culturally, economically, and socially suitable to the area in which they are implemented). 4) Using an operational model for sustainable development that is a global partnership, so students understand how to integrate and transfer the best and most appropriate knowledge, methodologies, techniques, and practices between the developed and developing
Page 14.137.3exercises designed to improve students' abilities in the areas in which they exhibited weakness.These sessions were conducted by mathematics graduate students. In these sessions, studentswere provided guidance, help, and training on an individual basis as much as possible. Thefocus was on the individual student's needs and how the student could achieve the best gains inthe topic skills. This was accomplished using the following principles and characteristics oflearner-centered education: active learning, student engagement, adaptability focused onindividual student needs, practice until mastery, prompt feedback, and general avoidance of thetraditional lecture format. TIMES concluded with a post-training skills assessment to
organizers. Rev. Educ. Res., 46(2), 239–265.13. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Engr. Education, 93(3), 223–231.14. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Stanne, M.E. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta–analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Cooperative Learning Center. .15. Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2008). Student ratings of teaching: Myths, facts, and good practices. Chem. Engr. Education, 42(1), 33–34. .16. McKeachie, W.J., & Svinicki, M. (2005). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for Page 14.177.28 college and university
cataloged within the appropriate collections of NSDL.Acknowledgement:School of Engineering Technologies participating FacultyBibliography:1. The National Academies Press2. The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation3. NGA Center for Best Practices, Hall of States Suite 2267-444 North Capitol Street – Washington, DC 20001- 1512-202 624 5300 . www.org/center4. Lois A. Dimpfel, Vice President, Global Services (retired), IBM Corporation5. Innovate America,” Council on Competitiveness, December 2004, Washington, DC. Report by the Council on Competitiveness.6. Andrew Reamer et al., Technology Transfer and Commercialization: Their Role in Economic Development - U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.7. Fairfield (CT) City Business Journal, May 16
, their workersare forced to adopt complex understanding and problem solving skills in technical areas.However, research pertaining to worker preparedness indicates that colleges and universities arenot adequately preparing graduates for this new work environment (Wieman, 2008)24.Manufacturing has become a field where global view and technical savvy are desirous qualitiesfor all persons involved. Since the 1980’s, manufacturing has undergone significant changes inoperational costs and product quality. The lean mangers of the 20th century are now retiring andthere are not enough new lean experts to lead US manufacturing into the next 20 years (Linford,2007)13.BackgroundResearch surrounding instructional design models has found that effective
University Professor, Educational Leadership and Counseling Psychology, and Director, Assessment and Evaluation Center, Washington State UniversityRobert Gerlick, Washington State University Graduate Research Assistant, Engineering Education, Washington State UniversitySusannah Howe, Smith College Director, Design Clinic, Smith College Page 14.237.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Assessing Design and Reflective Practice in Capstone Engineering Design CoursesAbstractEngineering practitioners in the twenty-first century face complex challenges with social,political
AC 2009-1244: DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR VIRTUAL-CLASSROOM ANDLABORATORY ENVIRONMENTSCharles Lesko, East Carolina University Charles Lesko is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Systems, College of Technology & Computer Science at East Carolina University. He received his BS at the US Naval Academy; he holds a MS in Forensics from National University and a second MS in Computer Information Systems from Boston University; his PhD is in Applied Management from Walden University. His current teaching and research regime focus on strategic technology management and communication, information technology project management, and virtual reality technology use in the
students throughresearch. While conducting basic research is important to developing hypotheses and acquiringknowledge about a phenomena, applied research is required when the goal is technologycommercialization. Applied research is designed to solve practical problems in the real world.Conducting applied research provides value not only to the researcher, but also to the populationwhom the research benefits.In order to motivate faculty to have a focus on applied research that has the potential forcommercialization, the promotion and tenure process must be augmented. A tenure process thatpromotes commercialization should provide incentives for working with industry, starting a
ESL graduate assistants (GA’s) in doctoralprograms and 17 faculty (assistant professor to professor)The theoretical framework for this study is the whole systems sub-paradigm of the learningparadigm in human resource development, where the goal is to provide employees with learningopportunities that will simultaneously build individual learning capacity and knowledge,improve performance, and strengthen the organization as a whole. 37, 38 The research questionsare guided by core adult learning principles and Knowles’ process design for adult learningprograms, wherein participants are actively involved in identifying their own needs and learningoutcomes, as well as how to best address the needs and fulfill the outcomes. 39 This study’sresearch
identity for this study by acting as aguide for categorizing data.Research Methods In conjunction with the theoretical framework previously described, this research employed amultiple case (multicase) study research method. Together, expectancy-value and multicasemethods frameworks shaped participant selection and data analysis choices. Examples of thesechoices can be seen through this section. The data analyzed for this study were collected as part of a larger body of work, the AcademicPathways Study (APS), conducted by the NSF-funded Center for Advancement of EngineeringEducation (CAEE). Overall study design and data collection strategies have been describedpreviously 33, 34. Data collection specifically at Technical Public Institution (TPub
application, consulting, facilitation and training of such methodologies and business practices as TRIZ, Competitive Opportunity Management, Strategic Planning, Competitive Intelligence, Product / Process Development and Optimization, Business Process Innovation, Design for Manufacture and Assembly, Quality Function Deployment, Technology Research and Organizational Engineering.Donald Reimer, Lawrence Technological University Donald M. Reimer is currently a fulltime senior lecturer and Associate Director of The Lear Entrepreneurial Program in College of Engineering at Lawrence Tech. Mr. Reimer holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Management from Lawrence Technological University and
PittsburghManuel Peace, General Motors Alan Wiechman The Boeing Co. Greg Shultz , Wal-MartPaul Clayson, nCoat Inc. James E. Stike, Materials Innovation Technology Ohio State and Ohio is active in industry; One of the first ERC programs; Comprehensive partnerships are necessary (ex. with Honda – schools pay a role in research, cost sharing, day to day solutions for practical problems); Faculty/Student Teams working with Industry, and Industry working directly will University; NSBE Jr Chapters, Following trends which need benchmark research to push the technology. Multiple methods need to be used to work with companies for success; NSF provides a good template for forming partnerships with companies; Master
, Uniqueness, Dimensionality, Directionality, Consolidation, Segmentation, Modification, Similarity and Experimentation. The material in the course will be complemented with activities from the “Projects”, “Competitions”,and “Challenges” modules. The second course is a multi-disciplinary class titled: Innovative Design in Practice. This courseconsists of project-based learning in subjects related to information technologies (IT). The project aims atlearning the development of an innovative data system for an existing real-life application. Participantswill learn and apply necessary basic programming skills/knowledge to explore and implement innovativesolutions. A typical process of developing an information system, often called the
AC 2009-1809: LEVERAGING WORKFORCE NEEDS TO INFORMCURRICULAR CHANGE IN COMPUTING EDUCATION FOR ENGINEERING:THE CPACE PROJECTClaudia E. Vergara, Michigan State University Claudia Elena Vergara. PhD Purdue University. Fields of expertise: Plant Biology and STEM Education Research Dr. Vergara is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Center for Research in College Science Teaching and Learning (CRCSTL) at Michigan State University. Her research interest is in STEM education through research projects on instructional design, implementation and assessment of student learning, aimed to improve science and technology education.Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University Mark Urban-Lurain is the Director of
colleges and universities to join biomedicalengineering (BME) graduate programs and by training teachers to inspire their students to enterbiomedical engineering through exposing them to excite BME research. We believe that locating the REU-RET collaborative biomedical research opportunitiesfor undergraduates at a major urban research university is important for several reasons. Thecampus is located in the center of a vibrant, multi-cultural urban environment, which makes it Page 14.1029.3appealing to students with a wide range of backgrounds. Examples of state of the art practice in
goals by addressing concerns rather than simply trying to convince them to attend graduate school. A suggested timetable for the application process as well as general suggestions for enhancing applications and obtaining reference letters is provided.Each year research projects for the REU Site are designed to introduce undergraduates fromdiverse engineering and science backgrounds to “hands-on” structural engineering laboratory,field, and computer simulation research experiences. Six to nine engineering and scienceundergraduates are recruited through a national application process annually, with a special focuson women and underrepresented ethnic minorities. Teams of two or three students are guided ona research project by
program. The challenges include securing sufficientadministrative, institutional, space, equipment, and personnel support. The opportunities lie inthe possibility to create an efficient, modern, and attractive program for engineering educationbased on proven innovative teaching methods, state of the art equipment, and a new student-centered curriculum.One of the first questions that immediately arise is “what is the best curriculum for a newprogram in Electrical and Computer Engineering?” In attempting to answer this simple question,many possibilities come to mind and a review of several expert opinions and an analysis of a fewcurricula from leading engineering schools lead to useful conclusions that are described in thispaper. Some of these lie
education and human resource development for over 30 years as high school industrial arts instructor, a training consultant to industry, and as a teacher educator at the university level. His research and consulting activities address ways to improve the quality of technical instruction. Dr. Johnson specializes in instructional design, instructional methods, and online learning. He is a primary developer of HRE Online, a web-based system that supports the delivery of the department's online graduate program. He is also the Research Director for the 33 National Center for Engineering and Technology Education and co-director of the Academy for Excellence in Engineering Education. The focus of
past performance atthe designated graduate institutional site of retaining, graduating, and placing significantnumbers of LSAMP graduates into doctoral-degree programs. A plan for formally connecting asignificant number of newly matriculated LSAMP students, including master's degree graduates,to doctoral degree programs is expected.Successful projects must demonstrate substantive and formal connection to other NSF-fundedprograms, such as CREST, NSF research centers, Integrative Graduate Education and ResearchTraining Program (IGERT), Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 Education Program (GK-12),and AGEP. Successful BD projects must ensure that a substantive number of first year BD
, and develop a local community around the One Laptop Per Child vision. We view OLPC as a valuable educational platform rooted in innovative technology. Our goals include community outreach, student development, and educational research. To this end, UW OLPC has established and is expanding local, national, and international relationships. Opportunities are also available to tailor projects to member initiatives and address specific needs of existing OLPC deployments worldwide. UW's OLPC student organization exists as a dynamic epicenter for communication and coordination among the OLPC community at large."[3] The increasing amount of support for the Wisconsin OLPC project has resulted in awonderful resource for
identify areas of best practice and potential pitfalls. This paper alsohelps existing providers of executive education with new insights and perspectives to improveprogram efficiency and effectiveness, and benefits new entrants into executive education whohave the desire, but not the resources, to singularly launch and manage an executive educationprogram.BackgroundIn 2007, the University of Maryland’s A. James Clark School of Engineering and Robert H.Smith School of Business partnered to deliver a groundbreaking executive education series thatleverages the unique capabilities of these two world-class institutions. This jointly offered CIMProgram is designed to provide entrepreneurs, small-business owners, and executives responsiblefor innovation
. Journal of Developmental Education, 23(2), 2-4, 6, 8. 10. Boylan, H. R. (2002). What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education. Boone, NC: National Center for Developmental Education. 11. Engel, C E (1991) Not Just a Method But a Way of Learning, in Boud D and Feletti, G (ends) The Challenge of Problem Based Learning. London: Kogan Page. 12. Magill, S. L., & Herden, R. P. (1998, October). Using educational outcomes and student portfolios to steer management education. Journal of Management Education, 22 (5), 567-90. 13. Keefe, J. W. (1991). Learning style: Cognitive and thinking skills. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals. 14. Keefe, J. W
international component.Volodymyr Tarabara, Michigan State University Volodymyr Tarabara is an Assistant Professor in the Environmental Engineering Program at Michigan State University and Co-Director of the PERMEANT project described in this presentation. He teaches undergraduate and graduate classes in physical-chemical processes. His research focuses on the applications and implications of nanotecnologies, with a focus on membrane processes. He holds a Lily Fellowship to explore how international research experiences can be translated to the classroom.Mark Wiesner, Duke University Mark R. Wiesner serves as Director of the Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (CEINT
Kinesthetic Mode = 5 Tactical- 3% Concrete Boylan, H. R. (2002). What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education. Boone, NC: National Center for Developmental Education. Sometimes, in engineering disciplines “Kinesthetic” and “Visual” may slightly overlap. In a laboratory setting, the students can actually “see and observe” certain operations when they “perform” experiments. See and observe may be interpreted as visual. Perform may be interpreted as Kinesthetic. Therefore, a
liaisons and feedback from many faculty project mentors, a “how-to”guide was developed as a resource for liaison engineers. This guide includes an overview of theIntegrated Product and Process Design program, roles and responsibilities for variousstakeholders, a collection of best practices, and a frequently asked questions section.A checklist for faculty project mentors was developed as a companion to the liaison engineer’sguide. This checklist helps to build rapport between the faculty mentor and the liaison engineer,and informs the liaison engineer about the Integrated Product and Process Design programmilestones, travel dates, and available resources.1. IntroductionThe Integrated Product and Process Design (IPPD) program1-4 is an innovative