Engineering offered by the CU Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science starting in fall 2016. Ms. Sandekian earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder, a Spe- cialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Northern Colorado, and expects to earn her Ph.D. in the Higher Education Student Affairs Leadership program from the University of Northern Colorado in 2017.Dr. Bernard Amadei, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Amadei is Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Colorado at Boulder. He received his PhD in 1982 from the University of California at Berkeley. Dr. Amadei holds the Mortenson Endowed Chair in
Paper ID #16799The Grammar Elephant in the Engineering Classroom: Panel ProposalMr. Brad Jerald Henderson, University of California, Davis Brad Henderson is a faculty in writing for the University Writing Program (UWP) at University of Cali- fornia, Davis. Henderson holds a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Cal Poly State University San Luis Obispo and a Masters in Professional Writing (MPW) from University of Southern California. Currently focusing his career on engineering communication and professionalism, he has worked as a design engineer and technical education specialist for Parker-Hannifin Aerospace and
appropriate governing boards by April 2013. Many programs looked towards “double-counting,” essentially the practice of meeting multiple General Education (GE) requirements within a single course or within major courses. The College of Engineering (CoE) at SJSU elected to move more upper division GE Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) into major courses, with the expectation to simultaneously satisfy all GE requirements, ABET requirements, and unit caps while graduating a technical person. The CoE offers eight programs (Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Materials Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, Industrial & Systems Engineering), which are accredited by the Engineering
be taughtand that companies would be open to it. Citing poor presentation skills of others as well as their own successes with using the AEapproach, twenty-seven participants expressed that they think it would be beneficial to spread AEto companies and research labs. They believe that AE would improve presentations by makingthem more engaging, more effective, and easier to understand and follow. Based on theirexperience in the aerospace and automotive industries, five participants did express that theythought AE might not be the best method for presentations with great technical depth; however,they still thought that AE would be better than the traditional method in more general contexts. When considering spreading AE, thirteen
a focus on electro- chemical energy storage systems.Israa Ali, University of Michigan Israa Ali is a senior undergraduate studying Aerospace Engineering.Dr. Corin L Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles Corin (Corey) Bowen is a postdoctoral researcher in the College of Engineering, Computer Science and Technology at California State University - Los Angeles, where she is working on the NSF-funded Eco- STEM project. Her engineering education research focuses on structural oppression in engineering sys- tems, organizing for equitable change, and developing an agenda of Engineering for the Common Good. She conferred her Ph.D. in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor in April
wrote frequently about engineering practices or becoming anengineer and related words; thirteen students mentioned engineering less than five times acrossmultiple pages and six students (25% of the sample) did not refer to engineering at all. A studentwho strongly identified as an engineer, and who had never flown on an airplane or left the U.S.,traveled to China. This aerospace engineering student wrote about an image taken from thewindow of the plane: “I was a little worried before the plane took off from Dulles. What if Ihated it? Then what would I do with my life? Would I still want to be an aerospace engineer? Allmy fears vanished as soon as the plane took off. It was thrilling!”This quotation also exemplifies the overall tone students
sciences (2) majors that were started before the 2000-2001 academic year (Table 1).The environmental design degree was housed in the College of Architecture and Planning. Eightof the programs were accredited by ABET’s EAC; one was Computing Association Commission(CAC)-accredited; 12 were non-accredited.The admissions criteria for majors in the CEAS differed from those in the College of Arts andSciences. These differences were reflected in the average high school GPA of the first-year students who matriculated into various majors, which ranged from a high of 3.90 in Aerospace Engineering to a low of 3.28 in Geography (based on the fall 2008 class). Table 1. The 21 studied undergraduate degree programs
visiting scholar at the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Singapore University of Technology and Design, Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Science and the Science and Technology Policy Institute. As a professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics & Engineering Systems, Professor Hastings has taught courses and seminars in plasma physics, rocket propulsion, advanced space power and propulsion systems, aerospace policy, technology and policy, and space systems engineering. His teaching has ranged from freshman classes to doctoral seminars. His research has spanned five areas. He has worked in laser material interactions, fusion plasma physics, spacecraft plasma environment interactions, space
%),and low rates in Aerospace Engineering (14.5%), Electrical Engineering (14.0%), ComputerScience (inside engineering) (13.0%), Computer Science (outside engineering) (13.0%),Mechanical Engineering (12.5%), Electrical/Computer Engineering (12.3%), MiningEngineering (12.1%), and Computer Engineering (10.7%).The proportion of women graduating with a bachelor’s degree in computing disciplines hasdecreased from 15,668 in 2003 to 8,730 in 2012 (a 44% decrease) while the rate of men earninga bachelor’s degree in computer science has only decreased by 17% (to 47,960 in 2012).1 Whilemany challenges to recruitment and retention are shared between computing disciplines and(other) engineering fields, Roberts, Kassianidou and Irani (2002) suggest that
. Avneet Hira is an Assistant Professor in the Human-Centered Engineering Program at Boston Col- lege. She received her PhD in Engineering Education and MS in Aerospace Engineering from Purdue University, and BE in Aeronautical Engineering from Punjab Engineering College. Her scholarship is motivated by the fundamental question of how engineering and technology can support people in living well in an increasingly engineered world. Her research focuses on affordances of technology, humanis- tic design, and engineering epistemology to promote purpose and connection in engineering education. In her work, she partners with students and educators (middle school to undergraduate), youth and their families, community
Paper ID #16107Engineering Faculty on Writing: What They Think and What They WantNatascha Michele Trellinger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natascha Trellinger is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She graduated with her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Syracuse University where her interest in the teaching and learning aspects of engineering began. At Purdue, Natascha is a member of the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) and is particularly interested in graduate level engineering education and faculty experiences.Prof. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West
Paper ID #24651A Frankenstein-inspired Engineering Design ProjectDr. James ”Jamie” Canino, Trine University Jamie Canino is currently an associate professor at Trine University where he focuses on undergraduate education research. He teaches in the thermal-fluids and aerospace engineering fields and can be reached at caninoj@trine.edu.Dr. Kendall B. Teichert, Trine University Dr. Teichert received his B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. His Masters research studied behavior of microelectromechanical sensors/actuators. He worked for a small engineering firm in Salt Lake City, Utah
be identified. The work will also roughly classify the identified films into genres anddevelop a small database for tracking. A small sample of feature films and correspondingengineering-related themes is shown in Table 120.Table 1: Examples of feature films illustrating key issues pertaining to engineering and engineer’s work Title Director, year Issues for discussionApollo 13 R. Howard, 1995 Teamwork, creativity, aerospace engineeringThe Bridge on the River D. Lean, 1957 Work organization, civil engineering,Kwai leadership
Paper ID #19515Exploring the Relationship between Mindfulness and Innovation in Engineer-ing StudentsBeth Rieken, Stanford University Beth Rieken is a PhD Candidate at Stanford University in the Mechanical Engineering Department. She is in the Designing Education Lab advised by Prof. Sheri Sheppard. Her work focuses on fostering mind- fulness, empathy and curiosity in engineering students. Beth completed a BS in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Virginia in 2010 and a MS in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford in 2012.Dr. Mark Schar, Stanford University The focus of Mark’s research can broadly be described as
Paper ID #21649A Broader Look at The Role of Andragogy in Engineering EducationCol. Richard Melnyk, United States Military Academy COL Rich Melnyk is an Army Aviator and Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point. He developed and implemented the first course offering of Thermal-Fluid Systems I in 2005. He was an Instructor and Assistant Professor from 2004-2007 and returned to teaching in 2015. He has a PhD in Aerospace Engineering, a PE in Mechanical Engineering, an MBA in Technology Management and recently commanded a Battalion at Hunter
-Hulman Institute of Technology. He teaches courses in fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, measurement systems, and aerospace engineering. He was a USAF officer for 13 years before joining Rose-Hulman. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Technical Communication across the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum at Rose-HulmanAbstractEngineering students can benefit from intentional development and reinforcement of technicalcommunication (TC) skills throughout their undergraduate studies. In this paper we will presenta flow chart that captures all TC instruction currently taking place in the mechanical engineering(ME) undergraduate curriculum at Rose-Hulman. This flow
civil engineering (some combined with related elements including aerospace,computing, and environmental, respectively), and 21 included chemical engineering.Table 1. Summary of Institutional Characteristics in Study % co- Institution # survey Control Basic IPUG Size Region curricular Pseudonym respondents
335 31.9 Male 709 67.6 Other 5 0.5Table 4. Self-Reported Student Majors Frequency Percent Aerospace Engineering 79 7.5 Agricultural and Biological 24 2.3 Engineering Bioengineering 66 6.3 Chemical and Biomolecular 3 0.3 Engineering Civil and Environmental 105 10.0 Engineering Computer Engineering 159 15.1 Computer Science 139 13.2 Electrical Engineering 127 12.1 Engineering Physics
students of unknown classyear (3%). Also, 15 participants majored in Civil Engineering (16%), 26 in ComputerScience/Engineering (27%), 11 in Environmental Engineering (11%), 16 in MechanicalEngineering (17%), 10 in Construction Engineering (10%), and 18 in “other” engineering field(including Aerospace, Biomedical, Electrical, Industrial and Systems Engineering) (19%). Thesample was 47 percent female, in part due to recruiting efforts to oversample for femaleengineering undergraduates. The majority of respondents were white (73%), and otherraces/ethnicities in the data included Asian (7%), Latinx/Hispanic (6%), and race/ethnicityunknown (7%). Seven reported having dual ethnicities (7%).Exploratory Factor AnalysisThe data for both engineering
theSchool of LA with a specialty in sociology; Larry Hickman, Director of the Center for DeweyStudies; Doug Acheson, a technology professor with expertise in manufacturing and design Page 24.516.6graphics; and Pete Hylton, an engineering professor with expertise in the fields of aerospace andmotorsports. This unique topic and diverse panel proved to be extremely popular as part of thefestival, with both students from the university and the public at-large attending in goodnumbers. The festival’s selection committee ranked the proposal as shown in Table 1. Afterevery session, the S&P supplies a survey for feedback from attendees. The audience
. ! !SECTION 1: YOUR CAREER GOALS1.! Rank the top 3 disciplines you are MOST likely to enter upon graduation: (Select one per column) Extremely likely (1) Somewhat (2) Maybe (3) Aerospace/Ocean/Astro Engineering O O O Agricultural/Biological/Biological Systems Engineering O O O Bioengineering/Biomedical Engineering O O O Civil Engineering (non-structural) O O O Chemical Engineering O O
Paper ID #10394A Math-Based System to Improve Engineering Writing OutcomesMr. Brad Jerald Henderson, University of California, Davis Brad Henderson is a faculty in writing for the University Writing Program (UWP) at University of Cali- fornia, Davis. Henderson holds a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Cal Poly State University San Luis Obispo and a Masters in Professional Writing (MPW) from University of Southern California. Currently focusing his career on engineering communication and professionalism, he has worked as a design engineer and technical education specialist for Parker-Hannifin Aerospace and Hewlett
5 Black or African American 2 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 1The yoga group attended 16 different institutions in 11 different states (16 in CA, 3 in NY, 2 inOH, 2 in TX, and 1 each in AZ, CO, FL, GA, KY, MA, and MI). Three of the 16 institutions wereprivate. The students were in 9 different engineering and computer science disciplines (8 in CS, 7in mechanical, 4 in civil, 4 in ECE, 2 in environmental, 2 in biomedical, and 1 each in aerospace,industrial and systems engineering, and mechatronics). There were no significant differencesbetween the yoga and non-yoga group in terms gender, race or ethnicity, or sexuality.Overall, there were 20 survey items for
sequence for the BIOE Department at the University of Washington. Taylor currently pursues educational research and continuous improvement activities, with the ultimate goal of optimizing bioengineering curriculum design and student learning outcomes.Dr. Stephanie Pulford, Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT) Dr. Stephanie Pulford is an instructional consultant within University of Washington’s Center for Engi- neering Teaching & Learning, where she coordinates the Engineering Writing & Communication Devel- opment Program. Dr. Pulford’s professional background in engineering includes a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering as well as
Paper ID #22743Reclaiming General Education: History for EngineersDr. Amber Genau, University of Alabama at Birmingham Dr. Amber Genau is an associate professor in the Materials Science and Engineering Department at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. She received her B.S. and M.S. from Iowa State University and Ph.D. from Northwestern University, all in materials engineering. Before coming to UAB, Dr. Genau spent two years as a guest scientist at the German Aerospace Center in Cologne, Germany, working on metal solidification and microstructural characterization. She is particularly interested in broadening
, participant demographics appear inTables 2-4. Table 2. Survey Participants’ Academic Major What is your academic major? Responses (%) Aerospace 3 Biological/biomedical 7 Chemical 17 Civil & environmental 12 Computer science 10 Electrical & computer 12 Industrial 8 Mechanical 25
Undergraduate Aerospace Engineering Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 255–262. 6. Sullivan, F., and R. Baren, 1997. “Simulating the Workplace in an Engineering Technology Course: A Rhetorical Model,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 279–284. 7. Sharp, J., et al., 1999. “Four Effective Writing Strategies for Engineering Classes,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 53–57. 8. Walker, Kristin, 2000. “Integrating Writing Instruction into Engineering Courses: A Writing Center Model Page 23.14.9 Department of Electrical and Computer
AC 2012-4268: UNDERSTANDING FACULTY AND STUDENT BELIEFSABOUT TEAMWORK AND COMMUNICATION SKILLSDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Holly Matusovich is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. Matusovich earned her doctoral degree in engineering education at Purdue University. She also has a B.S. in chemical engineering and an M.S. in materials science with a concentration in metallurgy. Additionally, Matuso- vich has four years of experience as a Consulting Engineer and seven years of industrial experience in a variety of technical roles related to metallurgy and quality systems for an aerospace supplier. Matuso- vich’s research interests include the role of motivation in learning
of engineering, thesocial and economic impact of engineering, and the global factors that complicate thatimpact. Areas of research such as transportation, food production, energy infrastructure,water supply, and waste disposal were at the top of the list of possible topics to havestudents investigate.Because the research project was the biggest component of the class, much of thecollaboration between Carvalho and Moore concerned that project. Professor Carvalhoresponded to initial requests from Moore for advice by suggesting first that students workin teams of three to five that contained a mix of students from different departments, suchas aerospace, mechanical, and electrical engineering, so that people in the groups wouldbring different