and co-moderated a Birds of a Feather session at SIGSCE 2022 virtually entitled: Mentoring a Women in Computing Club: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Dr. Villani presented a paper at ASEE 2022 in Minneapolis, MN entitled: Designed A (Re)Orientation Program for Women Computing Students at a Commuter College and Measuring its Effectiveness. Fall 2023 a paper entitled: An Early Measure of Women-Focused Initiatives in Gender-Imbalanced Computing programs were presented at CCSC Eastern Conference. Dr. Villani has been a Grace Hopper Scholarship reviewer, Dr. Villani was awarded the Chancellor’s Award for Teaching Excellence in 2013. Prior to joining FSC, Dr. Villani had a fifteen-year Computer Consulting Career in the
engineering would increase their interest in pursuing further education or a career inengineering after graduation. To test this, we added lectures, assignments, and active-learningmodules into required seminar courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels that explicitlydealt with gender inequalities and implicit bias in engineering. We hypothesized that theacknowledgement and open discussion of these issues for women would enhance their sense ofbelonging within biomedical engineering and increase their intention to persist in engineering.Additionally, we investigated whether a resource intensive small-group discussion enhanced theimpact of the educational modules.Methods In the fall semesters of 2021 and 2022, an anonymous survey was
professionals. She has a BA in Elementary Education from Johnson State College and believes that all youth should have access to high-quality and engaging afterschool programs. In 2014, Nicole was chosen as a Next Generation Leader by the National AfterSchool Association.Tracy L Truzansky ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Linking Engineering to Life: Expanding Gender Diversity in STEM Through an Afterschool ProgramBackgroundThe vitality and diversity of the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) workforceis a significant concern in the US, according to the 2022 US National Science and EngineeringIndicators, in part due to the “missing millions” of workers from
. Professor Villani presented a paper entitled, Solving the Gender Disparity Puzzle in Computing Disciplines at a Commuter State College at ISECON virtual conference in October 2021 and co-moderated a Birds of a Feather session at SIGSCE 2022 virtually entitled: Mentoring a Women in Computing Club: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Dr. Villani presented a paper at ASEE 2022 in Minneapolis, MN entitled: Designed A (Re)Orientation Program for Women Computing Students at a Commuter College and Measuring its Effectiveness. Fall 2023 a paper entitled: An Early Measure of Women-Focused Initiatives in Gender-Imbalanced Computing programs were presented at CCSC Eastern Conference. Dr. Villani has been a Grace Hopper Scholarship
faculty to mentors. There were also questions to identifywhether faculty value having mentors from outside their own institution, but from the CSUsystem, and whether they value having mentors of the same gender.4) Satisfaction with KIND speed mentoring events – The authors wanted to evaluate the level ofsatisfaction of the participants with the KIND speed mentoring events in order to improve futurementoring events. Therefore, this section asked participants to rate their level of satisfaction withtopics of the mentoring sessions and networking opportunities provided by these events. Thesurvey questions are listed in the Results and Discussions section.Results and Discussions:Three events were organized in Spring 2022, Summer 2022, and Fall 2022
fulfill basic general educationmath credits, making it a highly sought-after course.The traditional CS1 course at the school typically consists of four credits, with three hours oflectures led by a CS faculty member who meets twice a week and a one-hour separate labconducted by a graduate TA. The new format for CS1, utilizing a best practices approach, alsoconsists of four credits and meets twice a week. However, in this format, classroom meetinghours have doubled to three hours per session, with faculty and UTAs present. This adjustmentaims to provide additional teaching support for faculty and extra classroom time for students.UTAs started being used in Fall 2021, first in Programming 1 (CS1). By the next semester,Spring 2022, they were also
.” Accessed: Jun. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/Chapter16.pdf[9] A. Raborn and W. Leite, “ShortForm: Automatic Short Form Creation.” Dec. 13, 2023. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ShortForm/index.html[10] J. Meyer, “First Steps in Structural Equation Modeling: Confirmatory Factor Analysis,” The Analysis Factor. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.theanalysisfactor.com/structural- equation-modeling-first-step-confirmatory-factor-analysis-2/[11] S. Y. Yoon, Psychometric Properties of the Revised Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of Rotations (The Revised PSVT-R). ProQuest LLC, 2011.[12] K
of Biology and Materials in Chemical Engineering.Dr. Stephanie Butler Velegol, Pennsylvania State University Stephanie Butler Velegol is a Teaching Professor in Chemical Engineering at Penn State University. She pioneered the use of Flipped classes to increase active leaning in the classroom and works on water treatment. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Examining Gender Inclusivity through Sense of Belonging in a Summer Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Program at a Large Research UniversityAbstract This mixed-methods study describes the examination of women students’ sense ofbelonging in the Summer 2022 NSF-funded Research
department at the case University in November 2022, six teachers agreed to beinterviewed. Previous studies had used the interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)method to collect data from a small sample size (e.g., six interviewees in Wartenweiler’sstudy and Five interviewees in Wood et al.’s study [29][30][31]). The researcher decided todeploy the IPA method to work with the six female CS and engineering teachers. Duringinterviews, the questions were asked based on these guiding research questions: Whatperceived role and responsibilities do female faculty of computer science and engineeringhold? In what ways faculty’s gender identity influence their perceived roles andresponsibilities? How do they carry out their roles and responsibilities in
engineering programs worsefor women” which was developed as part of a master’s level creativity and innovation class for aresearch practitioner. The pilot was run with a small cohort of eight female engineering studentsfrom the local chapter of the Society for Women Engineers (SWE) during engineering week inMarch 2022. The 2-hour workshop employed three proven creativity techniques includingreverse brainstorming, a four-field matrix for evaluation, and enrichment tools for elaboration.The catchy title attracted a small outspoken group of participants that were able to create manynegative ideas, a good exercise in divergent thinking. Negative ideas are often easier to come upwith than solutions, as our analytical brains limit creative potential. The
one’s area of expertise, violating proper protocol in terms ofreport revisions and oversight, public safety, etc. To incorporate topics of harassment, equity, andbystanders into the study of Ethics and Professionalism, an additional module was created andimplemented in four sections of the Introduction to Engineering course (average section size of25 students) in the fall 2022 semester. The implementation of this additional module wasexecuted mid-semester to ensure some level of rapport had been established between the studentsthemselves and between the professor and students. Additionally, the faculty implementing theintervention maintained a journal to aid future adopters as they lead their own sections of first-year engineering students
Publishing, 2022).Ms. Shruti Misra, University of Washington I am a graduate student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. My research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. I am interesting in various ways that universitiesAlicia MullenProf. Eve A. Riskin P.E., University of Washington Eve Riskin received her BS degree in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and her graduate degrees in EE from Stanford. She was a professor in the ECE Department at the University of Washington for 32 years and is now Dean of Undergraduate Education at Stevens Institute of Technology.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a
teaching load. The M-CURE courses are opento all research students at the partner institution campus, but funding and programmatic support aredirected to BIPOC and women students.Building CommunityA few years ago some members of our team met at a conference focused on supporting underrepresentedstudents. We had a few conversations that identified possible ways to collaborate and our team started toform. In January 2022 we were funded with a pilot grant to explore a multiple-mentor model forbroadening participation using undergraduate research. Our team met bi-weekly to make progress on ourgoals, and to build community between our project team members.In a project focused on collaboration, we believe how our team tackled this project may be as
(inaugural), 2022, and 2023 (not included in this paper) as one-day events to engage women in a small community prior to the start of the academic year. These events offered opportunities for women computing students to engage in game-based teamwork, explore technical skills needed for their future courses, and attend panel discussions of role model women in the computing field including computing programs alumni [20-21]. 3) Field trips to women-centric conferences: Each spring the ACM-W Regional Celebration of Women conference is hosted in the state. Due to its proximity and affordable registration cost that included overnight accommodations, FSC was able
for women to upgrade their skills. Even incountries that improved their relevant indicators in recent years, still face hidden issues thatrequire careful consideration. Thus, this study was conducted to shed light on the influencesat the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and societal levels that are present as barriersto and facilitators for advancement in STEM studies and in particular engineering forfemales.The authors conducted 18 individual semi-structured in-depth interviews with femaleundergraduate students at a leading, English-language and American style research universityin Kazakhstan in 2022. Kazakhstan, being the leading country in Central Asia, representsinteresting case study as it has achieved gender parity in its
Advisor to the leadership at Sisters in STEM. Sreyoshi frequently collaborates on several National Science Foundation projects in the engineering education realm, researching engineering career trajectories, student motivation, and learning. Sreyoshi has been recognized as a Fellow at the Academy for Teaching Excellence at Virginia Tech (VTGrATE) and a Fellow at the Global Perspectives Program (GPP) and was inducted to the Yale Bouchet Honor Society during her time at Virginia Tech. She has also been honored as an Engaged Ad- vocate in 2022 and an Emerging Leader in Technology (New ELiTE) in 2021 by the Society of Women Engineers. Views expressed in this paper are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect those
years, there are many women who have experienced harassment and remarks frommale colleagues that degrade their worth as an engineer (Masta et al., 2022). Helping women to find andexpress their identity as an engineer can help them gain confidence to persist within their field. Consistentwith Godwin’s theory, women (and underrepresented individuals) need to perform, be interested andcompetent in the field, and be recognized as engineers to have a strong engineering identity. Within amale-dominated space, finding different avenues of identity to relate to engineering could help with thisrecognition.In particular, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Church of Jesus Christ) has a long historyof encouraging and supporting education
Intersectional Effects in the U.S.Engineering Workforce: Who Stays? Who Leaves?" International Journal of Gender,Science and Technology, vol. 11, no.1, pp. 181–202, 2019.[3] K. Doerr, C. Riegle-Crumb, T. Russo-Tait, K. Takasaki, S. Sassler and Y. Levitte,"Making Merit Work at the Entrance to the Engineering Workforce: Examining Women’sExperiences and Variations by Race/Ethnicity," Sex Roles, vol. 85, no.7, pp. 422–439, 2021,doi:10.1007/s11199-021-01233-6.[4] M. Nash and R. Moore, "In/visible: The intersectional experiences of women of color inscience, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine in Australia," Gender, Work &Organization, vol. n/a, 2022, doi:10.1111/gwao.12908.[5] M.L. Liani, I.K. Nyamongo and R. Tolhurst, "Understanding
. Traylor-Knowles, and M. Ziegler, "Rebuild the Academy: Supporting academic mothers during COVID-19 and beyond," PLoS biology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. e3001100-e3001100, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001100.[10] M. Harton, T. G. Kinzy, and A. Bear, "Monitoring and addressing the long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on women in academic science, engineering, and medicine," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, vol. 120, no. 19, pp. e2304603120-e2304603120, 2023, doi: 10.1073/PNAS.2304603120.[11] M. Karis, "An Overview of Barriers to Women in Engineering," Honors The University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis
pm, with a total attendanceof 67 female students ranging from 6th to 12th grade. The distribution of attendees by grade wasas follows: 13% 6th grade, 18% 7th grade, 19% 8th grade, 26% 9th grade, 11% 10th grade, 11%11th grade, and 2% 12th grade. Participation in our event is entirely voluntary for studentsenrolled in the RBTV program, as they select the STEM activities they wish to engage inthroughout the year. It is noteworthy that the number of attendees has significantly increasedsince last year; in 2022, only 38 students participated in the online workshop, compared to the 67attendees in 2023. The workshop began with a brief introduction, followed by a short physicalactivity session. Its primary focus was to offer female students an
impacted women students’ SoB and ASC.1. Introduction and BackgroundGender imbalance in computing programs is a persisting issue not only at Farmingdale StateCollege (FSC), but also at the national and international level. The authors have taken a multi-faceted approach to balance the gender gap by running multiple support programs at FSC moreconsistently since fall 2019 [1]. This paper focuses on the intervention of providing womenstudents with an opportunity to attend an overnight, women in computing conference. Preliminaryresults from the first in-person overnight mixed-gender field trip in spring 2022 were positive [2].This paper evaluates the impact of the second in-person overnight trip, that was limited to womenonly in spring 2023.Enrollment
profession with men in large majority, has been socially constructed. For example,the works of Wendy Faulkner and Teresa Cardador have, respectively, revealed the way “genderin/authenticity” between person and norms affect who finds identification and belonging inengineering, and offered the “inverted role hierarchy” as a framework to explain why womenadvancing into management roles often lose occupational status and their sense of engineeringidentity as they move away from the “technicist”-centric variety of work (i.e., masculine-leaningconception of engineering).Using data from a 2022 survey with responses from 982 engineering graduates across Canada,and building on our previous qualitative work identifying five distinct engineering career
areincluded and future work is proposed.II. MethodologyA. ParticipantsThis present study administered a validated survey on a sense of belonging. The instrument wasapplied at the end of the second semester in 2022 to undergraduate students enrolled in variouscourses at the School of Engineering of a private Chilean university. From a universe of 2428students, 369 voluntary responses were received, of which 328 responses were declared valid.As researchers we acknowledge that gender is a non-binary construct, however the data reportedcomes in binary terms, as less than 1% of responses originates from students who did notidentify as male or female. Therefore, from the 328 responses, 10.4% came from femalestudents and 89.6% from male students. The sample
bachelor’s degrees, we began conducting exit interviews with students inMay 2022, when the 2018 cohort began to graduate (10 students interviewed). These exitinterviews were repeated with the 2019 cohort in May 2023 (5 students interviewed).Each interview was conducted and recorded via Zoom by a member of our research team andlasted from 30-45 minutes. Students volunteered to participate and provided consent, includingpermission to record the interview. Questions asked during these interviews were designed toelicit students’ reflections on any long-term benefits they received from participating in RAMP,suggestions for continuing the program to the academic year, and plans for after graduation.Opportunity for students to ask their own questions and
womxn graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in STEMand motivates future research in womxn engineering faculties’ experiences of gender equity andthe role the dominant cultures of engineering play in increasing the participation of diverse andmarginalized womxn in STEM.BackgroundAs discussed, the perspectives of current graduate students and postdoctoral researchers are notoften brought forward at conferences and in the literature. So in spring 2022, the ASEE Womenin Engineering Division (WIED) sent out a call for applications for graduate students andpostdoctoral researchers who would be willing to participate on a panel at an upcoming ASEEmeeting to discuss their perspectives of the future of womxn in engineering, coordinated by
belonging; women in constructionIntroductionLatest figures from the National Employment Survey conducted by the Chilean NationalStatistics Institute [1] show that female participation in the labor market in the quarter fromNovember 2021 to January 2022 was 48.3%. This contrasts with particular economic sectors thathave been traditionally male-dominated, such as construction, in which female participation in2021 was a mere 9.6%. Other parts of the world report similar statistics, for example, womenaccount for just 9.9% of the construction labor force in the United States [2]. Similarly, Regis etal. [3] state that this figure exceeds no more than 10% in Brazil. A salient fact is that women'sparticipation in the labor force is at office and sales
, specifically the SDG 5, which aims to achieve equal rights and opportunities for womenand girls.As mentioned earlier, the low representation of women in engineering remains a concern, as theirparticipation in STEM fields (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) hoversaround 20%. This figure is even lower in specific engineering specialties, as reported by Zapataand Truyol (2022) [6]. According to the 2019 European Union report "She Figures”, only 15% ofwomen in STEM occupy high-ranking positions, compared to 22% of those present in highereducation [7]. This leads to an unequal representation of genders in a highly relevant space, asare Universities, where the education of future professionals takes place.A 2005 study conducted a
in thecollege. Through this work, GradWIE seeks to continue supporting graduate students byinvolving them directly in group and event development, providing a potential example for otheruniversities.IntroductionWe formed the student organization “Graduate Women in Engineering (GradWIE)” at PennState in 2022 as graduate students in the College of Engineering. GradWIE welcomes people ofall gender identities to support the personal and professional wellbeing of graduate studentsthrough peer support, the creation of safe spaces, social events, and diverse resources. We choseto focus on women because they are a minority within the College of Engineering at Penn State,as reflected in the enrollment numbers of women from 2017 to 2021 seen in Table
from Industry and Academia.” Int. J. Engng. Ed. Vol 26, No. 3: 727-734.Meiksin, Peter, Claudia Vanessa Garcia, Natali Huggins. Maya Menon, and Olivia Ryan (2024).“Women in Engineering: A Review of the 2022.” SWE: Magazine of the Society of WomenEngineers Vol. 70, No. 1. https://magazine.swe.org/lit-review-23/.Patrick, Anita, Catherine Riegle-Crumb, and Maura Borrego (2021). “Examining the GenderGap in Engineering Professional Identification.” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng. Vol. 12, No. 1: 31-55. doi: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2020030909.Silbey, Susan S. (2016) “Why Do So Many Women Who Study Engineering Leave the Field?”Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/08/why-do-so-many-women-who-study-engineering-leave-the-field?r.Wang, Ming-Te and