theArtificial Intelligence (AI) workforce in this two-year impact study from Fall 2022 to Fall 2024.Thus, our findings are relevant for optimizing pre-college to college education pipelines to meetworkforce needs in engineering, AI, and the Computer Science (CS) industry.To study the impact of the pre-college AI education program on student progression, we conductedfocus group interviews in Fall 2024, two years after the pre-college program. With thematic analy-sis, we quantify student and program outcomes by synthesizing four themes: social and emotionallearning, self-efficacy, career readiness, and program impact. To formally validate human thematicanalysis, we ask: (RQ1) What methods can validate heuristic thematic analysis for reliable studyof
engineering senior capstone design projects and teaches senior design lectures and studios. Her research interests include engineering education and engineering design methodology.Dr. Carlos R. Corleto P.E., Texas A&M University BS, MS, PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University. Experience includes 20 years in industry as a lab director, technical manager and engineering advisor, 8 years of academic experience at the assistant and tenured associate professor level, 4.5 years as a professor of practice, Undergraduate Program Director of the J. M. Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering since June 2022, and active industry consultant. Author and contributing author of 10 patents and multiple
?’: Women graduate students & faculty in science & engineering speak out,” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, 2019.[18] I. V. Villanueva Alarcón, “Ethical practices and tips for improving engineering faculty-student research relationships,” in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2022, pp. 1-8.[19] I. Villanueva, M. Di Stefano, L. Gelles, P. V. Osoria, and S. Benson, “A race re-imaged, intersectional approach to academic mentoring: Exploring the perspectives and responses of womxn in science and engineering research,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 59, p. 101786, 2019.[20] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
abilities, representational competence, and conceptual knowledge in statics," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Jul. 2021.[18] E. Davishahl, R. Pearce, T. R. Haskell, and K. J. Clarks, "Statics modeling kit: Hands-on learning in the flipped classroom," presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[19] E. Davishahl, L. Singleton, T. R. Haskell, and K. M. Rupe, "Hands-on statics to improve conceptual understanding and representational competence," presented at the 129th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2022.[20] E. Davishahl, A. Zhang, J. Chen, and K. M. Rupe, "Can hands-on statics improve
models germane to students living in fragile communities. Since that time, additional grants have been secured in 2022 to sustain the Center’s efforts from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in partnership with the Georgia Department of Community Affairs for the HUD Housing and Financial Literacy Grant; the National Science Foundation (NSF)-Racial Equity in STEM for the project ’Understanding Persistence through the Lens of Interruption: A Framework for Transformation (UPLIFT)’; and a mini-grant from the Southeast Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) Business Growth Hub, Accelerate Your Program to launch ”Think Like a GirlPreneur” for the ASU campus and community. She formerly served as
effectiveness.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis work was supported by the Spring 2022 Course Gamification Cohort Program Grant ofPurdue University Fort Wayne. The author would like to thank Dr. Katie Jia for her help and allformer students in my Analog Signal Processing classes, who provided positive feedback whenthey used these methods in their studies.REFERENCES[1] M. Ainley, “Connecting with Learning: Motivation, Affect and Cognition in Interest Processes.” Educational psychology review 18.4 (2006): 391–405.[2] J. Johns, A. Hayes, L. Grant, D. Caldwell, “Classroom Gamification: Merging Game Design Theory and Behavior Analysis for Increased Engagement” International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies, 2018, Las Vegas, NV https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3
] * Adaptive Concept Inventory in Introductory ACIIEC Espera & Pitterson 2020 Electric Circuits [17] Electric Circuit Concept Diagnostic ECCD Hunsu et al. [18] 2022 *Note. The acronyms were given by the authors of this paper and not by the developer of theconcept inventories.B. Six Concept Inventories Reviewed for This StudyTo obtain copies of the concept inventories listed in Table 1, we either contacted the authors ofthe concept inventories or collected them from PhysPort (https://www.physport.org/). As aresult, we were only able to acquire six concept inventories for this study. The other five conceptinventories were not used in this study because either
, NC, June 20-23, 1999.[7] S.W. St. Clair and N.C. Baker “Pedagogy and Technology in Statics,” Session 2793, ASEENational Annual Conference, Nashville, TN, June 22-25, 2003.[8] A. Nagchaudhuri and R.N. Sharma, “Software Simulations and Project Based ActiveLearning to Engage Students in an Introductory Statics Course,” ASEE National AnnualConference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013. 7[9] G. Glaudette and S. Wadin-Schwartz “Flying Forces: Adding Lift to Statics,” General Card#2270, 2022 [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/2270. [Accessed Dec.14, 2025].[10] S. Zappe, R Leicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger, and H. Woo Lee, “Flipping” the classroom toexplore active learning in a large
employers are looking for on graduates’ resumes," NationalAssociation of Colleges and Employers (NACE), Jan. 16, 2024. [Online].[3] J. L. Graves Jr., M. Kearney, G. Barabino, and S. Malcom, "Inequality in science and the casefor a new agenda," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119, no. 10, articlee2117831119, 2022.[4] V. Tiberius, "In defense of reflection," Philosophical Issues, vol. 23, pp. 223-243, 2013.[5] B. Jacoby, Service-Learning Essentials: Questions, Answers, and Lessons Learned. SanFrancisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.[6] B. Brown, Dare to Lead: Brave Work, Tough Conversations, Whole Hearts. New York:Random House, 2018.[7] R. Jarvis, K. Dempsey, G. Gutierrez, D. Lewis, K. Rouleau, and B. J. Stone, Peer
, J.-M. Heo, and K.-J. Cho, “High–load capacity origami transformable wheel,” Science Robotics, vol. 6, no. 53, p. eabe0201, 2021.[12] J. Kaufmann, P. Bhovad, and S. Li, “Harnessing the multistability of kresling origami for reconfigurable articulation in soft robotic arms,” Soft Robotics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 212–223, 2022, pMID: 33769099.[13] C. Liu, S. J. Wohlever, M. B. Ou, T. Padir, and S. M. Felton, “Shake and take: Fast transformation of an origami gripper,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 491–506, 2022.[14] A. M. Hoover, E. Steltz, and R. S. Fearing, “Roach: An autonomous 2.4 g crawling hexapod robot,” in 2008 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, 2008, pp. 26–33
— supported graduate engineering and computerscience students through financial assistance, mentorship, and professional development. A keyproject goal was to establish a graduate student association to sustain the student communitypost-funding. As of Fall 2022, retention for Cohort 3 (Fall 2021 entrants) reached 83%.Graduation rates by the fourth year were 100% for Cohort 1 (Fall 2019 entrants) and 86% forCohort 2 (Fall 2020 entrants). These outcomes are comparable to the institutionally reported fall-to-fall retention rate of 86% for master’s students, excluding those who had already completedthe program. Despite recruitment challenges, pandemic impacts, and post-grant sustainabilityconcerns, the project successfully cultivated a supportive
. Interestingly, the observed gains in students’ signaldetective skills were accompanied by a perceived reduction in mathematical rigor—an outcomewe did not initially anticipate. In future implementations, we will explore strategies to integratemore mathematical depth while preserving the benefits of the approach. IRB Statement on Data UsageThe data utilized in this study was anonymized and aggregated and was deemed as “exempt” byour university’s IRB committee. References[1] Fayyaz, F. “Work-in-Progress: Problems in Learning Related to Mathematical and GraphicalRepresentations of Signals.” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.2022.[2] Feldman, U., Ricco, G
Taskforces Concerning Critical Issues in US Undergraduate Education in the Sciences, Mathematics and Engineering (no. 3). National Science Foundation, 1989.[2] Y. Jia, T. Wang, C. Chen, and Y.-F. Jin, "Board 410: Tracing the Evolution of NSF REU Research Priorities and Trends," in 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2024.[3] L. Martin-Hansen, "Examining ways to meaningfully support students in STEM," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 53, 2018.[4] Y. Jin, C. Qian, and S. Ahmed, "Closing the Loop: A 10-year Follow-up Survey for Evaluation of an NSF REU Site," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41048
Outcomes of an International Research Collaboration between US and Germany: Developing Students as Global Engineers," ASEE Annual Conf. & Expo, Baltimore, MD, 2023. doi: 10.18260/1- 2--42353[4] C. Brathwaite, "International Research for Undergraduate Students in Cali and Caragena Colombia, 2009 to 2019," ASEE Annual Conf. & Expo, Portland, OR, 2024. doi: 10.18260/1-2--46396[5] National Science Board, National Science Foundation, "The STEM Labor Force of Today: Scientists, Engineers and Skilled Technical Workers," Science and Engineering Indicators 2022. NSB-2021-2. Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20212.[6] G. Chen, W.J. Starosta, "The Development and
curriculum). These items will be compared against ABET criteria. This isan observational study. The University of Miami IRB has determined that this study is exemptfrom review.Appendix A: Summary of Concentrations Available at Other UniversitiesComparisons based on data available on the internet in Fall 2022 Table 1. Universities with no specific requirements for electives beyond core curriculum University Concentrations Boston Offers plain BME degree with 8 elective courses University* Electives divided into “BME electives”, “Engineering electives”, “Professional electives”, and “Design electives” Georgia Tech Core curriculum with 4 BME “depth” electives; any courses on the
Student Success and Retention,” The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 10–20, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1080/07377363.2011.544977.[15] A. McDaniel, L. R. Halper, M. Van Jura, B. Fines, and M. S. Whittington, “Increasing Student Retention Rates Through Engagement in a Comprehensive Second-Year Program,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, p. 15210251221084622, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1177/15210251221084622.[16] A. McCourt and C. Carr, “Improving Student Engagement and Retention Through Small Group Tutorials,” Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 61–77, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.11120/ital.2010.09010061.[17] G. Crosling, M
Models in Engineering Design: A Review,” Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 144, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053859[4] H. A. Simon, “The structure of ill structured problems,” Artificial Intelligence, 4(3-4), 181- 201, 1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8[5] M. L. Maher, and J. Poon, “Modeling design exploration as co‐evolution,” Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(3), 195-209, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.1996.tb00323.x[6] B. Lawson, How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Architectural Press, 1997.[7] J. S. Gero and J. Milovanovic, “A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains
Education in Advanced Transportation Engineering Systems (CREATEs) atRowan University.REFERENCES[1] Franzwa, Christopher & Tang, Ying & Johnson, Aaron & Bielefeldt, Talbot. (2014). Balancing Fun and Learning in a Serious Game Design. International Journal of Game-Based Learning. 4. 37-57. 10.4018/ijgbl.2014100103.[2] Hare, Ryan & Tang, Ying. (2022). Player Modeling and Adaptation Methods Within Adaptive Serious Games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems. PP. 1-12. 10.1109/TCSS.2022.3203926.[3] Cui, L., Zhu, C., Hare, R. et al. MetaEdu: a new framework for future education. Discov Artif Intell 3, 10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-023- 00053-9[4] Cai, W., Huang, C., Zhu, C
." In Artificial Intelligence for Communications and Networks: Second EAI International Conference, AICON 2020, Virtual Event, December 19-20, 2020, Proceedings 2, pp. 326-339. Springer International Publishing, 2021.15. Holmes, Wayne, and Ilkka Tuomi. "State of the art and practice in AI in education." European Journal of Education 57, no. 4 (2022): 542-570.16. Tekes, A. (2024). Ayse-Tekes-Kennesaw-state-university. GitHub. https://github.com/Ayse- Tekes-Kennesaw-State-University17. MathWorks. (2024). Translational and Rotational Vibrations Virtual Lab. Translational and Rotational Vibrations Virtual Lab - File Exchange - MATLAB Central. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/111285-translational-and
team’sscore for Outcome 3. For example, a team of only PDM majors would obviously only contributeto the PDM program score. Similarly, a team of two EE, two ME and one PDM would have ascore of 2, 2, and 1 respectively for their programs. This is expressed as mathematical formula inEquation 1. Program Score = (1)where 𝑛 = number of teams, 𝑆 = score for the ith team, and 𝑘 = number of students in thatprogram on the ith team.ResultsThis section presents the results of a recent assessment performed on the capstone project sequenceat GVSU in 2022. There were 117 students who enrolled in the capstone courses
-track day are full of student focused activities, topics and needs madeavailable to all students, both locally and abroad. In fact, each session of the student-track dayinvolved participatory student input throughout the planning process. Some of the topicsdiscussed in the 2022 student-track conference proceedings were a sense of belonging; studentsmental health; full disclosure: speaking your truth student panel; inclusive student leadership andresilience. The student day provided students a platform to discuss equity and inclusion issuesthat impact them every day and develop and/or increase their skills related to equity andinclusion contexts. The day also helped them increase their awareness, recognize the benefits ofa diverse organization
Successful Joint Venture for International Engineering Education,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017. [Online]. Available: peer.asee.org[11] M. McInerney, A. Siahmakoun, and W. Joo, “International Collaborative dual MS degree program,” presented at the 2017 ASEE International Forum, Jun. 2017. [Online]. Available: peer.asee.org[12] Z. Balogh, R. Pozzi, J. Balogh, P. Ivanyi, and R. M. Gutkowski, “Enhancing Specialized Course Offerings,” presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2011, p. 22.620.1-22.620.9. [Online]. Available: peer.asee.org[13] World Green Building Council, “Annual Report 2022,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://worldgbc.org/our-annual-reports/[14
, "Modeling of student academic achievement in engineering education using cognitive and non-cognitive factors," Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 178-198, 2019.[4] D. Visco, N. Makki, E. Stevic, J. Phillips, E. Bonnema, D. Dunn and L. Carey, "Zip to Industry: A First-Year Corporate-STEM Connection Program," in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, 2022.[5] A. Van Wart, T. C. O'Brien, S. Varvayanis, J. Alder, J. Greenier and R. L. Layton, "Applying Experiential Learning to Career Development Training for Biomedical Graduate Students and Postdocs: Perspectives on Program Development and Design," CBE- Life Sciences Education, vol. 19, no. 3, 2020.[6] M. Moriarty, S
, MN, 2022. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41931[8] J. Brobst, E. Litzler, S. Alqudah, R. Barber, J. Davishahl, P. Fizzano, D. Hartenstine, and A. Klein, “Developing sense of belonging in isolation: insights from two projects supporting STEM undergraduates. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.3102/1885686[9] G. Trujillo and K. D. Tanner, “Considering the role of affect in learning: Monitoring students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity,” CBE-Life Sciences Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 6–15, 2014. Available: https://doi.org/10.1187%2Fcbe.13- 12-0241[10] R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown, and G. Hackett, G
Project Lead the Way (Research report)*Texas Education Agency. (2022, March 1). Career and Technology Education Allotment. Texas Education Agency. Retrieved from https://tea.texas.gov/finance-and-grants/state- funding/additional-finance-resources/career-and-technology-education-allotment*Texas Education Agency. (2022, June 3). House Bill 3. Texas Education Agency. Retrieved from https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/government-relations-and-legal/government-relations/house-bill-3Texas High School Project. (2010). Texas science technology engineering and mathematics academies design blueprint, rubric, and glossary. Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.Texas Education Agency. (2018). Texas science, technology, engineering
Paper ID #38433Research Experiences for Teachers in Simulation andVisualization for Innovative Industrial SolutionsJohn MorelandTyamo OkosunArmin Silaen (Associate Research Professor)Kyle Alexander Toth (Associate Research Engineer) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Research Experiences for Teachers in Simulation and Visualization for Innovative Industrial SolutionsAbstractAn NSF Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) Site has been established at PurdueUniversity Northwest to involved high school teachers and community college instructors inindustrial
- SEBoK.” https://sebokwiki.org/wiki/Stakeholder_Needs_Definition (accessed Feb. 01, 2023).[7] “System Lifecycle Process Models: Vee - SEBoK.” https://sebokwiki.org/wiki/System_Lifecycle_Process_Models:_Vee (accessed Feb. 01, 2023).[8] B Boehm, “A spiral model of software development and enhancement,” ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng., 1986, Accessed: Feb. 01, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/12944.12948.[9] K. Rosinsky et al., “A review of human-centered design in human services,” 2022, Accessed: Feb. 08, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/OPRE-HCD-State-of- Field.pdf.[10] A. Goncher, J. Mendoza -Garcia, and M. Li, “WIP: Assessing
, “Integrating the entrepreneurial mindset into the engineering classroom,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 150–155, 2021.[8] M. Nezafati, S. Schley, and J. M. Le Doux, “Responsible innovation in biomedical engineering: a value sensitive design intervention,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2022. doi: 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962507.[9] A. L. Zydney, J. S. Bennett, A. Shahid, and K. Bauer, “Faculty perspectives regarding the undergraduate research experience in science and engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 291–297, 2002.[10] A. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour, “Becoming a
graduating from the United States Military Academy, West Point and identified theHallmarks of a West Pointer: intelligence, tolerance, balance, and courage. Taking a cue fromMacArthur’s comments and careful study, this article proposes the hallmarks of an engineer tobe phronesis, justice, fortitude, and honesty. These four virtues are selected for their worth inguiding the engineer. It is hoped that this article provides context and additional relevance forguiding the engineer profession in selecting these hallmarks or starting the dialog to embracethem partially and select more applicable virtues.References[1] J. Lucas, "What is Engineering?," 28 February 2022, [Online], Available:https://www.livescience.com/47499-what-is-engineering.html