Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to AcademicAchievement? Two Meta-Analyses.” Psychological Science, Volume 29, Issue 4, April 2018,Pages 549-571[9] Tetley, J., Holaway, C., McCaig, K., & Scharff, L. (October 2021). “Student MindsetQuestionnaire: A Validation Study”. Poster presented at the Virtual Annual Conference on theTeaching of Psychology.[10] Tetley, J., Scharff, L., Holaway, C., & McCaig, K. (February 2022). “Understanding andMeasuring Instructor Mindset Interventions”. Talk presented at the SoTL Commons Conference,GA.[11] Canning, Elizabeth A., Katherine Muenks, Dorainne J. Green, and Mary C. Murphy."STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire lessstudent motivation
skills while applying these transferable skills in their classrooms andfuture careers.To assist engineering GTAs in honing their teaching skills, the research team developed agraduate teaching and leadership course. In Spring 2022, the Technological, Pedagogical, andContent Knowledge (TPACK) survey was used to assess the impact of the course on the GTAs’TPACK. Although it was found that the course positively impacted the GTAs’ TPACK, the teamdid not assess the impact of each of the course’s modules on the GTAs’ learning. This follow-upstudy addresses the critical need for effective pedagogical development among engineeringGTAs, focusing on the assessment of Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) and Pedagogical ContentKnowledge (PCK). Recognizing the gap in
. Litzler, and A.L. Swan, “FacultyDevelopment for Academic Change in the National Science Foundation RevolutionizingEngineering Departments (NSF RED) Context,” in S.M. Linder, C.M. Lee, S.K. Stefl, andK.A. High, K.A. (Eds.), Handbook of STEM Faculty Development, Information AgePublishing, 2022, https://www.infoagepub.com/products/Handbook-of-STEM-Faculty-Development[7] L.B. Cavagnaro, and H. Fasihuddin, “A moonshot approach to change in higher education:creativity, innovation, and the redesign of academia,” Liberal Education, 102(2), 2016,https://www.aacu.org/liberaleducation/2016/spring/cavagnaro.[8] L. Baer, A. Hill Duin, and D. Bushway, “Change agent leadership,” Planning for HigherEducation Journal, 43(3), 1-11, 2015.[9] J. Battilana and T
, 2016.[6] M. Caplan and E. Oropeza, "The STEAM Conference: An Event to Promote Youth to Explore STEAM related Fields and Potential Careers," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[7] J. Klar, "Mentoring Teachers in STEAM Improves Likelihood of Application," 2018.[8] D. Rufo, "STEAM with a capital A: Learning frenzy," The STEAM Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 25, 2013.[9] G. Šmitienė and K. Kesylė, "Opportunities for the use of STEAM projects in primary years classes: the points of view of international baccalaureate teachers," Regional formation and development studies: journal of social sciences, vol. 2, pp. 198-205, 2022.[10] Niche.com Inc., "Niche," 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.niche.com/?ref
was an NSF ATE Mentor Connect Mentor Fellow in 2022. She is an Emeritus Professor of Engineering and Physics at Bucks County Community College where she was the Principal Investigator of two NSF Advanced Technological Education (ATE) grants, focusing on workforce readiness, and creating pathways from non-credit into credit programs. She also taught at The College of New Jersey (TCNJ) in the School of Engineering for 15 years. With funding from these ATE grants she created two technician education programs, and enhanced the engineering major at her community college. Dr. Delahanty established technical, college level, programs of study for modernized classroom and laboratory including six online course platforms
Science Foundation’s Advanced TechnologyEducation Program (Award no. 2202201). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] McKinsey and Company Article (2022) “What are Industry 4.0, the Fourth IndustrialRevolution, and 4IR?”, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-are-industry-4-0-the-fourth-industrial-revolution-and-4ir.[2] McKinsey Global Institute report “Industry 4.0: How to navigate the digitaltransformation of manufacturing", published in January 2018.https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Operations/Our%20Insights/Industry%2040
was chosen to represent three cohortsof students transferring before the change in articulation agreement (n= 267, Academic years2016/2017, 2017/2018, 2018/2019) as well as three cohorts of students that transferred after thechange in articulation agreement (n= 186, Academic years 2019/2020, 2020/2021, 2021/2022).This allowed for the comparison of student’s course-taking patterns and degree completionbefore and after the change in articulation agreement.MeasuresTo be able to investigate the differences in students’ course-taking patterns and degreecompletion before and after the change in articulation agreement, changes in the articulationagreement were identified in a first step.Articulation agreement for mechanical engineering major. The
therelative magnitude of force vectors and their directions. Both problems were presented as multiple-choicequestions with follow-ups asking students to explain their reasoning.The control group (N = 59, Fall 2021-2022) consisted of students who were never required to draw vectorpolygons in Statics. The experimental group (N = 45, Fall 2023) took Statics with the same instructor and,in addition to being exposed to the same content and expectations, was required to draw vector polygonsin Statics tests. The intervention consisted of a 20-minute-long workshop during the first week of classesfocused on drawing force polygons to scale. In this workshop, one step-by-step example was presented toand discussed with the students. Then, students were invited
: 10.1177/105065190001400101.[2] C. D. Grant and B. R. Dickson, "Personal Skills in Chemical Engineering Graduates: The Development of Skills Within Degree Programmes to Meet the Needs of Employers," Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23-29, 2006/01/01/ 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1205/ece.05004.[3] M. C. Paretti, L. D. McNair, and J. A. Leydens, "Engineering Communication," in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 601-632.[4] S. Sahudin, "Literature Review on the Factors Affecting Employability of Engineering Graduates," ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13-22, 2022
-based programming environments with bayesian hierarchical models,” in Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 62–70, 2020. [6] R. C. Thomas, A. Karahasanovic, and G. E. Kennedy, “An investigation into keystroke latency metrics as an indicator of programming performance,” in Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on computing education, vol. 42, pp. 127–134, 2005. [7] R. Conijn, C. Cook, M. van Zaanen, and L. Van Waes, “Early prediction of writing quality using keystroke logging,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 835–866, 2022. [8] K. Longi, J. Leinonen, H. Nygren, J. Salmi, A. Klami, and A. Vihavainen
an environment external to the Athens campus,including established external education campuses.” Hence, a proposal to offer an externaldegree was prepared to allow the School of Chemical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering tooffer the MBB degree at the BUCT campus in Beijing, China. The Board of Regents approvedthe external degree proposal in November 2021.Finally, a Substantive Change Prospectus was required by our institutional accreditor, theSouthern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC), to allowus to establish an Off-campus Instructional Site and enter into a Cooperative AcademicArrangement with Non-Title IV Entities. SACSCOC approved UGA’s substantive change for theBUCT instructional site in June 2022
Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Jun. 2009. doi:10.18260/1-2--5604 [5] E. Cuddihy, S. Lappenbusch, and J. Turns, “Helping students navigate the PhD experience: A PhD seminar model used at the University of Washington,” 2005 Annual Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2005. doi:10.18260/1-2--14764 [6] E. Zerbe, G. Sallai, and C. G. Berdanier, “Surviving, thriving, departing, and the hidden competencies of Engineering Graduate School,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 147–169, Dec. 2022. doi:10.1002/jee.20498
/15283488.2014.989442.[20] D. Hiramori, E. Knaphus-Soran, and E. Litzler, “Critically quantitative: measuring community cultural wealth on surveys,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.18260/1-2--36880.[21] W. Castillo and D. Gilborn, “How to ‘QuantCrit:’ Practices and Questions for Education Data Researchers and Users,” EdWorkingPapers.com, 2022, doi: 10.26300/v5kh-dd65.[22] D. Gillborn, P. Warmington, and S. Demack, “QuantCrit: education, policy, ‘Big Data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics,” Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–22, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417.[23] C. Priddie and R. Renbarger, “Connecting
Data Visualization Activity Worksheets in the Context of aCritical Data Visualization Workshop: Findings from a Usability Survey. ASEE 2020, July 22-26,Virtual Conference.[7] Vetria L. Byrd. Innovative Pedagogy for Teaching and Learning Data Visualization. ASEE2021, July 26-29, Virtual Conference.[8] Bertin and Berg, Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. ESRI Press, 2011.[9] Gestalt psychology, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_psychology[10] Hans Rosling, https://www.ted.com/speakers/hans_rosling[11] McFarland, Joe. “When Art and Engineering Collide.” UToday News, 11 Jan. 2022,ucalgary.ca/news/when-art-and-engineering-collide[12] Lobos, A. Babbott, C. Integrating Emotional Attachment and Sustainability in ElectronicProduct
2022, when road trucks transported 72.6% of U.S.freight tonnage, worth about half of the nation’s GDP. The American Trucking Associationpredicts that freight costs will increase 50% from 2021 levels by 2032 [2]. Yet, the sectorremains the least automated and most labor-intensive transportation mode, causing high fatalitiesand pollution. Medium-duty and heavy-duty vehicles consume over 20% of energy and create23% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transportation [3, 4]. Trucking caused 20% ofworkplace deaths in 2019 more any other industry [5]. Besides having the 7th highest fatalityrate, long-haul drivers also suffer other work-related illnesses [6]. Pressure on human drivers andmanagers due to modern e-commerce and fast deliveries can
: https://peer.asee.org/nontraditional-student-access-and-success-in-engineering [9] A. McCourt and C. Carr, “Improving Student Engagement and Retention Through Small Group Tutorials,” Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 61–77, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.11120/ital.2010.09010061.[10] A. McDaniel, L. R. Halper, M. Van Jura, B. Fines, and M. S. Whittington, “Increasing Student Retention Rates Through Engagement in a Comprehensive Second-Year Program,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, p. 15210251221084622, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1177/15210251221084622.[11] K. S. Priode, R. B. Dail, and M. Swanson, “Nonacademic Factors That Influence
programs play in theparticipants’ success as it prepares them for further educational and professional pursuits [7]. References[1] B. Dewsbury and C. J. Brame, “Inclusive Teaching,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 18, no. 2, Jun. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-01-0021.[2] C. Harrison and K. D. Tanner, “Language Matters: Considering Microaggressions in Science,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 17, no. 1, p. fe4, Mar. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-01-0011.[3] S. Reardon, “The Widening Income Achievement Gap,” The Widening Income Achievement Gap,” vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 10–16, 2013, Available: https://stonecenter.gc.cuny.edu/files/2022/09/Conwell-2.pdf
experience on students’ efficacy beliefs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 177–190, 2008.[6] M. Meyer and S. Marx, “Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering,” Journal of engineering education, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 525–548, 2014.[7] E. R. Kahu, N. Ashley, and C. Picton, “Exploring the complexity of first-year student belonging in higher education: Familiarity, interpersonal, and academic belonging,” Student Success, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 10–20, 2022.[8] L. J. Sax, J. M. Blaney, K. J. Lehman, S. L. Rodriguez, K. L. George, and C. Zavala, “Sense of belonging in computing: The role of introductory courses for women and underrepresented minority students,” Social
problem-solving skills.ParticipantsThe data for this study was collected as part of the engineering design course evaluation.Students participated voluntarily, without any financial incentive. The data was collected for theacademic year 2022 at the end of spring semester through an online Qualtrics survey. Of the 110students who received the survey, only 90 completed it (N=90). Most students were male (78%),white (68%), and non-Hispanic (92%). Among non-white students, 12% identified as Asians,11% as Blacks/African Americans, 2% as multiracial and 7% as others. The sample contained21% female students. Most students came from traditional academic pathways, coming directlyfrom high school to college without delay (97%). 10% of students in the
intrinsic and extrinsic motivation [14].When students engage in project-based learning, their need for autonomy can be met as theyactively engage in tasks that promote learning, develop their cognitive capabilities, fostercollaboration amongst peers, and when they receive the right scaffolding from faculty [15].This paper directly builds on a study carried out with the students of Ashesi University whoparticipated in a first-year design-oriented course in 2022 [7]. That study commenced anexploration of the three constructs brought into view – self-efficacy, self-determination andagency, and it revealed the need for relying more on existing validated surveys. Here, a revisedset of scales is used to explore the relevance of these constructs through a
.2019.2909857.[3] A. Godwin, P. Geoff, Z. Hazari, and R. Lock, “Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 312–340, 2016.[4] K. Doran and J. Swenson, “‘Do I Belong Here?’: Persistence and Retention Implications of Engineering Belongingness and Identity in Academically At-Risk Populations,” IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962536.[5] J. M. Melo, B. Benedict, R. Clements, H. Perkins, A. Godwin, “See Me as an Engineer: Understanding the Role of Language and Multiple Role Identities on Engineering Students’ Identity Trajectory,” IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference
., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.[7] M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 93, pp. 223–231, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.[8] M. Groover, “Fundamentals in Modern Manufacturing : Material, Processes, and Systems /M.P. Groover.,” Jan. 2013.[9] Russell C. Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials. Pearson, 2022.[10] Russell C. Hibbeler, Engineering Mechanics: Statics, 15th edition. 2021.[11] David Joyner, Introduction to Computing, 1st ed. McGraw-Hill Education LLC, 2016.[12] E. Hamilton, R. Lesh
projects. This framework will appeal toyounger generations and help transform the learning of construction topics more effectively. Thedocumented results of the evaluation from this project will provide a clear guideline to easilytransfer and replicate the proposed approach to other programs at other institutions.References[1] BLS (2020). Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Construction Managers, https://www.bls.gov/ooh/management/construction-managers.htm (Retrieved June 19, 2022).[2] Bowen, S., (2005). Engaged Learning: Are We All on the Same Page?, Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), 7(2),[3] Young, M. R. (2010). The art and science of fostering engaged
and benchmarks and for implementation in that curriculum. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 345References1. Li, L. “Reskilling and Upskilling the Future-ready Workforce for Industry 4.0 and Beyond”. Inf Syst Front (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y2. IANS Faculty, "How to Structure Information Security Function" March 6, 2023. Accessed Sept 1, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.iansresearch.com/resources/all-blogs/post/security-blog/2021/04/30/how-to- structure-the
, > 0.9 excellent Infit Scores (person Outfit) 1.02 > 0.6 Outfit Scores (item Outfit) 1.02 < 1.4 Item Reliability .95 close to 1 Person Reliability .96 close to 1 Point-Biserial Correlations .41 to .80 positive, ideally > 0.3 and < 0.7 Item Separation Coefficient 4.52 1.5 acceptable, 2.0 good, 3.00 excellent Person Separation Coefficient 5.07 1.5 acceptable, 2.0 good, 3.00 excellentNote: Based on (Linacre, 2022)ProceduresAs mentioned, the students enrolled in both courses were required to complete weeklyassignments, voluntary pre- and a post- survey, and to engage in mandatory peer
%5D.pdf[3] Samantha Flanagan, "Innovative Experiential PhD Framework Lets Motivated Professionals Earn a PhD WhileWorking Full-Time," Mass Technology Leadership Council (3 May 2022), [Online]: Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 335https://www.masstlc.org/innovative-experiential-phd-framework-lets-motivated-professionals-earn-a-phd-while-working-full-time/[4] Alexander M. Wyglinski, Sandhya Balasubramanian, “Getting Your PhD While Working Full-Time: 5 Tips toSucceed,” Mass Technology Leadership Council (26
), our research team examined the dimensionality of the initial EIM itempool (89 items) and further reduced the EIM to 38 items, measuring six latent constructs (Tsai et al.,2024). During the EGA and bootEGA analysis, we identified a set of 51 items that were unstable acrossrandom samples. In this current study, we explored what item characteristics are related to the stable andunstable items. MethodsSample A total of 476 Latinx engineers completed all 89 items of the Engineering Interests Scale. Allparticipants received an engineering undergraduate degree between 2015 and 2022. All were employed asengineers in the U.S. Table 1 presents the sample characteristics. The average age of the
Paper ID #42745Board 82: Work in Progress: Examination of Video Demonstrations as anAlternate Content-Delivery MethodMr. Kevin E Wandke, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Kevin Wandke received his B.S. degree in mechanical science and engineering and the M.S. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, in 2019 and 2022, respectively, where he is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree in electrical and computer engineering. He was a member of the SULI Program at Argonne National Laboratory, and an Intern of the Edison Engineering Program, General Electric’s Global Research Center
thedevelopment of more effective and ethical assessment practices.References:[1] Polack, Cody W., and Ralph R. Miller. "Testing improves performance as well as assesseslearning: A review of the testing effect with implications for models of learning." Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition 48.3 (2022): 222[2] Binks, Sally. "Testing enhances learning: A review of the literature." Journal ofProfessional Nursing 34.3 (2018): 205-210.[3] Brame, Cynthia J., and Rachel Biel. "Test-enhanced learning: the potential for testing topromote greater learning in undergraduate science courses." CBE—Life Sciences Education 14.2(2015): es4.[4] Salinas-Navarro, David Ernesto, et al. "Using generative artificial intelligence toolsto
high-stakes summative assessments(four quizzes throughout the semester and a final exam). This course, like other engineeringcourses taught at University of Georgia, did not have mid-semester assessments, such asmidterms, scheduled outside of class. Rather, mid-semester summative evaluations were assessedwithin the class periods themselves, which typically run for 50 minutes three times a week for athree-credit hour course.As the instructor for this course in Fall 2022 and Spring 2023 (N = 67 students total), I noticedseveral themes emerge from students during the semester and during end-of-the-semester studentevaluations: 1. Large numbers of students were overwhelmed by the breadth and depth of material covered in the class 2