. His two papers have been selected and featured as cover articles on Intelligence & Robotics Journal. He won six oral and poster presentation awards at multiple conferences. Dr. Lei received the Best Paper Award in 2022 International Conference on Swarm Intelligence. Dr. Lei serves as Youth Editorial Board Member of Intelligence and Robotics. Dr. Lei has served on the technical program committee for numerous international conferences, such as IEEE-CEC, IEEE-IJCNN, ICSI, and PRIS, etc. Dr. Lei has extensively published journal and conference papers in robotics, intelligent systems, and engineering education areas. His research interests include engineering education, robotics and autonomous systems, human robot
Paper ID #41998Engineering Doctoral Students’ Expectations, Reflections, and Concerns RegardingFuture in AcademiaOmar Jose Garcia, University of Oklahoma Omar Garcia is an undergraduate Aerospace Engineering student at The University of OklahomaDr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011
the inexperienced analyst” [18] (pg xxii). The surveyed texts were all published between the years 1975 and 2022, shown in Figure1. Multiple editions of the same text were not reviewed, but the forwards of second or thirdeditions often mentioned updates such as changes in the unit systems presented, as well as moresubstantial updates of the technical content to include discussion of advanced reactor concepts. Figure 1. Timeline of the textbooks analyzed and historical events that are incorporated in some later editions of the textbooks as seminal case studies in nuclear engineering. The aim was to survey textbooks from a variety of topics within nuclear engineering,from
Fall 2022 to pursue her research interests in convergence in engineering education, global engineering education, and social issues in STEM research and practice. Recently, she has taken on new NSF projects to broaden participation in quantum engineering (IUSE Level 3), research abroad (IRES Track 1), and use-inspired research (Convergence Accelerator Track I). Having grown up in Australia, Canada, Korea, and Germany, she speaks three languages. Leveraging her international connections, she has served in leadership positions in the Korean-American Scientists and Engineers Association (KSEA, Vice President), Korean Society for Engineering Education (KSEE, International Relations Board Member), and the International
stewarding the world’s natural resources in sustainable ways, glorifying God, and advancing human and ecosystem health. She considers civil and environmental engineering as a space for Christians to meet the physical needs of our neighbors while showing Christ to the world. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Sustainability as Stewardship Framework: A Revision of the Engineering for One Planet Framework for an Existing Civil Engineering Program at a Christian InstitutionIntroductionThe Engineering for One Planet (EOP) Framework [1] was developed from 2017 to 2022 by theLemelson Foundation, VentureWell, Alula Consulting and hundreds of individual
other teachers and practicing professionalsMethodsThis qualitative study explores students’ perception of their relationship with research mentorsthroughout an undergraduate research experience. Specifically, this study involves 10undergraduate mechanical engineering students, 6 male and 4 female, who participated in anundergraduate research apprenticeship program for a full academic year in 2022/2023 session.The students were spread across different classes ranging from sophomore to senior and wereengaged in 10 hours of paid research weekly with a faculty research mentor. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceStructure of Undergraduate
lecturer in 2018 to teach design related courses in the mechanical engineering program. He specializes in product design, instrumentation, controls, and automation. Dr. Al-Hamidi founded the Engineering Enrichment Program in 2016, which is currently one of the Center for Teaching and Learning pillars. He received three Transformative Engineering Education grants related to multidisciplinary education in 2018, 2021 and 2022. In 2021 Dr. Al-Hamidi received the Dean’s Achievement Award to recognize his contribution to the campus within that year. In 2015 he received the Association of Former Students AFS Distinguished Achievement Award as a recognition for his commitment, performance and positive impact on Aggie students
/j.socscimed.2018.07.038.[13] G. Moloney and A. Ahern, “Exploring the lower rates of entry into undergraduate engineering among female students through the application of the reasoned action approach,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 483–500, 2022, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2021.2025342.[14] R. McEachan, N. Taylor, R. Harrison, R. Lawton, P. Gardner, and M. Conner, “Meta- Analysis of the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) to Understanding Health Behaviors,” Ann. Behav. Med. Publ. Soc. Behav. Med., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 592–612, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9798-4.[15] M. Fishbein, Readings in attitude theory and measurement. in Readings in attitude theory and measurement. Oxford, England: Wiley, 1967.[16] M. Fishbein
, women make up 14% of the engineering workforce (15% internationally),according to SWE Research Fast Facts, 2022. In 2020, 24% of bachelor’s degrees in engineeringwere earned by women, and women of color earned 10% of the total engineering degrees.However, there is no existing data particularly dedicated to international women of color inengineering. Women of Color are often presented as a monolith in all the statistical reports.While the overall number of STEM workers in the United States increased by 44.5 percentbetween 2000 and 2019, the number of immigrant STEM workers more than doubled over thesame period. By 2019, there were almost 2.5 million immigrant STEM workers, compared to just1.2 million in 2000. Women workers still remain
, “The Impact of Occupational Healthand Safety Measures on Employee Performance at the South Tongu District Hospital,” 2017.[5] E. Anne. Lloyd, The structure and confirmation of evolutionary theory. PrincetonUniversity Press, 2021.[6] A. Kok, “Cognitive control, motivation and fatigue: A cognitive neuroscienceperspective,” Brain Cogn, vol. 160, p. 105880, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.BANDC.2022.105880.[7] G. Borragán, H. Slama, M. Bartolomei, and P. Peigneux, “Cognitive fatigue: A Time-based Resource-sharing account,” Cortex, vol. 89, pp. 71–84, Apr. 2017, doi:10.1016/J.CORTEX.2017.01.023.[8] D. R. Davis, “The disorganization of behavior in fatigue,” J Neurol NeurosurgPsychiatry, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 23, Jan. 1946, doi: 10.1136/JNNP
:10.1371/journal.pone.0248925[3] K. Hu, K. Godfrey, Q. Ren, S. Wang, X. Yang, and Q. Li, “The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on college students in USA: Two years later,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 315, p. 114685, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114685.[4] M. Mailizar, D. Burg, and S. Maulina, “Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 7057–7077, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5.[5] A. D. Dumford and A. L. Miller, “Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 30, no. 3, pp
digital module‐based experiential learning in protein biochemistry during the covid‐19 pandemic paradigm”. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 51(1), 77-80. 2022. 11. E. Dopico, A.R. Linde and E. Garcia-Vazquez, “Learning gains in lab practices: teach science doing science”. Journal of Biological Education, 48(1), 46-52. 2014. 12. C.H. Herreid. “Case studies in science: A novel method of science education”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(4), 221–229. 1994. 13. HS. Barrows. “Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: a brief overview”. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3-12. 1996. 14. M. Breslin and R. Buchanan, “On the Case Study Method of Research and Teaching in
Making Under Deep Uncertainty Applications Using Green Infrastructure for Flood Management,” Earth’s Futur., vol. 10, no. 7, p. e2021EF002322, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1029/2021EF002322.[5] S. Flood, N. A. Cradock-Henry, P. Blackett, and P. Edwards, “Adaptive and interactive climate futures: Systematic review of ‘serious games’ for engagement and decision- making,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 13, no. 6, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aac1c6.[6] P. Suarez, F. E. L. Otto, N. Kalra, C. Bachofen, E. Gordon, and W. Mudenda, “Loss and damage in a changing climate,” Red Cross/Red Crescent Work. Pap. Ser., no. 8, 2015.[7] A. Solinska-Nowak, P. Magnuszewski, M. Curl, A. French, A. Keating, J. Mochizuki, W. Liu, R. Mechler, M
Professor at Arizona State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Lessons learned to promote teaching-oriented cross-cultural international mentoring and collaborationAbstractThis paper centers on two case studies, spanning 2020-2022, based on a partnership between aMid-western private United States (US) university (ranked in top 10 in Mid-west) and a southernprivate Indian university (ranked in top 35 in India). The goal of the collaboration was multi-faceted and designed as a traditional mentoring (US) to mentee (India) relationship. Thispractice-oriented paper is intended for faculty and administrators who might be engaged in or arelooking to engage in a similar
information toaddress the second, third, and fourth purposes of this paper: (2) describe what has worked welland identify areas for improvement, (3) provide recommendations for other faculty interested inimplementing a similar course or incorporating these themes into already-existing courses, and(4) summarize students’ perceptions of and learning within the course.To evaluate student learning and feedback on the course, ILA5, as well as comments withinteaching evaluation surveys, both completed by students at the end of the semester, werequalitatively analyzed. This data corresponds to the iteration of the course taught in 2023, whichis the most current version of the course and modifications. While data from 2022 and 2021 areavailable, the sections
Economy, Chicago ; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2018, pp. 129–163.[4] R. R. Rhinehart, “Is a college education enough to get young engineers ready for the workforce?,” Control. Accessed: Jul. 25, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.controlglobal.com/home/article/11326520/is-a-college-education-enough-to-get- young-engineers-ready-for-the-workforce[5] B. Díaz, C. Delgado, K. Han, and C. Lynch, “Use of Communities of Practice to Analyze and Improve Graduate Engineering Education.,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Jan. 05, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/use-of- communities-of-practice-to-analyze-and-improve-graduate-engineering-education
students. Due to this equivalency, the course is heavily populated by students in thesefields. This course is advertised through emails to students in the targeted majors, digital displayadvertisements around campus, and by working with academic advisors in the four previouslyspecified areas to make students aware of this option to complete the professionalismrequirement. This course was first offered in Fall 2020 as a special topics course. It was approvedto serve as an alternate course for the four majors’ professionalism requirement in Fall 2022 andapproved by the curriculum committee as a permanent course in Winter 2023.While the College of Engineering offers 18 undergraduate majors, this course typically enrolls47% from Computer Science, 17
., vol. 21, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41563-021- 01123-y.[21] H. C. Luegenbiehl and R. F. Clancy, Global Engineering Ethics. Oxford, UK, and Cambridge, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017.[22] B. Taebi, Ethics and Engineering: An Introduction. in Cambridge Applied Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.[23] J. Harper, Blades in the Dark. Silver Spring, MD: Evil Hat Productions, 2017.Appendix: Disasters and DecisionsThe following pages show the handouts and teacher materials used in the class described in §4. Ethical Decision-Making and ELMs Lesson Agenda
al., ASEE 2022). Minju is interested in designing assessments that can capture and motivate students’ deep conceptual learning, such as oral exams and the usage of visual representations (e.g., diagrams and manual gestures).Marko V. Lubarda, University of California, San Diego Marko V. Lubarda is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, San Diego. He teaches mechanics, materials science, design, computational analysis, and engineering mathematics courses, and has co-authored the undergraduate textbook Intermediate Solid Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2020). He is dedicated to engi- neering pedagogy and enriching students