The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation & Identity Formation

Timothy Duane Reedy; David Tomblin

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: July 12, 2024
Conference Session: Identity Formation and Engineering Cultures
Tagged Division: Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/48127

Request a correction

David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Engineering identity formation is not simply the result of knowledge acquisition, but also that of enculturation. As Basso (1996) reminds us, both processes of knowledge acquisition and enculturation are intricately linked to the places (i.e., physical infrastructures) in which they unfold. In the context of engineering university settings those places include laboratories, classrooms, communal areas, workshops, and other spaces that mediate social and technical relations. Places act as a conduit for engineering enculturation (or resistance to it), as it is within these settings that students are inundated with value-laden symbols & representations, participate in engineering activities and rituals, and are expected to adopt and embody dominant engineering mindsets and attitudes towards technical problem solving (Mutero & Govender, 2021; Ong, 2018; Tichavakunda, 2021; Verdiguel, 2021). Recognizing that the physical infrastructure serve as a tangible manifestation of broader challenges to addressing systemic societal issues, this paper delves into the institutional challenges of engineering enculturation by examining how physical spaces are implicated in the process of perpetuating inequalities and social injustices (e.g., systemic racism, classism, and other forms of discrimination), within an engineering school and how certain places are perceived differently by underrepresented groups such as minorities, women, and LGBTQ+ students. Employing qualitative research methodologies, we examined approximately 250 images submitted by students and conducted 16, identity-based focus group sessions, each lasting two hours, with undergraduate students. Focus groups were organized to ensure homogeneity in terms of race, sexual orientation, and gender among participants. Preliminary results highlight the pervasive influence of detrimental engineering ideologies (Riley, 2013) within the everyday symbols, rituals, and curricula and other built infrastructure within an engineering school. Students from diverse social identities reported that these physical manifestations invoke tensions between their sense of belonging and the perception of depoliticization within the field of engineering (Cech, 2013), the centrality of military and corporate interests (Leydens & Lucena, 2017; Riley, 2013), detachment from societal issues (Cech, 2014), and a glaring dearth of diverse representations within labs, classrooms, hallways, statues, public gathering areas, and study lounges. These findings underscore the significance of considering the role of physical places in the conceptualization of engineering identity formation and highlight the necessity for institutions to address and overcome existing infrastructural challenges to fostering inclusive environments that cater to a diverse array of identities.

Citation
Format

Reedy, T. D., & Tomblin, D. (2024, June), The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation & Identity Formation Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/48127

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Engineering identity formation is not simply the result of knowledge acquisition, but also that of enculturation. As Basso (1996) reminds us, both processes of knowledge acquisition and enculturation are intricately linked to the places (i.e., physical infrastructures) in which they unfold. In the context of engineering university settings those places include laboratories, classrooms, communal areas, workshops, and other spaces that mediate social and technical relations. Places act as a conduit for engineering enculturation (or resistance to it), as it is within these settings that students are inundated with value-laden symbols &amp;amp; representations, participate in engineering activities and rituals, and are expected to adopt and embody dominant engineering mindsets and attitudes towards technical problem solving (Mutero &amp;amp; Govender, 2021; Ong, 2018; Tichavakunda, 2021; Verdiguel, 2021). Recognizing that the physical infrastructure serve as a tangible manifestation of broader challenges to addressing systemic societal issues, this paper delves into the institutional challenges of engineering enculturation by examining how physical spaces are implicated in the process of perpetuating inequalities and social injustices (e.g., systemic racism, classism, and other forms of discrimination), within an engineering school and how certain places are perceived differently by underrepresented groups such as minorities, women, and LGBTQ+ students.
Employing qualitative research methodologies, we examined approximately 250 images submitted by students and conducted 16, identity-based focus group sessions, each lasting two hours, with undergraduate students. Focus groups were organized to ensure homogeneity in terms of race, sexual orientation, and gender among participants. Preliminary results highlight the pervasive influence of detrimental engineering ideologies (Riley, 2013) within the everyday symbols, rituals, and curricula and other built infrastructure within an engineering school. Students from diverse social identities reported that these physical manifestations invoke tensions between their sense of belonging and the perception of depoliticization within the field of engineering (Cech, 2013), the centrality of military and corporate interests (Leydens &amp;amp; Lucena, 2017; Riley, 2013), detachment from societal issues (Cech, 2014), and a glaring dearth of diverse representations within labs, classrooms, hallways, statues, public gathering areas, and study lounges.
These findings underscore the significance of considering the role of physical places in the conceptualization of engineering identity formation and highlight the necessity for institutions to address and overcome existing infrastructural challenges to fostering inclusive environments that cater to a diverse array of identities.

AU  - Timothy Duane Reedy
AU  - David Tomblin
CY  - Portland, Oregon
DA  - 2024/06/23
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation & Identity Formation
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/48127
ER  -

The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation & Identity Formation

Paper Authors

Timothy Duane Reedy University of Maryland, College Park

David Tomblin University of Maryland, College Park

Abstract

Citation

APA

APA - LaTeX bibitem

MLA

MLA - LaTeX bibitem

Bibtex

EndNote - RIS