writing/communicationscourse as part of their degree requirements. The James Worth Bagley College of Engineeringhires staff with English degrees to teach these courses. As part of the 2022-2023 academic year,the faculty worked on developing an AI policy (this was prior to the formation of institutionalpolicies). Their syllabus policy stated: ChatGPT and use of AI: Unless explicitly stated otherwise, you may not use artificial intelligence-based technologies – such as ChatGPT, Socratic from Google, PepperType, Rytr, Writesonic, and R-Tutor –to generate responses for your assignments. Such use of artificial-intelligence or word-mixing software to write your paper or disguise plagiarized work is considered unauthorized
Paper ID #45493The Role of TELPhE in the Education of Citizens and Engineers consideredfrom an Historical Perspective within ASEEProf. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He received ASEE’s Lifetime Achievement Award in 2022. He received the best research award for his book ”Engineering Education Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction” from the Division for the Professions of the American Educational
is a practical underpinning forconsidering curricular revisions across curricular levels (e.g., course, multiple courses, or project).Figure 1. Elements from Lattuca and Stark’s [23] Academic Plan Model were used as a theoreticalunderpinning for our study.Biomedical Engineering Program ContextOur program context is the undergraduate BME program at an R1 institution in the southeasternUnited States. Our ABET-accredited BME program was newly established in 2018, with the firstcohort of undergraduates graduating in May 2022. At the time of writing, our BME programcurrently enrolls ~250 undergraduate students seeking a B.S. in BME, with an additional ~80students pursuing a minor in BME. For over two years, faculty across the tenure and
/95f3cbfabfb6623add3133b89ec6af5d56e98a6e[6] R. A. E. Gutierrez, M. Sonsteng-Person, S. King-Shaw, and M. T. Valmocena, “For the institution or for the community?: toward an anti-oppressive research praxis in conducting participatory action research,” J. Community Pract., vol. 31, no. 3–4, pp. 284–296, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1080/10705422.2023.2272162.[7] R. A. Shahjahan, A. L. Estera, K. L. Surla, and K. T. Edwards, “‘Decolonizing’ Curriculum and Pedagogy: A Comparative Review Across Disciplines and Global Higher Education Contexts,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 73–113, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3102/00346543211042423.[8] S. Porter and Y. Siddiqui, “Addressing colonial and militarized themes in STEM education,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, p. 1480199, Sep. 2024
approximately 40 hours of grading in comparison to the exam-driven traditionalapproach previously used.This series of ungrading techniques has been implemented for three spring semester iterations ofthe Process Control course beginning in 2022 for a group of 54 junior and senior students. Thesecond iteration in spring 2023 was instructed to a total of 93 students across two sections taughtby the same instructor, and the third iteration in spring 2024 was delivered to 61 students.Instruction was also conducted in fall semesters by the same instructor as the spring semestercourses, but these classes were much smaller in size and usually involved students who were off-sequence in their instruction, making them more difficult to analyze as a whole; for
of AI to improve technical writing skillshas gained attention. A systematic review by Xu and Ouyang (2022) examined the use of AItechnologies in STEM education, highlighting the potential of AI to enhance technicalwriting skills through automated assessment and personalized feedback. The reviewidentified several AI applications, such as intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) and learninganalytics, that support the development of technical writing skills in STEM students [7].Additional reviews provide useful insights into integrating AI into instructional practice. Thestudy found that AI tools can enhance students’ technical writing skills by providing real-timefeedback and promoting critical thinking and problem-solving abilities [8]. Cai et al
Unleashed. Accessed: Feb. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/670[11] L. Bosman and M. Phillips, “Integrating the entrepreneurial mindset into the engineering classroom,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 150–155, 2021.[12] M. Nezafati, S. Schley, and J. M. Le Doux, “Responsible innovation in biomedical engineering: a value sensitive design intervention,” in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2022, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962507.[13] S. E. Zappe, S. L. Cutler, and L. Gase, “A Systematic Review of the Impacts of Entrepreneurial Support Programs in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Fields,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol
many workplace plans and initiatives togrind to a screeching halt. This curriculum renewal initiative of the mechanical engineeringprogram at Ohio State University was no exception. Over the course of 2020-2022, slowprogress was made on writing specific program goals to match each of the six guiding areasdeveloped during the 2019 retreat. Next, progress was made on developing the student learningoutcomes that would comprise each program goal. Starting in 2022, the curriculum committeewas finally able to move the project off the back burner and work with more focus and purposeto build out the student proficiencies, which are the fine-grained skills that make up studentlearning objectives.By the beginning of the 2023-2024 academic year, the
“Exempt category #2 – Tests, surveys, or observation of public behavior” and has beenapproved by the ONU IRB team.Works Cited[1] KEEN, "Engineering Unleashed," 2025. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset. [Accessed 2025].[2] M. N. Nooh, "Review of the Entrepreneurial Mindset," Voice of Academia, vol. 18, no. 2, 2022.[3] E. A. Henslee, L. Lowman, M. D. Gross and A. K. McCauley, "Student Motivation and Self-efficacy in Entrepreneurial-minded Learning (EML): What These Mean for Diversity and Inclusion in Engineering Classrooms," in 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Virutal, 2021.[4] G. Trujillo and K. D. Tanner, "Considering the Role of Affect in Learning: Monitoring Students’ Self-Efficacy, Sense of Belonging, and
University Dr Subramanian is currently a lecturer with the Ocean Engineering Department at Texas A and M Uni- versity at Galveston. He is primarily involved with teaching and mentoring undergraduates. He teaches courses including design of ships and floating structures, fluid mechanics and computational methods for engineers. Professional interests include developing and applying computational hydromechanics towards the hydrodynamic design of floating structures and engineering education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 1
serving in Minority Serving Institutions in developing STEM educational tools and resources for teachers to implement in their classrooms. Dr. Garc´ıa’s research agenda is geared towards community and educational change by creating healthy, equitable, and culturally responsive learning environments for traditionally underserved populations. Dr. Garc´ıa. earned both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from the University of Texas R´ıo Grande Valley, formerly University of Texas Pan American and holds a doctorate degree in School Improvement from Texas State University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Innovations in Engineering Education for
, 4th Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2018.[19] R. E. Boyatzis, Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. SAGE, 1998.[20] J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls, and R. Ormoston, Qualitative Research Practice, Second Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2013. Accessed: Sep. 20, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-research-practice/book237434
the University of Notre Dame’s inclusion of abrand-new makerspace influenced first-year students’ comfort with additive manufacturing andthree-dimensional modeling through both individual and group projects. The analysis includes abreakdown by gender and race, as well as a comparison based on the resources at the student’shigh schools. Based on the timing of the surveys, the paper investigates the role that differentproject components had on student comfort towards additive manufacturing andthree-dimensional modeling.The study was conducted at the University of Notre Dame, a medium-sized, private, Midwestern,residential university, and analyzed the response of students in the First-Year EngineeringProgram in the Fall 2022 semester. With the
an artifact of the time-constraint associated with the in-class preparation constraints or the planned usage (the examsare solved by individuals, not teams of students) is unclear.From a performance standpoint, the same course (with the same instructor) was taught in 2021,2022 and is currently being taught in 2023. In 2021, using individually prepared study guides,student performance between exam 1 and exam 2 decreased by 2.9 points (mean). In 2022 (thefocus of the current study and analysis), student performance between exam 1 and exam 2decreased by 2.5 points (mean). In 2023, students individually prepared study guides for exam 1and exam 2 (similar to 2021), and the student performance between exam 1 and exam 2decreased by 3.7 points (mean
innovative programs. The enrolment studentswere 20 students from various departments at the University of Tabuk, each student has his ownperformance profile (Report) to represent his performance, skills gained during the program andprediction for his future performance based on his current performance as shown in figure 6. TheUltimate Innovation assessment strategies, as depicted in figure 5, were followed to evaluate thestudents' performance. Table 4 provides a list of the students' departments. Table 4: 2022 Enrollment students department Number of Students Department 2 Arts
neighborhoodsof different classes and ethnic makeup. The findings from the Bok Choy project are shown inTable 1. Table 1: 2022 Bok Choy Project (* indicates West End neighborhood) Zip Code Bok Choy Organic Poverty rate % Black Population % Available? Options 40212* NO 4 37.9 60.1 Portland 40211* YES 7 34.1 93.9 California 40208 YES 18 36.6 29.4 U of L 40206 YES 21 10.6 9.3 Clifton 40205 YES 22
2009. Coordinator (2003-2008) of the Postgraduate Program in Psychology at the Federal University of Uberlˆandia. Coordinator of the Postgraduate Pro- gram in Health Psychology at Universidade Metodista de S˜ao Paulo (UMESP) from February 2016 to December 2021. Director of research and postgraduate studies at UMESP since April 2022. Founding member of the Brazilian Society of Organizational and Work Psychology (SBPOT) and member of the National Association for Research and Graduate Studies in Psychology (ANPEPP). She has experience in Organizational and Work Psychology and in Health Psychology with a research focus on measures in psychology, job satisfaction, social power bases, resilience at work, intragroup
systems and biological processes andmodel these processes using computer code. Pre and post-data were collected using a surveyinstrument at the beginning and the end of the course. The survey instrument captured students'perceptions toward five self-beliefs related to their experience with programming, i.e., self-efficacy, self-concept, interest, anxiety, and aptitude mindset.The population considered for the final analysis consisted of 100 students that completed bothsurveys. According to institutional data, in 2021-2022, about 56% of the students pursuingbiomedical engineering majors were women, and about 44% of the students were men. Themajority of the students were White 67%, followed by Asian 21%, International 10%, more thantwo races 6
. Steinmayr, A. F. Weidinger, M. Schwinger, and B. Spinath, "The importance of students’ motivation for their academic achievement–replicating and extending previous findings," Frontiers in psychology, vol. 10, p. 1730, 2019.[7] T. Vu et al., "Motivation-achievement cycles in learning: A literature review and research agenda," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 39-71, 2022.[8] D. A. Tomczyk, "The Relationship Between Long-Term Video Game Playing and Individuals' Entrepreneurial Traits and Intent: An Exploratory Study," Ph.D., The George Washington University, United States -- District of Columbia, 3433542, 2010.[9] S. Budner, "Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable," Journal of
emergency department to manage the COVID-19 outbreak. Int J Emerg Med, vo. 13, no. 32, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-020-00294-w[10] McGill, N., Weller-Newton, J. & Lees, C. A new survey tool for evaluating pandemic preparedness in health services. BMC Health Serv Res, vol. 22, no. 708, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08067-2
ASEE, he is chair of the Two-Year College Division, and Vice-Chair/Community Col- leges of the Pacific Southwest Section. He received the Outstanding Teaching Award for the ASEE/PSW Section in 2022.Dr. Lizabeth L. Thompson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the SUSTAINStephen Robert Beard ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Comparing Success for Transfers Students and First-Time Freshmen Using
literature,” Libr. Inf. Sci. Res., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 108–114, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.007.[3] O. Ilori and A. Onanuga, “Research Design in Library and Information Science,” Libr. Philos. Pract. E-J., Jan. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/7244[4] N. Van House, “Assessing the Quantity, Quality, and Impact of LIS Research,” in Library and information science research: perspectives and strategies for improvement, C. R. McClure and P. Hernon, Eds., in Information management, policy, and services, vol. policy, and services. Norwood, N.J: Ablex Pub. Corp, 1991, pp. 85–97.[5] L. A. Kloda, D. Koufogiannakis, and K. Mallan, “Transferring Evidence into Practice: What Evidence
Education,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 858–885, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2014.11777350.[4] L. Lattuca and J. Pollard, “Towards a Conceptualization of Faculty Decision-Making About Curricular and Instructional Change,” p. 20, 2016.[5] M. Paretti, J. Deters, and M. Menon, “Building a Sustainable University-Wide Interdisciplinary Graduate Program to Address Disasters,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/41956[6] J. R. Deters, M. Menon, M. C. Paretti, and M. Webb, “Exploring Interdisciplinary Identity Development Using Possible Selves: An Exploratory Study,” REES AAEE 2021 conference: Engineering Education Research Capability
students learn better and fasterwhen paired with high-quality learning materials and instruction. But due to the array ofavailable specializations in industry categories, selecting the best fit for their interests is a bigchallenge for engineering students. This paper focuses on using AI to help students choose theirengineering program.Using ChatGPTChatGPT is a chatbot launched by OpenAI in November 2022. It is built on top of OpenAI'sGPT-3 family of large language models and is fine-tuned with both supervised andreinforcement learning techniques. We tried to use ChatGPT as a trained AI system to answerthis question, “How ChatGPT helps students to select their program.”ChatGPT answer was:“ChatGPT is a large language generation model developed by
research interests include the use of interdisciplinary approaches to the study of social science problems as well as the assessment and improvement of tertiary science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 ENGINEERING FACULTY PERSPECTIVES: THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF AND PROMOTION OF STEM IDENTITY AMONG UNDERGRADUATE WOMEN IN THE CLASSROOM Sylvia Mendez, Emily Kulakowski, and Elizabeth Peterson University of Colorado Colorado SpringsThank you for joining us this morning as we share the results of
mixed methods researcher with interests in research impact, cyberlearning, and instructional change in STEM Education. Prior to being a faculty member, London worked at the National Science Foundation, GE Healthcare, and Anheuser-Busch. She earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 From Us, For Us: Recommendations for Institutional Efforts to Enhance the Black Student Experience in Engineering The pursuit of education in engineering is a challenging endeavor for students. However,for Black students, this