, you would learn and demonstrate your mastery of the content. Virtual Reality: This is an immersive experience that utilizes virtual reality (VR). You would visually experience a modern workplace where you would be apprenticed in the skills and content by a virtual mentor. There would be a storyline that guides you through the course to helps you master the content. The course wraps up with a project where you would demonstrate your mastery of the content.Participants.Data was collected between May 2022 and February 2023. Participants were recruited tocomplete the larger research study which required between two to three hours to complete.Participants were solicited from a 4-year STEM-focused institute in
Impact of GenderStereotyped Personal Protective Equipment on Women in Makerspaces,” ISAM, 2022.[30] D. Bar-El and M. Worsley, “Making the maker movement more inclusive: Lessons learned from a course on accessibility in making,” Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact., vol. 29, p. 100285, 2021.[31] M. Denton, M. Borrego, and A. Boklage, “Community cultural wealth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A systematic review,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 556–580, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20322.[32] M. (Maggie) Melo and R. Rodney, “The Power of First Impressions: Exploring the Design Impact of ‘Small Details’ and Signage for First-time Makerspace Users 7th International Symposium on Academic
Breviglieri Schultz. Braille technology beyond the financial barriers: A braille literacy platform to effectively combat braille literacy crisis. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, pages 41–46, 2018.[8] Idalis Villanueva and Marialuisa Di Stefano. Narrative inquiry on the teaching of stem to blind high school students. Education sciences, 7(4):89, 2017.[9] Amanda Lacy, Seth Polsley, Samantha Ray, and Tracy Hammond. A seat at the virtual table: Emergent inclusion in remote meetings. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2):1–20, 2022.[10] Sathiyaprakash Ramdoss
Ozdagli, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. Ali Irmak Ozdagli is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. He obtained his Bachelor of Science degree from Bogazici University, Turkey in 2007, followed by a Master of Science degree from the University of Notre Dame in 2009. Dr. Ozdagli furthered his academic pursuits with a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Purdue University in 2015, and later, a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Vanderbilt University in 2022. With dual Ph.Ds, Dr. Ozdagli brings a unique combination of expertise in Civil Engineering and Computer Science to his role at FGCU. Committed to advancing engineering education and research, his teaching philosophy emphasizes active
for hydraulic machinery courses." Computer Applications inEngineering Education 22, no. 4 (2014): 630-638.[16] Shepard, Thomas, and Krithiga Ganesan. "Effect of a Joint Experimental-CFD LabExperience on Perceptions of Data Authority and Student Learning." In Fluids EngineeringDivision Summer Meeting, vol. 46216, p. V01AT01A002. American Society of MechanicalEngineers, 2014.[17] Solmaz, Serkan, and Tom Van Gerven. "Interactive CFD simulations with virtual reality tosupport learning in mixing." Computers & Chemical Engineering 156 (2022): 107570.[18] Hu, Junling, Linfeng Zhang, and Xingguo Xiong. "Teaching computational fluid dynamics(CFD) to design engineers." In 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 13-1151. 2008.[19] Salinas
and Engineering Identity, and will allow for the exploration of how they interact.Methods The lesson materials of the intervention are based on the Facilitating EmpathicCommunication Modules in Undergraduate Engineering Education by Sochacka et al. [9]. At alarge Southeastern R1 institution, the lessons were implemented in the Fall of 2022 to anIntroduction to Engineering course honors section. They have been continuously improved withinput from the course instructors to improve the student experience. The lessons were givenagain during the Spring of 2023 to three sections of the Introduction to Engineering course, nonewith the honors designation, and all 20+ sections in the Fall of 2023 to a population of over1100. The students were
, satellitecampuses may have limited resources and extracurricular activities compared to larger campuses,but the benefits in terms of unique academic programs tailored according to the community needsand student interest, reduced tuition costs, and several internship/job opportunities with industriesbased in the local community, make them an impactful choice for undergraduate students.References1] Al Hassani, A.A. and Wilkins, S., 2022. Student retention in higher education: the influences of organizationalidentification and institution reputation on student satisfaction and behaviors. International Journal of EducationalManagement, (ahead-of-print).2] Jongbloed, B., Enders, J. and Salerno, C., 2008. Higher education and its communities: Interconnections
social justice," in Engineering and Social Justice: Springer, 2008, pp. 47-106.[2] J. A. Leydens, J. C. Lucena, and D. M. Riley, "Engineering education and social justice," in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, 2022.[3] R. Painter, "Engineering ethics, environmental justice, and environmental impact analysis: A synergistic approach to improving student learning," in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012, pp. 25.544. 1-25.544. 14.[4] M. M. Nussbaum, "Environmental justice in the college and university curriculum: A survey of the literature," Environmental Justice, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 95-101, 2014.[5] D. I. Castaneda, J. D. Merritt, and J. A. Mejia, "Integrating an engineering justice
asrepresenting the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Department of the Air Forceor the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprintsfor Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation hereinReferences[1] A. Bagiati, A. F. Salazar G´omez, J. Radovan, K. Kennedy, and C. Breazeal, “Learning journeys for scalable ai education: an mit-usaf collaboration,” in Towards a new future in engineering education, new scenarios that european alliances of tech universities open up. Universitat Polit`ecnica de Catalunya, 2022, pp. 1529–1537.[2] X. Du, S. Alghowinem, M. Taylor, K. Darling, and C. Breazeal, “Innovating ai leadership education,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference
discussion boards," Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 15-27, 2015.• [11] S. Boss and J. Krauss, Reinventing project-based learning: Your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. International Society for Technology in Education, 2022.• [12] D. Laur, Authentic learning experiences: A real-world approach to project-based learning. Routledge, 2013.• [13] S. Vonderwell, X. Liang, and K. Alderman, "Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning," Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 309-328, 2007.• [14] D. R. Garrison, "Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and
University. She earned her M.S., and Ph.D. from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She teaches thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, engineering laboratory, and senior design studio courses. Her research interests include engineering education and targeted drug delivery. In 2022, she was awarded the ASME Best Teacher Award and earned the ACUE Certificate in Effective College Instruction. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Comparative Study on the Role of Bloom’s Taxonomy-based Assignments and Project-based Learning on Student Performance in an Undergraduate Fluid Mechanics CourseAbstractThis paper compares and evaluates the role of two group-based active learning
. 1–6.[14] L. E. Montero-Moguel and V. Vargas-Alejo, “Ciclos de modelación y razonamiento covariacional al realizar una actividad provocadora de modelos,” Educación Matemática, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 214–248, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.24844/EM3401.08.[15] E. Hamilton, R. Lesh, F. Lester, and M. Brilleslyper, “Model-eliciting activities (MEAs) as a bridge between engineering education research and mathematics education research,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–25, 2008.[16] R. Lesh, J. Zawojewski, and G. Carmona, “What mathematical abilities are needed for success beyond school in a technology-based age of information?,” in Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem
students. Nevertheless, the department currently has noformal process to require faculty to use mentoring pacts. Individual faculty members typically gowith what has already worked well for them in the past, resulting in a range of perspectives on bestpractices. It was suggested that the department would likely encounter significant pushback if theuse of a mentoring tool was made a requirement instead of a recommendation.4.1.3 Feedback Mechanisms and Culture MonitoringAs a feedback mechanism, the department conducted graduate student climate surveys in the fallof 2021 and 2022. The response rate for the first year was 50%, while for the second year it wasless than 20%. Currently, it has decided to facilitate this survey every two years. The
Engineering Management from the Classroom to the Workplace at the ASEE National Conference June 6, 2023. He was also recognized with the Johns Hopkins Engineering for Professionals Distinguished Instructor Award for 2022-2023.Mr. Stanislaw Tarchalski, The Johns Hopkins University ˚ Tarchalski is a retired senior executive with more than 30 years of progressive responsibility and StaA experience in leading strategic business planning and execution, large/complex program development and management, technical leadership and systems e ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 PREPARING FUTURE GENERATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP ROLES IN TECHNICAL ORGANIZATIONS
. Herkert, “Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 303-313, 2000. 4. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs- 2022-2023/ 5. Haws, David R. (2001) Ethics Instruction in Engineering Education: A (Mini) Meta-Analysis. Journal of Engineering Education 90(2): 223-229. 6. Lynch, William T. (1997/1998) Teaching Engineering Ethics in the United States. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 16(4): 27-36. 7. Harris, Charles E. Jr.; Davis, Michael; Pritchard, Michael S.; & Rabins, Michael J. (1996) Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And
Paper ID #44046Work in Progress: Igniting Engineering Fundamentals—A Holistic Approachto First-Year Engineering with Entrepreneurial-Minded Learning and a Project-BasedExploration of MarsDr. Danahe Marmolejo, Saint Louis University Dr. Dana Marmolejo has been an assistant professor of practice in the Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department at the School of Science and Engineering since 2022. With a background in Chemical Engineering, her expertise lies in Thermodynamics and Process Systems Engineering. Dr. Marmolejo’s primary focus is teaching engineering courses, mostly for first- and second-year students. At
Paper ID #41037Characterization of Stress, Sense of Belonging, and Engineering Identity inFirst-Year Engineering StudentsDr. Wee Sing Yeo, University of Cincinnati WS Yeo is a Chartered Engineer registered with the UK’s Institution of Mechanical Engineers. They have a proven track record of experience and have been actively involved in promoting Outcome-Based Engineering (OBE) education in higher institutions from 2006 to 2022. WS Yeo holds a Ph.D. in Nanocomposite and a Master’s in Materials Engineering, solidifying their expertise in the field.Dr. Muhammad Asghar, Utah State University Muhammad Asghar is a Postdoctoral
provide amore accurate assessment of the platform's usefulness.References[1] R. M. Reck and R. S. Sreenivas, "Developing a New Affordable DC Motor Laboratory Kit for an Existing Undergraduate Controls Course," in American Control Conference, Chicago, 2015.[2] S. Wang, F. Zhang, Q. Tang, X. Zhang and R. Zhao, "A Take-Home Motor Control Teaching Experiment Platform for Control Engineering-Related Courses," IEEE Transactions On Education, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 115-123, 2022.[3] L. Zhou, J. Yoon, A. Andrien, M. I. Nejad, B. T. Allison and D. L. Trumper, "FlexLab and LevLab: A Portable Control and Mechatronics Educational System," IEEE/ASME Transactions On Mechatronics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 305-315, 2020.[4] D. Shetty, J. Kondo, C
received his B.Sc, M.A.Sc, and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toronto. He has worked as a project, design, and test engineer as well as a consultant to industry. His research interests include the applicatiProf. Salma Emara, University of Toronto Salma Emara is an Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Toronto. She received her B.Sc. in Electronics and Communications Engineering from the American University in Cairo in 2018, and her Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the University of Toronto in 2022. Her Ph.D. research focuses on improving reinforcement learning algorithms to solve problems in computer networking
and G. Webb, Supporting student learning: Case studies, experience & practice from higher education. Psychology Press, 2002.[17] S. Jenkins, M. K. Jordan, and P. O. Weiland, “The role of writing in graduate engineering education: A survey of faculty beliefs and practices,” English for Specific Purposes, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 51–67, 1993.[18] H. Nejadghanbar, M. R. Atai, and C. E. Snow, “Exploring the academic reading challenges of graduate students of applied linguistics,” Ib´erica: Revista de la Asociaci´on Europea de Lenguas para Fines Espec´ıficos (AELFE), no. 44, pp. 315–344, 2022.[19] L. Shi, I. Fazel, and N. Kowkabi, “Paraphrasing to transform knowledge in advanced graduate student writing,” English for Specific
. Pettigrew, "Intergroup Contact Theory," Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 65–85, 1998.[13] B. Say, Z. Erden, and C. Turhan, "A team‐oriented course development experience in distance education for multidisciplinary engineering design," Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1617–1640, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22546[14] K. Y. Lin, Y. T. Wu, Y. T. Hsu, and P. J. Williams, "Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers ’engineering design thinking," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 1, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186
Summary,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Virtual, 2021.[16] C. Wallwey, M. M. Longmeier, D. Hayde, J. Armstrong, R. Kajfez, and R. Pelan, “Consider ‘HACKS’ when designing hackathon challenges: Hook, action, collaborative knowledge sharing,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, no. September, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.954044.[17] R. M. Desing, R. R. Pelan, R. L. Kajfez, C. Wallwey, A. M. Clark, and S. Gopalakrishnan, “Identity Trajectories of Interdisciplinary STEAM Faculty: A Longitudinal Case Study,” In review.[18] National Research Council, Convergence: Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering, and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National
competency achievement: A systematic mixed studies review,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 35, p. 100431, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100431.[2] D. Lopez, “Using Service Learning for Improving Student Attraction and Engagement in STEM Studies,” presented at the 45th SEFI Conference, Azores, Portugal: European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), 2017, pp. 1053–1060. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/2117/113240[3] N. Evangelopoulos, A. Sidorova, and L. Riolli, “Can service-learning help students appreciate an unpopular course?: a theoretical framework,” Mich. J. Community Serv. Learn., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 15-, 2003.[4] C. Scherrer and J. Sharpe, “Service Learning Versus Traditional Project-Based Learning: A
, 27 (1), 63-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9341-0Armstrong, F. H. (1980). Faculty development through interdisciplinarity. The Journal of General Education, 52-63.Baxter, P. & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers, The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40-47.Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2022). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: Prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International
from High School to Workplace: A Review of the Literature," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Baltimore, 2023.[9] C. Rennick, V. Rajendran and S. Ifeanyi, "An Extra-Curricular Challenge Co-Developed with Industry: A Learning-Focused Hackathon," in CEEA-ACEG Annual Conference, Kelowna, 2023.[10] S. Elo and H. Kyngas, "The qualitative content analysis process," Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 62, no. 15, pp. 107-115, 2008.[11] U. Nguyen, T. Russo-Tait, C. Riegle-Crumb and K. Doerr, "Changing the gendered status quo in engineering? The encouraging and discouraging experiences of young women with engineering aspirations," Science Education, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1442-1468, 2022.
; Applications, 9th edition, Published by Pearson (January 7th, 2021) - Copyright © 2022, Thomas L. Floyd, David M. Buchla, Gary D. Snyder 5. M. Nasri, M. R. Hossain, H. L. Ginn and M. Moallem, "Agent-based real-time coordination of power converters in a DC shipboard power system," 2015 IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium (ESTS), Old Town Alexandria, VA, USA, 2015, pp. 8-13. 6. M. Nasri, M. R. Hossain, H. L. Ginn and M. Moallem, "Distributed control of converters in a DC microgrid using agent technology," 2016 Clemson University Power Systems Conference (PSC), Clemson, SC, USA, 2016, pp. 1-6.
knowledge in values education,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1791–1798, Oct. 2008. 2. M. W. Johansen et al., “Lack of ethics or lack of knowledge? European upper secondary students’ doubts and misconceptions about integrity issues,” International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 18, no. 1, Aug. 2022. 3. L. A. Jensen, J. J. Arnett, S. S. Feldman, and E. Cauffman, “It’s Wrong, But Everybody Does It: Academic Dishonesty among High School and College Students,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 209–228, Apr. 2002. 4. R. Hiebert, “Morality Play,” The Report, vol. 29, no. 23, pp. 56, 2 Dec. 2002. [Online] Available:https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct
and fracture properties of FDM 3D-printed PLA specimens,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 247, 108766, 2022.[7] E. Limpert, W.A. Stahel, and M. Abbt, “Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues,” BioScience, 51(5), pp. 341-352, 2001.[8] R. Diwakar, “An evaluation of normal versus lognormal distribution in data description and empirical analysis,” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 22(13), 2017.[9] Y. Kasai and M. Saito, “Weibull analysis of strengths of various reinforcing filaments,” Fibre Science and Technology, 12(1), pp. 21-29, 1979.[10] F.W. Zok, “On weakest link theory and Weibull statistics,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 100(4), pp. 1265–1268, 2017.[11] W. Huang, P
scores are statistically significant (p-values <0.0001).Table 5. Course and teacher survey data 2018 through 2023. Fall 2018 Fall 2019 Fall 2020 Fall 2021 Fall 2022 Fall 2023 Section All SB All SB All SB All SB All SB All SB Requires 4.1 4.7 4.2 4.7 4.2 4.5 4.1 4.9 4.1 4.6 4.0 4.6 hard work Intellectually stimulating 4.2 4.7 4.2 4.7 4.2 4.5 4.2 4.9 4.1 4.7 4.1 4.6 class Learned a 4.1 4.6 4.3 4.7 4.2 4.5 4.1 4.8 4.2 4.7 4.0 4.6 great deal Overall value 4.2 4.6
] C. Davis, and E. Wilcock, “Case studies in Engineering,” in Effective Learning and Teaching inEngineering, C. Baillie and I. Moore, Eds, London: Rutledge Falmer publishers, 2004, pp. 51-71.[4] P.K. Raju and C.S. Sankar (2013) “Teaching Real-World Issues through Case Studies,” Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 88, pp. 501-508, 2013.[5] V. Edmondson and F. Sherratt, “Engineering judgement in undergraduate structural designeducation: enhancing learning with failure case studies”, European Journal of Engineering Education,vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 577-590, 2022.[6] A. Yadav, M. Vinh, G.M. Shaver, P. Meckl and S. Firebaugh, “Case-based instruction: Improvingstudents' conceptual understanding through cases in a mechanical engineering course