Paper ID #15561Capstone Design Project Experience: Lunar Ice Extraction DesignMr. Steven Anthony Zusack, Purdue University: Engineering and Technology Recent graduate with a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering. Currently working as an Intern at NASA Johnson Space Planning to enter graduate school in the Fall of 2016 for a master’s in Aero/Astro Engineering at Purdue University. Aspirations of pursuing PhD in the field of Aerospace Engineering with a focus on aerospace systems.Miss Raveena Patil, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Recent graduate with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and will pursue
fabrication of the Berkut UAV for Geneva Aerospace, and engine fairings for the U.S. Army. He was the test conductor during the UltraLight Sensor Platform project, which was a research initiative to develop an ultralight sensor platform by creating an optionally-piloted aircraft system. As test conductor he wrote the flight test plans, flight test cards, and supervised the flight test team during test missions. He advises the Student UAS Team. He teaches the capstone aircraft design course, aircraft flight dynamics, and aircraft advanced performance. He has since left Raspet and transitioned to the aerospace engineering department. He is also developing the unmanned aircraft system engineering curriculum
, Fairbanks, Upward Bound John Monahan is currently the Director of University of Alaska Fairbanks, Upward Bound and Princi- pal Investigator of the National Science Foundations EPSCoR Track 3 ”Modern Blanket Toss” project investigating the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in K12 classrooms.Mr. Samuel VanderwaalCarl H FranceLogan Walker Graves, UAF c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 UAS Systems Engineering Design Process in Active LearningAbstractUnmanned aircraft systems (UAS) offer a fresh opportunity to teach students the systems engineeringdesign process (SEDP) and basic principles of aerospace engineering. The widespread popularity ofUAS, the explosion of affordable and
Paper ID #16028Mentored, Unpaid Design Team Internship ExperienceProf. Peter J. Schubert, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Schubert is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and serves as the Director of the Richard G. Lugar Center for Renewable Energy (www.lugarenergycenter.org) and is the faculty advisor for Stu- dents for the Exploration and Development of Space (SEDS) at IUPUI. He holds 40 US Patents, a Pro- fessional Engineering License (Illinois), and has published over 95 technical papers and book chapters. Schubert has managed research projects from USDA, NASA, DOE, NSF, and DoD
American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Preparing Aerospace Engineering Students for Career in UAV TechnologiesAbstractUnmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have potential of reducing human casualty and cost formany dull, dirty, and dangerous missions. UAVs are one of the fastest growing sectors ofAerospace Industry. However, there is a lack of professionals entering the workforce. There isalso a lack of students pursuing studies for graduate degrees in the UAV related areas. Thispaper talks about innovative projects and teaching practices designed to increase students’interest and involvement in UAV related projects. Many aspects of UAV technologies are not orcannot usually be taught in classroom
Paper ID #16714Concept of a Human-Attended Lunar OutpostMr. Thomas W. Arrington, Texas A&M University Thomas Arrington worked as the student Project Manager for the Human Attended Lunar Outpost senior design project for the the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University in College Station. He has interned with Boeing Research and Technology three times, and was an active member of the Texas A&M University Sounding Rocketry Team.Mr. Nicolas Federico Hurst, Texas A&M 2015 Capstone Design Spacecraft Nico Hurst is a student of Texas A&M University. He recently graduated from the Aerospace
the Students for the Exploration and Development of Space (SEDS) and Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) chapters. He is also an aca- demic success mentor who facilitates incoming university students in achieving educational fulfillment while encouraging involvement with undergraduate campus research.Mr. Steven Anthony Zusack, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Mechanical Engineering graduate. Current research includes design project of a 1G Spinning Space Station and Lunar Polar Ice Extraction for Moon Fueling Station. Aspirations of pursuing PhD in the field of Aerospace Engineering with a focus on Spacecraft Design. Currently working at NASA Johnson Space Center performing structural testing for
research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. In addition, he has been named as one of 14 ence in Cesk´ Jhumki Basu Scholars by the NARST’s Equity and Ethics Committee in 2014. He is the first and only individual from his native country and Texas Tech University to have received this prestigious award. Fur- thermore, he was a recipient of the Texas Tech University President’s Excellence in Diversity & Equity award in 2014 and was the only graduate student to have received the award, which was granted based on outstanding activities and projects that contribute to a better understanding of equity and diversity issues within Engineering Education. Additional projects involvement
by doing” is essential as science and technology change at a very fast pace. 5. Learning is an individualized process as each student has unique preferences while still being enrolled in an integrated environment. 6. Networking is essential as students need to practice and master belonging to community. 7. Learning is a global activity. Boundaries within cultures and languages impede advancement. 8. Students are mentored in clearly identifying the “purpose” of learning. Problem and project based learning strengthens intrinsic motivation; thus field experience is extremely valuableSimilar to ours, multiple institutions of higher learning in the United States are realizing that theconventional means of teaching may
, he was a recipient of the Texas Tech University President’s Excellence in Diversity & Equity award in 2014 and was the only graduate student to have received the award, which was granted based on outstanding activities and projects that contribute to a better understanding of equity and diversity issues within Engineering Education. Additional projects involvement include: Engineering is Elementary (EiE) Project; Computational Think- ing/Pedagogy Project; Rocket Project of SystemsGo; World MOON Project; East Lubbock Promise Neighborhood (ELPN) Project; and Robotics. Since 2013 he has served as the president of the Nu Sigma chapter of Kappa Delta Pi: International Honor Society in Education and was the founding
hypothetical, and tangible project architectures, and compare this totraditional approaches. As a final note we suggest that all industries in engineering andtechnology would benefit greatly from this cross-discipline approach to evaluating cyber-securityearly within the educational process.IntroductionAs we advance in the information age we are increasingly aware of the threat that cyber-terrorists pose to United States government and military networks around the world. In the past,information technology did little more for the government than to aid government offices inadministrative tasks, but has now become a critical part of military operations globally. The U.S.military cyberspace infrastructure is made up of tens of thousands of networks and
. Equipped with reaction wheels similar to what could be foundon a SmallSat class spacecraft, a MicroElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) inertialmeasurement unit, and simulated attitude sensors, the attitude test-bed allows for realistic attitudecontrol in the presence of noise. The system is integrated with MATLAB to make controlling it assimple as possible for students without extensive hardware programming experience. This systemhas been used to implement attitude estimation algorithms as part of a independent study andattitude control as part of a hands-on project to augment a graduate-level spacecraft control classthat has relied solely on lecture and simulated work in the past. This paper details the design andconstruction of the attitude test
solution.Another difference in expert and novice approaches to engineering design is their awareness of reasonsbehind a particular design solution.6 Expert designers generally have a larger problem space and are ableto refer to past projects to find similar designs. They are also able to consider the tradeoffs betweenmultiple design solutions.6,9 Further, expert designers identify and consider the relevancy of a topic insolving complex design problems.6 Conversely, novice engineering designers aren’t always aware of theinformation they lack to adequately solve the design problem.6In engineering education, Atman et al has conducted research to examine the design processes utilizedby student engineers.10-12 This research has shown that the engineering
by the individual, nor is it imposed from the outside, ‘it is constituted as an internal relation between them. There is only one world, but it is a world we experience, a world in which we live, a world that is ours’. The seminal research that developed phenomenography as a research methodology, forexample, investigated students’ understanding of velocity in a physics class[9]. Velocity was theconcept or “the thing”, but the researchers were actually interested in how students understoodvelocity, which is “the thing as it appeared”. It was the students’ understanding that was thephenomenon of research interest. In aerospace engineering, Subject Matter Experts are important assets to projects, andSMEs have deep
structures and materials in the School ofAeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University.As previously noted, the difference between our activities and PLTL/SI was that our TA-ledsupervised homework session used the assigned homework problems from the lecture to learnconcepts on structural mechanics, whereas the previously-reported projects used supplementalmaterials to teach the materials. More specifically, in our research, a problem was discussed bythe TA using a document camera and projector. Since no small group activities were involved,the TA-led supervised session was not a cooperative learning session.As the TA led the session by showing the key concepts needed to solve the problems, the TAcontinually asked questions on the important ideas
active learning exercises as Activities 1-5. Activities 1-3 wereimplemented as in-class activities. Due to time limitations, Activities 4 and 5 were integratedinto the lectures. In future course offerings, all activities will be in-class, team (2 or 3 students)exercises.An overview of the research project was given to the class at the beginning of the semester. Asthe course progressed, more in-depth presentations and discussions regarding the relevant topicsfollowed. For example, during the portion of the course in which vibration measurement wascovered, a presentation detailing the experimental method was given. This included discussionof the components of the test fixture, data acquisition system, and measurement sensors such asaccelerometers
engineering classes. 2. Did your elementary, middle, or high school have a gifted studies program? Did you participate in gifted studies? 3. Did you have any engineering experience before attending college? Where did you get this engineering experience? 4. Did you take any Project Lead the Way classes? 5. Have you participated in any advanced curriculum? Describe your experience. 6. Does either of your parents work in engineering or science related field? Explain. 7. Is there any reason that you might want to leave aerospace or engineering now or at some time in the future? Explain. 8. Are you an engineer? 9. Are you involved with any on-campus groups? If yes, then which ones? 10. What are your