professionals and leadersin the AEC industry are in high demand regionally, nationally and internationally. From a globalperspective, AE programs are unique and sparse compared to civil engineering and architectureprograms. In total there are 22 ABET accredited AE programs in the United States that offerdegrees. These programs must be adaptable to the industry to remain current with, and ahead of,leading industry practices. To remain most relevant to industry, AE programs regularly evolvetheir senior capstone project experience. Since the building industry is so diverse, and the AEprograms themselves are often diverse from one another, the composition of capstone coursesacross programs has not been heavily studied in looking for critical trends. Thus
eleven primary objectives where each objective was a mini-project. The objectives built toward a comprehensive design that was a code compliant, graphicaland numerical structural solution to a predetermined architectural design. The desired level oflearning was demonstrating the ability to apply the technical theory to a large complex problem.The instruments were in the form of homework problems and examinations for the introductoryclasses, and mini-projects assembling into a comprehensive solution for the capstone course.Each homework and examination question connected to a single learning objective. Thequestions were in the same format as the National Council of Architectural Registration Board(NCARB) license examination. I have been building
success of thecourse.1.0 Introduction Designers, builders and owners have been increasingly recognizing the value of having moreintegrated approach in the design process to facilitate development of an overall better buildingperformance (Holland et al. 2010). To be equipped to contribute to and lead integrated design teams, it iscritical that students gain experience during their education in integrated design projects that leveragecollaboration (Messner et al. 2011). In academic settings, strategic locations for integrated design educationare commonly located in capstones and design studios. For engineering students, capstone courses looklargely at technical integration and engineering system development, whereas for architecture
inter-disciplinary teamwork, instead ofjust ‘working’ in groups together. Students demonstrated their potential to advance the scienceand technology frontier through effective inter-disciplinary collaboration (Exhibit 1).Colleagues from College of Architecture and engineering technology program in the College ofTechnology developed learning objectives and a pedagogical approach before co-teaching thecourse in Fall 2017. As project-intensive inquiry-based learning course it provided a platform forstudents to innovate within a real world project by applying design strategy and technicalsolutions developed in their capstone projects and studios.Exhibit 1Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Students Presenting to Campus Sustainability Committee1.3
design) and designintegration and presentation. The students learn how architects and engineers work together inmulti-disciplinary teams to complete a building design project. The course is assessed each yearthrough course assessment plans, course assessment reports, student course critiques andprogram graduation surveys. Quantitative and qualitative assessment data are presented. Itsupports multiple ABET student outcomes and criteria. Students rate it among their favoriteundergraduate courses. More importantly, it prepares them for their future roles in designing andmanaging real building projects.Keywords: ABET, architecture, civil engineering, engineering design, interdisciplinary, BIMIntroductionUndergraduate civil engineering programs
. Once a community project and partner have beenprudently chosen, Sutton suggests the following transformative strategies to utilize in servicelearning pedagogy: “cumulative exposures, comprehensive experiences, capstone experiences,immersion experiences, interdisciplinary experiences, community participation, youthparticipation, reflective practice, long term participation, and institutional participation” (Sutton2012). While this is a lengthy list of strategies, not all of these concepts can be applied to asingle course, as several are realized over the duration of one’s academic career. The strategiesmost applicable to this paper are immersion experiences and reflective practice, due to theduration of this particular community engaged
education.Bhattacharjee and Ghosh discussed the usefulness of role-playing in construction education andemphasized how students employed critical thinking skills as they played the role of differentstakeholders [6] [7]. In project-based learning, students work on real projects. Most constructionprograms require students to complete capstone projects as the culminating experience to earntheir degrees. Students can learn higher-level cognitive skills through project-based and problem-based learning [8].In recent years, there has been increasing use of technology to foster and support learning.Messner et al. discussed the use of immersive virtual reality in construction education, and theyfound that students have a better understanding of construction projects in
-based inductive learningexperience. According to Prince and Felder, Inductive learning is conclusively better thantraditional deductive pedagogy [6]. Project-based inductive learning is typical to mostengineering capstone course projects [6], where course knowledge and theories are meant to bediscovered by the students through a realistic design problem, rather than delivered to them at theonset of the assignment. In our particular case, we are attempting a self-driven inductive learningexercise before the students have received any formal post-secondary level instruction. It istherefore important that a sufficient support structure is maintained at all times.In the case of the AE design days activity, this support was given in the form of
/AIAS New Faculty Teaching Award, and the 2006 Halliburton Excellent Young Teacher Award. In addition to carrying on an architectural practice while teaching, many of her scholarship and creative activities relate to teaching in the Comprehensive Design Studio. Topics include multidisciplinary collaborations and integration of systems. She has collaboratively created educational material covering basics of egress design which has been viewed by students and professionals worldwide, and has led multidisciplinary design teams and research projects. She has presented at a variety of architecture, engineering, and fire protection academic and professional venues.Mr. William Crawford American
, with a background in struc- tural engineering and project management. Dr. Mosier has received regional and international teaching awards through the Associated Schools of Construction. Research interests include the cost of sustainable construction to owners and engineering education.Dr. Heather N. Yates, Oklahoma State University Dr. Yates joined the Oklahoma State University Construction Faculty in 2006 as an Assistant Professor. She received her Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology from the OSU Construction Manage- ment Department in 1998. She graduated with a Masters of Engineering Technology from Pittsburg State University in 2002. She also earned a Specialist in Education Degree from Pittsburg State
Modularized LecturesAbstract Traditional lecturing of building code related topics are commonly taught ad-hoc in courses,often get misinterpreted by faculty unfamiliar with code details, or left out entirely from courses. Toimprove dissemination of code knowledge in our department but also be applicable to two otherassociated departments, a project was undertaken to enhance mechanisms for faculty to better deliverbuilding code knowledge in academic settings. Here, self-contained teaching modules were developedthat can be incorporated within existing courses. Our code education enhancements take what has beentraditionally perceived as passively learned content with little appeal that minimizes studentengagement and immersion, to more active
via Facebook Live and four of them via Zoom Meetings.In total, there was a participation of 121 undergraduate students from the following courses: - Foundations Engineering, - Design of Steel Structures, - Structural Systems, - Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures, - Capstone Project in Structural Design.The average age of the participants is twenty-one years. They were notified about the virtual visita week before the first one, and one session before the following five.III.a. The virtual site visitsStudents were asked to connect to Zoom or Facebook at the beginning of the class. The professorwould already be in the construction site. The professor used a cellphone Samsung Galaxy S9+,to broadcast the visit. The
-19: Student perspectivesAbstractThe paper examines students’ perspectives that impact the student learning activities’ transitiondue to COVID-19. The study seeks to determine how face-to-face or in-person teaching to non-traditional or online methods has affected the student, particularly in the construction program.Additionally, as construction courses typically include labs and capstone projects, it is essential todetermine how these courses were delivered as the programs transitioned to the online mediums.The research study compares content delivery before and during COVID-19. The survey questionsare used to determine the challenges students face in accessing the course management system,familiarizing themselves, and being satisfied with
of this paper is to present a set of hands-on modules that utilizes mathematical andgeometric modeling as educational activities in a facade design course. The proposed modulescan be utilized in various courses such as facade design, capstone design/ thesis, or independentstudy in architecture and/or interior design undergraduate or graduate programs. 3The proposed design modulesThe process of pattern modeling and design of pattern-based responsive facades can beconsidered a valuable learning experience in an interdisciplinary process that includes research,design, simulation, performance evaluation, optimization, testing, and documentation.The proposed hands-on modules have been designed to
simulation of materials. He participate in multiple projects, including the Development of a Model for The Metal Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process. Dr. Ahmed Cherif Megri is currently the chair of the NCAT CAM’s Education subcommittee. He contributed to the outreach CAM since 2015.Mr. Ismail Megri Is a rising junior at Northwest Middle in Greensboro, has begun taking 3D printing and design courses at North Carolina A&T State University. He participated to 2017 Appalachian Energy Summit Poster Competition.Dr. Sameer Hamoush P.E., North Carolina A&T State University Professor and Chair of Civil and Architectural Engineering DepartmentDr. Taher M. Abu-Lebdeh c
and detailed design, thenmaterial ‘ordering’ and the start of the Build Phase. Next, the second day consisted ofbuilding in the morning, then load testing and presentations in the afternoon. Faculty, staff,and graduate student volunteers facilitated critique sessions after each of the two designphases; the volunteers also acted as the judges on the review panels during final testing andpresentations. Figure 1: In-person AE Design Days event structure [1].Overall, the event was motivated by an inductive learning pedagogical approach. Prince andFelder (2006) stated that inductive learning is better than the traditional deductive learningexperience, with the example given being the use of capstone design projects in
and international committees for many international conferences.Dr. Shinming Shyu, Eastern Michigan University Shinming Shyu is a faculty member of College of Technology at Eastern Michigan University. Earning his Ph.D. degree in Architecture from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Dr. Shyu, LEED AP BD+C, has been engaged in teaching and research activities in building performance and sustainable design. Being a registered architect since 1992, Dr. Shyu involved in numerous large-scaled projects, ranging from hospital, museum, library, church, and corporate headquarter, and is equipped with a wealth of experiences accumulated in the field of architectural design and building construction. With deep interest
Paper ID #32343Student Internships During Times of Pandemic: A Historical View ofPandemics, Recession and Their Effect on EducationDr. Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University Dr. Rachel Mosier is an Associate Professor at Oklahoma State University, with a background in struc- tural engineering and project management. Dr. Mosier has received regional and international teaching awards through the Associated Schools of Construction. Research interests include the cost of sustainable construction to owners and engineering education.Dr. Heather N. Yates, Oklahoma State University Dr. Yates joined the Oklahoma State