Paper ID #36882Combining Evidence-Based Practices with Technology to Enhance anArchitectural Technology Design StudioProf. Darrell D. Nickolson, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis Darrell Nickolson serves as an Associate Professor at the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology on the Indianapolis campus and also is a member of the design team at Curran Architecture. Professor Nickolson teachers Architectural Technology, Interior Design, and BIM coursework, and he leads students in community-based experiential learning design projects and most recently solar energy research.Kelly Scholl, Indiana University
Paper ID #38104Impact of the digital design process in an architectural engineeringtechnology program: Integration of advanced digital tools (work inprogress)Mr. Eugene Kwak, State University of New York, College of Technology at Farmingdale Eugene Kwak is a licensed architect and an assistant professor in the Department of Architecture and Construction Management at Farmingdale State College, State University of New York. He has been running research-based projects, including the most recent project ”Togather” which has been featured in the New York Times and Dwell. ”Togather” focuses on the regional food systems, land access
Paper ID #38942Implication of Developing Digital Twins to Improve Students’ LearningExperiencesDr. Mohammad Heidarinejad, Illinois Institute of Technology Mohammad Heidarinejad, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering at Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, IL. Mohammad received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering and his M.Sc. in Architectural Engineering, both from Pennsylvania State University. Previously he was a research assistant professor and research associate in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Maryland
and a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (SFHEA) in the UK. Shannon is Deputy Editor of the European Journal of Engineering Education and has served as Full Professor of Architecture in the USA, Chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN), Associate Editor of IEEE Transactions on Education, Fulbright Fellow to Ireland, and a Marie Curie Research Fellow (to both Ireland and the UK).Dr. Barry McAuley, Technological University Dublin Dr. Barry McAuley is a Chartered Construction Project Manager and Head of Digital Construction and Geospatial Surveying at the Technological University Dublin’s School of Surveying and Construction Innovation. Prior to his current position, Barry spent a
Paper ID #36797Using Conceptual Cost Estimating as a Constraint and Tool in DesignCurriculumProf. Eric Anderson R.A., State University of New York, College of Technology at Farmingdale Eric Anderson is an architect and educator with more than thirty years in educational and non-profit facil- ities planning and management. He has overseen the planning and/or construction of over $ 1 billion of capital improvement for non-profit and educational institutions in New Mexico, West Virginia, Nevada, and New York. He is a registered architect in New York and West Virginia. Professional memberships include the American Institute
authored several technical publications of the Mexican Institute of Transporta- tion, extensive publications in congresses, international and national symposiums, as well as in scientific journals. From 2017 to 2020 he served as Director of the Civil Engineering program at Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Campus Quer´etaro and as professor of the Structural Engineering area at the institution and since November 2020 he leads the Department of Sustainable Technologies and Civil Engineering at Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Campus Quer´etaro.Prof. Miguel X. Rodriguez-Paz, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico Prof. Rodriguez-Paz got his B.Sc. In Civil Engineering from Tecnologico de Oaxaca in 1993. He studied a M.Sc. In Structural
include ARCHE professors in the beginning architectural design studios appears tobe successful and should be continued.References[1] S. Olson and D. Riordan, “Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathemetics,” Report to the President, Feb. 2012.[2] J. Morrow and M. Ackermann, “Intention to Persist and Retention of First-Year Students: The Importance of Motivation and Sense of Belonging,” College Student Journal, vol. 46, pp. 483-491, Sept. 2012.[3] J. Phillips, “Updating the Curriculum in an ARCHE Program to Include New Degree Options”, proceedings of the 2017 ARCHEI National Conference; April 2017.[4] Structural Engineering, Engagement, and Equity
also a competence-based one, inwhich each program has major competences that we declare our students will develop duringtheir studies. The name of our model is Tec21 and has proven to be very successful inattracting students to all the programs. The model also includes the design of new learningspaces and the use of the latest technologies in the learning rooms [1-6]. Fig. 1 shows the newlayout for teaching Engineering courses in our university. ^ Fig. 1. New learning spaces with chairs that allowed collaboration (September 2019)The main objective of this paper is to present some of the activities that have been wellaccepted by students as well as some of the best practices from online terms, in whichprofessors had to adapt the
Paper ID #38777Implementing NACE Competencies in LEED Lab to Prepare a Career-ReadyWorkforceDr. Mohsen Goodarzi, Ball State University Dr. Mohsen Goodarzi is an assistant professor of construction Management at Ball State University. He received his PhD. in Construction Management from Michigan State University in 2021. His research focuses on sustainability in the built environment, life cycle costing, and construction education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Implementing NACE competencies in LEED Lab to prepare a career-readyworkforce Mohsen Goodarzi
University’s Engineering Management and Systems Engineering Department in Washington DC.Dr. Joost R. Santos, The George Washington University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Novel Approach for Teaching System Architecture at the Undergraduate Engineering Level Eric Dano, Ph.D. and Joost Santos, Ph.D. George Washington University, Engineering Management and Systems Engineering (EMSE) Department ericdano@gwu.edu and joost@gwu.eduAbstract:Research has shown that system architecture, along with the concurrent decision analyses andrequirements definition, has the greatest effect on an engineered system’s cost
regarding active experimentation[7]. Open-ended laboratory courses or even traditional classes with experimentation exposure have shownto provide greater learning value as compared to the traditional lecture only focus [2,8]. Such coursesemploy an approach to learning science that are backed by a significant body of work on research-basedand active pedagogies in various engineering disciplines as well as have demonstrated superior levels ofstudent engagement and learning. Introduction of real-world problems not only allows students to masterappropriate techniques and technologies, but also allows the students to design strategies for solvingproblems and practice an overall process of inquiry [9-10]. Since experimentation is so critical to
creativity and critical thinking [27]. Interdisciplinary learning is an effective way to overcome barriers among different disciplines,improve communication and collaboration skills, and promote the understanding and mastery ofprofessional skills in future employment for future professionals and emphasized that interdisciplinarylearning in the context of technology can add value to higher education students and benefit their skillsdevelopment, thereby increasing student success [4]. Interdisciplinary learning has been shown to improveacademic progress and general skill, and increase student engagement [28]. In addition, interdisciplinarylearning is used in engineering to emphasize the importance of interpersonal skills and to enhance
States that produce students ready to beemployed in the construction industry. These programs are generally accredited by ABET orACCE. ABET accredited programs are reviewed by a variety of commissions, such as theEngineering Accreditation Commission, the Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission,and the Applied and Natural Science Accreditation Commission, and have descriptions such as“Construction Management”, “Construction Engineering”, “Construction EngineeringTechnology”, etc. ACCE accredited programs are more streamlined, and their descriptions arein general “Construction Management”.In any case, these programs have curricula that are similar in various ways, and this researchaims to identify these similarities. Research presented in
Paper ID #39682Artificial Intelligence (AI) Art Generators in the Architectural DesignCurriculaProf. Keith E. Hedges, Drury University Keith Hedges is a registered architect and professor of architecture that teaches the architectural structures sequence at Drury University. Keith’s teaching repertoire includes 20 different courses of engineering topics at NAAB (architecture) and architecture topics at ABET (engineering) accredited institutions. His interests involve the disciplinary knowledge gap between architecture and engineering students in higher education. Keith is the editor of the Architectural Graphic
Paper ID #38812Sustainability-Related Issues among Architecture and ConstructionStudents: Analyzing Perception of Sustainable Design and ConstructionDr. Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He completed a Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management, from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with 22 years of the aca- demic experience at five
symposiums, as well as in scientific journals. From 2017 to 2020 he served as Director of the Civil Engineering program at Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Campus Quer´etaro and as professor of the Structural Engineering area at the institution and since November 2020 he leads the Department of Sustainable Technologies and Civil Engineering at Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Campus Quer´etaro. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Construction site visits during pandemic period and their use in postpandemic timesAbstractDuring the years 2020 - 2021, students and lecturers have faced academical challenges like noother generation before them. One of the most important changes was the inability ofattending
publications in congresses, international and national symposiums, as well as in scientific journals. From 2017 to 2020 he served as Director of the Civil Engineering program at Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Campus Quer´etaro and as professor of the Structural Engineering area at the institution and since November 2020 he leads the Department of Sustainable Technologies and Civil Engineering at Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Campus Quer´etaro. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023The positive effect of construction site visits in the adequatecomprehension of structural engineering concepts for students.AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate, through on-line polls, questionnaires, and face-to
classroom.Juan Sebastian Andrade, Universidad San Francisco de Quito Juan Sebasti´an Andrade is an undergraduate student in the College of Architecture and Interior Design CADI at Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ.Nicole Janine Villac´ıs, Nicole Villac´ıs Nicole is an undergraduate student in the College of Architecture and Interior design CADI at University San Francisco de Quito USFQ. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Mind mapping to improve architecture students’ skills in navigating hand-on and lecture-based pedagogies Ignacio Guerra P. 1*, Juan Sebastián Andrade2, Nicole Villacís21 Professor, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ
the role of both civil engineer and architect. In 1818 the Institute of CivilEngineers appeared in Great Britain, and it was not until 1834 that the Royal Institute ofBritish Architects was formed in the same country. The creation of these twoinstitutions gave rise to different specializations in each profession. On the one hand,engineering and structural problems and, on the other hand, design and functionalspecifications [1]. This event initiated the creation of a gap between both constructionbranches that has been growing until today so that even though both professions sharesimilar design objectives the standards experienced are different [2], [3]. Nowadays, dueto technological advances and the growth of the demand for infrastructure