cadre of engineering education research faculty in the engineering departments and creating a graduate program. Her research focuses on the development, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts; the design and implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Weekly Self-rating of Proficiency with Course Learning Objectives: Gaining Insight into Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of their LearningAbstractQuizzes, mid-term examinations, and homework are common ways
]. The instrument assesses learning preferences on four scales withtwo dimensions each: Processing with the Active and Reflective dimensions; Perception with theSensing and Intuitive dimensions; Input with the Visual and Verbal dimensions; andUnderstanding with the Sequential and Global dimensions. Ratings are represented by a degreeof preference for each learning scale: balanced (no preference between dimensions), moderatepreference for one dimension, or strong preference for one dimension.In the processing scale, active learners prefer learning the material by applying it, discussing it orexplaining it to others. Reflective learners prefer to think about and reflect on the material first.In the perception scale, sensing learners prefer to
conceptualized from a longitudinal study of a scholar’s program atthree different universities in the state of Nebraska. A department faculty member was part of amulti-year institutional professional learning community (PLC) that explored the scale-up andscale-out of this model. Based on their experience from the PLC, this model was used in thedevelopment of the department’s overall student services ethos and in the specificimplementation of two initiatives: 1) hybrid advising/mentoring model, and 2) peer-mentoringprogram. This practice paper provides an overview of the ecological validation model andpresents our approach to implementing these initiatives. We also reflect on challenges and futureopportunities including long-term sustainability and
one hour twice weekly summer school programfor students who had recently finished 3rd grade using this curriculum.This reflection examines the experiences of curriculum designers and instructors during the firstuse of the materials to understand the efficacy of the curriculum to meet key learning objectivesrelated to AMR. This case study reflection also examines the quality of student engagement andease of use to instructors for interactive components developed in this curriculum, like animatedvideos and hands-on activities. All the data and insights presented in this paper are based on theperspectives and feedback provided by iAMResponsible™ team members who developed thecurriculum, summer program instructor, student teaching assistants, and
. The goal of these discussions is togather detailed information about how they use multiple languages and technology in labs, with afocus on how they communicate and understand tasks. Following these discussions, we holdreflection meetings to go over and confirm the details gathered from the interviews. The findingsfrom these interviews will help us think about how to make future classroom experiences bettersuited for graduate student assistants from different language backgrounds. In December 2023,during our reflection meetings, we took a close look at our own experiences. Hector led grouptalks and interviews to study our experiences, especially the cultural parts in our life stories andresearch. We found important topics and patterns. Hector
course in Fall 2023. In addition to the survey questions,students were invited to answer open-ended questions about the positive aspects of the courseand to write a reflection after the meet and greet event. The survey questions are presented inTable 1. The sense of belonging questions were adapted from the Sense of Belonging to MathScale by Good et al. [16], and the motivation question was taken from the MUSIC model byJones [6]. Table 1. Survey items related to students’ interests, motivation and sense of belongingMeasurement Survey Questions Answers Time of CollectionInterests How much are you currently Likert scale • FALL 22 END interested in
fromcomputer science (University of Maryland Baltimore County) participated in the sustainablerobotic agriculture project and worked closely with undergraduates in Agriculture and Engineeringmajors from the home institution to assist with setting up experiments; collecting and analyzingdata. The students were required to submit a short report reflecting on the experience and resultsof the findings. During the entire academic year, there were 5 students (2 as a part of theirundergraduate research experience; and 3 as part of their paid assistantships) participated in thisproject. Out of the six students; two were from general engineering majors; one from agriculturemajor; one from computer science major; and two were from Biology majors.2.2 Farmbots
workplace. Figure 2.d. shows that students considered that working in thelaboratory helped them the most to develop teamwork skills. Responses included the followingcomments: “We fell into our natural group roles”, “My work was valued”, “I have been able towork with peers who have different strengths, and we learned to use our strengths to completethe lab.”Figure 2.e, shows that challenges this semester were tied to academics and life balance. Asignificant number of responses reflected on the difficulties of developing healthy study habits.Students usually have to balance their academic load, roles in other social clubs, work, personallife, etc. However, although challenges pointed to the academic topics, figure 2.f. shows thatstudents felt they
0.99 assignments Weighted Mean 2.45 0.94 2.49 0.71 2.75 1.00 2.55 1.01Student engagement and growthThe experiment focused on problem-solving, motivation, confidence, and interest, which showedmeasurable growth. This indicates that the experiment targeted dimensions associated with activelearning as identified in previous studies. This supports the idea that practical activities canenhance STEM education [13]. The decrease by Fall 2023 reflects warnings from Braxton et al.[3] that numerous reforms often lead to only a temporary increase in engagement. They stress thatmaintaining behavioral changes necessitates consistently cultivating a supportive culture for anextended period. The latest
level of learning needed to apply identified knowledge areas to thecorresponding step of the design process at the undergraduate level. This process was firstcompleted by a committee composed of AEES members from academia and industry withexpertise in one or more of the application areas. After an application area was completed, it wasshared with at least two external reviewers with expertise in the application for feedback.Whenever possible, external reviewers with industry experience were targeted to ensure that theknowledge, skills, and abilities as well as expected cognitive levels reflected what potentialemployers of EcoE graduates expected of new hires. Comments from external reviewers were thenincorporated by the committee of AEES
framework was often cited by students as a positive example of transfer.Others benefitted from taking the lead in their learning and reflecting on the material. Thesestudents found what worked for them in terms of transfer:“What I figured out about myself is I learn best through, like, evidence learning and examplelearning where I go through and essentially like, will diagram out problems of being like, okay,now solve this, or this is how the book solved it. How did we get to each line? What...whatprinciple is this applying? What equations am I using? Why do we move on to each step? And Iwill, like, do that for different systems until I understand the overall ideas of why.”This theme draws attention to the importance of transferring all types of
publication are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture orNational Science Foundation.References 1. W.J. Mitsch, “Ecological engineering: a new paradigm for engineers and ecologists,” Engineering within Ecological Constraints. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 111, 1996.2. W.J. Mitsch, “What is ecological engineering?” Ecological Engineering, 45, 5-12, 2012.3. J. L. Martin, V. Maris, and D. S. Simberloff, “The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(22), 6105-6112, 2016.4. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Data science for undergraduates