Degree will be able to work in avariety of medical facilities from doctor's offices to hospitals2. Specifically, they will beresponsible for problem solving, data interpretation, complex troubleshooting, preparation ofspecifications, scheduling, planning, analysis, project management, and decision making.BET CurriculumDrexel’s Engineering Technology undergraduate bachelor’s program consists of 187.5 totalquarter credits3. BET curriculum is based on ET core courses supplemented with a combinationof courses in biology, human factors, medical terminology, codes and regulations, medicalinstrumentation, and healthcare administration courses specific to the BET concentration, shownin red. Courses BET 301, BET 302, BET 303, and BET 305 have been
club (or how to find and read a research article), discussions on laboratory etiquette andresearch ethics. Participants were then integrated into their research mentors laboratory, andspent eight weeks on a research project. The program has two Peer Mentors, who areundergraduates with research experience, that live with the students and participate in theresearch project. The mentors are also responsible for additional social and academic activitiesduring nights and weekends. This paper describes the program, evaluations and critiques fromthe first year (from both research mentors and participants), as well as the challenges andopportunities the program presents to future “Research Experience for Undergraduates”programs. Surveys will continue
Engineering Research Center. He joined the BME depart- ment at IIT in 2007, where he is interested in problems associated with molecular and cellular engineer- ing, specifically the computational modeling of cellular migration. David teaches several courses within the BME department, most notably the senior design capstone sequence (BME 419 and 420) which he co-instructs with Dr. Jennifer Kang Derwent. He also is the lead instructor for IPRO 2.0, an interdisci- plinary project-based course required of all undergraduate at IIT. David collaborates actively with IIT’s entrepreneurship academy as well as its math and science education department. David is a member of the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) and the American
in a Bioinstrumentation Laboratory CourseAbstractMany lecture courses use muddy points as an instructional assessment technique that allows theinstructor to gather information about the topics that are not clear to the students at the end ofeach class. Using this information, the amount of lecture time allocated to a specific topic can beincreased or decreased to match students’ feedback and emphasize the areas where the studentsneed more support.A modified version of this technique was recently implemented in a junior level, project-basedbioinstrumentation course that focuses around the design, construction and testing of biomedicaltechnology. At the end of each class, students take an on-line survey where they are asked toidentify the
program now exceeding 150 students, the major challenges that stemfrom our decision to make this a required course are 1) providing a sufficient number ofinternship opportunities, and 2) finding projects that match students’ interests. Fortunately, at Page 13.797.3the University of Pittsburgh, the Swanson School of Engineering is located within one city blockof our world class School of Medicine and the vast clinical research facilities at the University ofPittsburgh Medical Center. As a result, undergraduates are able to participate in research andpatient care programs that are unmatched across the United States.These include the extracorporeal
firm since 1986, she is also the VaNTH project leader for core competency instruction. Hirsch has a B.A. in English from the University of Michigan and a Ph.D. in English from Northwestern University.Stacy Klein, Vanderbilt University Stacy S. Klein is the Associate Dean for Outreach at the Vanderbilt University School of Engineering. She is also a Research Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Radiological Sciences, and Teaching & Learning. An active mentor in the REU program, she also runs an RET program.Julie Greenberg, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Julie E. Greenberg is a Principal Research Scientist and Director of Education and Academic Affairs at the
Page 23.1400.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Works in Progress: North American Consortium onRehabilitation Engineering and Technology for the Individual (NARETI) Page 23.1400.2The availability and accessibility of appropriate rehabilitative health care, medical technologyand treatment is an important local, regional, national, and international issue. The focus of thisNorth American Mobility Program1 project is to increase awareness among biomedical engineersof the differing individual, family and community rehabilitative health care needs in NorthAmerica via student exchange
problems for a real client, 2.exploring the leading edges of the field, and 3. learning strategies to solve novel problems.Our challenge has been to turn teenagers straight out of high school into individuals with a realappreciation, based on experience, of what it takes to be an engineer. To this end, the course isorganized as a company, Blue Genes Research and Development, and our students are formedinto project teams, each assigned to a client, a specialist physician at the University of MichiganHospitals. Each team must work with the physician to develop a diagnostic test to detect adisease before the onset of symptoms. Course material emphasizes the fundamental doctrines ofsystems biology, the central role of quantification in design and
. Page 14.822.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Jumpstarting the Capstone Experience Through a Bioengineering Product Design CourseIntroductionFaculty at Florida Gulf Coast University have developed Bioengineering Product Design (BME4800C) specifically to introduce concepts and skills in bioengineering product design in thesemester prior to our capstone experience – thus, jumpstarting students into their senior designprojects. Our intent has been to use a reverse engineering, semester-long project to familiarizestudents with FDA regulations, intellectual property issues, and design with SolidWorks, amongother topics, in their junior year so more attention can be paid to the design
order to introduce freshmen students toBioengineering. BENG 1, Introduction to Bioengineering, is designed to introduce students tobioengineering as a discipline and also to introduce them to the research activities in thedepartment in a large lecture-style course format. Bioengineering faculty members speak abouttheir research during the class sessions and teams of students explore a design project of theirchoice. BENG 87, Freshmen Seminars in Bioengineering, is offered to introduce students toaspects of bioengineering in a small interactive group setting with faculty. Faculty members offerseminars each quarter on topics of their choice, usually related to their research interests.Students select seminars on a topic of interest and are
Medical Center, and Columbia Technology Ventures that facilitates commercialization of clinical solutions driven by teams of engineers, clinicians, scientists, students and others, with the end goal of moving promising biomedical technologies to clinical application and market-based healthcare solutions.Ms. Lorna Helen Begg, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health Ms. Lorna Begg is a MPH student at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. She works part-time as a Project Coordinator at the Columbia-Coulter Translational Research Partnership.John D. O’Neill, Columbia University, Department of Biomedical EngineeringAhmet-Hamdi Cavusoglu, Columbia University Ahmet-Hamdi Cavusoglu is a Chemical
students devote considerable effort to the design and developmentof their projects, but that they are not as motivated to devote time and effort to writing. As aresult, their final reports often have significant problems with organization, clarity, andeffectiveness. Therefore, we recently adopted several new strategies to improve the quality ofstudent writing. Our goals were to 1) encourage students to work on their writing earlier andthroughout the semester; 2) engage every student in each team in the writing process; 3) usewriting as a tool to improve students’ understanding of the clinical problem that they areaddressing and how their design addresses their client’s needs; and 4) improve the quality of thefinal reports.To achieve these goals
Paper ID #5945Work-in-Progress: Teaching Responsibility for Safety in Bioengineering De-signDr. Denny C. Davis P.E., Washington State University Dr. Denny Davis is emeritus professor of Chemical and Bioengineering at Washington State University. He has taught bioengineering multidisciplinary design for approximately a decade, with recent attention given to entrepreneurial projects. Dr. Davis recently co-developed instructional materials on Prevention through Design in Bioengineering for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). He is a Fellow of ASEE.Dr. Howard P Davis, Washington State University
topics. For examplein the specifications and architectural design tasks, all the students worked together to definehow signals would flow between modules; students gathered together again during the testingtasks. The following rules were established to facilitate and reward the collaboration andlearning:a) Personal accountability vs. team performance: Each student was responsible as individual for his product assignment (for example microcontroller HW&SW) while the team was responsible for the product.b) Co-tutoring: During the evaluation of the project any student could be required to explain, in detail, any design/implementation aspect. Students trained each other about their own specific aspect.c) Any type of intra-team
established the 10 educational program outcomes listed in Table 1. AnAssessment Committee was formed in 2006 and charged with developing a continuousimprovement process linked to educational objectives that could provide quantitative feedbackon strengths and potential areas of improvement of the program and assess the impact of changesto the curriculum.Our curriculum is unique nationwide. Design courses throughout the curriculum form a uniquefeature of the BME undergraduate degree program3, 4. Every BME student registers for a designcourse and works on a client-based design project every semester for six consecutive semesters.These design courses are supervised by faculty advisors and meet for two hours per week.Therefore, every BME student has
travelopportunities ties and project foundations. In February of 2009, students traveled to El Salvador tocomplete their first hospital and clinic assessment. Based upon the information gathered, theengineering crew returned in November of 2009 to remodel a clinic in prepar preparation ation for a nursingstudent-led health service trip which took place February 2011. Since the organization’s birth,the scope has expanded to include Nicaragua, Guatemala, and even ven right at home in Milwaukee.Students are finding that there are abundant opportunities all around the world and at homewhere they can
culture, microscopy, RNA and protein extraction, western blotting, RT-PCR, biomaterials and tissue engineering, ultrasound, EKG, biomechanics, microfluidics,biofluid dynamics, and quantitative clinical measurement methodologies. The end of this courseconsists of a four-week project which empowers the students to integrate the skills andknowledge accumulated throughout the year towards independently addressing a relevanthypothesis or question in BME. Student lab proficiency and analytical ability were assessed viadetailed group lab reports on each module, weekly quizzes, in-lab observation by the instructorsand TAs, and a final written practicum exam. Additionally, feedback on the course was gatheredfrom: 1) student evaluations, surveys, and
year of the undergraduate curriculum to teach thefundamentals of design (from needs identification and brainstorming to manufacturing andcommercialization). In spring 2013 we introduced significant changes to our required secondyear level semester-long design course aimed at teaching the ambit of BME research as well asdeveloping design principles and practices.BackgroundHistorically, this course has two main objectives: introducing new engineering students to thevast field of biomedical engineering and to developing designs with faculty andengineering/medical professionals. While looking for projects to assign our students in the springof 2013, we took a tour of our hospital’s Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with aneonatologist who had
, Inc., a San Luis Obispo-based biotechnology startup company. He has also served as an Assistant Professor at Milwaukee School of Engineering and was employed by McDonnell Douglas Space Systems Company, where he was a lead engineer and Principal Investigator on projects to develop technology evolution plans for the Space Station. Page 11.362.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 COSMM: An Undergraduate Laboratory for Engineering and Manufacturing Complex, Organic Shapes Using Nature as a TemplateIntroductionThe COSMM (Complex/Organic Shapes and Multiple
Paper ID #19437Clinical Immersion and Team-Based Design: Into a Third YearDr. Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University Jennifer Kadlowec is Professor and Department Head of Mechanical Engineering in the Henry M. Rowan of College of Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ. She has been an active member of ASEE since 1998. She joined as a graduate student, after working on an engineering education project and pre- senting that work and student chapter activities at annual conference. As a faculty member, she regularly publishes and presents at the ASEE Annual Conference. Her interests are in design education and assess
modules (“NanoLabs”) implemented to guide students through specificaspects of nanotechnology and existing tools. In a final project, students worked in teams toaddress specific design issues surrounding a number of areas including nanomedicine andbiosensors. The course was offered twice with limited enrollments in fall 2007 (12 students) and2008 (11 students). A number of changes were made in response to student comments after thefirst offering and this paper will discuss the course structure during the second offering.Course StructureThe course combined lectures, student-led presentations on journal articles, “Nanolab” modulesand their write-ups or reports, and a major team project that lead to final presentations andreports. The course schedule
Engineering, Biological Sciences, or AnimalScience.After completing their coursework, students complete a nine-month internship in a stem cellresearch lab at one of our partner institutions. The nine-month internship, which addresses all ofour programmatic learning goals, allows students to further develop their laboratory and criticalthinking skills in a research-intensive environment with a rigorous and independent project.Upon completion of their research internships, students return for one final quarter ofcoursework. During the quarter, students complete a Master’s Project Course that allows them toapply the skills gained during the research internship to existing research efforts at ouruniversity. This Master’s Project provides students with
. Concepts are generated and evaluated, and a plan is generated for thePage 13.359.4The faculty concluded that completely independent capstone experiences were not conducive tocreating a comprehensive design or experimental capstone experience.Phase II: Selective Integration of Capstone ExperiencesWe implemented a pilot study (Phase II) in which two of the design teams were allowed toremain intact for the experimental capstone experience. Furthermore, those teams were alsoassigned the same project in both capstone sequences. All other students experienced thecapstone courses in a manner identical to students in Phase I. We found that the students in theÐukping-team, single-rtqlgevÑ"rgthqtogf"cv"c"jkijgt"ngxgl as measured by quantitative
communication and final designdocumentation. There are numerous instruments involved with each step toassure that the final design has been optimized, meets the client’s needs, and iswell documented. At the end of the first quarter small teams are formed and aproject is assigned to each team. These projects are all different and by the end ofthe third quarter a product is produced.During the first quarter the class also forms teams of four or more and each teamundertakes the same design project. They then use the methods being taught ontheir design. It has been observed that while the students learned the principles,they were frustrated with the experience. Usually one or two on a team wouldtake the lead and the others coasted. A major problem was
, wheelchair setup, adaptive exercise equipment and recreational technologies. He has taught several project-based courses where student teams designed assistive devices for clients with disabilities Page 12.431.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Current Topics in Rehabilitation EngineeringAbstractThis paper describes a new introductory one hour freshman module developed to cover currenttopics in Rehabilitation Engineering. The course was team taught by an engineer/owner of alocal mobility aids firm and by a biomedical engineering design instructor. Students whoenrolled for the course were
projects. The data consisted of twice weekly reflections of the activities that studentteams engaged in during their design process, as well as open-ended comments about theirdesign progression. This data was then collapsed into Dym’s model from which empiricalassociations were made between the various stages. Coupled with the teams’ open-ended weeklyreflections, we were able to identify educational patterns that potentially lead to higher or lowerquality designs. Based on their final artifact, teams were judged to be innovative or non-innovative. We found that differences exist between those teams innovative non-innovativeteams. This paper reports these findings.IntroductionInnovation is highly important as competition between companies and
AC 2007-1194: 75 UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS OBTAIN MOTIVATINGEXPERIENTIAL EDUCATION BY PARTICIPATING IN A HUMAN CLINICALTRIAL WHILE PERFORMING BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCHVikki Hazelwood, Stevens Institute of TechnologyArthur Ritter, Stevens Institute of Technology Page 12.7.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 54 Undergraduate Students Obtain Clinical Experiential Education as Participants in Biomedical Engineering ResearchAuthor Block: Vikki Hazelwood, Arthur Ritter Biomedical Engineering, Stevens Institute ofTechnology, Hoboken, NJ.Objective: To implement an effective experiential education research project designed to educateundergraduate students
students about their learning, these quizzes identify areasthat need extra emphasis in lecture 14,15. They are not intended to determine if students have metthe learning objectives of the course, so are not used in evaluating the course.Students perform a final project that focuses on synthesizing the material they learned in theclass and exploring their interests in this area more fully. These projects include definingengineering design criteria and constraints of current or proposed genetic sequencingtechnologies, or analysis of a chosen data set. Undergraduate students work in teams of 2-3 andgraduate students work alone. Graduate students present their project to the class. These projectsdemonstrate the skills gained by the students during the
initial ideationthrough the final project design3. In this study of teams working on different design projects,Design Heuristics were found to be applicable across a diverse range of problems. In sum, DesignHeuristics have been established as a beneficial tool to assist mechanical engineers in generatingdiverse and create ideas3,4,41,42,44,45. In the present study, we sought to determine whether thisinstructional method would also benefit students in the domain of biomedical engineering design.Research MethodsResearch QuestionsThe focus of this study was to investigate whether and how Design Heuristics may assist studentsin generating design ideas in the context of biomedical engineering problems. We were alsointerested in how students developed
and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013