Asee peer logo
Displaying results 121 - 132 of 132 in total
Conference Session
Experiential Learning and Globalization in BME
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Judy L. Cezeaux, Western New England College; Michael J. Rust, Western New England College; Robert Gettens, Western New England College; Richard D. Beach, Western New England College; Jason A Criscuolo, Western New England College
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
fieldas a result of the program. The increase in confidence level for performing engineeringcalculations is intriguing as no calculations were required for any of the laboratory modules.This may reflect an overall increase in confidence related to a better understanding of thebiomedical engineering field. The increase in confidence in performing laboratory experimentsis likely due to their performance of multiple hands-on experiments over the span of theprogram. In addition, the participants increased their knowledge of the educational opportunitiesavailable for them in the biomedical engineering program at Western New England College. It islikely that many of the participants were unaware of the institution itself as well as thebiomedical
Conference Session
Using Technology and Research-based Instructional Practices in BME
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
Statistics and Statistical Education Broadening the Scope of Statistics and Statistical Education. Am Stat. 1988;42(2):93-99.9. Cross KP, Angelo T. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for Faculty. Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1988:1-168.10. Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. J Eng Educ. 2005;94(1):87-101.11. Eccles JS, Wigfield A. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:109-132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.12. Carberry A, Waters C, Krause S, Ankeny C. “Unmuddying” Course Content Using Muddiest Point Reflections. Front Educ. 2013;Oct 23-26:937-942.13. Ankeny C, Krause S. Flipped Biomedical Engineering
Conference Session
Assessment of Learning in BME
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aldin Malkoc, Arizona State University ; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
, Krause S, Ankeny C. “Unmuddying” Course Content Using Muddiest Point Reflections. Front Educ. 2013;Oct 23-26:937-942.[11] Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 69(1), 21-51.[12] Pollard, J. K., & Magdi, S. (2014, October). Building motivation by student-teaching. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2014 IEEE (pp. 1-5). IEEE.[13] Lin, T., Sharif Ullah, A. M. M., & Harib, K. H. (2006). On the effective teaching of CAD/CAM at the undergraduate level. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 3(1-4), 331-339.[14] CELANI, M. G
Conference Session
Freshman Design and Other Novel Programs
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebecca Willits, Saint Louis University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
their knowledge bybreaking the topics down for the high school level. The presenters were asked to fill out a shortquestionnaire (Table 3) about their experience of presenting their project for outreach. Whilethere were only a small number of student presenters (n=2), the feedback was good. They bothcited how the high school student questions allowed them to reflect on their knowledge.Additionally, both students cited methods of improving their projects as demonstrations,including using more games and focusing less on equations or actual lecture. The results fromthis questionnaire will be distributed to students in future courses, to allow them to see other’sreflections on their projects.Table 3: Questionnaire for students who presented their
Conference Session
Pedagogical Developments in BME
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sara Koehler, Northwestern University; Wendy Murray, Northwestern University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
analysis tutorial, which reflect baselinecompetency prior to review. Students demonstrated low-level performance in vector projectionskills, shown in blue. a) W09 Post-Test Improvement b) W10 Post-Test Improvement 60 60Percent Improvement in Post-Test Results Percent Improvement in Post-Test Results
Conference Session
BME Laboratory and Project Experiences
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Donna M. Ebenstein, Bucknell University; Eric A. Kennedy, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
more biomedically relevant experiment wasincorporated into the class. Rather than focusing on cell growth, a cell cytotoxicity experiment Page 25.21.3was developed based on appropriate ISO and ASTM standards (1-5). This experiment was 2motivated by lectures on biocompatibility and relevant biocompatibility tests for differentmedical devices, illustrating that cell cytotoxicity tests are required for all body-contactingmedical devices (1,6). At the same time, the amount of time required in lab both in and outsideof class was reduced to reflect the fact that the course was not a full credit course
Conference Session
BME Course and Curriculum Development
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Steve Warren, Kansas State University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
topics listed on the tentative schedule in the course syllabus.More specifically, the students are instructed to submit the following by mid-semester: • A session outline that indicates how they wish to allocate their 25 minutes. • A list of teaching tools they plan to employ to most effectively demonstrate their topic (white papers, journal articles, web sites, videos, personal interviews, props, …). • An idea or two regarding a homework assignment that will better familiarize the other students with the subject. The assignment should be doable in about an hour and be focused enough that the other students can reflect on one facet of the chosen area. Because two sessions are planned for each 50-minute class
Conference Session
BME Courses and Learning Activities
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jorge E. Bohorquez, University of Miami; Ozcan Ozdamar, University of Miami; Jonathon Anthony Toft-Nielsen, University of Miami
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
was related to exams andhomework: students felt the instructor did not provided enough homework and feedback duringthe semester. We think these comments reflect the fact that practice exercises and homeworkload were heavily shifted to the laboratory session, while the main exams (midterm and finalexam) were given in the lecture section. It seems that the communication between the lecture andlaboratory did not work as well as expected (see comments in the table). While the content andpace of the laboratory session was influenced by the lecture session, there was no feedback in theother direction, with the lab influencing the lecture. Allowing for two ways flow of informationbetween lab and lecture, and having both session adapt to each other
Conference Session
Experiential Learning and Globalization in BME
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eric M. Brey, Illinois Institute of Technology; David W. Gatchell, Illinois Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
. Faculty mentors were selected from a variety of departments, including BiomedicalEngineering, Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Chemistry, Physics, and theSchool of Medicine. Diabetes is a complex pathologic condition and addressing the diseaserequires a diverse set of approaches from fundamental understanding of disease pathology,disease management and treatment either of the disease directly or one of its manycomplications. The students joined projects related to diabetes that were already ongoing in thefaculty laboratories. Research projects in this REU program reflect this diversity, with projectsoffered in metabolic engineering, biomaterials, biosensors, and tissue engineering. Projects for2010 are shown in Table 1. In
Conference Session
Design in BME Education
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eric Kennedy, Bucknell University; Donna Ebenstein, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
a chance to inspect thecube and observe any particular manufacturing errors or basic differences between differentmaterials. Each group or team is asked to explain any challenges they faced in manufacturingtheir side of the Cube and discuss the source of any flaws in the final produced piece or the fitwithin the assembly. The discussion about the evolution of the project from concept to prototypeto manufactured assembly also gives the students a sense of accomplishment and serves as anopportunity to reflect on what it took to bring this admittedly simple part to fruition.9. Research and Write Material MemoThe final written portion of the project serves to disseminate information learned by each teamregarding their particular assigned
Conference Session
Design in the Curriculum
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amit Janardhan Nimunkar, University of Wisconsin, Madison; John P. Puccinelli, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Matthew S. Bollom; Willis J. Tompkins, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
videos from a previous offeringof the course. These videos are linked from the Moodle Courses homepage. A short reflection onthe video is due at noon the following Monday.Required MaterialsThe required BME 201 Course Handbook will be sold by the UW Chapter of the BiomedicalEngineering Society (BMES) during the first lecture for $20.00. There are no other requiredtextbooks. Videos, slides, and written materials will be provided on Moodle Courses. Printing access (such as through your CAE account) will also be needed for somesupplemental materials to your handbook such as Lab 2 and notes about the design project.Course HandbookThe BME 201 Course Handbook contains notes about design project topics, the lab materials,and starting space for your
Conference Session
BME Courses & Curricular Content
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Linsenmeier, Northwestern University; David Gatchell, Northwestern University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
. The one exception was the conceptual Control Diagrams problem.5. Discussion5.1 Delphi Study This analysis of physiology and biology topics is the first that we are aware of. We foundagreement between responses from academia and industry participants, not only that some topicsare more important and others less important, but in general on the rank order of the topics.Perhaps this is not too surprising, because the highly rated topics primarily reflect the traditionalfields that biomedical engineers have worked in (cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, and neural).Fields in which few biomedical engineers are currently involved were rated lower, although theremay be opportunities in these as well. No topics in physiology, aside from our one