regarding global health issues, 2) increasestudent interest in global health as an area for future study or careers, and 3) increase studentinterest in traveling abroad and learning a foreign language.Course BackgroundThe new Global Health & Technology course was developed and implemented for the first timein Spring 2011. The course was co-instructed by two faculty members from the College ofEngineering, including one biomedical engineer and one electrical engineer (EE). Bothinstructors had prior experience with global health, including research projects involving medicaldevices and prior course-based trips to developing countries. Since one of the goals of thecourse was to create a multidisciplinary learning environment, the course was made
passages crucial? 9. Is immediate access to Web sites with more information a decisive feature of the e-book? 10. Do you find it useful to project the text on a screen before the class for presentation purposes? 11. Please make any other comments you wish. Page 15.233.3 The text was used in the classroom in several different colleges offering biomedicalengineering and biomedical engineering technology in four successive semesters, as noted above. 10 of 200 Teachers and Researchers who received the e-book answered most of thequestions in the survey, as did 17 of the 19 Students in one class at ETSU who
,2012; Tanner and Allen, 2007). There is ample evidence that engineering courses thatimplement evidence-based methods like active or project-based learning improve studentretention and performance (Bullard et al., 2008; Felder et al., 1998; Knight et al., 2007; Martin etal., 2007).Two beliefs limit education about teaching: First, many current STEM faculty members, at leastat the research institutions that are training all the future STEM faculty, do not view teaching assomething that can be learned. Second, teaching is not something that should be learned. Theyconsider time spent on teaching development to be detrimental to one’s productivity and futureprospects for jobs and funding. Neither of these is a valid argument. With the variety
powerful educational method for delivering engineering curricula [1, 2]while benefiting student retention, personal development, and community connections [3, 4].Furthermore, positive societal impact is especially important to underrepresented students incareer selection [5, 6] and classes or projects with clear engineering-service componentscommonly attract a higher percentage of students from underrepresented groups [7, 8]. In thiswork-in-progress, we examine our initial efforts in implementing toy adaptation to enhanceengineering education and to serve our broader community.What is an adapted toy?An adapted toy has modified activation, function, orother components to increase accessibility andenhance the user’s experience. Here, we use
Society for Engineering Education, 2017 #FunTimesWithTheTA – A Series of Fun, Supplementary Lessons for Introductory Level Biomedical Instrumentation Students (Work-in-Progress)Engineering is hallmarked by the process of assessing a need and implementing a design to meetthe need[1]. Over the years, universities have adopted the capstone Senior Design project inorder to provide students the opportunity to put their engineering skills to the test in real-worldprojects. However, educators agree that obtaining competency in engineering design requireshours of hands-on practice beyond the time and scope of a university course. As a result, we arepilot testing a series of supplementary active-learning
crash safety and orthopedic biomechanics.A sense that these courses were attracting students already at the university, and that they had thepotential to recruit high school students (especially underrepresented minorities) became theimpetus for developing a concentration. Currently, the Bioengineering Applicationconcentration includes the following: Introduction to Bioengineering Applications Choose three of the following five: Biology I Biology II Anatomy and Physiology Automotive Bioengineering: Occupant Protection and Safety Vehicular Crash Dynamics and Accident Reconstruction Bioengineering Applications Project (Capstone)This paper focuses on the
orient their preparation. However, incontrast to the practice of traditional laboratories, a circuit diagram including componentvalues, or a plan for the experiment including information about the measurements to obtainwas not provided. Each laboratory session started with a discussion moderated by theinstructor and teaching assistant aimed at establishing a layout for the circuit or a template forthe design of the experiment.Two laboratory sections enrolled 23 and 24 students respectively, who completed six “one-session” laboratories and two mini-projects spread over several weeks (electromyogramamplifier and blood pressure monitor). An anonymous student survey was conducted at theend of the semester to gather student feedback about the inquiry
research projects. As CSULA begins todevelop this BME program, we have aimed to make the limited opportunities available to ourstudents in BME thus far as enriching as possible.Over the past year, we have exploited the unique user interface of the HP Tablet PC to restructurethe teaching / student learning paradigm in the Biomedical Instrumentation course and to involvestudents in a biomedical engineering research project. Our objectives were to engage students inlearning BME course material by incorporating a technological gadget which students find funand interesting in and of itself, provide an avenue for interaction with the teacher and otherstudents, and aid instruction by allowing for an engaging method for on-the-spot assessment andfeedback
Bioinstrumentation and has taken initiative to develop hands-on blended learning based courses on the same topics. His research interest is on global health and engineering and currently working on projects in Honduras, Ethiopia, India and Vietnam. He has received the Recognition Award for Achievement in Global Engaged Scholarship in 2013 through the Wisconsin Without Borders at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the Professor of the Year Award in 2012, through the Biomedical Engineering Society at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a number of teaching awards.Miss Xuan Zhang, University of Wisconsin - madison Xuan Zhang received her B.E. degree in the Department of Electrical and Information Engineering from Harbin
Technology had on theparticipants’ career paths. Over the nine years, there have been 131 undergraduate students whoparticipated. Ninety nine (76%) of these students were supported via funding from the NationalScience Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates program. The other 32 (24%)were supported through institutional funds. More than half of the students (56.5%) were female,26.7% of the students were from underrepresented groups, and 52.7% students without previousresearch experience. The undergraduate research program understudy is a 10-week engineeringresearch project working in research laboratories at the University or a collaborating MedicalSchool. A tiered mentoring structure was developed within the participating laboratories
, workshops, and field trips (Appendix C). Specialcare is given in selecting participants who can function in a highly independent and technicalenvironment. YSP participants are monitored closely, but encouraged to contribute to furthering Page 26.415.5research projects, and actively taking part in all aspects of the program.Program ResultsBRAIN GamesThe following charts contain questions asked of those participating in BRAIN games. Students learned alot from this activity 100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% Response Rate
a web-based tutorial that teach about the engineering designprocess and principles of engineering, such as mass transfer and fluid flow, that are essential tohemodialysis systems. Next, the students are issued a challenge to design, build and operatetheir own hemodialysis systems via another video segment. Before moving into the actualdesign project, students have access to a web-based simulation that allows them to adjustparameters (such as flow velocity, flow direction, membrane pore size and surface area) toobserve how each affects the efficiency and cost of a hemodialysis system. After the studentssuccessfully complete the computer simulation, the patient and doctor (via video segment)discuss their visions of hemodialysis for the future
part of this exercise)“prompts students to develop higher-order cognitive skills.”6 While we have no control group forthis particular intervention, we find no evidence that this or any other element of a single-semester written assignment alters cognitive skill.Eight months after the end of the writing project we conducted an assessment of informationrecall to determine if the type of paper written by the student influenced their long-term retentionof information. Five questions were selected from among those posed on exams during thesemester that were related in topic to the papers students wrote – that is, questions having to dowith the cytoskeleton, molecular motors, and nitric oxide. Five additional questions wererandomly selected that
. Page 22.1057.3Pedagogical MotivationThe motivation to start this project was originated from the idea, “A picture is worth/better than athousand words”, i.e., using pictorial description would be superior to the text-only description.We extended the idea, “A moving picture is better than a static picture,” (by using Adobe FlashPlayer or Media Player). Furthermore, we added, “An interactive moving picture is better than asimple moving picture,” (by adding interactivities). Ultimately, our goal is to build an onlineuser-interactive teaching/learning system, featuring animation and simultion for physicalprinciples, mathematical derivations and engineering implementations, so as to fulfill themedical imaging education tasks optimally. By this
AC 2011-2272: A STUDENT-CENTERED COURSE FOR INTEGRATIONOF ETHICS INTO A BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH EXPE-RIENCE FOR UNDERGRADUATESEric M Brey, Illinois Institute of Technology Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering Assistant Dean, Office of Undergraduate Research Illinois Institute of TechnologyKelly Laas, Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology Kelly Laas is the Librarian/Information Researcher at the Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions (CSEP) at the Illinois Institute of Technology. During her four years at the Center, she has supervised a number of projects relating to the development of online ethics resources and collections, including the
encouraged individual accountability within the group. The groups pursued aresearch question of their own for their final project which was based on multiple technologiesand skills sets learned throughout the class.Students’ pre- and post- test performance on statics and force concept inventories werecompared. Perceptions of learning gains and expert experience were assessed through studentinterviews and surveys. We will report on these results and discuss implications and limitationson learning through constructed contextual knowledge based on situated cognition andconstructivist theory.IntroductionStudy Abroad Program Description Page
(FIPSE); Adventures in Biotechnology for HS Students (PADCED); Summer Page 23.1385.1 High School Research Program, K-12 TE and Biotech education and curricula development; 2+2+2 Life Sciences Pipeline (FIPSE and PADCED); Middle and High School Summer Camps for disadvantaged students; SEPAand a host of other formal and informal educational activities including a Phase I and Phase II SEPA project featuring a permanent science center exhibit, travel component (7 sites across US, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
teaching with engineers and scientists has been geared towards encouraging them to think about the broader social, ethical and political dimensions of their research and training.Dr. Michael R. Caplan, Arizona State University Michael Caplan earned his undergraduate degrees from The University of Texas at Austin and his PhD from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Following post-doctoral research at Duke University Medical Center in Cell Biology, Michael joined the faculty of Arizona State University in 2003, and he is now an Associate Professor in Biomedical Engineering. Dr. Caplan’s research focuses on molecular cooperativity in drug targeting, bio-sensing, and cell sig- naling. Current projects align along
online discussion forums were delivered through a course web site in the university learningmanagement system (UVaCollab, collab.itc.virginia.edu). Some aspects of the grade were basedon activities that could be compared to the traditional lecture course: homework problems (25%of the grade), in-class test problems (25% of the grade), and a final exam (15% of the grade).Students also worked in teams to complete a “grand challenge project” (25% of the grade) thatconsisted of a series of assignments of increasing complexity addressing methods to deliverchemotherapeutic drug to a tumor in a patient. Finally, students completed daily formativeassessments in a category called, “Help Yourself Learn” (10% of the grade). Examples of theselow-stakes
design paradigm ● Hands-on and problem-based learning ● Development of team-building skills ● Recognition of creativity in engineering designThe drug-delivery module is the first of three sections in this new course, which leads thefreshmen students through several aspects of design in the biomedical engineering field, andexposes them to all three tracks in The University of Texas at Austin BME department. Sincethis module is the first in the series, it has the most rigorous (i.e. least open-ended) project Page 25.345.3guidelines. The students are introduced to the concept of engineering design, but in a directedmanner. Unlike the later
(MEMS) with a focus on effect of space charges on micro- to nano-scale electrostatic actuation. Upon receiving her Ph.D., she worked as a Postdoctoral Research Associate in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering in the University of Illi- nois, Urbana-Champaign, where worked in multiple projects using scanning probe microscopy to study material properties. In 2009, Yan Wu joined the faculty of the Department of Engineering Physics at the University of Wisconsin, Platteville. From fall 2015 to summer 2016, Yan Wu completed one year of sabbatical as a visiting scholar in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at University of Wisconsin – Madison.Dr. Theodorus Evan de Groot, University of Wisconsin
studentlearning in their graduate teaching. Most of the faculty currently rely on paper-and-pencil homeworks rather than homeworks submitted electronically. Likewise,the faculty regularly use paper-and-pencil exams during class time but only oneperson uses electronically-submitted exams administered during class time.Generally, our faculty do not currently use take-home exams, either paper-and-pencil or with electronic submission. The faculty are split on the extent to whichthey use laboratory activities and associated reports to assess student learning ingraduate courses. On the other hand, projects, which are completed outside ofclasstime and may involve group work, are often used in our graduate curriculum.Similarly, graduate student learning is
Florida Gulf Coast University. He received his Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from Kansas State University in 1993, M.S. degrees in Structural and Geotechnical Engineering from Stanford University in 1984, and a Bachelor of Science from the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1975. He served in the Army Corps of Engineers for 23 years and retired as a Lieutenant Colonel. Dr. O'Neill has been active as a Senior Mentor and instructor in Project ExCEEd for the American Society for Civil Engineering. Page 13.1376.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Utilizing the
post-lab analysis, including asking students to analyze hypothetical results or asking students how the results would have been affected if they had made a hypothetical mistake in the procedure. 3) Students reflect at the end of every lab report on what learned and feel confident about, and also anything that is still unclear. This is an application of the “muddiest point” exercise that has been used extensively in assessment of undergraduate education,6 and was recently implemented in a project-based bioinstrumentation lab at Rice University.7 4) Instructor emphasizes the experimental process rather than results, and makes it clear that mistakes are an inevitable and acceptable part of the learning process
developed for PTEI, as a part of the 2+2+2 Life Science Pipeline Project [4]. Another unique aspect of the camp is the involvement of undergraduate student interns.These interns, along-side master teachers, work over the course of ten weeks, to create modulesor activities for camp participants (campers). Approximately half of the modules or activitiesused are taken from a collection of academically tested modules. These modules are learningactivities that cover a wide variety of topics associated with biomedical engineering, includingbut are not limited to the use of stem cells, blood vessel synthesis, gene expression, prosthetics,bone augmentation, and the impact of bone decalcification. The coordinators for the NC A&T camp have
university technology transferoffice (Clemson University Research Foundation-CURF) to provide exposure to portfolioassessment, technology marketing, and technology licensing and commercialization. Withmentorship from the technology transfer officers and interns, the students evaluated both theneeds they were identifying in their own clinical shadowing experience as well as thosepreviously designed and housed within the university intellectual property medical technologyportfolio. Commercial potential was evaluated by the students themselves with the goal to gaininsight into the process that their future senior design projects would eventually undergo at theconclusion of their senior design experience. Both immersions were vital to the collection
TOTAL 30 20 10 Page 12.1210.2 0 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2006 2000-2009 Projected Table 1: Recently Accredited Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering Programs2 Next General Year Review (NGR) Accredited University
problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004. 101(46): p. 16385-16389.5 Gurin, P., E. Dey, S. Hurtado, and G. Gurin, Diversity in higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Reviews, 2002. 72(3): p. 330-366.6 Orfield, G. and D. Whitla, Diversity and legal education: Student experiences in leading law schools, in Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action, G. Orfield and M. Kurlaender, Editors. 2001, Harvard Publishing Group and The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University: Cambridge, MA.7 Banaji, M., K. Lemm, and S. Carpenter, The social unconscious, in Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual
tissue injurymodel to approximate first, second, and third degree injuries [2]. The context for this laboratoryis introduced by asking how are firefighting materials and equipment designed or selected. Thislaboratory follows the same approach as the previous laboratory: an overall learning objectiveand an “additional questions” handout is provided followed up with a tutorial for step-by-stepguidance. The intent is to provide clear aims for the student as well as structure to help buildskills and confidence.Course Student-Selected Projects Page 23.1384.4Collaborative learning was fostered by allowing teams of two or three students to take on a self
includes curricular andextracurricular approaches. In the curricular approach, modules that introduce key concepts ofentrepreneurship would be strategically incorporated into the biomedical engineering designsequence. The long-term goal of the KEEN project is to develop 10 to 12 lectures and laboratoryactivities that can be incorporated into a design program, thus capitalizing on the four-yeardesign curriculum.The first four “entrepreneurship” modules have been developed for the freshman design course.Topics include intellectual property, IP protection, market and customer needs, andentrepreneurship. Future modules are still under development. A pre- and post-course studentassessment survey developed by the NCIIA KEEN project team will be