education. The design of theprogramming activities was driven by the inexperience of the potential participants, and theseactivities, such as Peer Mentor activities and developmental activities, were positively receivedand did not hinder research productivity. Enhanced recruiting during the second year of theprogram will be targeted at improving the diversity of the participants. Finally, smallmodifications to the programming will be implemented based on the participants feedback.Bibliography1. Gregerman, SR, "The Role od Undergraduate Rsearch in Student Retention, Academic Engagement, and thePursuit of Graduate Education", commisioned paper from Evidence on Promising Practices in UndergraduateScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
bioengineering laboratory courseAbstractSuccessful engineers are competent in 21st century skills (problem-solving, critical thinking,technology literacy, creativity, independent learning, excellent communication, and collaborationskills), as well as technical and mathematical principles in order to develop societal solutions.Typically, undergraduate engineering programs utilize capstone design projects and problem setsto promote understanding and integration of engineering concepts. However, in cross-disciplinary fields such as bioengineering, knowledge and use of life sciences is as important asapplying engineering principles. Thus, we need to identify ways to introduce more life sciencestrategies into our bioengineering curriculum. One way to
Focus on Change. Report on NSF Workshop for Engineering Education. 1995.9. Ph. Hernigou, G. Mathieu, A. Poignard, O. Manicom, P. Filippini, and A. Demoura, “Oxinium, a New Alternative Femoral Bearing Surface Option for Hip Replacement,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 17 [3] 243-246 (2006).10. N.I. Health, "Improve Medical Performance through Retrieval Information: Challenges and Opportunities " (2000) NIH Technology Assessment Conference Summary. 11. "Standard Guide for Retrieval and Analysis of Medical Devices and Associated Tissues and Fluids," ASTM Designation F 561-05 A. American Society for Testing and Materials
Paper ID #13205Design and Implementation of Web-based System for Client-based DesignProject ManagementDr. John P Puccinelli, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Puccinelli is the Associate Chair of the Undergraduate Program in the Department of Biomedical Engineering. He began here as student near the start of the UW-BME program and earned his BS, MS, and PhD in BME. He is interested in hands-on instruction – teaching and developing courses related to biomaterials and tissue engineering, as well as design. He was awarded the BMES Student Chapter Teaching Award in 2011, 2013, and 2014 and the Polygon Outstanding BME Instructor
promote creativity inthe laboratory since students are told what to do in exact detail[2].Criterion 3b of the accreditation process for engineering programs by the Accreditation Boardfor Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires that graduates from an accreditedengineering program have the ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as toanalyze and interpret data. Engineering laboratories in which students follow detailedprocedures without deviation are unlikely to impart the ability to design and conductexperiments because the students never experience designing experiments and are being ledby prescriptive instructions rather than by a protocol they established on their own. Providedthey follow the instructions correctly, the students
engineering (BME), which is still a young field relative to the more“traditional” engineering disciplines, has been responsible for many high-impact biomedicaladvances (both clinically and in basic research) over the past 50-60 years1. However, over thelast decade the field of BME has been significantly transformed by far-reaching new scientificand technological developments. The human genome has been sequenced2,3, the field ofbioinformatics has generated powerful data annotation and database management tools4,diagnostic and imaging approaches are evolving at a rapid pace due to advances in molecularnanotechnology5, and computational power and capabilities are increasing exponentially everyyear. But the faster the pace of biomedical discovery, the
AC 2008-568: DESIGNING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CURRICULUMFOR UNDERGRADUATES: SAFE, HANDS-ON AND INEXPENSIVEINSTRUCTIONKristen Jevsevar, Vanderbilt University Ms. Jevsevar is a senior in biomedical engineering at Vanderbilt University. She was one of four undergraduates who conducted the beta testing and developed the project in the summer of 2007. Ms. Jevsevar completed the adaptation of the undergraduate materials that were developed to the high school level.Melanie Aston, Vanderbilt University Ms. Aston is a senior in biomedical engineering at Vanderbilt University. He was one of four undergraduates who conducted the beta testing and developed the project in the summer of 2007
AC 2010-1321: EVALUATION OF PEERWISE AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL FORBIOENGINEERSPaul Denny, University of Auckland Paul Denny is an instructor in the Computer Science Department at the University of Auckland in New Zealand. In addition to Computer Science Education, his research interests include collaborative student learning and he created the PeerWise tool to support this approach.Beth Simon, University of California, San Diego Beth Simon is a Lecturer with the Potential for Security of Employment in the Computer Science and Engineering Department at the University of California, San Diego. Her research interests include educational technology and computer science education research.Melissa Micou
-building activities did not detractfrom their research. Incorporating community-building activities into undergraduate researchprograms can help provide students with a more meaningful and positive research experience.IntroductionDespite widespread recognition of the importance of maintaining a well-trained science,technology, engineering, and math (STEM) workforce and significant efforts to recruit and retainstudents in these fields, the number of students earning engineering undergraduate and advanceddegrees in STEM fields in the United States is decreasing. One proven mechanism forencouraging undergraduates to pursue advanced degrees in STEM fields is participation inundergraduate research 3, 4. The NSF funds a large number of REUs in STEM
Paper ID #16223The ’Invisible Handshake’ Project as a Practical, Hands-on Experience in aBiomedical Electronics ClassDr. Richard Goldberg, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Richard Goldberg is a research associate professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University. He teaches several instrumentation courses and a senior design class. His primary interest is in rehabilitation engineering and assistive technology for people with disabilities. c American Society for
In-Class Peer Review Activities. The Teaching Center, University of Washington St. Louis at 26. Nichols, A. & Texas, A. Using Calibrated Peer Review as a Teaching Tool for Structural Technology in Architecture. in ASEE 2008 Annual Conference and Expo (2008).27. Pulford, S. & Taylor, A. C. Visual Communication Learning through Peer Design Critiques: Engineering Communication Across Divisions. in Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (American Society for Engineering Education, 2015).28. Nystrand, M. Learning to write by talking about writing: a summary of research on intensive peer review in expository writing instruction at the University of Wisconsin
increasingly complex, and miniaturized.Constructing custom electronics in the laboratory is far less common today than in decades past.At the same time, an explosion in imaging technologies and the incredible evolution ofcomputers have usurped the interests of many students who might have once been electronics“gadgeteers.” Nonetheless, the act of analyzing, constructing, and debugging relatively simpleelectronic circuits remains an effective way for students to learn about mathematics, physics, andthe scientific method. Forty years ago a company named Heathkit® produced educational kitsfrom which many enthusiasts learned the basic theory and practice of electronics. A surprisingnumber of today’s senior electrical engineers fondly recall building these
Engineering 138(7):070804-070804-070809.Colliver, J. A. (2000). "Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory."Academic Medicine 75(3): 259-266.Dochy, F., M. Segers, P. Van den Bossche and D. Gijbels (2003). "Effects of problem-basedlearning: a meta-analysis." Learning and Instruction 13(5): 533-568.Eberlein, T., J. Kampmeier, V. Minderhout, R. S. Moog, T. Platt, P. Varma-Nelson and H. B.White (2008). "Pedagogies of engagement in science." Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyEducation 36(4): 262-273.Fairweather, J. (2010). Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Undergraduate Education: A Status Report for theNational Academies National Research Council Board of
the electronic format. Those who find it frustrating are apt todismiss the utility of the module and those who are accepting of the electronic format tend tofind the modules useful. This suggests that enhancement of the electronic experience itself couldallow more students to recognize the learning benefits of this technology.IntroductionThe VaNTH Engineering Research Center in Bioengineering Educational Technologies(www.vanth.org) developed a platform for electronic delivery of problems consisting of anauthoring component (Courseware Authoring and Packaging Environment – CAPE) and adelivery component (experimental Learning Management System - eLMS) that deliversproblems to students and records their interactions 1, 2. eLMS can be used in a
Paper ID #9545A Course in Biomaterials Taught Using the Socratic MethodDr. William H Guilford, University of Virginia Will Guilford is an Associate Professor and Undergraduate Program Director of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received his B.S. in Biology and Chemistry from St. Francis College in Ft. Wayne, Indiana and his Ph.D. in Physiology from the University of Arizona. Will did his postdoctoral training in Molecular Biophysics at the University of Vermont under David Warshaw. His research inter- ests include the molecular mechanisms of cell movement and muscle contraction, and effective means
AC 2008-757: INTEGRATING EXTERNAL MENTORS INTO BME SENIORDESIGNJoe Tranquillo, Bucknell UniversityDonna Ebenstein, Bucknell UniversityJames Baish, Bucknell UniversityWilliam King, Bucknell UniversityDaniel Cavanagh, Bucknell University Page 13.764.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Integrating External Mentors into BME Senior DesignIntroductionTo build strong independent design skills, our department exposes students to more andmore open-ended projects through our curriculum. The culminating experience is a two-semester, team-based senior capstone project, mentored by external biomedical expertsand advised by faculty within the department. The single most
AC 2007-2420: A SMALL, HIGH-FIDELITY REFLECTANCE PULSE OXIMETERDavid Thompson, Kansas State University David Thompson is a Fulbright Fellow currently studying in Japan. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Kansas State University University in May, 2006. His areas of research interest include biomedical sensors, neural prosthetics, embedded systems design, and analog & digital circuitry.Steve Warren, Kansas State University Steve Warren is an Associate Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Kansas State University. He teaches courses in linear systems, computer graphics, biomedical instrumentation, and scientific computing. Dr. Warren manages the KSU Medical
Investigator, NSF Award 9981107.6. National Science Board. Undergraduate Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education: Role for the National Science Foundation and Recommendations for Action by Other Sectors to Strengthen Collegiate Education and Pursue Excellence in the Next Generation of U.S. Leadership in Science and Technology, Report of the Task Committee on Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education, Neal, I-I., Chair, Washington DC.7. Reba, M., and B. Weaver. (2007)"Tablet PC-Enabled Active Learning in Mathematics: A First Study." In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pen-Based Learning Technologies (IEEE), 10-16
Writing and Critical-Thinking Instructional Tool.” (Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and mathematics (STEM) Education. Washington DC: AAAS, 2005, pp. 67-71.2. Chapman, O. L. and M. Fiore. “The White Paper: A Description of CPR™.” http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu/cpr/resources/documents/misc/CPR_White_Paper.pdf, UCLA, 2001. Accessed 1/9/08.3. Carlson, P.A. and F.C. Berry. “Calibrated Peer Review ™ and Assessing Learning Outcomes,” Proceedings, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2003, pp. F3E1-F3E6.4. Gobin, A.S. and J.L. West. “Effects of Epidermal Growth Factor on Fibroblast Migration through Biomimetic Hydrogels,” Biotechnol Prog., Vol. 19, 2003, pp
):223-231.3. Springer L, Stanne ME, Donovan SS. Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science,Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. 1999;69(1):21-51.4. Wales CE, Stager RA. Thinking with Equations : Problem Solving in Math & Science. Morgantown, W. Va.: C.E.Wales; 1990.5. National Research Council. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the NewCentury. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005.6. Duderstadt JJ. Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of American Engineering Practice,Research, and Education. In: Domenico G, Burkins MB, eds. Holistic Engineering Education: Beyond Technology.New York: Springer; 2010:17-35.7
AC 2010-2260: USE OF AN AUDIENCE RESPONSE SYSTEM FOR CONTINUOUSSUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTWilliam Guilford, University of Virginia Will Guilford is currently an Associate Professor and Undergraduate Program Director in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received his B.S. in Biology and Chemistry from Saint Francis College in Fort Wayne, Indiana, and his Ph.D. in Physiology from the University of Arizona in Tucson. Will's research is the biophysical basis of cell movement and muscle contraction. He is also keenly interested in promoting research-based undergraduate education