the Armour College of Engineering at the Illinois Institute of Technology.Dr. Judith S Zawojewski, Illinois Institute of Technology Dr. Zawojewski received her B.S. Ed. from Northwestern University, M.S. Ed. from National Col- lege of Education (now National-Louis University) and her Ph.D. from Northwestern University. She recently retired as Associate Professor Emerita from Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, and in semi-retirement has joined the University of Chicago Center for Elementary Science and Mathematics Education as a Senior Curriculum Developer. She recently served on the Board of Directors for the Na- tional Council of Teachers of Mathematics and on the Editorial Panel for Mathematics
, Illinois Institute of Technology Professor Eric Brey is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and co-Director of Distinctive Education in the Armour College of Engineering at the Illinois Institute of Technology.Dr. Judith S Zawojewski, Illinois Institute of Technology Dr. Zawojewski received her B.S. Ed. from Northwestern University, M.S. Ed. from National College of Education (now National-Louis University) and her Ph.D. from Northwestern University. She recently retired as Associate Professor Emerita from Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, and in semi- retirement joined the University of Chicago Center for Elementary Science and Mathematics Education as a Senior Curriculum Developer. She recently
Biomedical Engineering. He began here as student near the start of the UW-BME program and earned his BS, MS, and PhD in BME. He is interested in hands-on instruction – teaching and developing courses related to biomaterials and tissue engineering, as well as design. He was awarded the BMES Student Chapter Teaching Award in 2011 and 2013 and the Polygon Outstanding BME Instructor Award in 2012.Mr. Matthew S BollomDr. Willis J. Tompkins P.E., University of Wisconsin, Madison Willis J. Tompkins received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Maine at Orono in 1963 and 1965, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in biomedical electronic engineer- ing from the University of Pennsylvania in 1973
Response % Trainee 0 0% Trainee's primary advisor(s) 0 0% Host institution 4 57% Graduate program 0 0% T32 grant 4 57% Other: 1 14% Figure 6. Question #21 results for stipend source during experience. Page 24.650.7 Most commonly, programs do not assign an off-campus training experience, but ratherallow trainees to self
from the assessments. Other programs can verify the difference in skills andlearning outcomes of students who did and did not participate in an international SDE. This is avery exciting collaboration with many positive aspects to explore and share.Bibliography1. Laguette, Stephen W. Development of a Capstone Design Program for Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.2. Dieter, George E. and Linda C. Schmidt. Engineering Design. Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill.3. Davis, Denny and S. Beyerlein, P. Thompson, K. Gentili, L. McKenzie. How Universal are Capstone Design Course Outcomes? Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.4. Beyerlein, Steven and D. Davis, M
for upper-division undergraduates and serves as a mechanism for just-in-timeteaching. Moreover, preliminary analysis of student attitude and persistence data both supportthat this instructional paradigm is an effective pedagogy for teaching and learning in the flippedclassroom.AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge the support of this work from NSF Grant #1226325. Page 24.614.14Works Cited1. McKeachie, W. J. Student-centered versus instructor-centered instruction. J. Educ. Psychol. 45, 143–150 (1954).2. Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R. & Cook, K. E. Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom
. (2013, October 17). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2013 – 2014 [Online]. http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3149[2] E. Rushton et al., “Infusing Engineering into Public Schools” in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2002 © American Society for Engineering Education[3] A. Bandura. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997.[4] “The Condition of Education.” United States Department of Education: National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 2006.[5] S. Peirce-Cottler et al. (2007). “Designing a Medical Device to Extract Foreign Bodies from the Ear”. [Online
through guided activities and assignments. After class, assignments are completed andstudents prepare for the next class. Table 2: Typical Inverted Class Day ScheduleBefore Class In Class After Class• Preparation activity: Reading, • Short lecture • Finish application assignments, • Activities Page 24.1389.3 video, tutorial, or problem(s) open lab• Evaluation: online quiz or turned • Application assignments or lab • Prepare for next class in solutionThe
Paper ID #10294NSFREU Site on Neural Engineering: Aiming at High Research Standards(work in progress)Dr. Raquel Perez Castillejos, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Raquel Perez-Castillejos is an assistant professor of Biomedical Engineering at the New Jersey Insti- tute of Technology (NJIT). Her research (www.tissuemodels.net) focuses on the development of tools for cell and tissue biology using micro- and nanotechnologies. Raquel obtained her Ph.D. with the National Center of Microelectronics in Barcelona. She was a postdoctoral fellow at the Laboratory of Miniaturized Systems (Univ. S˜ao Paulo, Brasil) and later at
). FreeMat. Available: http://freemat.sourceforge.net/index.html#home[8] Simtk. (1-Jan-2014). OpenSim. Available: https://simtk.org/home/opensim[9] J. A. Reinbolt, A. Seth, and S. L. Delp, "Simulation of human movement: applications using OpenSim," Procedia IUTAM, vol. 2, pp. 186-198, 2011.[10] A. Seth, M. Sherman, J. A. Reinbolt, and S. L. Delp, "OpenSim: a musculoskeletal modeling and simulation framework for in silico investigations and exchange," Procedia IUTAM, vol. 2, pp. 212-232, 2011.[11] S. L. Delp, F. C. Anderson, A. S. Arnold, P. Loan, A. Habib, C. T. John, et al., "OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement," Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions
a 1800’s technologyAppreciation of posed an interesting case” Unique 2 “stipulation of using pre 1900 technology made me think how hard Constraints inventors and scientists had to think outside the box to prove theories and invent … technologies” Page 24.1409.7 Hands-On “interesting lesson that I took away from the RDC was becoming 1 Skills more comfortable with biomedical equipment”An additional indirect assessment of students’ assessment of RDC
flow. Gettingcomplete coverage of the material requires that the discussion not be free ranging, but rathergently guided by the instructor; this takes significant planning.Literature cited1. Williams, D. F. & Biomaterials, E. S. for. Definitions in biomaterials: proceedings of a consensus conference of the European Society for Biomaterials, Chester, England, March 3-5, 1986. (Elsevier, 1987).2. Custers, E. J. F. M. Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study. Adv. Heal. Sci. Educ. 15, 109–128 (2010).3. Arzi, H. J., Ben-Zvi, R. & Ganiel, U. Forgetting versus savings: The many facets of long-term retention. Sci. Educ. 70, 171–188 (1986).4. Kooshkabadi, M. & Chen, J. Staged PCI Case Study. ZOLL LifeVest at
Page 24.1018.9[7] N, Friesen, "Defining Blended Learning". Technical report, 2012.[8] D. R. Garrison & H. Kanuka, “Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education.”The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 7, pp. 95–105, 2004. [9] S. Alexander, “Flexible Learning in Higher Education,” In: Editors-in-Chief: Penelope Peterson, Eva Baker andBarry McGaw, Editor(s)-in-Chief, International Encyclopedia of Education (Third Edition), Elsevier, Oxford, pp.441-447, 2010.[10] M. Driscoll, "Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype." E-learning 1.4, 2002.[11] Hoic-Bozic, Natasa, Vedran Mornar, and Ivica Boticki. "A blended learning approach to course design andimplementation." Education, IEEE Transactions on 52.1 (2009
the ‘autosave’ feature.The LabArchives development team implemented this feature into the ELN on request. At theend of the semester both the students and the faculty were surveyed. All surveys wereanonymous and consent to use the anonymous data was obtained for IRB approval. Since themajority of the students used paper notebooks either in their freshman design course, perviousBME design course(s), and/or during their employment (i.e. internship or co-op) they couldmake a direct comparison. They were asked to rate a number of criteria, on a scale of 1-3 (where1 is poorly, 2 is moderately, and 3 is very), related to logistics and the engineering outcomesused to grade the notebooks for both paper and electronic notebooks. Environment plots
experiment’s main goal is to analyzereal ECG signals – either acquired by the ADS1298ECG, or by the analog ECG amplifier builtin Experiment #2.If using the ECG amplifier built in Experiment #2, that amplifier’s output can be directlyconnected to the OMAP’s analog input, which will allow it to be further sampled and displayedby winDSK8’s oscilloscope function. The ECG signal acquired by ADS1298ECG follows asimilar path, but now the signal is sampled before it is connected to the OMAP L-138baseboard. Regardless the signal acquisition tool used, both techniques allow the signal to bedisplayed on a computer screen, which will then permit the students to observe the normal sinusrhythm in the ECG waveform and the naturally varying heart rate.In addition, we
recognized "core"of material that has been relatively stable for at least ten years. It has evolved in the field withoutany agency or body attempting to specify such a core. Unfortunately, it is difficult to look backto the early 70’s when the first programs were created to see the evolution to this point.However, the data presented here will provide a point of reference for studying the evolution ofthe undergraduate bioengineering curriculum in the future. Our analyses have emphasized commonalities across BME, but there is clearly alsoconsiderable diversity in BME undergraduate curricula. If we were to investigate certain otherbranches of engineering, at least five or six topics would be expected to be nearly 100%consistent across programs