-programs-2018-2019/#GC5 [Accessed: Jan. 27, 2019].[6] B. Harding and P. McPherson, “What do employers want in terms of employee knowledge of technical standards and the process of standardization?” in Proceedings of the 117th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, USA, June 20-23, 2010.[7] C. Leachman and C. Pezeshki, “What’s standard? Industry application versus university education of engineering standards,” in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, June 14-17, 2015.[8] J. L. Gbur and D. Solomon, “Promoting technical standards education in engineering,” in Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA
instantiationof the project for Fall 2017 has already been described in detail in an ASEE 2018 paper [23] and(b) each student employed the AD2 functionality in an individual way. The second instantiationof the project is described in an ASEE 2019 manuscript accepted for publication [24].Table 1. Fall 2017 and Fall 2018 laboratory experiences that employed Analog Discovery 2units for circuit excitation and signal acquisition/visualization. Laboratory Experience Representative Graphic Lab 1 – Getting Started with the Analog Discovery 2 The goal of this session is to introduce the student to functionality supported by the Analog Discovery 2 unit and the Waveforms 2015 companion software [10
Health Organization, “Human Resources for Medical Devices. The Role ofBiomedical Engineers,” WHO Medical Device Technical Series, 2017. [Online]. Available:https://www.who.int/medical_devices/support/en/. [Accessed January 28, 2019].[3] G. Baura, “Educating for Industry. A Call to Auction for Bio-/Biomedical EngineeringProfessors and Students,” IEEE Pulse, March/April 2015. [Online]. Available:https://pulse.embs.org/march-2015/educating-industry/. [Accessed January 28, 2019].[4] O. Imas, J.A. LaMack, I. dos Santos, L. Fennigkoh, and C.S. Tritt, “Streamlining BiomedicalEngineering Capstone Design Process.,” ASEE 2018, Salt Lake City, UT, June, 2018.[5] J.A. LaMack, I. dos Santos, L. Fennigkoh, O. Imas and C.S. Tritt, “Spicing Up Instruction
writingskills. We anticipate that student survey results will uncover additional insight for students’current and future technical communication self-efficacy.References1. ABET. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering- programs-2018-2019/, accessed February 2, 2018.2. Kai, J. C., & Turpin, A. (2015). Improving Students' Technical Writing Skills: Abstracts in Introductory Solid Mechanics. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Trellinger, N. M., Essig, R. R., Troy, C. D., Jesiek, B. K., & Boyd, J. (January 01, 2015). Something to Write Home(work) About: An Analysis of
Electrical & Electronic Engineers, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, American College of Clinical Engineering, American Society for Engineering Education, and an inducted Fellow within both the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering, and the American College of Clinical Engineering.Prof. Paul Licato c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work-In-Progress: Improving Student Views of Medical Device Standards Through Implementation in a First-Term Biomedical Engineering CourseAs undergraduate engineering students develop technical skills and an inclination to base designdecisions on technical constraints, the
” completing marathons on 7 of 7 continents including Comrades (the Ultimate Human Race) in South Africa. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Development of a biomedical engineering concentration area within an integrated engineering major emphasizing sociotechnical thinkingIntroduction. In this ‘Work in Progress’ paper, we present our efforts to develop a newconcentration area in biomedical engineering (BME) within a newly created IntegratedEngineering major at The University of San Diego (USD), which has been a “Changemaker”-designated campus since 2011. The goal with the development of our BME concentration area isto provide students with an engineering curriculum
," ed, 2017.[2] L. A. Riley, P. Furth, and J. Zelmer, "Assessing our engineering alumni: Determinants of success in the workplace," in 2000 ASEE/Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference, 2000.[3] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019-2020," ed, 2019.[4] K. Cho and C. D. Schunn, "Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web- based reciprocal peer review system," Computers & Education, vol. 48, pp. 409-426, 4// 2007.[5] N. Artemeva, S. Logie, and J. St‐Martin, "From page to stage: How theories of genre and situated learning help introduce engineering students to discipline‐specific communication," Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 8, pp. 301-316, 1999/06
Paper ID #27669Board 10: Work in Progress: A Blended Model for a Biomaterials CourseImproves Student Learning and Allows for Enhanced ContentDr. John P Puccinelli, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Puccinelli is the Associate Chair of the Undergraduate Program in the Department of Biomedical Engineering. He began here as student near the start of the UW-BME program and earned his BS, MS, and PhD in BME. He is interested in hands-on instruction – teaching and developing courses related to biomaterials and tissue engineering, as well as design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
Paper ID #27395An Improved Cellphone-based Wearable Electrocardiograph Project for aBiomedical Instrumentation Course SequenceDr. Charles Carlson, Kansas State University Charles Carlson received a B.S. degree in Physics from Fort Hays State University in 2013 as well as B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Kansas State University in 2013, 2015, and 2019, respectively. Charles is currently a Graduate Teaching and Research Assistant in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Kansas State University (KSU). He works in the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory and is interested in engineering
undergraduate engineering population be enhanced through curricular change?” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 3, 2004.[7] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the Numbers,” ASEE, 2017.[8] “Degree Attainment,” Research and Trends for Women in STEM, 17-Aug-2016. [Online]. Available: https://research.swe.org/2016/08/degree-attainment/. [Accessed: 18-Mar-2019].[9] “Report - S&E Indicators 2018 | NSF - National Science Foundation.” [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/higher-education-in-science-and- engineering/undergraduate-education-enrollment-and-degrees-in-the-united-states. [Accessed: 18-Mar- 2019].[10] N. R. Center, “Science & Engineering Degree Attainment - 2017,” National
4, 2019].7. Pociask, S., Gross, D., and Shih, M.-Y., “Does team formation impact student performance, effort and attitudes in a college course employing collaborative learning?” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 17(3):19-33. doi: 10.14434/josotl.v17i3.21158, 2017.8. Allen, T.E. and Blackman, B.R. “Integrative Design and Experimental Analysis: A yearlong laboratory course in Biomedical Engineering.” Paper presented at 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI. https://peer.asee.org/2477, 2007.9. Comer, D.R., “A model of social loafing in real work groups,” Human Relations, 48(6):647- 667, 1995.10. Strong, J.T. and Anderson, R.E., “Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and
education.Prof. Henry Hess, Columbia University Henry Hess received the Dr.rer.nat. in Physics from the Free University Berlin, Germany, in 1999. He is currently a Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Columbia University, New York, a member of the External Advisory Board of Nano Letters since 2010, and serves as the Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience since 2014. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A hybrid engineering course combining case-based and lecture-based teaching 1. Abstract Engineering and business school courses both aim to teach students to solve problems, but theapproaches they use to reach that objective are traditionally perceived as
Education and Biomedical Engineering. Previously, Aileen was the Associate Director for Academics in the Center for Entrepreneurship and was responsible for building the Program in Entrepreneurship for UM undergraduates, co-developing the masters level entrepreneur- ship program, and launching the biomedical engineering graduate design program. Aileen has received a number of awards for her teaching, including the Thomas M. Sawyer, Jr. Teaching Award, the UM ASEE Outstanding Professor Award and the Teaching with Sakai Innovation Award. Prior to joining the University of Michigan faculty, she worked in the private sector gaining experience in biotech, defense, and medical device testing at large companies and start-ups
focused on gait analysis and the biome- chanics of running related to various injuries including hamstring strains and injuries of the knee.Dr. Naomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison Naomi C. Chesler is Professor of Biomedical Engineering with an affiliate appointment in Educational Psychology. Her research interests include vascular biomechanics, hemodynamics and cardiac function as well as the factors that motivate students to pursue and persist in engineering careers, with a focus on women and under-represented minorities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Teaching Assistant’s Perspective on “Flipping” an Undergraduate Biomechanics Course
, 2019 A Gold Nanoparticle Based Lab Experiment Sequence to Enhance Learning in Biomedical Nanotechnology at the Undergraduate LevelAbstract:Introduction: The development of affordable, practical, and real-life hands-on nanotechnologylabs for biomedical engineering students is challenging. Here, we present a three-part series oflab experiments that comprise synthesis, characterization, and biomedical application of goldnanoparticles in a logical and sequential order. These experiences were designed as part of a 1credit hour lab course to complement a traditional style upper-level 3 credit hour “lecture” coursetitled “Biomedical Micro- Nanotechnology”. Synchronization of lecture and lab
and in experiential learning for undergraduates in science and engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Specifications Grading in an Upper-Level BME Elective CourseRecent trends in BME education emphasize aspects of the engineering profession such as designprocess, entrepreneurial mindset, and active problem-solving. However, the grading strategy inmost traditional BME courses revolves around assigning points to student work based onapparent quality or degree of completion. Awarding “partial credit” is time-consuming and oftenis not closely mapped to learning objectives [1]. As a result, students often focus on how manypoints they earned relative to their perceived level of effort