of Problem-based Learning,” Interdiscip J Problem-based Learn, vol. 6, no. 1, 2012, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1314.[4] K. M. Markham, J. J. Mintzes, and M. G. Jones, “The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity,” J Res Sci Teach, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 91–101, 1994, doi: 10.1002/tea.3660310109.[5] L. Hsu and S.-I. Hsieh, “Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool in a Nursing Course,” J Prof Nurs, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 141–149, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.04.006.[6] D. M. Torre, B. Daley, T. Stark-Schweitzer, S. Siddartha, J. Petkova, and M. Ziebert, “A qualitative evaluation of medical student learning with concept maps,” Med Teach, vol. 29, no. 9– 10, pp. 949–955
. Newton, “How to Co-Lead a Team,” Harvard Business Review, 2015. https://hbr.org/2015/07/how-to-co-lead-a-team (accessed Nov. 07, 2022).[13] Q. Wu and K. Cormican, “Shared Leadership and Team Effectiveness: An Investigation of Whether and When in Engineering Design Teams,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, no. January, pp. 1– 12, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569198.[14] “Best Biomedical Engineering Programs - Top Engineering Schools - US News,” 2022. https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/biomedical-rankings (accessed Feb. 22, 2023).[15] Allen, R. H., Acharya, S., Jancuk, C., & Shoukas, A. A. (2013). Sharing best practices in teaching biomedical engineering design. Annals of
that students’self-reported attendance of office hours throughout the quarter was low, with 50% of studentsnever having attended office hours and 39% having attended infrequently (1-4 times).Motivation and Barriers to Office Hours Attendance: Students in the Test Course were askedfor what reason(s) they typically have attended office hours in previous courses, andapproximately 47% of students indicated that “build[ing] relationships with instructors” was agoal of their attendance. Students additionally reported through a free response question that adiverse set of reasons can prevent them from attending office hours. Most importantly, a number of the barriers cited by students in the pre
impact on our undergraduate Biomedical Engineering students. Our team isconducting a continuing, longitudinal study to track the short-term (survey data, and IPapplications) and long-term (via exit survey and job placement data, awarded patents)performance of this clinical observations course.References:[1] A. E. Felder, M. Kotche, S. Stirling, and K. M. Wilkens, “Interdisciplinary Clinical Immersion: from Needs Identification to Concept Generation,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2018-June, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 30699.[2] B. Przestrzelski and J. D. DesJardins, “The DeFINE Program: A Clinical Immersion for Biomedical Needs Identification,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &
://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002.[4] M. Wilkerson, V. Maldonado, S. Sivaraman, R. R. Rao, and M. Elsaadany, "Incorporating immersive learning into biomedical engineering laboratories using virtual reality," Journal of Biological Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 20, 2022/08/08 2022, doi: 10.1186/s13036-022- 00300-0.[5] S. Robert, "Biomedical Engineering Virtual Circuit Simulation Laboratories," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2007/06/24, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/2171.[6] P. D. Ryan, M. Dominik, and T. G. Cheryl, "WIP: Pilot Study for the Effect of Simulated Laboratories on the Motivation of Biological Engineering Students
-Piñera, et al., “Design and integration of a problem-based biofabrication course into an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum”, J Biol Eng 10, 2016, 10.[3] A.B. Abell, “Embracing Ambiguity: A Framework for Promoting Iterative Design Thinking Approaches in Open-Ended Engineering and Design Curricula”, 2017.[4] S. R. Daly, C. M. Seifert, S. Yilmaz, R. Gonzalez, "Comparing Ideation Techniques for Beginning Designers", ASME. J. Mech. Des. October 2016; 138(10): 101108.[5] T.C. Davies, J. Manzin, M. Meraw, et al., “Understanding the Development of a Design Thinking Mindset During a Biomedical Engineering Third-Year Course”, Biomed Eng Education 2023, 3, pp.123–132.[6] A. S. T. Wong, & C
content. Students value that these authentic experienceshelp to answer “overarching scientific question[s] for most of the labs and we weredoing the lab for a purpose.” Course evaluations for Cellular Engineering report a4.83/5 overall evaluation score, with a 5/5 score for intellectually stimulatingcontent. Likewise, Molecular Engineering course evaluations report a 4.00/5overall evaluation score, with a 4.53/5 score for intellectually stimulating content.Additional questions on integrating these new gateway courses with advancedtopics and electives are pending, along with long-term success of the new courseson student engagement in primary research at Duke University, industryconnections and career success.Introduction Linsenmeier and
autocoding. Every question that was analyzed exhibited an increase in positivesentiment, directly relating to the advantages the course has to offer. It is important to analyzeour results not only in isolation but also within the current landscape of literature. The ClinicalImmersion program developed by S. Stirling and M. Kotche [7] at the University of Illinois atChicago saw similar results and value in clinical observations. Similar to this study, B.Przestrzelski and J. DesJardins [2] at Clemson University found their clinical immersionprogram to be beneficial for preparing students for their senior design course. This study alsofound the class of students at the time of participation impacted the level of influence theprogram had, with graduate
Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 606-632.5. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 87-101.6. Mandala, M., Schunn, C., Dow, S., Goldberg, M., Pearlman, J., Clark, W., & Mena, I. (2018). Impact of collaborative team peer review on the quality of feedback in engineering design projects. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 1299-1313.7. McAlpine, I., & Reidsema, C. (2007, January). The role of student peer review and assessment in an introductory project-based engineering design course. In ConnectEd, International Conference of Design Education.8. Carlson, P. A., Berry
disagreement with those that werenegatively worded.In summary, peer review has the potential to teach students how to deliver high-quality feedback,may improve draft quality, may require additional instruction, and is viewed favorably bystudents.IRB Statement: This work has been deemed exempt from continuing oversight by the universityIRB (STU00214218).REFERENCES[1] B. Dewsbury and C. J. Brame, “Inclusive Teaching,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 18, no. 2, p. fe2, 2019, doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0021.[2] S. Blum, Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead), 1st ed. West Virginia University Press, 2020.[3] M. E. Ko, “Revolutionizing Grading: Implications on Power, Agency, and Equity,” in American Society
help build and encourage students to get into engineering.Erdal S¸enocak, Tokat Gaziosmanpas¸a University He is a professor of chemistry education. He has been teaching chemistry at the undergraduate and graduate levels for fifteen years. His interests include how people learn science/chemistry, problem-based learning, and nanotechnology education. He works with educators from kindergarten to undergraduate to help them learn how to teach science effectively in their schools. He had also spent a year as a visiting scholar at Purdue University. In that period, he collaborated with researchers to design an instrument to determine kindergarten students’ understandings of the scientific inquiry process
Submittal(s) Timeline Introduction and team formation Week 1 Project ideation (incorporation of Project idea description including Weeks 1-4 biomimicry) the major reference article(s)) Project idea validation (optional) Interview notes, survey, etc. Weeks 4-10 Prototyping planning (optional) Prototyping plan Weeks 4-8 Prototyping (optional) Prototype and a short video Weeks 9-10 recording of the whole process Project report writing Final project report
Project (2018). 5. Cheryan, S., Master, A. & Meltzoff, A. N. Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Front. Psychol. 6, (2015). 6. Boucher, K. L. & Murphy, M. C. Why so few? The role of social identity and situational cues in understanding the underrepresentation of women in STEM fields. in Self and social identity in educational contexts 93–111 7. Malone, K. R. & Barabino, G. Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Sci. Educ. 93, 485–510 (2009). 8. Sparks, D. M. Navigating STEM-worlds: Applying a lens of intersectionality to the career identity
at San Antonio Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an associate professor with joint appointment in the Department of Bicultural-Bilingual Studies and the Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio. Dr. Mejiaˆa C™s work examDr. Teja Guda, The University of Texas at San Antonio ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work-In-Progress: The Influence of Digital and In-Person Pedagogical Interventions on Undergraduate Biomedical EngineersIntroduction Undergraduate engineering programs are designed to be both rigorous and experiential,consisting of a curriculum aimed at helping students develop a strong foundation of
Center for Education Statistics, 2021. [2] D. P. Banks and S. M. Vergez, “Online and in-person learning preferences during the covid-19 pandemic among students attending the city university of new york,” Journal of Microbiology &; Biology Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. e00 012–22, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://journals.asm.org/doi/abs/10.1128/jmbe.00012-22 [3] J. H. Corpus, K. A. Robinson, and Z. Liu, “Comparing college students’ motivation trajectories before and during covid-19: A self-determination theory approach,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.848643 [4] E. R. Wester, L. L. Walsh, S. Arango-Caro, and K. L. Callis-Duehl
Oklahoma. He received his B.S. (2019) in Chemical and Biological Engineering from Colorado State University and his Ph.D. (2023) in Biomedical Engineering from University of Oklahoma.Dr. Stefan Wilhelm, University of Oklahoma Dr. Wilhelm is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. In 2014, he received his doctoral degree from the University of Regensburg (Germany) under the supervision of Prof. Otto S. Wolfbeis (Institute of Analytical Ch ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Longitudinal Analysis of Strategies for Improving Biomedical Engineering Student Knowledge of Career Paths and Desired
, “Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology,” LSE, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 524–535, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005.[3] J. Handelsman et al., “Scientific Teaching,” Science, vol. 304, no. 5670, pp. 521–522, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1126/science.1096022.[4] A. J. Carroll, “Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy,” Medical Reference Services Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 295–307, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1778336.[5] A. J. Carroll, S. J. Hallman, K. A. Umstead, J. McCall, and A. J. DiMeo, “Using information literacy to teach medical entrepreneurship and health care economics,” Journal of the Medical Library Association
here are approved by the University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignInstitutional Review Board under NHSR designation 23380. Capstone Innovations at Carle IllinoisCollege of Medicine are supported by The Henry Dale and Betty Smith Family.References[1] DianeR. Bridges, R. A. Davidson, P. Soule Odegard, I. V. Maki, and J. Tomkowiak, “Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education,” Medical Education Online, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 6035, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035.[2] S. Chien, R. Bashir, R. M. Nerem, and R. Pettigrew, “Engineering as a new frontier for translational medicine,” Sci. Transl. Med., vol. 7, no. 281, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa4325.[3] K. Alder, Engineering the
presentations, and this was not due to differences in anxiety using thesedifferent modes. Student understanding and learning outcomes for both the presenters andthe audience members were significantly higher for in-person presentations. Although itwas not possible with the number of student responses in this course (one undergraduatestudent and eight graduate students), in the future it would be interesting to see if some ofthese results are driven by degree program level or experience with different presentationtypes, as only two students had previous experience with pre-recorded presentations.References[1] S. K. A. Soong, L. K. Chan, C. Cheers, and C. Hu, "Impact of video recorded lectures among students," Who’s learning, pp. 789-793, 2006
of this study also taught the course understudy.Ethics approval: Research conducted retrospectively under IRB approval through Texas A&MUniversity.Consent to participate: Not applicable (exempted through IRB approval)Consent for publication: Publication was approved by IRB board.Availability of data and material: All student record data were de-identified and approved forFERPA compliance by Texas A&M University’s Office of the Registrar.References[1] M. Itani, S. Kaddoura, & F. al Husseiny. “The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on on-line examination: challenges and opportunities,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 105–120, 2022.[2] B. Ives, & A.-M. Cazan. “Did the COVID-19 pandemic lead to an increase in
Establishing Course Objectives for a Re-designed Materials Engineering Course," in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, June 26, 2011 2011, pp. 22.1591.1 - 22.1591.20.[15] Z. Obermeyer, B. Powers, C. Vogeli, and S. Mullainathan, "Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations," Science, vol. 366, no. 6464, pp. 447-453, 2019, doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.[16] A. Kashi and S. Saha, "Ethics in Biomaterials Research," Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 19-30, 2009, doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v19.i1.30.[17] A. C. d. L. Pimentel, C. B. Jannotti, P. Gaudenzi, and L. A. d. S. Teixeira, "A breve vida do Norplant
students with VR. Future quantitative andqualitative (coded) evaluations of survey questions are required to understand student experiencewith VR. Completion of this study will help in furthering our understanding of how tosuccessfully integrate VR videos in traditional biomedical engineering labs.References[1] B. Marks and J. Thomas, "Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory," Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1287-1305, 2022/01/01 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10653-6.[2] A. Singh, D. Ferry, A. Ramakrishnan, and S. Balasubramanian, "Using Virtual Reality in Biomedical Engineering Education," (in eng), J
elaboration and peer learning strategies. Future work couldinvestigate these questions.References[1] A. W. Chickering and Z. F. Gamson, “Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education,” AAHE Bull., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 3–7, Mar. 1987.[2] E. P. Driessen, J. K. Knight, M. K. Smith, and C. J. Ballen, “Demystifying the meaning of active learning in postsecondary biology education,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 4, p. ar52, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-04-0068.[3] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.[4] L. D. Fink, Creating Significant Learning
: 10.1007/s43683-020-00030-z.[10] R. E. Clark, “Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 445–459, Dec. 1983, doi: 10.3102/00346543053004445.[11] M. E. Beier, M. H. Kim, A. Saterbak, V. Leautaud, S. Bishnoi, and J. M. Gilberto, “The effect of authentic project-based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3–23, 2019, doi: 10.1002/tea.21465.[12] N. Falchikov and D. Boud, “Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta- Analysis,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 395–430, 1989, doi: 10.2307/1170205.[13] J. Seifried and A. Rausch, “Applying the Experience Sampling Method to Research on Workplace Learning,” in Methods for
Network (KEEN).References1 Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S.,Klaassen, R., and Boon, M.: ‘Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision,teaching, and support’, Journal of Engineering Education, 2020, 109, (3), pp. 508-5552 Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J.C., HernándezAlcántara, D., and Morales-Menendez, R.: ‘Active learning in engineering education. A reviewof fundamentals, best practices and experiences’, International Journal on Interactive Design andManufacturing (IJIDeM), 2019, 13, (3), pp. 909-9223 Makki, B.I., Feng, F., Waqar, M.A., and Adhikari, I.M.: ‘Work Readiness, Decision-Making Self-Efficacy, and Career Exploration among
their disposition toward the class. Three main themesemerged from the open-ended responses related to student articulation of disposition (Table 2). Each themeemerged from a grouping of sub-themes. Table 2. Survey 2 Open-ended response themes for disposition changes and effects. Theme, example quotes, and the number of associated quotes for each theme are reported. N=19 Theme Example Quote(s) Positive Disposition (11): Students emphasized the "My increased growth mindset has importance of having a positive disposition in influencing allowed me to face adversity with a one's performance and attitude toward learning. positive outlook
students have increased experience with a variety of prototypingtechniques is a foundational requirement for programmatic success.References:[1] Hamburg, Shanti D. "Flipped Lab: Introduction to Prototyping & Manufacturing ScalableInstruction in Making." IJAMM(2020).[2] Epstein, A. W., & Rudolph, S., & Einstein, H. H., & Reis, P. M. (2014, June), EnhancingDesign Students’ Comfort and Versatility in the Shop: A Project-Based Approach Paperpresented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--20415[3] Cook, T. V., & Lyle, J. A., & Kerestes, R. J. (2018, June), Board 73 : Work in Progress:Reinforcement of Engineering Education with Hands-on Learning of Technical Skills Paperpresented at
’ college teaching self-efficacy," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 17, no. 1, p. ar14, 2018/03/01 2018, doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-02- 0039.[3] E. E. Shortlidge and S. L. Eddy, "The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?," PLOS ONE, vol. 13, no. 6, p. e0199576, 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199576.[4] N. Davidson and C. H. Major, "Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning," Journal on excellence in college teaching, vol. 25, 2014.
. validate solution(s). Value and Student attitude Indifferent or Generic comments Good comments Excellent comments, Attributes toward their own negative comments that do not provide providing insight correcting mistakes with work about their own any insight. and reasonable insight critique. work. critique.Appendix B: BEN 201 Assessment Example On the following page, there is a process flow diagram created as a preliminary design of a three-stage process ofmanufacturing acetic acid at 0.7 mol% aqueous solution to be used as an aseptic for wound care. This process
, no. 4, pp. 517–542, 2003.[5] D. Bairaktarova and A. Woodcock, “Engineering student’s ethical awareness and behavior: Anew motivational model,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1129–1157, 2016.[6] L. Shuman, C. Mitcham, B. Olds, R. Miller, H. Wolfe, M. Besterfield-Sacre, R. Pinkus, andM. Sindelar, “Can our students recognize and resolve ethical dilemmas?,” 2004 AnnualConference Proceedings.[7] M. C. Jaklevic, “No shield from X-rays: How science is rethinking lead aprons,” KaiserHealth News, 16-Jan-2020. [Online]. Available: https://khn.org/news/no-shield-from-x-rays-how-science-is-rethinking-lead-aprons/. [Accessed: 28-Feb-2023].[8] Y. Heo, H. Chun, S. Kang, W. Lee, T. Jang, and J. Park, “Relating factors to wearingpersonal