Paper ID #42567The Snail Progression of Ethical Instruction: Nurturing Ethical MindsetsAcross the Biomedical Engineering CurriculumDr. Elizabeth Kathleen Bucholz, Duke University Dr. Bucholz is an Associate Professor of the Practice for the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and currently serves as the Director of Undergraduate Studies for the Department of Biomedical Engineering in the Pratt School of EngineeringDr. Cameron Kim, Duke University Cameron Kim is an Assistant Professor of the Practice in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and serves as the Associate Director for
, Dr. Saikia teaches courses in the fields of Biomaterials and Drug Delivery (BMDD), and Molecular, Cellular, and Systems Engineering (MCSE). As part of her engineering education research, Dr. Saikia is studying the role of active learning and case-based learning in biomedical engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Integrating Active Learning, Case Studies, Cytotoxicity Testing, and Ethical Considerations in Biomaterials Education: A Novel ApproachAbstract:This study presents a new active learning approach designed to enhance theeducational experience in a biomaterials class through the incorporation of devicecase studies, a cytotoxicity testing
Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Understanding Student Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Technical WritingOpen generative artificial intelligence’s (AI’s) ability to craft human-like text concerns educatorswho fear students will complete assignments without meeting course objectives. Currently, AIdetection is unreliable, adding to educators’ concerns. While these fears are valid, we believe thebest way forward is to teach students how to use this powerful technology ethically andeffectively. Best practices for using AI
also been the PI on an NSF REU site focused on multi-scale systems bioengineering and biomedical data sciences, a collaboration involving faculty in SEAS, SOM, SDS, and CLAS at UVA, as well as six partner institutions in the mid-Atlantic and Southeast. Dr. Allen has been the recipient of 11 teaching awards and honors and is an elected Fellow of AIMBE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work-in-Progress: A collaborative, principle-focused curriculum design process for a BMEundergraduate programHow biomedical engineering (BME) students learn to approach problem-solving is critical—theymust consider ethical and societal implications; develop and implement systems of increasingcomplexity
in teams of 3-4, each with a defined rolemodeled after those from the medical devices industry. Teams explored three medical deviceunits in spring 2022: surgical staplers, breast pumps, and stents. Each 4-week unit consisted offour key topics: needs identification, design requirements, regulatory, and ethics. The coursefocused on understanding these existing devices and their limitations, not on designing a newdevice. To scale up the needs-finding benefits of traditional clinical immersion courses whileavoiding some of the restrictions [5]-[7], students accessed the voice of the customer (VoC)through pre-recorded video interviews conducted by the instructor. Each unit included 4-5 VoCinterviews with medical device users and clinicians, which
disciplines [2]. Engineering curriculums typically well-incorporate fundamentalinstruction through required introductory applied mathematics, physics, chemistry, computerscience, and engineering design coursework. However, exposure to multiple disciplines is oftenoverlooked in the process of developing engineering curriculums [3-5]. Given that majorselection is typically done in students’ first and second years [6-11], sufficient exposure toresearch, career/internship, alumni/professional experiences, and ethical/social insights isespecially important early in college. This will enable students to better choose majors/careersthat align with their interests and aptitudes [12-13]. Engineers stand to acquire many benefitsfrom an interdisciplinary
Research Overviews Part I 4.93 0.27 DAY 1: ATP-Bio Research Overviews Part II (hands on) 4.79 0.43 DAY 1: REU Alumni Panel 4.93 0.27 DAY 1: How to Read a Scientific Paper 4.79 0.43 DAY 2: Lab tours 4.64 0.63 DAY 2: Ethical Lab and Data Practices 4.93 0.27 DAY 2: Scholar Panel 4.86 0.53 Section 2Rate the following experiences from very poor (1) to excellent (5)Survey Item
understanding of the scientific writing process. On an integer scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is “Weak” and 5 is “Strong”. 8. Rate your understanding of ethics in scientific publication. On an integer scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is “Weak” and 5 is “Strong”. 9. How comfortable are you with preparing and presenting technical presentations? On an integer scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is “Never Tried” and 5 is “Very Comfortable”.10. How often do you use ChatGPT, BingChat or other AI Large Language Model (LLM) tools for writing tasks? On an integer scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is “Never Tried” and 5 is “Very Often”.11. If you use these AI tools, what specifically have you used them for? [open response]12. What is one area of technical communication
challenging dominant narratives and fostering inclusive and equitablepractices. By engaging in self-reflection and critical dialogue, engineers can better recognize thesocial implications of their work, identify potential sources of bias or discrimination, and strivetowards more ethical and socially responsible solutions. Critical reflexivity, thus, encouragescollaboration and interdisciplinary engagement, inviting engineering students to consider diverseperspectives and alternative approaches to problem-solving.Pilot Study The initial step in this pilot study entailed selecting a tissue mechanics course that is partof an undergraduate biomedical engineering program. The course consisted of a ‘lecture-driven’,traditional teaching environment
provides anoverview of these important topics to undergraduate BME students.Incorporating assistive applications into the course, exposes students to human “stories” whichdeal with supporting people with cognitive and/or motor impairments, whether these aretemporary due to injury or life long as a result of a condition or an event, such as stroke. In theprocess, students uncover important issues like privacy, data integrity, information security, risk,decision making, ethics, regulations, and social disparities in access to care and outcomes.Students find that exploration of these issues adds context and meaning to their training asbiomedical engineers. The Active Learning ActivityThe key active learning
supporting STEM faculty on STEM education research projects.Dr. Sharon Miller, Purdue University Sharon Miller, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University. She received a BS degree in Materials Science and Engineering from Purdue University and MS and PhD degrees in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan. Her educational efforts focus on biomedical engineering discipline-based educational research, including design self-efficacy, project-based learning, critical reflection in ethics, and high-impact practices. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: A Multi-level Undergraduate Curricular
. Under this protocol, copies of all completed course assignments in which studentsreflected on career plans and motivation were collected directly from course instructors for tworequired courses in the Biomedical Engineering (BME) curriculum:Sophomore Seminar: This is a required course which is usually taken by students in their first orsecond semester of joining the BME major. The course meets once per week and covers a varietyof topics including career paths, curriculum planning, biomedical ethics, and professionaldevelopment opportunities. Currently, data has been collected from three separate instructorssince the Spring 2019 semester. The specific assignments collected vary slightly by semester andinstructor, but in general consist of at
regionalconstraints. We are a land grant state University, the only Ph.D. granting program in BiomedicalEngineering in the state, but are located more than three hours from the nearest major research-intensive medical school and teaching hospitals, which presents logistical and collaborativechallenges. The rural nature of our state leads to unique healthcare considerations and disparitiesthat present unique opportunities for our students to learn.MethodsClinical Observations and Needs Finding is a 1 credit hour course that introduces students to thetechnical, ethical, and professional responsibilities of biomedical engineers during the productdevelopment process. This course is offered in both the fall and spring semesters, withapproximately 30-35 students
0 Connections Between People Learning Work-Life Balance Figure 1: Authors identified three major themes from written reflections. The height of each bar represents the number of responses for each theme.Identification of Sub-ThemesBased on established theories of identity, the authors next explored identity related sub-themeswithin the thematically grouped responses to assess how aspects of students’ self-conceptinformed their identification of workplace priorities [3][4][5]. The sub-themes considered werethe following: ● Personal Characteristics (Individual Self): individual knowledge, skills, behaviors, and attitudes; includes moral and ethical frameworks ● Relational
Arduino, Python The didactic portions of the senior design course combines instruction to teachengineering design principles concurrently with student-led, team-based project work [14].Topics covered in instruction include project management strategies, the Biodesign framework,patents & engineering standards, FDA & regulatory landscape, professional ethics [13], and acustomer discovery series adapted from the NSF I-Corps program [30]. The semester consistsroughly of three phases: background research, design, and implementation. In the backgroundresearch phase, students research their project information and are directed to perform at least 3stakeholder interviews. In the design phase, students work on ideation and
4), which utilizedLikert scales to judge their performance and how well they believed the module was set up. Thequestions for each survey were determined through discussion with a science education facultymember.Statistics The mean and standard deviations were found for each question and rubric criteria, whichwere then plotted. The N of this module was 13.Ethics Statement Prior to the study, all participants signed the consent form included in Appendix 6. IRBrequest for exemption is filed to South Dakota State University (IRB-2024-27).Results Figure 2 represents the side-by-side comparison of the LEGO® and final prototype of eachgroup. Group 1 chose to build a bioreactor by stretching the scaffolds through a magnetic