student assessment. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work In Progress: Factors Influencing Career Choice and Success in Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe field of biomedical engineering (BME) has witnessed significant growth in recent years,driven by advances in technology and a growing emphasis on healthcare innovation. This growthhas led to a large range of post-graduation career paths for BME undergraduates includingmedical and professional school, graduate school, and direct employment as engineers in themedtech, biotech, and healthcare industries [1]. Much of the literature on career choice andmotivations of these students focuses on their plans at
A scoping review found nine papers that examined how BME undergraduate coursesaddressed HD. The review revealed that the incorporation of HD often happens in a single courseas opposed to multiple courses across the four-year curriculum. While two papers focused onincorporating HD throughout the four-year curriculum [9], [17] and one described a global healthdisparities minor [16], the remaining six papers focused on individual courses at different stagesof the curriculum (first year [10], [15], middle years [12]-[15] and last year [11], [15]).Additionally, approaches to incorporating HD vary. Some studies introduced HD topics asadditional modules in a course [10], [11], [15] whereas some studies incorporated HD topics inlesson plans and
-efficacy as educators, empowering them to contribute moreeffectively to learning environments. We have offered the course in the Spring quarters of 2021,2022, and 2023. In each iteration, we sought to actively demonstrate evidence-based inclusivepedagogical techniques through our course design and instruction. In the future, we plan to 1)evaluate the effectiveness of our course design on participant accomplishment of learning goals,and 2) examine the impact of course participants as TAs on the broader bioengineeringcommunity.Course Design: Enabling effective learning of pedagogical skillsCourse Learning Goals: We designed a course to address a critical need in the training ofgraduate TAs by allowing them to build pedagogical skills before their
development of suchcompetencies of both students and teachers for active learning. We want to use the data to seekevidence of better practice in promoting student learning in engineering core courses, especiallythe traditional lecture-based ones.Course structureThis study has been conducted in a sophomore-level Biothermodynamics class for two semesters(2022 Spring and Fall). Previously, the course was taught with lecture-based materials relying onnote-taking and individual homework traditionally. Under the new design, students will receive adetailed content structure at the beginning of the semester, shown in Appendix, Figure 1.Students will obtain a general view of the course content, types of assignments/exams, and theirdue times from this plan
the classroom. The current solution to tackle these challengeswas implementing a professional identity assessment [3], as well as utilizing the reflectionsto better understand their experiences and what needs arose from the program. IntroductionThe at-home remote patient monitoring sector of healthcare is a growing industry. Thishealthcare market is valued at $24 billion and is projected to reach $166 Billion by 2030 [1],[4]. This industry provides individuals with disabilities or chronic medical conditions withnew levels of independence by allowing them to remain at home. These companiesleverage technology and personally crafted care plans that address the needs of theirclients. The technologies
without changes in outcome. A self-evaluation can be an obstacle for many students[4].Allowing students to make errors and then reflect on why these occurred has been shown topositively impact learning [5]. By articulating the “whys” and “hows” of errors and finding gapsin thought processes and/or incorrect learnings, students can refine their understanding of coursecontent. In this work-in-progress study, we hypothesize that the use of metacognitive tools suchas exam error classification and progress planning in a sophomore level core curriculumphysiology course will lead to more deep/strategic learning and engagement (as opposed tosuperficial/apathetic learning engagement). Furthermore, the evolution of perceived studentstrengths and weaknesses
use of their own metacognitive skillsthrough self-reporting and intends to expand on instructor-guided future implementation ofpedagogical interventions that support student’s metacognitive skills.Theoretical Framework This study is grounded in the theoretical framework presented in Fostering Metacognitionto Support Student Learning and Performance [4], which defines metacognition as an individual'sawareness and understanding of their own cognitive processes. Metacognition is conceptualized intwo interrelated domains: (1) metacognitive knowledge, which encompasses declarative,procedural, and conditional knowledge, and (2) metacognitive regulation, which involves theprocesses of planning, monitoring, and evaluating one’s cognitive
the new concentration will be in effect from Fall 2023 or latestFall 2024 to recruit new students. The plan for assessment for this new concentration is bifold. We expect to invitean external reviewer from similar program and concentration to review our curriculum progress and provide usfeedback. In addition, we plan to monitor the enrollment numbers to see if it reflects what the market study shows.The expected enrollment is 50-60 students and gradually increasing. The committee will continue to meet at leastonce or twice in a semester to follow the progress of the proposed concentration. Once the concentration is approvedunder the general ETEC program, the department plans to apply for Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology, Inc
second draft that received in-person, one-on-one feedback. The one-on-one feedbackwas either given by the instructor of record or the graduate teaching assistant who had both ascience and technical writing background. The students then rewrote and submitted a finalversion of the section. This process was repeated for each scientific section covered by thecourse. Each course taken by Group A (FA22, SP23) covered different writing sections(Biomechanics: Methods, Results, Graphs, Tables, and Discussion; Biomaterials: Abstracts,Introductions, Hypothesis Formulation, and References). We planned the last assignment in eachcourse to be a full lab report which includes all scientific writing sections.A standardized rubric was developed for each
Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Dr. Feldman developed informatics metrics to quantify performance of clinicians when using digital diagnostic tools. He has published in Radiology, Academic Radiology, IS&T, SPIE, and RESNA. As a Latino and native Spanish speaker, born in Peru, Dr. Feldman has created markets and commercialized innovative telemedicine products in Latin America for medical device companies, including Orex Computed Radiography, Kodak Health Group, and ICRco. Dr. Feldman also served as Chief Information Officer (CIO) of Boston Healthcare for the Homeless Program where he led the strategic planning and migration to EPIC Electronic Health Records system and novel meaningful use implementations
usability of the modules. However, the students were very engaged and exceled. Theycontributed insightful ideas in discussions that shaped module content, worked well in theirinterdisciplinary teams to iteratively redesign modules based on feedback, refined learningobjectives, and contributed not only to their groups but to the class. Throughout the process,students learned about each other’s own research which is beneficial in growing one’s networkand establishing future collaborations.While there were many positives in the course, there were also areas of improvement whichcould be incorporated by anyone planning to include this structure in a course. In spring 2022,students were initially confused about how to begin; so, in fall 2023, we added
Work in Progress: Development of a Medical Devices Course for Sophomore Biomedical Engineering Undergraduate StudentsIntroductionThe biomedical engineering (BME) workforce requires competency in professional and technicalskills. BMEs often use knowledge in design, administration and management, and customerneeds assessment [1]. Typical work activities of a BME include analyzing data or information,organizing and planning work, determining compliance with standards, building teams, anddrafting and specifying technical device parts [1]. The undergraduate BME capstone designcourse is often used as a “catchall” to develop these critical professional skills; however, to buildcompetency, it is recommended that these skills be practiced
Postdoctoral Fellow at Harvard Medical School at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Dr. Feldman developed informatics metrics to quantify performance of clinicians when using digital diagnostic tools. He has published in Radiology, Academic Radiology, IS&T, SPIE, and RESNA. As a Latino and native Spanish speaker, born in Peru, Dr. Feldman has created markets and commercialized innovative telemedicine products in Latin America for medical device companies, including Orex Computed Radiography, Kodak Health Group, and ICRco. Dr. Feldman also served as Chief Information Officer (CIO) of Boston Healthcare for the Homeless Program where he led the strategic planning and migration to EPIC Electronic Health Records
connections.Challenges Faced:It should be made clear that the students are expected to lead the interactions with their mentors.The first year of our program, some students, especially the younger ones saw the mentorssimilar to their faculty members. Since their only previous experience was in a classroom setting,they would show up to a meeting with the mentor and expect the mentor to teach them theknowledge they need like a professor with a lesson plan. To combat this, the application wasupdated to include questions about what the student wanted to get out of the year-longexperience and what questions they planned to ask their mentor so that they are thinking of thesetopics ahead of time. The program announcement and the application also now contain
with otherresearchers [9], [10], [11]. Students tend to enjoy REU programs and find them valuable inhelping direct their future plans, often including graduate school and further research [12], [13].Recent research argues for developing an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) in engineering students[14], [15], suggesting that it is crucial that BME programs, including research experiences,emphasize EM competencies [16], [17]. EM interventions in engineering education exist toenhance the traditional technical-focused education engineers receive and encourage well-rounded engineering graduates [14], [18]. Students exposed to EM interventions in researchexperiences expressed gaining confidence in business skills and value recognition [19], [20],which are
unique. This restructuring would also allow students to work in an industry-like environment where teams have specific tasks and communication is critical. The particularuse case presented in this paper is to create a remote-sensing application for vital signmonitoring. Some details will not be included to avoid IP infringement with the sponsor of thisproject.The assessment plan is to evaluate if this new team structure improves learning outcomescompared to a traditional team. The two outcomes being compared in this study are ABETstudent outcome 3 and 5 by measuring student's communication and self-efficacy relative toother team structures (e.g. other capstone section). ABET 3 (Communication) relates to theability to communicate effectively with
Submittal(s) Timeline Introduction and team formation Week 1 Project ideation (incorporation of Project idea description including Weeks 1-4 biomimicry) the major reference article(s)) Project idea validation (optional) Interview notes, survey, etc. Weeks 4-10 Prototyping planning (optional) Prototyping plan Weeks 4-8 Prototyping (optional) Prototype and a short video Weeks 9-10 recording of the whole process Project report writing Final project report
to feel comfortable with both their peers and their TA tobe able to recover from a setback quickly. 1. Student experiences a setback (lab does not go as planned). 2. Student looks to a) lab partner(s) or peers, and/or b) TA, and/or c) class and lab materials to decide how to respond. 3. Student's ability to move past the setback depends on whether a) others experience the same setback, b) others normalize setbacks, and c) they know where to look to help them troubleshoot. These factors impact whether they can effectively manage their frustration in the moment.Figure 1. Student Response to Setbacks in Lab Settings FlowchartConclusion To summarize, students’ ability to recover from
components. Educators at other institutionsmay find that lecture-based courses in the engineering curriculum could benefit equally frominformation literacy instruction. However, the degradation of some students’ recall ofinformation sources following the 4901 post-test (where specific information tools were notaddressed) may highlight the importance of continued refresher training on these topics.Future Work: The objective questions in these tests do not measure how well students can usetechnical literature; rather, they test recognition of resource types, tools, and article structure. Atthe 2024 Annual Meeting, we plan to share preliminary data from a sentiment analysis of arandom sample of open response questions from students who completed all
Work and ConclusionWhile they are central and essential to our redesign process, faculty are not our onlystakeholders. In our future work, the new curricular objectives and proficiency rubrics, alongwith curriculum mapping data, will be shared with a focus group of current undergraduatestudents, as well as external stakeholders (including alumni, employers, and the program’sexternal advisory board), for observations and input. Once input has been received and any finaladjustments to the objectives and rubrics have been made, the UPC will develop proposals forcurriculum changes. These changes may include changes in sequencing, course offerings, orindividual course changes. The UPC plans to use the objective rubrics to track student learningover
to engineering education that employers can leverage.MethodsThis work was determined to be exempt from further review by UIC Institutional Review Board.To date we have piloted all four modules in Fall 2023 while a second pilot is underway in Spring2024. Modules were piloted between our BME 410 and our year-long BME senior design course(BME 396/397). Final iterations of all four modules are planned for Fall 2024 and Spring 2025,wherein curricular materials will be recorded and disseminated publicly.Module 1: Sourcing and appropriate selection of standards. Partnered with our universityengineering librarian in Fall 2023 and Spring 2024, we gave a short lecture introducing standardsorganizations (e.g. ISO, ASTM), the structure of consensus
differentinstructor (2017−19 average 4.5I, 4.3C). Students reported that the class “modeled andencouraged problem-solving strategies” more in 2022 (4.9) than in 2021 (4.0). Better studentsatisfaction was shared by UCD (89%, 4.8I, 4.8C) versus the evaluation results frompre-pandemic instructors (2009-19 average 3.7I, 3.8C). Our results complement recent researchon PBL-related improvement on self-reported learning [11], confidence [11], and perceived value[12] in biomedical engineering education.The redesigned lectures are planned to be continually implemented in both sites. Moretrack-record in time and the high enrollment (typically > 80 in UCD) will help us with finding thesignificance in student performance while understanding whether the improvement in
pages of data.We are using NVivo software to analyze these transcripts, applying the components of SCCT asa priori codes. After we complete this round of coding, we plan to inductively code the data tocatch any relevant data that may not directly map to SCCT. Finally, we will review the data inthese codes as a team for salient themes and answers to our research questions.Preliminary Results and DiscussionThe data have so far confirmed our previous findings. Multiple participants expressed beingunaware of Quality Engineering and related fields as undergraduates. Some participants learnedabout QE through career fairs and networking as undergraduates. The participants viewed R&Dengineering as the most coveted role for BMEs whether or not they
their client. We facilitated relationship-building activities, such as team icebreakers,group lunches, car rides, immersive brainstorming sessions, and informal chats with the clientover snacks and drinks. As the sprint evolved, we observed the students and client becomingincreasingly comfortable sharing ideas and suggestions with each other.For future program iterations, we aim to expand our collection of program assessment data intwo key ways. First, we would expand the post-program longitudinal data collection , enablinganalysis of the impact of the design sprint on student success during senior capstone. We plan toexpand our data collection to include CATME team assessments throughout the academicsemester, which will provide insights on
courses, yet these are typically taught in isolation from corebiology and physiology classes. We argue that computational modeling can be used as a tool forunderstanding these concepts. Using coding and modeling as a tool also exposes students to awider range of applications for computer programming and provides them with opportunities toapply computational thinking to real-world applications. We plan to continue innovating ourcourse and move towards more accessible tools, such as Jupyter Notebooks, CVSim [8], andCircAdapt [9], as platforms for enhanced learning of cardiovascular function in BME curricula.
project consists of teams of two fourth-year medical students as team leaders at thisnew engineering-based medical school. There are 32 medical students that will be enrolled in thecapstone 2022-2023. In the academic year 2021-2022, 16 medical students participated in thisintegrated curriculum. We expect that enrollment will approach a steady state in this fourth yearof the school’s operation. The students will design, fabricate, and develop a business plan for abroad-scoped project that aims to solve a need that the students have identified during theirrequired clinical rotations in their third-year year.Exploring opportunities for the integrated modelConcurrently running three capstones is resource intensive (projects, course staff, design labs
- and post-course CI. We believe these areinducing some ceiling and floor effects on ourmeasurements. We plan to address both infuture semesters as well as in future analysis.To address our second research question, weperformed two-way ANOVA to test impact ofclass type (PSS or no PSS) and pre- and post-scores as well as their interaction (Figure 2).Our results show that the pre-post effect wassignificant (Δmean=1.83, F(1,241)=24.53,p
experience. In the future we plan to evaluate assignmentsand course evaluations to assess learning outcomes and student satisfaction.Introduction: Students graduating from biomedical engineering (BME) programs have expressedfrustration and difficulties when competing for industry positions against traditional engineeringgraduates, such as mechanical, chemical, or electrical engineers [4, 5, 6]. Seeing a similarfrustration in our students we sought a way to adapt our program to ensure our students could meetthe demands and requirements of future employers. One way BME programs can adapt to industrydemands is by increasing the amount of design experiences for students [7]. This can be done byincluding sophomore and junior-level engineering design
excited to see links between theirmath and physiology course content. We plan to provide better priming and scaffolding here in future versions.When the code is complete, it generates a confusion chart, inference run time, and test accuracy (Figure 3).Students then enter that information into the Google Spreadsheet (Figure 4) and a cross-class summary is againgenerated (Figure 5). Finally, students are asked to put themselves in the shoes of clinicians and asked whetherthey would rely on this diagnostic tool to guide treatment, and what physiological consequences may resultfrom a treatment choice based on an incorrect diagnosis. We noted that the model trained on raw ECGsperforms at a level that is above the level of most clinicians but below the
across six corecourses and one advanced technical elective in an undergraduate biomedical engineering (BME)program curriculum. Our collaborative autoethnography examines the following researchquestions (RQ):RQ1: Why do faculty revise their BME courses to incorporate health equity concepts?RQ2: How do BME faculty integrate health equity concepts into undergraduate BME courses?RQ3: What best practices can be illuminated to support further health equity-focused curricularreform?Conceptual Framework: The Academic PlanTo establish a shared vocabulary for exploration of our research questions, we leverage Lattucaand Stark’s [23] Academic Plan Model to underpin our collaborative reflections. The AcademicPlan Model is a framework for understanding