Asee peer logo

Board 15: Work in Progress: Mixing Flipped and Traditional Teaching to Support Conceptual Learning and Motivation in a Cell and Molecular Biology Course

Download Paper |

Conference

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 23, 2024

Start Date

June 23, 2024

End Date

June 26, 2024

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session

Tagged Division

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

Page Count

6

DOI

10.18260/1-2--46710

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/46710

Download Count

50

Paper Authors

biography

Laura Christian Georgia Institute of Technology

visit author page

Laura Christian's doctorate work at UT Austin was is in the field of cell and molecular biology and she has held biology teaching faculty positions at West Virginia University and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. She is currently a Lecturer in the Biomedical Engineering Department at Georgia Tech. She is excited to combine her experiences in biology teaching with methods used in engineering instruction and to use education research techniques determine methods that work well for these students.

visit author page

biography

Todd M. Fernandez Georgia Institute of Technology Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0002-1387-2575

visit author page

Todd is a lecturer in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His research interests are engineering students beliefs about knowledge and education and how those beliefs interact with learning engineering.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Cell and molecular biology courses often focus on memorization of biological facts using traditional lecture approaches. The disconnect between typical approaches to teaching such courses and the larger goals of engineering education has the potential to reduce student learning and motivation in an important core course. Active pedagogical techniques and flipped course delivery have been shown to be more effective than traditional lectures. In addition, both of these solutions are relatively accessible to instructors with limited time to engage in course design or redesign.

With the goal of improving content learning and increasing student motivation for learning cell and molecular biology, we revised the instructional design for a junior-level cell and molecular biology course for BME students. The first change was the integration of Problem Solving Studio (PSS) into three to five class sessions. PSS is a student apprenticeship learning model, where small groups of students solve open-ended problem sets with facilitation by an instructor. While PSS has been shown to increase student motivation and learning over a semester, changes in these parameters have not been measured in semesters before and after its implementation. PSS is also frequently used in courses focused on math concepts, but it also has the potential to increase student learning and motivation in a cell and molecular biology course for engineering students.

In order to assess student learning of concepts and motivation, student data is being collected through pre- and post-course assessments: a cell and molecular biology concept inventory (CI) and responses to a survey on motivation, along with exam grades and demographic information. In this preliminary analysis, we asked two research questions: RQ1. Does student learning increase over the semester, regardless of class type? RQ2. Does the class type (PSS or no PSS) affect CI scores in this course? Using Classical Test Theory and two-way ANOVA, we determined that student learning does increase over the semester regardless of class type. However, we were unable to show that class type affects CI scores.

Christian, L., & Fernandez, T. M. (2024, June), Board 15: Work in Progress: Mixing Flipped and Traditional Teaching to Support Conceptual Learning and Motivation in a Cell and Molecular Biology Course Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--46710

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015