Conference Session

The Year of Dialogue: What We Have Learned So Far

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. P. Mohsen, University of Louisville; Ronald Barr, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Divisions

Campus Representatives

ofpresentation and prioritization. A comparison of the YOD results to Boyer’s general concept of“Scholarship” for the professorate is made. A vision of SEE is presented and illustrated, basedon the input from all YOD discussions. Major action items that ASEE can address are presentedin the conclusion. Page 13.1286.2 Introduction In January 2006, the ASEE Board of Directors endorsed the “Rising Above the GatheringStorm” (RAGS) report [1]. The issues in RAGS had been discussed at length by the Board, andas a result, a committee was organized to orchestrate a series of events during the following year.These

Conference Session

Sharing Best Practices

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles McIntyre, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Campus Representatives

Department of any changes. In lieu of an active and conscientious SectionCampus Rep, these duties, by default, become the duties of the Section Chair. However, severalof the recommendations and suggestions presented in this paper may be conducted by either theSection Chair or the Section Campus Rep. Effective and ongoing communication between theSection Chair and the Section Campus Rep is needed to decide who should address each of theissues presented in this paper.In general, before making changes to any process or program, one must become knowledgeableof the overall process or program. From the perspective of a Section Chair, with regard to theCampus Rep Program within the Section, the Section Chair must: 1.) understand theresponsibilities of a