choosewhich topic was most interesting and join the team. Timing was such that the first item (theAgreement of Cooperation19) was due at the end of the first week of class so that the teams werestarted quickly with a clear, immediately milestone. Feedback was given on these agreements sothat students had all discussed how to deal with conflict, differing work ethic, and how to bestrespect each other’s ideas. The schedule and plan of progress reports were outlined in thesyllabus on the first day of class for the students. The progress reports were: • Team’s Agreement of Cooperation: Outline goals and guidelines of group participation. • Progress Report 1: Introductory description of proposed, novel analytical
the classroom at the same time, in away that the instructor could be explaining the problem and solving it on the blackboard. Withthis technological aid, the instructor has the possibility to have three teaching tools at the same Page 23.1077.3time: 1) the blackboard, to solve the equations and do the mathematics; 2) the Graphical UserInterface (GUI), which shows the process; and 3) the Audio and Video Interface of the realequipment of the lab. Using all these elements, the learning experience in the classroom is highlyincreased, allowing the students to interact with real world applications of the concepts they arelearning about
the teaching of concepts in an introductory thermodynamics coursethrough video. This generation of students is technology savvy, and regularly communicates bymeans other than face-to-face interactions (e.g. texting). Additionally, the popularity of sites suchas Khan Academy makes the idea of teaching with video difficult to ignore. Thus, we assert thatthere is value in using this media for instruction, and that this media can be leveraged for use in achemical engineering course. During this study, students will be asked to 1) take a conceptdiscussed during class, and articulate it in video media using everyday examples that otherstudents can relate to (autodidactic learning) 2) watch peer-made videos that teach these concepts(peer-to-peer
.(30) In other words, when students come to science classesthey are not “blank slates,” but are informed by scientific knowledge that comes from out-of- Page 23.1191.2class settings as well as previous courses.(3)These same conceptual difficulties have been found in undergraduate engineering students.(21, 25,28) For example, Prince and Vigeant found that many engineering undergraduates viewed heatand temperature as equivalent entities.(25) Self et al. determined that almost 30% of chemical andmechanical engineering seniors could not, “…logically distinguish between temperature andenergy in simple engineering systems and processes” (p. S2G-1
conclusive description of a topic and then applying that description to specific scenarios. For example, the theory behind heat transfer is learned first and the student is then expected to apply this theory to a particular real-world design. This approach is essentially the opposite of the process by which a particular body of knowledge was originally Figure 1. Inductive and deductive learning4. developed.Inductive learning, on the other hand, involves the acquisition
environment.Studio-Based LearningStudio-based learning (SBL) techniques have been used in a variety of disciplines, mostnotably in architectural education.1 The technique is rooted in a type of constructivistlearning theory called sociocultural constructivism.2 The studio-based approach typicallyencompasses four key steps (see Figure 1). 3 First, students are given complex andmeaningful problems for which they have to construct solutions. Second, studentspresent their solutions and justifications to the entire class for discussion and feedback.Third, students’ peers critique their solutions and provide comments. Finally, students aregiven the opportunity to respond to comments and criticisms, and to modify theirsolutions appropriately
Mississippi State University.The results of this project are the development of nearly four dozen modules inchemical engineering, over two dozen modules in mechanical engineering, and over adozen modules in electrical engineering developed. The modules are available5:(http://www.che.msstate.edu/pdfs/h2ed/) with links to the separate curricula from thatpage. The chemical engineering modules are listed in Table 1 below.Table 1. Chemical Engineering Modules Arranged by CourseIntroductory Material:Overview of Hydrogen Energy and Fuel CellsFuel Cell Sizing Made Easy (Knovel Engineering Cases)The Short-Term Hydrogen Economy: Fueling Fuel Cells (Knovel Engineering Cases)Material and Energy Balances:Heat of Formation for Fuel Cell ApplicationsMaterial
divided into the following topics: 1. Discussion of cubic B-splines and their advantages over normal cubic splines. 2. Tutorial on writing user-defined functions in Visual Basic for Applications (VBA). 3. Steps required to create the Excel worksheet to display the McCabe-Thiele diagram.Cubic B-splinesTo illustrate the problem of fitting experimental data, consider the ethanol/water data11 (at 1 atm)shown in Table 1 and plotted in Figure 1: # x y T (K) 1 0.0010 0.0047 373.15 2 0.0061 0.0721 371.75 3 0.0145 0.1539 369.65 4 0.0237 0.2301 367.35 5 0.0310 0.2851 365.65 6 0.0490
resurveyed the samedepartments in 2015 (Figure 1). At the start of ourwork, early curriculum laboratory experiences foraspiring chemical engineers were rare. Figure 1 Figure 1: Percentage of Chemicalshows lab courses for freshmen and sophomores Engineering Departments Requiringhave been gaining in popularity; however, such Engineering Laboratory Courses. Fiftycourses are still relatively rare and the best practices randomly selected departments are represented.for managing such laboratories remain in need of These departments were surveyed in July ofinvestigation. 2012, and these same departments were
benefits of hands-on learning, such asincreased student attention, are widely acclaimed [1-5], there are also benefits to more traditionalteaching styles, such as the ability transmit more information [6], and the instructor is left tryingto determine which pedagogy will be best suited for each topic in a course. As part of an effort todevelop and promulgate hands-on, active learning pedagogies, the authors have undertaken astudy to develop guidelines for lecture versus hands-on, active learning in fluid mechanics andheat transfer.Students in a junior level Chemical Engineering Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer course weretaught in a split manner with two sections and one instructor. The sections were taught in analternating manner. For any given
analysis of thedegrees of freedom for stage-wise separations, however, do not offer a generalized formalism fora broader range of problems. Rodriguez and Gayosos12 extended an earlier formalism proposedby Ponton13, also for stead-state processes.Current texts, however, offer a number of starting points that are quite useful. Felder andRousseau1 present and illustrate a degrees of freedom approach wherein they state that: ndf = nunknowns – nindependent equations (1) where ndf is the number of degrees of freedom, nunknowns is the number of “unknown variables”and nindependent equations is the number of “independent equations” relating the
students were balancing an individual project with a team project, and afinal one at the end-of-semester when only a final team project remained. This three projectstructure, two individual and one team, allowed us to examine both the design experiences andteam effects on student self-efficacy.A wide number of self-efficacy gains suggest that students’ self-efficacy is positively affected byour senior design class. Patterns of self-efficacy gains indicate that there may be a time-dependent variable that affects the development of students’ self-efficacy. A higher number ofobserved self-efficacy gains between surveys 1 and 2 suggests that the steeper learning curveduring the first half of the course may allow for high gains in self-efficacy
student teams work out theirinterpersonal problems only to then be faced with hours of grading lengthy reports. And,although the students only have to complete the work once, for faculty, the cycle repeatsannually.Two years ago, we attended a presentation on gamification in a laboratory course 1. Although theplan used in that paper did not suit us, the idea of adding an element of fun and competition tothe Unit Ops Lab had a certain appeal. We brainstormed ways to incorporate the game conceptand fix some of the small annoyances of teaching the lab courses. The small gamificationaddition was dubbed “Bragging Points”. The idea would be to recognize the students for doingsomething right (that they probably should have been doing anyway) and let them
significantly more efficient than previous technologies.Analogously, textbooks became a standard tool for higher education in the 20th century, and formany undergraduate engineering courses, remain as the standard method for informationdissemination and reference. The engineering textbook is primarily used for defining terms andequations. Additionally, worked examples and homework problems are included in mostengineering textbooks. However, the invention and mass production of the smartphone andsimple access to factual information through Internet search engines, including Google, haschanged how students obtain most of the information found in textbooks [1]. The price oftextbooks has risen dramatically to more than $200 per traditional hard cover book
with respect to both temperatures achievable and bio-oil yield .Introduction:Due to stringent emission requirements the increasing amount of CO2 emissions and of othergreenhouse gases from combustion processes, technologies in renewable energies that decreasethese emissions have been streamlined for implementation in industry.1 Pyrolysis is an effectivethermochemical conversion process that helps to cut down emissions while producing a sourceof useable fuel from renewable resources. In the process of pyrolysis, biomass is heated to 400-600°C in the absence of oxygen, to produce bio-oil.2 The products formed in the process arechar, oil, tar, water, and fuel gases. It is known that rapid heating yields higher volatilecomponents and temperatures
engineering. Theengineering overview is divided into four sections (each half of a 15 week semester). Thefirst section is general to all students, and establishes some basic vocabulary andengineering concepts(1). The next two sections, the students select from eight different“mini-projects” on topics such as Artificial Kidney Design(2), Biomass Conversion toFuels and Absorption of Wastewater Contaminants. These “mini- projects” are project-based multi-disciplinary design experiences. The goal is to introduce some basicengineering concepts, as well as guide the students to which type of engineering theyprefer to study(3, 4) . The final section of the course is then a discipline specificintroductory course. Each department has
experimental set of diffusion coefficients Compare the experimental drug release profile to a theoretical release profile predicted from estimates of the diffusion coefficientExperimental SetupThe following reagents are required: sodium alginate, chitosan, 6% calcium chloride in distilledwater, 5% sodium citrate/0.9% NaCl in distilled water, pure distilled water, Allura Red(McCormick red food dye), fluorescein-labeled bovine serum albumin (BSA). The total expenseof these reagents is approximately $300, most of which is attributed to the fluorescent BSA.Prior to the lab, sodium alginate is dissolved in distilled water with the model drug and agitatedovernight at room temperature. The alginate composition varies from 1-3% alginate by mass
the article, andability to reproduce the thermodynamic calculations of the article. All three of these improved asthe students learned the material in the course and worked with it through homework and thedesign project. Confidences in ability to understand engineering principles and to reproducecalculations of similar articles also improved during the study and were probed with separatequestions. This study showed that lifelong learning can be encouraged in lower-level courseswith the appropriate selection of articles.IntroductionWhen CEP published an article on organic Rankine cycles and included flowsheets 1, a designproject was created for an introductory thermodynamics class that required the students toreproduce the calculations
-2008 Fulbright exchange to Nigeria set the stage for him to receive the Marian Smith Award given annually to the most innovative teacher at Washington State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Implementation of an Ultra-low Cost Heat Exchanger Learning Module to Address Energy Balance ConceptsIntroductionEngineering education researchers are publishing many instructional designs that report acognitive edge over straight lecture (1, 2). These fall under the category of High PerformanceLearning Environments (Hi-Pe-LE) (3) which constitute a wide array of pedagogies ofengagement (4) like Problem-Based Learning (PBL) (5), hands-on learning and experimentalformats (6
fundamental courses like physics and chemistry. While freshmen tend to focus on the socialaspects of moving away from home and living on a large college campus, sophomore studentsbegin to worry about building their resumes to enhancing their chances for obtaining their firstsummer internship or co-op. In recent years the AIChE student chapter and their faculty advisorat Louisiana State University (LSU) have been tracking student performance in two core courses that the majority of sophomores are enrolled in during the fall semester (Figure 1
graduate students and facultymentors. Students also participated in professional development seminars and structured socialactivities designed to further facilitate cohesion and integration into the research setting. Thefindings support the use of effective structural and programmatic elements in implementingresearch programs aimed at fostering research skills among undergraduate students. The findingsalso contribute to a developing understanding in the literature of the benefits of REU programsas well as the importance of student collaboration during structured research as a mechanism forfostering the development of research skills 1-4.BackgroundThe importance of undergraduate research experiences in facilitating students’ research-basedskills
newsletter editor. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics. Page 26.1739.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Why Not Ask Students to Explain Themselves? Enhancing Conceptual Testing with Technical WritingNote: Based on reviewer comments this paper is submitted to the ASEE 2015 Annual Conference as a “Work-In-Progress” that is intended to be presented at the ChE Division Poster Session.1. IntroductionRecently a great deal of
, reciprocity, reactivity, careerdevelopment, and social interaction.1 It should be noted that an individual outreach volunteermay perform multiple functions and have multiple motivations at any single event. Researchersat Rice University used Volunteer Motivation Inventories and other metrics to assess themotivations of head mentors in their DREAM engineering outreach program for underservedHouston schools. They found that the mentors’ motivations were dominated by the fundamentalbelief in helping others, with a distant second motivation of better understanding themselves andothers. This finding was independent of ethnicity and gender. While there are not sufficientsimilar studies on other engineering outreach programs to know if this finding is
any agreed upon significantfindings to the appropriate unit or person that has the authority to make changes. This open-ended student-designed risk assessment offers more realistic communication experiences;introduces the concept of project shaping; and requires the application of safety knowledgegained to be put into practice. Qualitative student and staff response to this teaching approachare presented.IntroductionAll ABET accredited Chemical Engineering programs are required to show student outcomesrelating to the eight guidelines for teaching safety and design.1 Individual departments have thediscretion of meeting these objectives in a single course, through inclusion across multiple corecourses, or through some combination of both.The
experiment will convey. Page 26.1158.2EquipmentThe equipment is shown in figures 1 and 2.Figure 1 shows the vessel which is glass, 210 mm in diameter with 250 mm straight side and aflat base. There is a removable steel ring to which four vertical baffles are attached. The widthof the baffles is 1/12 of the vessel diameter which is standard in industry. This allowsexperiments to be carried out in baffled and unbaffled configurations.The drive has a 1 kW motor with a maximum operating speed of 1800 RPM and is supportedfrom a steel frame. The speed is controlled by a variable frequency drive (VFD) which hastorque and rotational speed indicators.A variety
diversity of theirstudent populations. Despite myriad efforts, students from groups underrepresented inengineering are still less likely to persist, relative to their peers.1-10 To address this, manyprograms have incorporated design projects early in the curriculum, leading to higher overallretention of diverse students in engineering.11-23 For instance, students from underrepresentedgroups were likelier to persist if they completed a first year design course, and this was attributedto the hands-on and contextual nature of the experience12. Elsewhere, higher retention of diversestudents is attributed to the fact that students like getting exposure to authentic projects,24, 25because such projects provide opportunities for students to learn
from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Data Analytics for Interactive Virtual LaboratoriesIntroductionWe have previously described the development and implementation of a set of InteractiveVirtual Laboratories (IVLs) in thermodynamics.1 Each IVL provides a set of activities to addresstargeted threshold concepts2 via actively engaging students in a series of actions. The IVLsprovide a less
large library of thermodynamics videos, suitable toact as “learning objects” for topic introduction or further study outside of class, enhanced studentengagement, student demonstration of the capacity to engage in lifelong learning. By the draftpaper due date, we will also be able to say whether or not it also resulted in a significant changein students’ thermodynamics concept inventory scores. In previous years of the study, simplywatching videos or generating a single video on a larger team did not improve student scoresover control.BackgroundPeer instruction has been shown to be a powerful tool for learning(1). The goal of this work wasto see if the benefits of peer instruction could be attained asynchronously via the medium ofvideo. In the
middleand end of the term for a survey and formal report on a student’s experience, we now use a seriesof short reflective writing assignments distributed across their term in industry in order toaccelerate the student’s professional development and fortify their confidence. The newapproach maintains two primary objectives to help students: 1. Gain real-world professional experience that enhances their academic training 2. Develop professional engineering skills valued by employers to propel them towards successful careersWe consulted with practicing engineers on our program’s industrial advisory committee toidentify professional competencies to focus our efforts for professional development of our coopand intern students. With the support
problemwith other chemical engineering courses, and d) think of a related problem. In this paper we willpresent the analysis of this valuable data set of student reflections as we seek to more deeplyanalyze students reflective writing in terms of (1) the specific technical content discussed and (2)the way the student engaged with the content, its connections to other ideas, and their ownunderstanding (“thinking about thinking,” or metacognition).IntroductionChemical engineering thermodynamics and chemical process control and safety are two requiredcourses taught in the fall and spring of the junior year, respectively. The prerequisites forthermodynamics include material and energy balances, organic chemistry, and multivariablecalculus, while the