throughout the 14-week semester, with a projectproposal due three weeks into the semester, a project update due eight weeks into the semester,and the final project due twelve weeks into the semester. The intermediate deadlines wereestablished to help ensure that students would develop a schedule plan to guide their progressthroughout the semester, and to allow for the instructor to provide constructive feedback as needed. Grading expectations were defined at the beginning of the semester when the project wasassigned. Students were reassured that artistic quality was not a priority for any of the visually-inclined projects, as long as sufficient effort was put in. Examples of insufficient effort wouldinclude developing stick figure comics, or
) from an academic program must prepare their graduates with “an ability to communicateeffectively” (SO k), and the “ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze andinterpret data” (SO b), and others [6]. In fact, the new ABET student outcomes, effective in2019-2020, have a stronger emphasis on team efforts: “An ability to function effectively as amember or leader of a team that establishes goals, plans tasks, meets deadlines, and creates acollaborative and inclusive environment” (SO “3”)[6]. All these outcomes can be assessedthrough the Unit Operations Laboratory; however, the main challenge is to implement practicaltools for a team, either assigned or self-selected, to function properly throughout the semester.For instance
planning and designstages. This is an approach that we expect to successfully address the new requirements of theAIChE Program Criteria; moreover, we expect that our students will graduate with abilities inprocess hazards analysis that will be of benefit in the workplace.BackgroundIn response to the updated ABET Program Criteria for chemical engineering that now requireconsideration of hazards associated with the processes that our students design, analyze, andcontrol, we have acknowledged the need to provide additional exposure to risk assessment andmore rigorous safety considerations in our baccalaureate chemical engineering curriculum.Therefore, we are adding simplified Process Hazard Analyses to both Unit Operations andProcess Design courses
added to a “first year ChE”email list, which is used to provide relevant information such as how to makeappointments and choosing appropriate courses. I meet with students to discuss ourprogram and complete long-term course plans. Page 22.1315.4Welcoming and supporting our sophomoresThe first 15 minutes of the first day of ChE 230, the Material and Energy Balancescourse, serve as a welcome to the department. The department chair, representativesfrom all departmental student groups and I extend our welcome, and provide informationof how we can assist them. Students then complete forms letting us know their
experimental • Background research • Dependent variables plan (description, nomenclature, units, expected values)Student teams undertake two unit operations projects separated by a project management Page 22.431.8fundamentals project performed during laboratory time (see Figure 4). Laboratory preparation isfurther reinforced by having student teams prepare partial reports after their first laboratoryperiod working with a particular unit operation project. Specifically, they submit an abstractdraft, Background
, December 2008.2. Wilding, W.V., Harb, J.N., Terry, R.E., and Hecker, W.C., “Maximizing the Benefits of Developing an Educational Plan to Meet the ABET 2000 Criteria”, Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, June 20-23, 1999.3. Harb, J.N., Wilding, W.V., and Terry, R.E., "Implementing an Education Plan to Meet the ABET 2000 Criteria", Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, June 18-21, 2000.4. Terry, R.E., Harb, J.N., Hecker, W.C, and Wilding, W.V., “Definition of Student Competencies and Development of an Educational Plan to Assess Student Mastery Level,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(2), 225-235, 2002
pulmonary air-particle flow simulations help engineers and physicians tooptimize the inhalation therapy plans for patients with lung diseases. All activities serve the fourfocuses of the LUNGevity session: structure, function, disease, and treatment. We also describetwo newly designed hands-on modules that will be piloted in the next offering of GrandparentUniversity. 7Lung Activity 1: “X-ray” Test of Lung Structure Using Virtuali-Tee®First, introduce the anatomical features of the human respiratory system using the visualizationof 3D human respiratory systems (Figure 4a) and the physical 3D printed airways models (Figure4b). Ask students to volunteer and draw human respiratory systems on the
filtration system using sand, pebbles, activated carbon, and coffee filters. Not only did the designs vary significantly between groups, but the creativity in planning and modeling their devices did as well
for engineers’ careers that are not taught in core technical curricula.As the course has developed over its four years as part of the curriculum, there has grown to be adiverse population of students who have previously taken the course and still attend theuniversity. This presents an opportunity to compare the communication skills of students whotook the technical communications course with those who did not. We plan to study students’habits while writing technical reports by analyzing their process of writing and their finalproduct, and from there draw conclusions about their communication skills. We hypothesize thata dedicated technical communications course is effective at developing communications skillsamong engineering students, and
resulted (last column of Table 1). Some groups that included reactantrecycle reported only minimal improvement in conversion associated with the recycle. In thecase of a vinyl chloride process (performed by two different groups), hydrochloric acid generatedas a by-product of a third reactor was recycled back to the beginning of the process where it wasutilized as a reactant in one of the first two parallel reactions. Besides reactant recycle, threedesign groups included recycling of non-reactant chemicals added for the express purpose ofproduct recovery (triethylene glycol for water recovery, paraffin oil for isobutylene recovery, anddibutyl phthalate for maleic anhydride recovery). In the future, the instructor plans to requestthat the students
environment with other students and the course instructor.We plan to utilize evidence-based evaluation techniques to assess the effectiveness of the course(and individual features of the course) toward student learning. Possible evaluation methods willbe discussed, and feedback from the audience will be encouraged.Keywords: Chemical Engineering, Engineering Education, Bridging Course, Online Course,Continuing Education1. INTRODUCTIONChemical engineering graduate programs often receive applications from students whoseundergraduate degree is in chemistry, physics, biology, or another engineering discipline. Thesetypically are excellent students with undergraduate research or work experience, but their lack ofchemical engineering background can present
. o Investigates the capacities of the team and its individual members and encourages them to improve continuously.Builds the Team o Is responsible for the team charter (clients, stakeholders’ needs and requirements, team norms, project scope, time schedule, product definition, communication processes, etc.). o Monitors process execution and manages changes in the planning. o Assesses team members to improve performance (givesManages the continuous feedback and quantitative performance appraisal toProject team members, applies balance of consequences). o Handles conflicts
, we plan to conduct a formal experimentalstudy that compares the ChemProV tool to simple paper-and-pencil—the current “goldstandard” medium for solving chemical balance problems. In our within-subjects study, agroup of twelve to 20 students recruited from an introductory chemical engineeringcourse will be asked to solve two chemical balance problems that are isomorphic withrespect to difficulty: one using the ChemProV tool, and the other using pencil-and-paper.Task and treatment order will be fully counterbalanced in order to guard against ordereffects. We will record students’ problem solving activities. Their solutions will beevaluated with respect to four dependent measures: time to complete the task, accuracy ofthe process flow
as a whole, students from 1990 would find much that they recognize in the chemicalengineering curricula of today, while they might not recognize the classroom activities or co-curricular opportunities as familiar.. In discussion of these results at the AIChE 2016 AnnualMeeting, it was observed that a stable curriculum is a sign of a stable body of knowledge and amature field, rather than a sign of stagnation.Works Cited1. Pintar, A., B. Aller, T. Rogers, K. Schulz, and D. Shonnard. “Developing an Assessment Plan to Meet Abet Ec2000.” Paper presented at the American Association for Engineering Education, Charlotte, NC, 1999.2. ABET. 2017. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2017-2018. http://www.abet.org/accreditation
was and showing briefexamples. Then students had fifteen minutes to work individually on generating their maps usingpencil and paper. They were told that their maps would be collected but not evaluated for agrade. Electronic copies of the maps were made, and maps were offered back to the students inthe last day of lecture for the semester.As a preliminary start to this work in progress, ten maps chosen at random from the 2016 and2017 semesters were evaluated in random order according to the holistic rubric from Besterfieldet al. It is also planned to use a more hierarchical rubric to reevaluate the rubrics. Ultimately thiswill be done for each of the approximately 90 mind maps from both the 2016 and 2017iterations. Scores on the maps will be
friendly competition of trying tofind the lowest IAE. Table 1 presents some of the survey questions with the percent of studentsselecting each answer. There were also short answer, open-ended, response questions thatyielded numerous positive comments about the value of the simulation allowing them to quicklyand easily observe the effect of each parameter by adjusting them one at time. Although nearlyall the students indicated that the simulations were highly effective in helping them learn thematerial, there was an understandable desire on the part of some students to conduct morephysical experiments and to seek to bring the simulation in closer agreement with the physicalexperiment as we had originally planned. Overall this new experiment was
of RBIS in engineering courses. The virtual aspect ofthe project aims to overcome the barriers of cost, scale and physical location that are inherentwith local (face-to-face) communities. A previous paper described the structure, goals, organization and technology of the VCP forChemical, Materials, and Biological Engineering12, but the previous paper did not include anydetailed information on the instructional innovations developed and implemented by individualmembers of the community. This paper specifically focuses on the experiences of eight partici-pants who transformed their courses through the implementation of a variety of RBIS. Facultyparticipants developed individual action plans to transform their course through RBIS using ap
agenda. Our future work includes a means to have students systematicallyreflect on their engineering assets and connect these to their developing engineering identities.As we integrate new engineering design challenges into early coursework, we plan to explore theimpact of both of these efforts on student persistence.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC #1544233. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. Atman, C.J., et al., Moving from pipeline thinking to understanding pathways: Findings from the academic
Of Understanding SafeLaboratory Practices And MSDS Sheets.Ñ 15 Again, there was little, if any, mention of a riskassessment in these papers or laboratory procedures. Page 13.556.3A ÐRubric for Laboratory ExperimentsÑ that included safety was located (this rubric is useful tomeet ABET EC2000 requirements).16 However, among the five evaluation parameters under theÐDesign, Perform Safe ExperimentsÑ headings: 1) Design of safe, effective laboratory experiment 2) Laboratory execution according to safe, approved experimental plan 3) Understanding of how equipment works, equipment limitations, safe operation 4) Understanding of how
New York City (from Staten Island tothe Bronx) were chosen to be part of the pharmaceutical engineering project. In an effort toengage the students and “break the ice” a series of group activities were developed to introducethe students to chemical engineering, pharmaceutical engineering, and to their fellow teammates.For the first exercise, students were required to work in groups of two to fill out activity formsthat included questions about their teammates (e.g. “what does your teammate plan to learn fromparticipating in this?” Following this, students were given an introduction to the field ofchemical engineering. At the end of the lecture, the students were required to work in teams andfill out questions about chemical engineering (e.g
either included or excluded. While the majority of students seem to have higherscores when their own self-evaluation is included in the computation of this score, the statisticalsignificance of this observation is more modest, on the level of α=0.2.We did not implement any measure to determine student preferences for the two types ofevaluation systems. Both the point division and CATME systems are being implemented again inthe Spring 2013 semester and plans for a student attitude survey are ongoing. Page 23.32.8References[1] Michaelsen, L. K., A. B. Knight, and L. D. Fink (eds.), Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of SmallGroups in
courseinstructors.Outcomes AssessmentIncluded with the module is a pre- / post- assessment test. This test allows the course instructor Page 25.180.5to gauge the students’ baseline knowledge of the concepts to be presented in the module and thestudents’ retailed knowledge after completing the module. The assessment test consists of 10multiple choice questions covering each of the major topics presented in the module. Theassessment test is shown in Table 1, below. Assessment data from the first class of chemicalengineering thermodynamics students to utilize the fully implemented module is currently beingcompiled and will be made available in a planned future
evaluation of student understanding through use of multiplechoice/fill in the blank questions. Performance on these evaluations will be captured using ascore that may be submitted for credit. This coming semester (Fall 2011), the module will bedeployed as a self-paced instructional unit with assessment of student performance using themyCourses platform. Plans are to provide the refined module to other educators wishing toincorporate the content into their courses. The modular format allows the content to be readilyincorporated into a variety of courses in the chemical engineering curriculum in addition tochemical reactor design, including process or plant design, advanced separations, or an electivefocused on process intensification
presuppose deep scientific knowledge of physical and chemical laws,molecular and quantum chemistry, fine technologies, models based on types of interaction,thermodynamic, kinetic and mathematical regularities as well as on modern computertechnologies and programs.Multi-level structure of educational programs in Lomonosov Moscow State Academy of FineChemical Technology (MITHT)The multi-level education system for chemical engineers has been tested and developed for20 years since 1991 up to the present in Lomonosov Moscow State Academy of FineChemical Technology3. The former system consisted in the linear professional curriculacovering five and a half years. Such curricula were successfully realized in the former SovietUnion under conditions of a plan
through a cylinder: Page 22.466.8Solute transport in the Mass and fluid transportglomeruli through poresFarheus effect in Segregated fluid flow in pipesblood flow (marginal zone theory)Generalized model Mass flow balancefor drug transport inan organ For vascular space: For interstitial space: For cellular space: Overall mass transport: Page 22.466.9Future plans:Future plans for this course include: (i) Adding guest lectures by medical school
additional decision variable is introduced into the batch design optimization. Thissimple example illustrates one of the differences between modeling, design, and optimizationprocedures for batch and continuous operations. Another constraint in batch modeling is that thevolume of the batch must be matched with the equipment size. This imposes additionalconstraints on Equation 3. For example, not all combinations of t and A can be accommodated,if t is small and A is large, the volume of process liquid may be too small to cover the coil orjacket.Gantt charts and scheduling: The scheduling of different equipment in a given process is bestillustrated through the use of simple Gantt charts. Gantt charts are used extensively in thescheduling and planning
time and the Temp*time terms reflect the fact that these are notsignificant factors. This equation can be used to predict directly the response (absorbance) thatwill be achieved using specific operating conditions (temperature and time).AssessmentThis project and experimental design module has been run in three consecutive years of theFreshman Clinic. To evaluate student learning of concepts related to experimental design, threeinstruments were used: the final report, a final oral presentation, and the final exam. Thecumulative results over the three year period are presented here. A total of 62 students wereevaluated.An assessment plan was developed to map student work directly to the individual learningoutcomes of these freshmen. Levels of
patterns. Second, they mentally representproblems largely in terms of underlying principles. Finally, experts plan solution strategies, anddetect constraints given in the problem statement. To incorporate these ideas into engineeringeducation, a project called “Reverse Engineering” was created, and employed in a sophomorefluids mechanics class. No different than taking a piece of equipment apart to better understandits operation, students can apply the same approach to chemical engineering problems. Briefly,students were asked to generate their own problems related to a concept discussed during class,and present the solution by breaking it down into its fundamental parts. We hypothesize thatstudents would improve their problem solving ability by
statement of its significance, that is, what problem or opportunity the action would address) 3. Background (summarizes what has been done to date that has led to the proposed course of action) 4. Solution or Plan (what would be done? how? where?, methods and procedures, expected outcomes) 5. Qualifications (brief bios of the primary team, establishing their competence to carry out the proposed action) 6. Conclusion or SummaryAppendices: i) Budget (realistic, as complete and detailed as possible, including overhead costs, but also economical, bearing in mind that a proposal may be in competition for funds from other proposals) ii) Schedule (anticipated dates for each stage of the process and its
). 4 3 2 1 1. Formulates Can easily convert Forms workable Has difficulty in Has difficulty appropriate solution word problems to strategies, but may planning an getting beyond the strategies equations. Sees not be optimal. approach. Tends to given unless what must be done Occasional reliance leave some directly instructed on brute force problems unsolved 2. Identifies relevant Consistently uses Ultimately identifies Identifies some Cannot identify and principles