Paper ID #23558Assessment of a Global Engineering Outreach CourseDr. Randy S. Lewis, Brigham Young University Dr. Randy S. Lewis is professor at Brigham Young University (BYU). He received his B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from BYU and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, respectively. He currently serves as chair of the Education and Accreditation Committee of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and as an ABET commissioner for accrediting engineering programs. He previously served in several national positions of AIChE. His research interests include biomaterials development, engineering
Paper ID #22840Effective Teamwork Dynamics in a Unit Operations Laboratory CourseDr. Erick S. Vasquez, University of Dayton Erick S. Vasquez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Dayton. Dr. Vasquez earned his B.Sc. degree in chemical engineering at Universidad Centroamericana Jose Simeon Canas (UCA) in El Salvador. He received his M.Sc. degree in chemi- cal engineering from Clemson University and his Ph.D. degree in chemical engineering from Mississippi State University. His research focuses on the development and applications of nanomaterials in separation
and time on task can be tracked. A survey is beingdeveloped to determine the effectiveness of these web-based multimedia pre-labs throughstudent perceived learning and motivation.AcknowledgmentThis research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaScholarship.References[1] S. Chen, "The view of scientific inquiry conveyed by simulation-based virtual laboratories", Computers & Education, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1123-1130, 2010.[2] J. Ma and J. Nickerson, "Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories", ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, no. 3, p. 7-es, 2006.[3] D. Jolley, S. Wilson, C. Kelso, G. O’Brien and C. Mason, "Analytical Thinking, Analytical Action: Using Prelab Video Demonstrations and e-Quizzes
new team membershave been able to productively contribute.As with the design-based research approach, we will continue to iterate on our design, to bettertest ways to help team members value each other’s assets.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC #1544233. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] S. Harvey, “A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity,” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 822–832, 2013.[2] J. A. Mejia, A. Wilson-Lopez, C. E. Hailey, I
transfer [3]. We recommend that instructors frame the activity intheir classroom (e.g., examples, group problems, and homework) in ways that help studentsbetter connect their work to that of professional practice. Such framing can be included both inthe problem statement itself, and in how it is communicated to students.AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the National Science Foundationthrough grant EEC 1519467. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References: [1] M. D. Koretsky, D. Montfort, S. Nolen, M. Bothwell, S. Davis, and J. Sweeney. “Towards a stronger
development. Table 2 provides a description ofpedagogical topics covered, the associated learning goals, resources used, and the primaryactivities implemented.Table 2. Timetable of pedagogical development seminar topics, main resources, and activities Term Week Topic(s) Goal(s) Resource(s) Activities Studio pedagogy Koretsky, 2015 [1]; Metacognition Tanner, 2012 [14]; Whole class discussion Pre-Fall 1, 2, 3, 0 Fixed vs. growth Dweck, 2007 [15]; Read articleOrientation 4, 5
implementation with emphasis on two of the classrooms inparticular, as the third class will be included in a later study.Classroom Implementation ExperimentFor on-site mentoring Prof. Van Wie met with two implementing professors: Prof. S. Wilson (UK-Lex) in a Fall 2016 visit before initiating his Spring 2017 sabbatical and Prof. D. Englert (UK-Pad) during the sabbatical period. To begin, Prof. Van Wie set-up an LC-DLM with ancillary fluidreservoir, pump, tubing and connectors, while the new implementing professors set-up acompanion system. They then went through student team-based worksheets to practice datacollection and review the activity-guiding questions on the worksheet. Discussions also took placearound pre- and posttest questions, how to coach
/2015che_academicindustryalignmentstudy.compressed.pdf [Accessed Oct. 14, 2017].[2] U. S. Chemical Safety Board, “Investigations”. [Online]. Available:https://www.csb.gov/investigations/ [Accessed Feb. 4, 2018].[3] L. D. Feisel, A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate EngineeringEducation”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 121-130, 2005.[4] U. S. Chemical Safety Board, 2009. “T2 Laboratories, Inc. Runaway Reaction”. [Online].Available: https://www.csb.gov/t2-laboratories-inc-reactive-chemical-explosion/ [Accessed Apr.30, 2018].[5] ABET. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2016-2017”. [Online]. Available:http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/#program [Accessed Feb. 4, 2018].[6
students working together too closely or copying Excel files. Beginning in Fall2008, an increased percentage of the cases were students who have accessed unauthorized copiesof the solution key on-line and duplicated the solution key for part or all of their solution. Theproliferation of “information sharing sites” like www.chegg.com and www.coursehero.com havechanged the preferred means of cheating from copying a friend’s homework to copying somethingon-line. In addition, use of cell phones, smart watches, and wireless capability was not commonin the mid 2000’s. The original videos included a scenario involving a copy machine, which led astudent to comment, “What is that? Why don’t they just use their phone?”In an effort to modernize the video
] D. N. Shah, J. E. French, J. Rankin, and L. Breslow, “ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings.,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013, p. 23.1347.1-23.1347.13.[2] R. L. Falkenstein-Smith, J. S. Rossetti, M. Garrett, and J. Ahn, “Investigating the Influence of Micro-Videos used as a Supplementary Course Material,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[3] K. R. GREEN, T. PINDER-GROVER, and J. M. MILLUNCHICK, “Impact of Screencast Technology: Connecting the Perception of Usefulness and the Reality of Performance,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 717–737, Oct. 2012.[4] M. Richards-Babb, R. Curtis, V. J. Smith, and M. Xu, “Problem Solving Videos for
devices for chemical engineering applications have also been developed, includingmicrofluidic devices (complete with valves, pumps, and mixers) [3–5], structured monolithiccatalysts [6], reactors with complex geometries to enhance chemical synthesis [7,8], andchromatography columns. Aside from their lower cost, the main benefit of these devices is thatthey can be specifically designed for unique applications in the lab. 3D printing also allows theuser to create complex structures and shapes that cannot be fabricated by other traditional methods. Labware Reference(s) Syringe pump [1] Centrifuge
themselves [12]. For thisdemonstration, students will be asked prior to the activity to describe what they think they willsee, as well as a direct question regarding the relative velocities. They could also be asked howthey think the various velocities could be measured with this setup. After showing thedemonstration, students will be given a reflection activity on their homework assignment, inwhich they will be asked to directly address any differences in their understanding between thepre-demonstration activity and afterwards. Students will also be asked for feedback forimproving the activity. As before, some indirect assessment of learning gains may be achievedby comparing scores from 2017 and 2018 on relevant problem(s) from quizzes and
student. Examining that data in addition to the data included in this paperwould give further insight into the changing elements of student perceptions of an engineeringmajor.Overall, it appears as though a student’s detailed knowledge of a career path is loosely connectedwith certainty in a major. Providing more concrete details of post-college life in the workplacemay allow students to make their major choice with more confidence. This paper provides aninitial investigation in chemical engineering major selection and lays the foundation for futurestudies.References [1] Montmarquette, C; Cannings, K; Mahseredjian, S, "How do young people choose college majors?" Economics of Education Review, 21, 2001, 543-556. [2] Arcidiacono, P, "Ability
Paper ID #22785Citizen Scientists Engagement in Air Quality MeasurementsProf. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Assistant Professor (Lecturing) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation.Katrina My Quyen Le, AMES High School
course(s), certificate, degree, etc.) and set of LO’s should provide all of the necessary content and skills for that course. o Timebound – time constraints for specific tasks and overall attainment of LO’s should be considered such that all LO’s can be attained and assessed in the course. Time constraints should be specified somewhere, though not necessarily in the LO itself.Try to limit the number of these course-level learning outcomes to 10 or fewer. An example listfrom a Heat Transfer course is given here:Example Course-Level Learning Outcomes In order to successfully complete CBEN 308, students should be able to: 1. Explain in your own words the three modes of heat transfer
survey, American Association for Engineering Education,Columbus, OH, 2017.9. Description of Academic Credit Systems,https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/credits.doc&usg=AOvVaw1EGAH-eLs0EkSXPqXpcr8j, Accessed 2008.10. Boud, D. J., Dunn, J., Kennedy, T., and Thorley, R., The Aims of Science LaboratoryCourses: A Survey of Students, Graduates, and Practising Scientists, European Journal ofScience Education, 2(4), 1980, 415-428.11. Domin, D. S., A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles, Journal of chemical education,76(4), 1999, 543.12. Elawady, Y. and Tolba, A. S., Educational Objectives of Different Laboratory Types: AComparative Study, International Journal of Computer Science and Information
Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Modeling Student Performance in an Introductory Chemical Engineering CourseWe have developed an open-ended, laboratory-based introduction to chemical engineering, acourse coupling traditional, hands-on, and
Reaction,” Internet:http://www.csb.gov/assets/1/19/T2_Final_Copy_9_17_09.pdf, Sept. 7, 2009 [Oct. 10, 2017].2) S.J. Dee, B.L. Cox, R.A. Ogle, “Process Safety in the Classroom: The Current State ofChemical Engineering Programs at US Universities,” Process Safety Programs, vol. 34, no. 4,pp. 314-319, 2015.3) D.C. Shallcross, “Safety Shares in the Chemical Engineering Classroom,” Education forChemical Engineers, vol. 9, pp. 94-105, 2014.4) D.C. Shallcross, “Safety Education through Case Study Presentations,” Education forChemical Engineers¸ vol. 8, pp. 12-30, 2013.5) J. Rest, D. Narvaez, M. Bebeau, S. Thoma, “A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT andschema theory,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 11, pp. 291-324, 1999.6) Q. Zhu, C.B. Zoltowski, M.K
contribute ideas for activities based upon their more recentexperiences learning the material.How can I start flipping a large class with no graduate or undergraduate TA support?Julie – Since I don’t really know the institutional constraints involved, I’m just going to throwout some ideas. Maybe one will work; hopefully, one will get you thinking about what couldwork for you specifically. Could you conscript your graduate student(s) to TA for you pro bono(as part of their broader impact fulfillment on a research stipend)? Could you have anindependent study class for undergraduates that would focus on teaching, mentoring and
80 individuals who taught only chemical engineering students and another27 taught both chemical engineering students and related area(s) (biomedical, n=12; biological,n=6; environmental, n=7; materials, n=5; petroleum, n=3; plastics, n=2; paper=1). These twogroups were combined to represent chemical engineering respondents, n=107. These individualsrepresented 76 different institutions, including 72 that award ABET EAC-accredited bachelor’sdegrees in chemical engineering and two international. The ranks of these chemical engineeringinstructors were 36% full professors, 33% associate professors, 21% assistant professors, and 8%full-time instructors. Additional positions held by these respondents included 20% directors ofprogram or center, 16
Sciences Education 14, no. 3, 2015[7] B. D. Jones, J. M. Watson, L. Rakes, and S. Akalin, “Factors that impact students’ motivation in an online course: Using the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation,” Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42–58, 2012.[8] B. D. Jones and G. Skaggs, “Measuring Students’ Motivation: Validity Evidence for the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation Inventory.,” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 10, no. 1, p. n1, 2016.[9] W. C. Lee, C. Brozina, C. T. Amelink, and B. D. Jones, “Motivating Incoming Engineering Students with Diverse Backgrounds: Assessing a Summer Bridge Program’s Impact on Academic
have access to. Through research and comparison to dialysis for larger flow ratesand systems, students can again approximate a potential solution to conductivity on the bench- andpilot-scale. Other methods with more common use in real-world applications, like membrane-based separation, are also viable if students choose to pursue that approach within the permittedbudget.Week Three and FourDuring the third and fourth week of laboratory experimentation, each group is expected to conducta trial run with their model river and designed treatment system. In the trial, an appropriate amountof pollution (depending on the size of their river basin and contents) is poured in at the pre-selectedlocation(s) into the river, at which point the remediation