student learning experience. Linking theory and calculations from the lecture to somethingconcrete to which the students are routinely exposed provides relevancy and can successfullyreinforce key aspects of the topic. This paper illustrates the integration of a practical exampleinto a chemical engineering curriculum, with the example pulled from a Mass and EnergyBalances course.The problem involves calculation of the power required to vaporize the liquid in an electroniccigarette (e-cigarette or vaporizer). Solution of this problem requires a coupled mass and energybalance and requires some knowledge of vapor-liquid equilibrium. Obviously, someassumptions are required to analyze this problem. Even with these assumptions, a reasonableestimate of
Student c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Quantifying self-guided repetition within an interactive textbook for a material and energy balances courseAbstractInteractive technology has quickly integrated into daily lives through handheld electronics and theInternet. Here, an interactive textbook replacement from zyBooks for a material and energybalances course has been used in recent years. While features of the interactive textbook werehighlighted previously, including animations replacing figures and question sets in lieu of largeblocks of text, student usage will be the focus of this contribution. Similarly, reading
suited forchemical engineers. In short, as engineers we are relatively late to the makerspace movement,likely due to the complications of incorporating wet chemistry with process design, and a studentbody that is not often trained on machining tools or expected to develop CAD skills. Regardless,the advances we have made as an engineering discipline in this area could use additional scrutinyto discern what has worked for a chemical engineering population and what has not.In this work I describe the design and impacts of a makerspace at the University of Utah, createdspecifically for chemical engineering curriculum. Results are compared from a first-yearchemical engineering design course taught both in a traditional unit operation laboratory
for engineering classes,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 1999.[21] K. D. Dahm, S. Farrell, and R. P. Ramachandran, “Communication in the Engineering Curriculum: Learning to Write and Writing to Learn,” J. Eng. Educ. Transform., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2015.[22] V. Svihla, “Advances in Design-Based Research in the Learning Sciences,” Front. Learn. Res., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 35–45, 2014.[23] The Design-Based Research Collective, “Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry,” Educ. Res., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 5–8, 2003.[24] J. R. Gomez and V. Svihla, “Building individual accountability through consensus,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 53, no. 1, 2019.[25] J. R. Gomez, V. Svihla
Paper ID #18197WIP: An On-going Analysis of the Impact of Assigning Online Thermody-namic Homework in place of Traditional HomeworkDr. Louis Reis, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Louis Reis currently serves as a lecturer in the Mechanical Engineering department at Louisiana Tech University. He received his B.S. degrees in Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University along with his M.S. degree in Microsystems Engineering and his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering. He teaches a variety of courses at Louisiana Tech including: Thermodynamics, Fluid Mechanics, and the ”Living with the Lab” freshmen
OperatingProcedures; and other process-specific topics germane to an organization. The undergraduateChemical Engineering curriculum can provide courses in these topics, or integrate these topicsinto existing courses to help prepare the graduating engineer for industrial practice.In addition to proactive programs that prevent incidents, it is important to learn from pastexperience. In the words of George Santanaya, a famous Spanish philosopher, “Those who donot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Company-sponsored, post-graduationtraining programs are meant to fulfill these needs.A more formal approach to deciding what process safety topics should be covered is to reviewthe regulatory framework. Companies in the United States involved with storing
. o Polls: Integrative polls in Collaborate Ultra is an excellent way of getting stu- dents engaged and involved in a discussion. They also helped instructor to gauge student understanding of a particular topic. o Chat Box: Chatbox available through a Blackboard conferencing tool allows the students to provide comments and answers to the questions. The chatting setting was done in such a way that every participant can send a message to everyone or have the ability to send a private message to the instructor. o Annotation on the PowerPoint slides: Annotation on the PowerPoint slides is another excellent feature when teaching
, M. Miletic, E. Seebauer, A. Tillman, and T. Vogel, “Integrating Team-Based Design Across the Curriculum at a Large Public University,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 139–148, 2014.[21] N. Cross and A. Clayburn Cross, “Observations of teamwork and social processes in design,” Des. Stud., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 143–170, 1995.[22] L. L. Bucciarelli, “An ethnographic perspective on engineering design,” Des. Stud., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 159–168, 1988.[23] A. C. Edmondson, J. R. Dillon, and K. S. Roloff, “Three Perspectives On Team Learning: Outcome Improvement, Task Mastery, And Group Process,” Acad. Manag. Ann., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 269–314, 2006.[24] L. A. Meadows, D. Sekaquaptewa, and M. C. Paretti, “Interactive panel
. Breathe Utah took responsibility for outreach visits to local middle schools, modifyingthe teaching module to better accommodate student sophistication and grade curriculum. BreathUtah was also instrumental in addressing district governmental hurdles.Finally, teaching modules were developed in partnership with high school interns from theAcademy for Math, Engineering, and Science (AMES). Our department maintains an internshipprogram with AMES, a Title 1 high school, from which we gain about 20 interns each year.These interns worked on teaching module language and procedures, vetting that the concepts andactivities would be effective in engaging our target cohort of citizens in this CS project [7].Once appropriate teaching modules were developed
Paper ID #33454Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Care in Chemical EngineeringMrs. Kristen Ferris, University of New Mexico Kristen Ferris is a student in the Organization, Information, and Learning Sciences program at the Uni- versity of New Mexico. Her research interests include faculty mindset change, change management, and organizational citizenship behavior. Much of her research is part of a National Science Foundation grant at UNM where the chemical and biological engineering department is redesigning curriculum to support diverse student retention and graduation. She intends to further her knowledge in the
and mechanical engineering. Campbell University started the engineering program in 2016, and she is leading the design and imple- mentation of the chemical engineering curriculum at Campbell’s innovative, project based pedagogical approach. She has a PhD in chemical engineering from Washington State University, where she special- ized in miniaturizing industrial systems for applications in the undergraduate engineering classroom.Dr. Olusola Adesope, Washington State University Dr. Olusola O. Adesope is an Associate Professor of Educational Psychology and a Boeing Distinguished Professor of STEM Education at Washington State University, Pullman. His research is at the intersection of educational psychology, learning
sustainable thinking is a challenge for education in engineering, but it is essential tothe personal and professional development of an engineer since the demand for labor requires Page 26.1125.2engineers with professional practice, knowledge, and ability to make decisions to meet every daychallenges in their work field. These decisions involve aspects of Sustainable Development (SD)1 like: “the development that satisfies the needs of the people today without compromising thefuture generations”2. The resulting situation at the universities today is that SD integration isoften limited to some specific courses (depending on the lecturers) and that
Undergraduate Curriculum Com- mittee, as well as faculty advisor for several student societies. She is the instructor of several courses in the CBE curriculum including the Material and Energy Balances, junior laboratories and Capstone De- sign courses. She is associated with several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Victor Law, Program of Organization, Information, and Learning Sciences at University of New Mexico Dr. Victor Law is an Assistant Professor at the University of New Mexico in the
Paper ID #17752Chemical Engineering Student Perceptions of Communication Developmentfrom Participation in Game-Based ActivitiesAbigail Jane Kulhanek Abigail Kulhanek is an undergraduate student studying Chemical Engineering at the University of Pitts- burgh.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering
Paper ID #34050Pilot: ”Success is a State Function”—Ways of Viewing Student SuccessRobert Wayne Gammon-Pitman, Ohio State University Robert Gammon-Pitman: PhD candidate in STEM education with a focus in engineering education. His research focuses on student success and how the meaning of success changes as the students matriculate and enter the profession. Dr. Lin Ding: Associate Professor in Department of Teaching & Learning. Dr. Ding has extensive expe- rience in discipline-based physics education research, including students’ conceptual learning, problem solving and scientific reasoning, curriculum development
Paper ID #15699A Chemical Engineering Success Course for Transfer StudentsDr. Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Pittsburgh Taryn Bayles, Ph.D., is a NTS Professor of Chemical Engineering in the Chemical and Petroleum Engi- neering Department at the University of Pittsburgh, where she incorporates her industrial experience by bringing practical examples and interactive learning to help students understand fundamental engineering principles. Her current research focuses on engineering education, outreach and curriculum development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A
interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Why Not Ask Students to Explain Themselves? Enhancing Conceptual Testing with Technical Writing1. IntroductionRecently a great deal of exciting work has been performed on concept-based instruction inchemical engineering, in particular the efforts associated with the AIChE Concept Warehouse(AIChE-CW)1,2. The AIChE-CW provides chemical engineering educators with instruments forevaluating students’ conceptual understanding of course material. Conceptual learning is notwell-served by traditional
integration is not suitable for processes that do notrequire high temperatures for a reaction step, or (2) students encounter a lack of available timenear project completion because too much time is spent early in the project on correctimplementation of reaction kinetics. In the 2016 offering of Design III, 4 out of 6 groupssuccessfully incorporated heat integration in their process (see Figure 1). In the spring 2017offering of Design III, 7 out of 11 groups successfully incorporated heat integration in theirprocess, while in the summer 2017 offering of Design III, only 1 out of 4 groups successfullyincorporated heat integration in their process. Table 2 below presents an overview of the utilitycost benefit for the 12 senior design groups that chose
of the46 following four areas: academic and career advising, high school preparation, engineering structure and47 curriculum, and faculty relations[9]. This paper focuses on faculty relations because, historically, 148 universities have relegated retention issues to staff and advisors. The importance of faculty influence on49 student retention is an under-researched and under-explored area. Specifically, faculty relations can be50 shaped through specific teaching practices instructors can use to increase student retention. Research51 supports the claim that student-professor relationships are vital in promoting the success of engineering52 students [10], [11]. One
cover the overall field of engineering.Further, Crash Course: Engineering was effectively an extension of the project into the next fieldto cover, after having previously covered other subjects like chemistry, ecology, and literature; thebest practices utilized in producing these engineering videos were thus based on previous effortswithin Crash Course, and not based on work conducted by other researchers. The previous studies,on the other hand, will be most impactful moving forward in guiding future analyses of CrashCourse: Engineering videos in formal and informal learning environments, by means ofshowcasing how videos can best be integrated into classrooms or tutoring. Work-to-date with the Crash Course: Engineering videos has
, as well as creative problem solving skills [11-16]. Design projects are a promising way toprepare students for industry [17]. Authentic design problems that have meaning beyond theclassroom are most effective [18] as they allow students to integrate knowledge and practice[19].Commonly, instructors include a host of active learning instructional strategies to scaffoldstudent learning related to projects. Broadly, active learning instructional strategies have beenshown to better support learning than traditional lectures [4, 20, 21]. We employed an activelearning technique used commonly in the past—particularly in elementary classrooms—calledjigsaw [22], which is well backed by learning theory [23, 24].Jigsaw is a technique in which students
parameters. The interdisciplinary and intercultural team is more representative ofindustrial design teams, particularly from global companies.Due to the nature and scope required to design an entire chemical process in an intensive three-week period, this course is taught as a more structured design with some room for variation andcreativity in the plant design. The entire design is broken into major tasks, e.g., mass balance,kinetics and reactor design, separation, safety, and economics. The tutors develop specific tasksand goals (daily and overall) corresponding to these major tasks that the teams must meet.Additionally, during the second week, certain teams may be asked for more advanced designs, forexample, incorporating heat integration
, students participate in a two-week tripwhere students interact with the community and implement the project, participate in culturalexperiences, and identify projects for the following year. Following the trip, additionaldocumentation similar to items noted above is required, as well as an executive summary, shortvideo, reflections paper, and survey.Previous publications related to the course have discussed training internationally responsibleengineers3, sustainability and impact4, integration of sociology and engineering using keyprinciples of human-centered design5, GEO course insights6, social connectivity betweenstudents and communities7, the documentation strategy2, and water filter implementation inSouthern Peru8. Some of these publications