- Conference Session
- Instructional and Learning Assessment in Chemical Engineering
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Washington State University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University; Kirk A Reinkens, Washington State University; Stephanie Anne Pitts, Washington State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Chemical Engineering
attrition and success in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education. 1997; 86(2): 139-49.2. Yoder BL. Going the distance: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineeringtechnology and computing students: American Society of Engineering Education; 2012.3. Budny D, LeBold W, Bjedov G. Assessment of the impact of the freshman engineering courses. Journal ofEngineering Education. 1998; 87(4): 405-11.4. Chesler NC, D'Angelo CM, Bagley EA, Shaffer DW. Design of a professional practice simulator foreducating and motivating first-year engineering students. Advances in Engineering Education. 2013; 3(3): 1-30.5. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education. 2004;93
- Conference Session
- Chemical Engineering Courses in Emergent Areas
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Daniel Lepek, The Cooper Union; Marc-Olivier Coppens, University College London (UCL)
- Tagged Divisions
-
Chemical Engineering
problems. This wasachieved by using a variety of active learning and pedagogical techniques such as, annotatedtextbook readings of current journal publications, oral presentations highlighting the balancebetween nature and technology, laboratory demonstrations, and a semester-long group projectmotivated by student interest in nature and chemical engineering.In this paper, the opportunities and challenges associated with developing a new course in anemerging multidisciplinary research area will be addressed. In addition, suggestions for bestpractices in course development will be provided for instructors who seek to develop similar newresearch-based elective courses.BackgroundIn 2014, a new graduate-level course intended for Master’s students on
- Conference Session
- Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Paul B. Golter, Washington State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Chemical Engineering
protocol was able to leverage the benefits explicated above. This paper willreport on the results, and provide practical implications for researchers on performing a similarconversion.IntroductionThe study of student conceptual understanding has become an increasingly important part ofengineering education research. For example, Brown, et al. recently interviewed 50 students inorder to design classroom activities specifically aimed at addressing misconceptions. One couldimagine that this required a significant investment in time and money, both to conduct andtranscribe the interviews. If an interview protocol can be effectively converted to an onlinesurvey implementation, transcription time can be significantly reduced.Semi-structured interviews