first, and in the second, became confused aboutthe solution to an example problem. Reflecting on these two episodes and their implications formy instructional practice led to the following research questions: 1. In what ways does confusion manifest in an interactive classroom environment? 2. How can an instructor engage in reflective practice to make sense of and shift their framing of their confusion and mistakes?MethodsParticipants, Positionality, and ContextThis work is part of an ongoing ethnographic research project in which I serve as an instructor inthe chemical engineering department at a private, research-focused university while studying thefactors impacting instruction in the department from within. For this paper, I focus
these twovariables relate.Related workThe project involves measuring two desired outcomes of laboratory courses: self-efficacy andtroubleshooting ability. This section reviews previous literature on these two outcomes.The concept of self-efficacy states that a person with high self-efficacy, i.e., a strong belief intheir ability to succeed at a task, is more likely to succeed at that task than someone with lowerself-efficacy, even if the two people have the same underlying ability [2]. Increasing self-efficacy is thus a common goal of courses. Kolil et al. [3] studied students in chemistrylaboratories and identified four barriers to developing ESE: 1. Lack of conceptual understanding (CU) of the underlying phenomena, 2. Fear of
formalcooperative learning groups are set up as a structured team with members depending on teammembers for success on the assigned project. The Johnson and Johnson model on socialinterdependence theory [5] incorporates 5 essential elements of co-operative learning: positiveinterdependence, individual accountability, promotive interaction, appropriate use of socialskills, and team evaluation. It is generally found that more well-defined cooperative learninggroups with strong positive interdependence work the best for student engagement and learning[9]. Collaborative learning refers to an active learning environment in which studentscollaborate in small groups towards a common goal [1], but groups are generally less structuredthan in co-operative learning
University (ASU). She earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering Sciences at Harvard University and a PhD in Chemical Engineering at the California Institute of Technology.Prof. Nilza D. Aples, University of Technology, Jamaica A professional chemical and environmental engineer with over 35 years of combined experience in process design and project management in the petroleum industry and environmental consulting, Prof. Aples join the University of Technology, Jamaica in 1999. Since 1999, she has spearheaded the Waste Management & Laboratory Services Research Unit at UTech. She led the design team that developed and implemented the first bilingual chemical engineering undergraduate programme in Jamaica. Also
technical project,” focus on critical-thinking skills, which were also – mentionedin the open-ended responses.Self-reported gaps in student understanding and curriculum coverageIn the final set of questions, students were asked to self-report gaps in their understanding andwhat topics the chemical engineering curriculum overall should do a better job of covering. Inboth questions, students were asked to select their top three from the list of thirteen lab learningoutcomes, and the percentage of respondents that chose each learning outcome was quantified.In terms of self-reported weaknesses (Figure 4), over 40% of students selected “Designprototype” and “Compare to theory” as their greatest weaknesses. “Design experiment” and“Troubleshoot” were also
-making opportunities.Our approach to promote student engagement and belonging in engineering is to investigate therole of consequential agency in laboratory experiments. To determine the effect agency has onstudents, we explore how different aspects of laboratory experiments contribute to students’development through a survey used to measure consequential agency as well as engineeringidentity, relevance, and persistence intentions.The goal of the project is to extend theory about agency in learning and the development ofprofessional identity in upper division chemical engineering laboratory courses. Specifically, weinvestigate how agency in four domains—(1) experimental design prior to doing the laboratoryexperiment; (2) data collection and
considered on their own, many of the changes seen here match expectations of the course faculty. (1) Teamwork is a large portion of the first-year engineering sequence with required team projects in both semesters. This is less emphasized in CBE 20255; therefore, it is unsurprising for that to be less emphasized in student response post-course. (2) Resilience rises in mentions in the study group while falling in the control group. In the study group, resilience and persistence were common themes of class lectures and office hours. This was a deliberate inclusion when students struggled, especially around large assessments. Therefore, class instruction can be linked to this
specific SOs will beintroduced or reinforced, and thus serve as formative assessment. Assessment in I- and R-designated courses are performed each year, while A-designated courses are assessed once everytwo years. SOs 1 through 3 are assessed in the first year, and SOs 4 through 7 are assessed in thesecond year of the two-year cycle. I-designated courses are all sophomore and first-semesterjunior level courses, while the R-designated courses are second-semester junior level courses.Those SOs that can be more challenging to assess in typical lecture courses, namely SO 2(design), SO 3 (communications), SO 4 (ethics and professional responsibility) and SO 5(teamwork), were concentrated for assessment in courses with design projects (Introduction
were assigned a concept mapping activity as a pre-writing exercisefor a larger proposal assignment. Specifics about the prompt for each group are provided in Table1. In the proposal assignment, students were developing a persuasive argument to convince theirtarget audience to take some desired action (greenlight a project, fund some research, implementa new approach). The goal of the concept map was to provide students with an alternative form fororganizing their thoughts and recognizing what gaps remained in their understanding of, researchon, or argument for their topic. The assignment included a brief reflection asking the students toshare what new connections the map allowed them to see and what “unfinished business” itsurfaced. Students
and continuing his research. Along with this, he is part of a NASA Undergraduate Student Research Project working on developing a fully autonomous delivery drone. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Process Control Experiment Using an Arduino Board and LED LightsAbstractThe current study focuses on the design, assembly and operation of a simple control systemusing an Arduino Uno R3 microcontroller board. The system involves controlling the light levelin a small box. An LED and a photoresistor are placed on opposite sides of the box. A secondlight, placed underneath the first light, is independent of the control system and serves as adisturbance. The control system is run using MATLAB Simulink. The
similar approach in the future. However, they all recommended starting with a simpler case first to understand the learning method, then moving forward to a more advanced tutorial as the one offered to them.• The final stage is to introduce this intervention in the classroom for all students who are taking the Kinetics and Reactor Design. A structured assessment needs to be established to assess the students' learning experience. At the moment, the intention for the structured assessment is to provide the same questionnaire (in the form of reflection questions) to two different classes. The first class will be implementing Jupyter notebook as a tool in the assignments and course project along with in-class tutorials on how
validated ICAP [12] frameworkthat allows to make claims to measure student cognitive engagement in these activities [11]. Thisinformation will help us to shape our learning activities to meet student needs.In this first year, both assessments of IRB-approved surveys, and the worksheet, our focus willbe on identifying student misconceptions and determining how to repair these misconceptionswill help us to focus our repairs on the most important concepts in this topic. As we reiterate ourclassroom implementation strategies, we plan to implement this module across the country at dif-ferent institutions. Our ultimate goal in this project is to provide a learning tool that can enhancelearning in packed bed/fluidized bed topics across different
variousteaching roles (labs, tutorials and design projects), who contractually can undertake a maximum of 6hours of teaching per week. Our GTA cohort is somewhat heterogenous made up of a mixture ofrecent graduates and those with industrial experience, with some being entirely new to teaching whileothers have limited prior experience.The central research question guiding the study reported here is: whether there are any currentmechanisms that are illustrative of (potential) decisional capital, and how these could be furtherenhanced. As this paper is a work in progress (WIP) piece, we are deliberately focusing on one aspectof a much wider study, that considers how professional capital [3][4] can be used to enable individualGTAs to professionalise their
. * (w), Keszler, M. (p) Refrigeration Cycles. Boston, MA: Northeastern. 2016 [8 1/2”X 11” comic. 1-10](28) Shepherd, D. * (w), Lubchansky, M. (p). Recycle and Purge Streams. Boston, MA: Northeastern.2016 [8 1/2" X 11" comic. 1-8](29) Cogswell, C. (w), Shepherd, D. * (w), Pietsch, C. (p) Assumptions. Boston, MA: Northeastern.2016 [8 1/2” X 11” comic. 1-8](30) Shepherd, D. * (w), Lubchansky, M. (p). Heat Exchangers. Boston, MA: Northeastern. 2016 [8 1/2"X 11" comic. 1-6](31) Landherr, L.J.T. “By Students for Students: Using Course Projects to Create Learning Materials forFuture Classes”. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2020.(32) Shepherd, D. * (w), Cooke, J. (p). Fugacity. Boston, MA: Northeastern. 2016 [8 1/2" X 11" comic. 1-10](33
contained the same grade distribution forclass participation, weekly group work participation, homework, group project, and the finalexam. While the control group had 3 midterm exams, the intervention group had 2 midtermexams and one group research presentation with the same grade distribution. The goal of our IRB-approved research study was to analyze the impact of gender,racial/ethnic background, and first-generation status on the students’ mindsets. In this paper, wereported our preliminary observations from the control group and described the mindsetinterventions applied to the intervention group. In the future, we intend to report the observationsfrom the intervention group and show the comparisons between the control and the
mindsets of the students from the control group (Fall 2022)and the intervention group (Spring 2023) at the end of the semester. As the results turned out to bequite interesting, we decided to continue this study with additional upgrades in our study.Study informationMindset interventions We incorporated the mindset interventions in the MEB course in a way so that they wereconnected to the course contents and did not seem out of context. We kept the basic coursestructures similar during both Fall 2022 and Spring 2023 semesters. Both courses had the samegrade distribution for class participation (5%), weekly group work or recitation session (5%),homework (20%), group project (15%), and the final exam (17.5%). The control group had 3midterm exams
skills they are learning • teaching assistant support... what would you like • more practice for students on common mistakesto change in your • more interaction between students and the task with their peerscourse to improve • more resources for project-based learning and more prolongedstudent learning, if engagement with design projectsyou had the necessary • recitation sections for core coursestime/funds/support? • flip the entire course • smaller class sizes (e.g., provide more individualized support) • like to learn about other EBIPs and their possible applications • co-teaching with faculty recognized for their teaching
average Likert scale scores are listed after the genre.As mentioned in the open-ended responses, genre selection depends upon the purpose of thecommunication, the context and, importantly, the audience. Industry representatives respondedthat they interact regularly with different audiences. They have daily or weekly interactions withcolleagues, supervisors, subordinates, clients, and suppliers/vendors while at the monthly level,they interact with colleagues from international branches and the public. The details of what acolleague or subordinate needs to know regarding a project is much different than theinformation a supplier or the public needs, impacting the genre that would be most effective.Therefore, it is important to design communication
students subsequently analyze thetransient CO2 response to determine the rate of CO2 uptake by the terrarium plants given the rateof CO2 production by the soil bacteria and the diffusion rate of CO2 from the terrarium. As partof the assignment, the students are also asked to reflect on the similarities between the terrariumand the earth's atmosphere. This multifaceted project not only emphasizes fundamental chemicalengineering principles but also explores the broader context of environmental sustainability andclimate change. This activity is part of a recent curriculum change in the chemical engineeringdepartment with a greater emphasis on a larger quantity of focused laboratory activities in placeof fewer and longer unit operation experiments
Dutch and in English. During this time his primary teaching and course develop- ment responsibilities were wide-ranging, but included running the Unit Operations laboratory, introducing Aspen Plus software to the curriculum, and developing a course for a new M.S. program on Renewable Energy (EUREC). In conjunction with his teaching appointment, he supervised dozens of internships (a part of the curriculum at the Hanze), and a number of undergraduate research projects with the Energy Knowledge Center (EKC) as well as a master’s thesis. In 2016, Dr. Barankin returned to the US to teach at the Colorado School of Mines. His primary teaching and course development responsibilities here include the Unit Operations Lab and
them intheir interviews.Process safety can be a scary topic if we emphasize explosions and disasters. Emphasize insteadthat chemical engineering is about keeping people safe: we have a safety culture because wecare about the students, the operators, and the employees. Teach successes as well as disastersand emphasize learning from failures and leading and lagging indicators. The Center forChemical Process Safety is working on a project about successes - look for Risk-based ProcessSafety – Implementation Guide in mid-2025.Another way to move from disasters is to focus on the daily practice of safety. Have the studentsdo a hazard and risk analysis for walking into traffic without looking or for driving while on theirphones to bring process
by chemical engineering educators identified an approach toassess student understanding of moral reasoning through the development of the EngineeringProcess Safety Research Instrument (EPSRI); however, given that many chemical engineeringstudents have not completed a course in ethics or moral reasoning it has not been easy to implementthe tool. The goal of this project was to develop a learning module to teach students about differentapproaches to moral reasoning and ethical concepts associated with these approaches to betterprepare them for careers in which they can (and most likely will) encounter supervisors and co-workers who use different moral frameworks and exhibit varying stages of moral development.Indeed, one objective of the
Paper ID #41062Work In Progress: Enhancing Thermal and Fluids Laboratory Learningthrough the Integration of the Heat Exchanger Module (HEM)Benjamin Miles Phillips, Baylor University Ben Phillips is a PhD Candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University, working as a Research Assistant in the Baylor Energy And Renewable Systems (BEARS) Lab. His research interests are in Energy Storage and Renewable Systems, with projects focused in Concentrated Solar Thermal Energy Storage. He aspires to become a lecturer in the field of Chemical or Mechanical Engineering.Alexandre Yokochi, Baylor UniversityDr. Anne
://www.chronicle.com/article/why-campus-life-fell-apart.27. Hylton, J.B. and B.A. Hays. Modifying the value rubrics to assess the entrepreneurial mind-set. in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference. 2019. Tampa, FL. DOI:28. Beichner, R.J., J.M. Saul, D.S. Abbott, J.J. Morse, D. Deardorff, R.J. Allain, S.W. Bonham, M.H. Dancy, and J.S. Risley, The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project. Research-based reform of university physics, 2007. 1(1): p. 2-39. DOI: https://www.academia.edu/download/32837058/Chapter.pdf29. Hylton, B.J., D. Mikesell, J.-D. Yoder, and H. LeBlanc, Working to Instill the Entrepreneurial Mindset Across the Curriculum. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy
appointed by the CEE Editor andPublications Board to evaluate if the current journal structure is best serving the needs of thecommunity at the present time and projected into the future. This community includes the currentconstituency of authors, reviewers, and readers, as well as potential community members whocurrently use other publication venues. The authors represent members of the committee withvarious levels of engagement with CEE, including Publications Board members, editorial staff,active authors publishing in CEE, and those with no previous activity at the journal.Based on this charge, the committee formulated a set of goals and protocols to gather a broad setof data to understand how the journal currently is positioned within the
. Cordella, N.L. Tagliamonte, et al, “Nursing-Engineering Interdisciplinary Research: A Synthesis of Methodological Approach to Perform Healthcare- Technology Integration Projects,” MethodsX, vol. 12, no. 102525, 2024.[20] D.B. Oerther, “Introducing Molecular Biology Tools to Environmental Engineers Through Development of a New Course,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, pp. 258-263, 2002.[21] D.B. Oerther, “Integrating Biological Principles in Environmental Engineering: Summary Results of a Three Year Pilot Study,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, 2003. [Online] Available: https://www.doi.org/10.18260/1-2--12315.[22] D.B. Oerther, “Integrating Molecular Biology Research, Teaching, and
, subject matter expertise is outside the primary scope of the findingsrelated to auto-graded problems. Specifically, the auto-graded problems are part of an interactivetextbook for a Mass and Energy Balances (MEB) course. As the first chemical engineeringcourse in most curricula, student develop engineering problem solving skills related to non-reacting and reacting processes as well as multi-unit operations. In some cases, interventions forthis course were inspired by high attrition rates [16], so the literature contains many novelpedagogies and projects, e.g., [2, 17-19], but a thorough review is not relevant to this research.This contribution’s research questions explore types of auto-graded questions, multiple metricsrelated to correctness and
chance. 5. A man always deserves the respect of his wife and children. 15Does endorsement of masculine ideals predict sense of belonging and identity over performance and peer interactions? 6. It is essential for a man to always have the respect and admiration of everyone who knows him. 7. A man should never back down in the face of trouble. 8. I always like a man who’s totally sure of himself. 9. A man should always think everything out coolly and logically, and have rational reasons for everything he does. 10. A man should always try to project an air of
include a small sample size of industry professionals (n=3), two of whichworked at the same company. Additionally, all three participants held a process safety role or equivalentrole at their company. While results from this study provide valuable insight, it is important to recognizethat our findings are not representative of the broader population of industry professionals due to thesmall sample size. These trends also may have emerged due to the shared mindset of those holding similarjob roles, or due to company policy or culture of the participants working for the same company. Futureiterations of this project include recruiting industry professionals working for a variety of companies,within various job roles which still interact with