Paper ID #37143Work-in-Progress: Developing a Research Plan for a RetrospectiveAnalysis of the Effect of Bridging Courses on Student Success inGraduate StudiesDr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Dr. Matthew Cooper is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University where he teaches courses in Senior Design, Unit Opera- tions, Transport Phenomena, Material & Energy Balances and Mathematical/Computational Methods. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, process safety education and conceptual learning
developed to date, classroom implementation plans,assessment strategy, a preliminary analysis of student learning gains and which will be furtheranalyzed by the time of the ASEE Work-In-Progress presentation, and future directions for con-tinuous improvement.Fluidized Bed LCDLMDesign, Development and Testing of the Fluidized Bed LCDLMThe FB DLM is designed to help student conceptual learning as well as promote active learningof packed bed and fluidized bed theory in a normal classroom. This new module has been con-structed from mostly off-the-shelf hardware. Construction of the FB DLM requires minimum ad-ditional modifications to the purchased hardware such as drilling holes in the PVC piping, cut-ting and inserting a mesh, filling the column with
excerpts of studentresponses.In addition to reporting on the research question itself, this paper will serve as a process guide foranalysis of a small set of qualitative data in the context of chemical engineering education. Theintent is to make thematic analysis more accessible for faculty who might otherwise not considerthis approach in pedagogical work.IntroductionLaboratory courses are often the first, and sometimes only, place where undergraduate ChemicalEngineering students encounter real Chemical Engineering equipment and work in a large-scalelaboratory environment. Beyond technical and sensory experience, capstone laboratory alsoaffords students the ability to practice other critical skills, such as safety, experimental planning
PIDcontrollers for six experimental set-ups with liquid level and temperature control, using labequipment fully automated for data acquisition, handling of manipulated and disturbancevariables, and selection of parameters for PID controllers. MATLAB codes and Simulinkgraphical simulations support the processing of data and analysis of results. In addition, thecourse develops a unique experience in team skills and performance where every team is acombination of two sub-teams. The “office” sub-team oversees research on industrialapplications, instrumentation characteristics, and computational modeling. The “lab” sub-teamoversees elaborating and testing experimental plans, collecting data, and analyzing results. Everyteam is assigned two sequential
undertake this project. Furthermore, weassign sub-teams to specific tasks related to the proposed project plan. The graduate student,along with undergraduates, are involved in technical meetings with the academic advisors andindustry partners. In addition to the development of their research skills, our students also gainexperience in problem recognition, definition, solution, project management, communication,and presentation skills through detailed literature review, brainstorming, collaboration,teamwork, technical reports, conference presentations, and journal publications. These studentsthen graduate with an understanding of a combination of fundamentals and technology and cansupport the uptake of these ideas for their future employer
. Teamwork skills areshown at the very top as the most common attribute. However, it is a frequent observation byprofessors that students usually limit the teamwork strategy to an initial distribution of tasks(generally predetermined by the structure of the projects) and occasional meetings to assemblethe contributions in reports or presentations (“divide and conquer” strategy). Experiences withsenior students have proved that they rarely rely on effective planning, revisions, and updates ofa general plan. Team identity is taken for granted as defined exclusively by the expectation ofgetting a good grade. Techniques learned in the short first-year training, like the team contract,are hardly followed. No records of progressive work are taken
submitting a knowledge inventory and remediation plan. Students create a glossary of termsand concepts from the class and rank them by their level of understanding. Recent iterations ofthe remediation plan also include reflections on emotions and support networks.In February 2023, the project team will scale the interventions to freshman-level IntroductoryProgramming, which has 400 students and the college’s highest fail/withdrawal rate. The largesample size will enable more robust statistics to correlate exam scores, intervention rubric items,and surveys on assignment effectiveness. Piloting interventions in various environments andclasses will establish best pedagogical practices that minimize instructors’ workload and decisionfatigue. The
available to you? How do you think your knowledge and skills will influence your career plans? Job Skills Follow-up: How did you develop this knowledge and these skills? Regarding getting a job, what do you think will be the most meaningful aspect of your job search process? What knowledge, skills, and abilities do you believe to be most Job Acquisition Skills important in obtaining your first job; how does this knowledge Perceptions of Preparedness and these skills and abilities
practice of teamwork have shifted in modern organizations. Effective teamwork andthe cultivation of teaming skills must be approached as a dynamic activity that occurs withinfast-moving work environments that promote flexible team structures. We discuss our plannedimplementation of the model in the following section. In addition, we describe our exploration infinding ways to promote these aspects of teaming in a laboratory course.Model ImplementationWe plan to implement our training model to promote teaming skills in chemical engineeringstudents in a senior level Unit Operations laboratory course (referred as “the projectslaboratory”) in a research university in Texas, USA (referred as “the University”). Thislaboratory course is a core-course in
frequent error messages, communication issuesbetween microprocessor and computer, operating system incompatibilities, and other software-related difficulties. Even with successful configuration, software operation involves frequentcrashes, non-intuitive and disorganized data layout, and limited options for efficient datavisualization. Moreover, the lack of an intuitive, experimenter-focused interface walkingstudents through customizable yet user friendly software options remain as a challenge. It isevident that this and the other previously described challenges have been selected as the mainaims in the optimization plan presented in the next section.Optimization PlanAim 1: Integrated Circuit to Reduce Electrical Setup TimeThis aim focuses on
that assessment was not inclusive enough for minoritygroups, despite recent curriculum changes to include more coursework. Literature supportsthe argument that very little has changed in terms of tried and tested assessment methods e.g.closed exams, and that student choice and universal design for assessment need to be betterprioritised going forward [17].As part of the planned updates, it is important that students take some ownership ofdiscussion and activity around EDI and that it resonates with them and their livedexperiences. Our findings suggest that a proportionally significant number of studentrespondents – 22 out of 56 (39.3% disagree at some level or neither agree/disagree) felt thattheir elected student representatives either failed
Day 2 Update is submitted as an ~6-8-minute video PowerPointpresentation two days after the second lab day. The goal of this deliverable is for the student toprovide an oral preliminary report where the lab instructor can provide feedback on experimentalplans and preliminary results as well as insight on how to plan for the third and final lab day. Theuse of the video was to give students additional opportunities to improve their oral presentationskills while preventing any loss of lab time. The ~10-12 min oral presentation is given during thescheduled lab period and is graded by both the primary instructor and lab instructor. The writtenreport is due 24 hours after the oral presentation so that students can use the questions andfeedback
group presentation at the end of the semester.Table 2. Mindset interventions planned for specific homework problems. Content of the Hypothetical scenario Instructions for the students chosen problem Generation- You perform this analysis while working in a chemical Write a response for addressing your consumption company and present it during a group meeting. Your supervisor’s feedback after watching analysis supervisor thinks that although the analysis is good, the a YouTube video on accepting presentation quality is poor. He provides you
." "Overall the biggest issue was a lack of time. We recommend that more time should be given for the final project to allow time for planning and redirecting the experiment if something doesn't go as planned." "It was hard to use our time productively when we were waiting on material or devices needed to move forward with our project." "It also was difficult to gather the last data points while over [Thanksgiving] break and finalize the presentation when we were all off campus." "Not only was the ordering process rushed and on a strict timeline to ensure experimentation was possible, but there were a lot of things that would have been beneficial if completed/planned before the first section
flipped model I had been using forthese lessons.So, what was I to do with the class time? Another idea that I had gleaned from conversationswith students was that they didn’t remember much from their computer science Introduction toComputing courses because it seemed impractical. “Hello, world” and other programs they hadbeen asked to write were not related to what they saw as their future career. My goal, therefore,was to demonstrate relevance to my students. Thus, each problem they were asked to solveneeded to relate to chemical engineering. This was made more challenging by the fact that thestudents had very limited knowledge of what chemical engineering was at the time they weretaking this course. My plan was to demonstrate a variety of
summer and school year PD days. To collect data on self-efficacyand culturally relevant engineering design implementation several data collection methods wereused, including: Teaching Engineering Self-Efficacy Scale (TESS) [9], Culturally ResponsiveTeaching Self-Efficacy Scale (CRTSES) [10], Culturally Congruent Instruction survey (CCI)[11], qualitative teacher feedback from focus group and individual written and verbal reflections,video recordings of classroom implementation, and lesson plan evaluation with a STEAMscorecard [12]. A more detailed description of the professional development program andengineering design task implementation is described in [13].Observable Outcomes in Upper Elementary and Middle School ClassroomsFrom teacher
concepts are reintroduced or reframed from previous chemical engineering coursesfor the context of the material at hand. Further, this course serves as a cross-disciplinary electiveacross multiple programs, with previous enrollment having included students fromcivil/environmental engineering, mechanical engineering, and integrative engineering.The Spring 2022 instance of Atmospheric Engineering and Science comprised of 3 seniors, 8juniors, 8 sophomores, and one first-year student. With the exception of two junior students,whom were environmentally-focused integrative engineering students, students in this instanceof the course majored in or planned on majoring in chemical engineering. Though first-yearstudents are broadly discouraged from taking
-0.07 -0.10 0.00 0.02 0.73 -seem to be? (1.58)Significance and implicationsIncorporating opportunities for consequential agency into more traditional laboratoryexperiments is important and worthwhile, however, it is not well understood how and whatchoices would have the most impact on the student’s perception of agency. Therefore, weconducted exploratory factor analysis to evaluate a survey as a means to measure different facetsof agency. We found strong support for items measuring agency as responsibility, authenticity,agency in the communication domain, agency in the experimental design domain, andopportunity structure. In our ongoing work, we plan
of these objectives often focuses on the students’ ability to communicate thetechnical outcomes (e.g., written reports or technical presentations) and may overlook evidencefor holistic development in areas such as troubleshooting abilities. Troubleshooting is afundamental skill that instructors would like their students to gain from experience in alaboratory course, but assessing this skill can be challenging.In this study, we tested a method to holistically test students’ ability to troubleshoot a chemicalengineering problem in a laboratory course. Our research goal is to develop a baselineunderstanding of how to measure students’ experimental self-efficacy and theirtroubleshooting performance. Planned future research may then consider how
letter instead of in their paper, and papers and editorials offeredadditional guidance [6, 13]. As detailed in an editorial, this change was prompted by LisaBenson’s comments at an ASEE presentation about how journals can play a role in DEI [14].Using the values, attitudes, beliefs approach to analysis, we can characterize a developmentaltrajectory suggested by this requirement. Specifically, while many authors might holdsituationally ascribed values that DEI is important, many may not take this value up as anenduring attitude or a belief that guides their actions as they plan studies, develop learningexperiences, conduct analysis or evaluation, and communicate their results. By adding the DEIrequirement, CEE inserted a “rule for acting” that
impacts of this incident, such as the Chief Counsel’s Report [9], the ExecutiveSummary and 4-volume U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board report [10], theResearch Planning, Inc. report [11], the National Commission’s Report to the President [12], andthe National Academies Press 2012 free e-book on this blowout [13]. Student teams must reporton the technical and ethical causes of the disaster, and then expound on the global, cultural,economic, and environmental impacts of the event. Further, they examine the regulatory aspectsof deepwater drilling that were in place before this event, and changes introduced by the Obamaand Trump administrations. Student teams then apply this learning to analyze the case of anoilfield storage tank
been instituted, theassessment results are presented in summary form in Table 3. The data are summarized for eachsemester as the count of assessments that are either above or below the designated criteria of 3.0,per each SO and by either I, R, or A assessment type. A principal result indicated in thissummary format is the fact that 50% or more of assessments are below 3.0 for SOs 1, 2 and in afew cases, for SOs 6 and 7. A possible cause may be the relatively wide range of engineeringstudent performance our program experiences, since it is not a Tier 1 school where GPArequirements for graduation are typically more stringent. Historically, the department faculty hasindicated an action plan of “more example problems will be conducted during class
judgment and decision making’, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2012, 26,(3), pp. 285-29416 Patel, V.L., and Groen, G.J.: ‘The general and specific nature of medical expertise: A critical look’:‘Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits’ (Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 93-12517 Phillips, J.K., Klein, G., and Sieck, W.R.: ‘Expertise in judgment and decision making: A case fortraining intuitive decision skills’: ‘Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making’ (BlackwellPublishing, 2004), pp. 297-32518 Seifert, C.M., Patalano, A.L., Hammond, K.J., and Converse, T.M.: ‘Experience and expertise: Therole of memory in planning for opportunities’: ‘Expertise in Context’ (AAAI Press/ MIT Press, 1997
and Environmental Science, vol. 12, no. 7. 2019. doi: 10.1039/c9ee00223e.[3] B. Plumer and J. Cowan, “California Plans to Ban Sales of New Gas-Powered Cars in 15 Years,” The New York TImes, 2020.[4] IEA, “Policies to promote electric vehicle deployment - Global EV Outlook 2021,” iea.org, 2021.[5] R. D. Braatz and O. D. Crisalle, “Chemical process control,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 17, no. 13. 2007. doi: 10.1002/rnc.1173. 8 2023 ASEE Annual Conference[6] X. Li and Z. (Jacky) Huang, “An inverted classroom approach to educate MATLAB in chemical process
to use the notebook combined with Python, while the second class will be applying the traditional approach. This stage is not yet done as this is still a work in progress. Nevertheless, the plan is to introduce this new approach next year when the kinetics and reactor design course is offered.Presenting this research at the 2023 ASEE annual conference, while it is still at the progressstage, enables us to interact with other instructors who have done something similar to shareexperiences and to develop our structured assessment for next year’s intervention. In principle,the proposed intervention can be implemented in other engineering courses that have a similarteaching challenge and require a computational approach. Following the
application of this project, researchers willmodify and improve the laboratory experiment that students will work through in order toincrease student ability to apply in-class knowledge to this system that is more like what theywould experience on the field.End Goal In future developments to push this toward applications across a whole degree plan, theresearchers intend to open the process to enable the students to design and implement otherprocesses, such as replacing the process implemented in the CSTR. Specifically, the idea ofreplacing the CSTR with a bioprocess (e.g., a simple fermentation using brewer’s yeast), amembrane separation process, or a fractional distillation of a water/ethanol mixture are underconsideration. The development of
an artifact of the time-constraint associated with the in-class preparation constraints or the planned usage (the examsare solved by individuals, not teams of students) is unclear.From a performance standpoint, the same course (with the same instructor) was taught in 2021,2022 and is currently being taught in 2023. In 2021, using individually prepared study guides,student performance between exam 1 and exam 2 decreased by 2.9 points (mean). In 2022 (thefocus of the current study and analysis), student performance between exam 1 and exam 2decreased by 2.5 points (mean). In 2023, students individually prepared study guides for exam 1and exam 2 (similar to 2021), and the student performance between exam 1 and exam 2decreased by 3.7 points (mean
Plans and Support for COVID-19 Risk Mitigation MeasuresAmong Parents and Guardians,” Acad Pediatr, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 684–693, May 2021, doi:10.1016/j.acap.2020.11.017.[8] D. J. Deming, C. Goldin, L. F. Katz, and N. Yuchtman, “Can online learning bend thehigher education cost curve?,” American Economic Review, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 496–501, May2015, doi: 10.1257/AER.P20151024.[9] S. W. Hemelt and K. M. Stange, “Why the move to online instruction won’t reducecollege costs,” Brookings, 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2020/07/28/why-the-move-to-online-instruction-wont-reduce-college-costs/(accessed Jan. 17, 2023).[10] S. Hubler, “As Colleges Move Classes Online, Families Rebel Against the Cost,” TheNew York Times
importanceof building in some time for networking, both structured and unstructured. To facilitate this, wedrew from successful events from previous Summer Schools. There were informal buttopically-structured networking events on Monday and Thursday, after the last regular session ofthe day and before dinner. There were also two poster session events for new attendees onMonday and Tuesday evenings to allow participants to share their work, current or planned, aswell as interact with more senior members of the community. Finally, on Wednesday there wasan Industry Expo, which allowed participants to interact with corporate and academic partnersand sponsors, followed by a variety of social events, ranging from a Colorado Rockies Game towhitewater rafting