currently teaching the undergraduate classes of Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering and Computer Methods in Civil Engineering as well as a newly developed graduate course on Numerical Modeling in Geotechnical Engineering.Dr. S. Immanuel Selvaraj P.E., University of Evansville Dr. Immanuel Selvaraj is an associate professor of civil engineering at the University of Evansville, IN. He holds a PhD degree from Auburn University and a licensed professional engineer.Dr. Dennis J. Fallon, The Citadel Dennis John Fallon is presently Distinguished Professor of Engineering Education at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. He received his BSEE from Old Dominion University (ODU) with honors in 1970, and his MSCE and PhD
13 13 18 11 4.5 A 2. Natural sciences 3 36 5 4.5A 3. Humanities 2 77 1 S -- 4. Social sciences 2 69 2 I -- 5. Material science 8 15 12 -- 6. Mechanics 14 12 11 13 -- 7. Experiments 3 41 3 S 3.7 8. Problem
Likert Taxonomy Criteria Scale Level(a) 4 Examine correct equation for d(min) 3 Interpret d(max) 0 = No work 3 Execute the equation 1 Report units 1 = Method and/or understanding(b) 4 Examine correct zero air void line significantly below standard equation 1 Remember to use specific gravity in 2 = Touches on right method but equation significant errors in concept 3 Interpret optimum water content 2 Identify S = 1.0 for the zero air void 3
3-5 2 6-10 3 More than 10 2The survey asked participants to rate the seminars (Figure 4) and other aspects of the workshop(Figure 5). While all seminars were rated highly on average, the first five seminars, which focuson teaching and learning principles and class planning were rated most highly. Questioning,Assessment, and Non-Verbal Communication were rated lowest, although comments did notprovide any specific reasons for the low ratings. Participants were asked “which seminar(s) madethe greatest impact and why.” Their responses included “Learning to teach, effective teaching, learning styles, and learning objectives had the greatest
internships. These results aredemonstrated in Figure 1. The vertical axis indicates the total number of learning behaviors (orfine codes) demonstrated in an internship and each bar indicates the number of learningbehaviors under each style. In this study, three learning styles dictated students’ internshipexperiences as demonstrated by subordinating learning behaviors. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ex ias y s t ax hn yn ley ecca na il y Ki m Al b elb ar
] Saunders, G. and Klemming, F. (2003). Integrating technology into a traditional learning environment: Reasons for and risks of success, Active Learning in Higher Education, 1, 74–86.[10] Byers, C. (2001). Interactive assessment: An approach to enhance teaching and learning, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(4), 359–374.[11] Kendall, M. (2001). Teaching online to campus-based students, Education for Information, 19(1), 325–346.[12] Sorg, S., Juge, F. and Bledsoe, R. (1998). Institutional change through a web-enhanced course model, Paper presented at the Florida Educational Technology Conference, Orlando, FL, March, 2000. Available at http://distrib.ucf.edu/dlucf/present.htm[13] Brown, D. J
Page 13.1004.11requirement that students can explain basic concepts in management, business, public policy, andleadership (ASCE 5 in Table 1) and can explain the importance of professional licensure (ASCE6 in Table 1) are assessed in this course.A rubric was developed to aid in the assessment process. An example is shown as Figure 1. Theinstructor(s) teaching the course are provided with the rubric at the start of the semester and it istheir responsibility to create and evaluate the assignments. All assignments are evaluated and theinstructor saves one example of student work from each category for archival purposes.In addition to performing assessment on individual outcomes, the instructor(s) also qualitativelyassess the course at the end of
the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resources Research 42: W03S04 Doi:10·1029/2005WR004362. 6. Wagener T, Sivapalan M, McDonnell JJ, Hooper R, Lakshmi V, Liang X, Kumar P. 2004. Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a catalyst for multi-disciplinary hydrology. Transactions-American Geophysical Union, 85(44), 451–452. 7. Nash JE, Eagleson PS, Philip JR, Van der Molen WH. 1990. The education of hydrologists. Hydrological Sciences Journal 35(6): 597–607. 8. Eagleson PS, Brutsaert WH, Colbeck SC, Cummins KW, Dozier J, Dunne T, Edmond JM, Gupta VK, Jacoby GC, Manabe S, Nicholson SE, Nielsen DR, Rodriguez
My instructor seems well-prepared for class. 4.8 My instructor has an effective style of presentation. 4.3 I am generally pleased with the text(s) required for this course. 4.7 Course assignments are interesting and stimulating. 4.3 My instructor is actively helpful when students have problems. 4.9 My instructor is readily available for consultation. 4.8 I would enjoy taking another course from this instructor. 4.9 My instructor displays enthusiasm when teaching. 4.9 My instructor motivates me to do my best work
professional practice. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia and a Distinguished Member of ASCE.Jeffrey S. Russell, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Jeffrey S. Russell is a Professor and Chair in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Wisconsin. He received his BS degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and his MS and PhD degrees from Purdue University and is a registered professional engineer in Wisconsin. He is a co-founder of the Construction Engineering and Management program at UW-Madison. In the last 20 years, he has advised over 100 graduate students including 26 Ph.D. students. He has been a principal or co
Paper ID #29558Analyzing the Effectiveness of Competition and Interdisciplinary Teamsin Student LearningCol. Aaron T. Hill Jr., United States Military Academy Colonel Aaron Hill is an Assistant Professor and Design Group Director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from West Point, a Master of Science degree in Engineering Management from Missouri S&T, a Master of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. Aaron has
updated in the future, it is important that thistake place using rigorous methodologies that take into account changes in the breath and depth ofcivil engineering knowledge. The widest possible input should be sought from stakeholderswithin the academic, practicing and government civil engineering communities. There is hardlya more significant set of documents to define and defend the civil engineering profession in achanging world.References[1] S. Lester, “On professions and being a professional,” Stan Lester Developments, Taonton,UK, devmts.org.uk, 2015.[2] E. Hoyle and P. D. John, Professional Knowledge and Professional Practice, London, UK:Cassell, 1995.[3] ASCE, “Policy statement 465 – academic prerequisites for licensure and
revolutionary) approach to e-learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Aldrich, C. (2009). The complete guide to simulations and serious games: How the most valuable content will be created in the age beyond Gutenberg to Google. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86- 107.Clark, D. B., Nelson, B., Chang, H., D’Angelo, C. M., Slack, K., & Martinez-Garza, M. (2011). Exploring Newtonian mechanics in a conceptually-integrated digital game: Comparison of learning and affective outcomes for students in Taiwan and the United States. Computers
structural responses. GM1 0.5 Fixed Isolated Acc [g] 0 -0.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time [s] GM2 3 Fixed Isolated 2 1 Acc [g] 0 -1 -2 -3 0 5 10 15 20 25
). "Models, Models, Models: The Use of Physical Models to Enhance the Structural Engineering Experience." Paper ID #1998-389, Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition. Page 26.1027.183. Saliklis, E. (2008). "Arch Building for Kids. What did they learn? What did we learn?" Paper ID #2008- 571, Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition.4. Gifford, M.P, Cervo, E.G., Savelski, M.J., Farrell, S., Hesketh, R.P., and Slater, C.S. (2003). "Non- traditional Laboratory Experiments: Olive Oil
Description Comments ASCE31-03 C Load path N/A Mezzanines The strength of the lateral-force 79% x resisting system shall not be less direction (N- Tier 2: than 80% of the strength in an C Weak story S), only 1% 4.3.2.1 adjacent story, above or below for
also extend to the mentors.ReferencesAmaral, K. E., & Vala, M. (2009). What teaching teaches: Mentoring and the performance gains of mentors. J. Chem. Educ, 86(5), 630.Collings, R., Swanson, V., & Watkins, R. (2014). The impact of peer mentoring on levels of student wellbeing, integration and retention: a controlled comparative evaluation of residential students in UK higher education. Higher Education, 68(6), 927-942.Gafney, L., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2008). Peer-led team learning: evaluation, dissemination, and institutionalization of a college level initiative (Vol. 16): Springer Science & Business Media.Hug, S., Thiry, H., & Tedford, P. (2011). Learning to love computer science: peer leaders
specifically, responses from Question 2 of the firstand second activities were qualitatively evaluated using the rubric presented in Table 4. Thisparticular question, which was repeated in both activities, prompts the students with “Whatinformation do you think you need to know to answer the driving question? List all of the factorsand/or variables that are needed and identify which ones are the most important. For eachfactor/variable listed, offer a rationale for why it is needed. For example, through whatmechanism/s does it affect strength enhancement?” The rubric was designed to gain an overviewof the general state of student understanding of nanomaterials at the nanoscale and theirrelevance in the context of cement mortar. Scores of Poor, Good
be more directly comparable with Senior Exit Survey responses and FE Exam scores. 3. Expand course-based Embedded Indicator results to include sample standard deviation allowing analysis of sample variance and evaluation of standards with regard to acceptable lower distribution limits for student performance, rather than merely a comparison of a student average.References 1. Little, D. L., Quardokus Fisher, K., Brown, S. A., Koretsky, M., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., “Measuring Student Perceptions of Engineering Classroom Activities and the Use of Such Measures by STEM Faculty: The Development of the Student Class Activity and Engagement Instrument,” Proceedings of the 122nd American Society for Engineering
students understanding theconcepts presented in the course. We also identified that there was an increase in the studentsexpressing “Very High Interest” in the civil engineering discipline when compared between thetotal number of students at the beginning and end of the semester. Our assessment resultsindicate that the lectures have helped the students understand the concepts of sustainability aswell the current US Infrastructure rank. However, we do note that the assessment questions needmodification to correctly understand the reasons for students varying interest in CivilEngineering discipline. REFERENCES[1] S. L. Star and K. Ruhleder, "Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access
. Sturgill, A. Kirk, and G. B. Dadi, "Estimating earthwork volumes through use of unmanned aerial systems," Transportation Research Record, pp. 1-8, 2017.[5] S. Siebert and J. Teizer, "Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork projects using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) system," Automation in Construction, vol. 41, pp. 1- 14, May 2014.[6] R. E. Pereira, S. Zhou, and M. Gheisari, "Integrating the use of UAVs and photogrammetry into a construction management course: Lessons learned," presented at the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2018), 2018.[7] J. B. Sharma and D. Hulsey, "Integrating the UAS in Undergraduate Teaching and Research
, and economic criteria and reflects balance of dimensions13. Uses and/or creates innovation(s) in its specific field to achievesustainability14. Worked with experts from other disciplines (i.e., outsideengineering) to enhance process or final designMethodsIn Fall 2019, 35 civil engineering seniors at The Citadel were recruited to apply the SustainableDesign Rubric to their capstone projects. In place of one of their regular Water and WastewaterSystems classes, students attend an active 1.5 hour session to learn about and apply the Rubricthrough individual reflection and group discussions. For participating in the session, studentsearned bonus points on one of the course’s design projects. Students were in their first semesterof a two-semester
”, be itoff-the-main-campus, for fall 2005. At that time, access to the main campus was limited to upperadministration and facility services, operating in temporary offices in the Education Building astheir offices had rain damage or had flooded.Renewal/recovery plansBoth universities’ upper administration realized that proper planning was necessary to minimizethe serious impact of Katrina. However, the process used by each university to develop therecovery plans drastically differed.Tulane University’s President, S. Cowen, and Provost, L. Lefton, drew up a renewal plan anddeclared financial exigency on December 8, 2005, after reviewing the plan with the Board ofTrustees. The Plan for Renewal was adopted in response to major Katrina-related
-basedserver managed by Bentley. However, university IT departments often have existing experiencewith virtualization servers, and could potentially be called upon to host applications that are to beused for instructional purposes.The technical specifications of the remote server hosting the software (Intel Xeon @ 2.45 GHzwith 7.5 GB main memory running 64-bit Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter), coupled withthe requirements of the program(s) being virtualized and the virtualization software used, canlimit the number of simultaneous users that can be accommodated via remote connection from asingle server. In the case of the single server that was utilized to host virtualization for thiscourse (which was not designed for many simultaneous users, but
learning throughout one's life. Anotherstudent reported that “when someone does a life-long learning assignment the knowledgelearned will stick throughout his/her life”. The student responses were focused on what theyhoped these courses would provide them for their future engineering career. Although thestudents appeared to have a high level of understanding of the concepts of LLL (Q-2), thestudents were not able to envision how these courses would prepare them for life-longlearning. With these results, the instructors were better able to structure the remainingassignment(s) with the goal of applying the concepts of LLL to real life engineeringproblems. An emphasis was placed on the assessment of critical thinking skills in designing arubric for
, contrast sensitivity, and motionperception.The driving simulator10 at Missouri University of Science and Technology (Missouri S&T) istypically used to analyze driver behavior under different roadway conditions. Figure 1 shows thedriving simulator, which uses three LCD projectors, each having 3,000 lumens and controlled bya PC. Page 25.1408.3 The driving cabin is instrumented with optical encoders for measuring the input of the steering
, 2008. All of the academicprograms within the college are now either recommending or requiring the course for theirstudents. Currently two large sections (i.e. 70 students/section) are offered each semester andadditional sections are projected for the future. Many of the elements of the course could beadopted directly as embedded indicators for ABET assessment tools. The level of the outcomespecified in the new class in the areas of leadership, professional and ethical responsibility, andteamwork meets the level suggested in ASCE’s BOK2. When coupled with the total collegeincentives, the level of the leadership outcome surpasses BOK2’s requirements.The topics of this course naturally lead to a great deal of student discussion. The typical