resources, and environmental security. He retired from active duty in the grade of Colonel in 2008 with 28+ years of service in the US Army Corps of Engineers. Dr Manous has been actively involved with the "professional" aspects of the engineering profession for over 15 years particularly through his involvement with the American Society of Civil Engineers where he chairs the ASCE Committee on Professional Practice and the Post-Hurricane Katrina Critical Infrastructure Guidance Task Force. Dr Manous is a graduate of the Georgia Institute of Technology (BCE, Civil Engineering), North Georgia College (BS, Physics), University of Illinois (MS, Civil Engineering), US Army War College
24.341.7thinking is the CAT© developed by researchers at Tennessee Technical University5,6. The CAT©consists of fifteen short answer essays and takes approximately one hour to complete6. It isideally suited for test retest evaluation of interventions and according to the developers sensitiveenough to detect differences in critical thinking ability between freshman and seniors and theimpact of a single course that emphasizes critical thinking with high reliability. The range ofscores is from zero to forty, and the CAT© is administered to all students entering the CEprogram and graduating senior CE students. While students are encouraged to do their best onthe test, there is no direct grade consequences associated with taking it. Therefore, theparticipation
the structure of communication systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 An Institutional Excellence in Teaching Workshop Adapted from the ExCEEd ModelAbstractThe American Society of Civil Engineering’s Excellence in Civil Engineering Education(ExCEEd) Teaching Workshop has been delivered each year since 1999 with great success andbroad recognition. The elements of the workshop are practical and promote best practices inclassroom instruction. The workshop was modified for delivery at a public polytechnicinstitution to faculty in disciplines as diverse as computer science, the humanities, and dentalhygiene. The contents of the ExCEEd workshop as well as its
integrates these program students into a single cohort.IntroductionThe honors program at The Citadel provides an exceptional learning experience foroutstanding students. It has been admitting 20-24 students each year and has an 85 percentretention rate for all four years. The honors program attributes its success to a number ofspecific high impact practices including; 1. Assigning a honors faculty advisor; 2. A honorsstudent association responsible for social and academic activities; 3. Maintaining cohesion byplacing each cohort into nine honors courses in the first three years; 4. Providing honorseminar classes; and 5. Requiring two honors directed research projects. Together thesepractices provide students help in their acclimation and later
students are members ofclubs and classes throughout the Philadelphia School District and participate in various Page 15.1060.9competitions during the academic year. Mentors spend three hours a week at an assigned school.In total five schools were visited during the six week competition period for BEST Robotics. Inaddition, in 2006, almost two dozen Robotics educators, from the School District of Philadelphia(SDP), gathered at Villanova University' s Center for Engineering Education and Research(CEER) to take part in an AT&T sponsored three-day computer-aided design workshop. Thisprogram was repeated in 2007 when 26 teachers visited Villanova
mustdefend their decisions at this time and receive feedback from both the client and theengineers. The clients give feedback on the success of the design in meeting initialvisions, and the engineers give feedback on the realism of the solution, solutioneffectivenss and practicality, and strengths and areas for improvement in the studentsdesign.2.4 Professional Plans Reviewed with Design Teams Post ProjectAn area of improvement that the UT Tyler CE Program is looking to incorporate in futureofferings is allowing students to review actual plans of their project produced by workingengineers. Using a real site enables this opportunity. The activity can be structured tosimulate a design review with a government agency, and students would see the
exclusively on the United Nations SustainableDevelopment Goals (UN SDGs) and each project’s ability to achieve two goals. Students wereasked to write briefly on what the SDGs are, then choose one direct and one indirect UN SDG toincorporate into their proposed engineering design project. 1 Sustainability was first introducedwithin the context of the UN SDGs. These goals were presented as a way of incorporatingsustainability into the design projects. Each student had to identify at least one direct and oneindirect goal for their design and then the team worked together to identify the best direct andindirect goals to focus on as they developed their proposed designs. The UN SDGs helped thestudents gain an understanding of the impact engineering
AC 2007-2603: LEARNING THROUGH WORK STUDY OPPORTUNITIES INCIVIL ENGINEERINGSubhi Bazlamit, Ohio Northern University Subhi M Bazlamit is a Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Ohio Northern University. Dr. Bazlamit is the Director of Pavement management Center for Cities Counties and Villages (PMC-CCV)Farhad Reza, Ohio Northern University Farhad Reza is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Ohio Northern University. Dr. Reza's research interests include pavement management,design and maintenance. Page 12.1012.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Support for Implementation of Infrastructure Education Courses Across Multiple InstitutionsIntroductionCommunities of Practice (CoP) are formed when individuals collaborate in order to shareknowledge and develop solutions for collective problems[1]. They usually grow informallyaround a need and involve voluntary membership by participants who are motivated to take partin a learning community that serves a common purpose.[2] In higher education, CoPs often formwith the intent of sharing best practices, resources, and knowledge around a common domain.They can serve to invigorate and advance the teaching and learning beyond what may bepossible by
elective for both seniors and graduate students. The curricula of these coursesdevote a considerable amount of time to students, developing an understanding of fundamentalsin highway design, traffic flow theory and traffic control. Thus, in my recent developedtransportation engineering course, computer micro-simulation tools are applied to provide ainteractive learning environment and engage students’ motivation in experiments and knowledgeconstruction. The course, covering an entire semester, is divided into two stages. The first half ofthe semester is to create a simulation learning environment for students to learn traffic modeltheory and control methods, while during the second stage, the students work on a real-lifeproject using traffic
and post-baccalaureate formal education as well as pre-licensure experience. Specific emphasis is giventhose BOK2 outcomes that previous survey data identified as being a challenge for manyprograms to address within current curricular design. The curriculum, as developed, isconsidered to be BOK2-complient, in addition to meeting current university graduation andABET/EAC accreditation requirements.IntroductionThe first edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century1 (BOK1) wasreleased in January 2004. Based on various inputs, a second edition of the Civil EngineeringBody of Knowledge for the 21st Century2 (BOK2) was developed and released in February 2008.The BOK1 has already impacted accreditation criteria and civil
for transportation engineering education.By using the practical problem of designing a road and structuring the presentation of materialaround the student’s efforts, the authors aim at providing relevant experience to students that willprepare them for future challenges. As an end-state, it is hoped that teaching methods, as used inConstruction Management and the Introduction to Transportation Course, will facilitate thedevelopment of graduates who have reached the highest levels of Blooms taxonomy and are ableto synthesize, evaluate and characterize the efficacy of the construction methods they utilize. Page 15.416.16Bibliography1
has been involved in research projects to develop, refine, and apply innovative assessment tools for characterizing student knowledge of sustainability. Her ultimate goal is to use this assessment data to guide the design and evaluation of educational interventions to improve undergraduate sustainability education. In the area of bioprocessing, Dr. Watson has experience using bacteria and algae to convert waste materials into high-value products, such as biofuels.Mr. Joshua Pelkey, AirWatch Joshua Pelkey is currently a product manager at AirWatch in Atlanta, GA. He completed his MS in Elec- trical and Computer Engineering at GT and his BS in Computer Engineering from Clemson University. He has conducted
practical experienceduring the pre-licensure and post-licensure periods.One of the next crucial issues associated with this initiative to raise the bar in civil engineeringeducation is, “Who should teach the BOK?” Currently, the model is that all tenured faculty musthave a Ph.D. and if they are teaching a design course, they need a professional license orequivalent education and experience. It is extremely difficult to find a faculty member who is anoutstanding researcher, has extensive academic credentials, and possesses experience inprofessional practice. What is the ideal combination? Must the person teaching design havemore than just the minimum number of years of practical experience necessary to sit for the PE?Or should these faculty have
survey used for this research is presented in the Appendix.Questions 1 and 6 were used by Bramald and Wilkinson13, while the remaining questions werebased on the Kagawa45 study; questions 2, 3, 4, 5 were identical to Kagawa45 survey questionsand questions 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 were similar.Research Goals Page 15.803.5The goals of this study were to introduce sustainability into a required first year civil engineeringcourse and determine the impacts on the students. The unit on sustainability was coupled withan evaluation of student attitudes and perceptions of sustainability, measured using ananonymous written survey administered in-class and in-class
completing standard fresh and hardened concrete tests. One frame is tested understatic load, while the second frame is tested under impact load. Each group is given a copy of ACI 211.1-91 – Standard Practice for SelectingProportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete [31] and ACI 211.2-98 – StandardPractice for Selecting Proportions for Structural Lightweight Concrete [32] and are expected tocomplete a full mix design, which is due one week prior to specimen casting. The concrete mixmay only consist of the four primary constituents: Type I/II Portland cement, coarse aggregate,fine aggregate, and water. The coarse aggregate may be limestone or river rock, but should beno larger than ⅜ in. Lightweight aggregate may be used but it must
environmental systems engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Andrea L. Welker, Villanova University Andrea L. Welker, P.E., is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at Villanova University. Welker teaches a variety of geotechnical undergraduate and graduate classes, including foundation design and geosynthetics. Her research focuses on the geotechnical aspects of stormwater control measures. In addition to teaching and performing research, she is the assessment chair and study abroad advisor for her department. Page 25.1217.1 c American Society
, M.Phil. in Engineering from the University of Cambridge, and M.S. in Civil Engi- neering from Stanford University. He is a licensed Professional Engineer (Alaska), LEED Accredited Professional, and Envision Sustainability Professional. His research interests include sustainable design, construction, infrastructure, and engineering education.Major Berndt Spittka P.E., U.S. Military AcademyDr. Seamus F Freyne P.E., Mississippi State University Page 24.762.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Inspiring Student Engagement through Two-Minute FolliesAbstractShort, in
cognitive and affectivedomains, which did not appear in CEBOK2, namely: Post Graduate Education (PG) - a replacement for the Master’s or plus 30 designation in CEBOK2 and indicates formal education beyond the baccalaureate degree; Mentored Experience (ME) - experience gained under the mentorship of an engineer who has already satisfied the BOK requirements for entry into professional practice; and Self Directed (SD) - a program of learning initiated and pursued by the individual.Two of these new pathways, in addition to the existing Undergraduate Education (UG) pathwayappear in Tables 6-12. It should be noted that the listed pathways in these tables are only typicalpathways and are not the
undergraduate engineering courses and studied the effects on student learning as wellas student perception of classroom environment in the seven psychosocial dimensions:personalization, involvement, student cohesiveness, satisfaction, task orientation, innovation, andindividualization.2. Class Information The University of Pittsburgh is a public university with 16,719 full time undergraduatesand 10,297 graduate students. The flipped class contained 33 students of mixed majors andyears in school, but was predominately civil and environmental students. The class was CEE Page 24.1295.31218/2218-Design for the Environment, an experiential learning
-level design solution using appropriate design methods and tools. (4) Document the finished product or process according to standard practice. Page 25.230.4Additionally, the department identified senior design reports for the assessment of its secondcriterion related to Engineering Impact: Outcome: Explain the impact of engineering solutions on the economy, environment, political landscape, and society; apply the principles of sustainability to the design of engineering systems. Criterion: (2) Incorporate sustainability principles in the design of a civil engineering project.As described later herein
facility neighbors). In courses withauthentic design projects, particularly those that use a human-centered design paradigm, multipleopportunities for authentic listening practice are available.Ultimately, like many professional skills, listening is perhaps best taught in a cohesive approachthat is integrated through the curriculum. A single mention of listening in one course isinsufficient. When programs are integrating communication skills, teamwork/leadership, andethics/societal impacts as required learning outcomes for ABET, listening can be explicitlyidentified to students as sub-elements among these outcomes. For example, students couldpractice their listening skills in association with oral presentations by their peers. Traditionalstudent
in terms of providing classes for 150200 students at a time, not 2050. There is also the issue of faculty skills. With tenure as a practice, the change in skill mix is very slow. Thirty year careers are very common, so only onethirtieth of the resident skills has the possibility of change every year. While practitioners and adjuncts help accelerate this process, in the long run those individuals are not permanent fixtures in the program. The second is that ASCE’s BOK2 “demands” are only one of a larger set of “demands” that current programs face. An example is preparation for graduate school, teaching students how to do scholarly research, about which the BOK2 is silent. Naturally, the BOK2 addresses
helping companies attract innovators.Carolyn Breden Voter, University of Wisconsin-Madison Carolyn Voter is a Ph.D. candidate in Civil and Environmental Engineering at University of Wisconsin- Madison where she focuses on urban hydroecology as part of the Hydroecology Lab with Dr. Steven P. Loheide II. She also currently serves as the project assistant for Water@UW-Madison, an umbrella organization which connects water scholars on the UW-Madison campus and beyond. As a certified instructor for the Software Carpentry Foundation, Voter regularly teaches scientists and engineers best practices for scientific computing by live-coding in a two-day, learner-centered workshop. She completed her Delta Certificate in Teaching
Paper ID #9379Work in Progress: Using Outcomes-Based Assessment in an IntroductoryStructural Engineering CourseDr. Matthew W Roberts, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Matthew Roberts has been teaching at UW-Platteville since 2002. He is originally from Denver, Colorado and attended Brigham Young University for his B.S. in Civil Engineering. He then spent four years as a civil engineering officer in the U.S. Air Force. After his military service, he completed graduate work at Texas A&M University. He teaches classes on reinforced concrete design, structural steel design, and other structural engineering topics.Ms
engineeringprograms do not explicitly address it throughout their curricula. For instance, there are manycompetitions, challenges and opportunities for the demonstration of design skills, but most areoptional or extracurricular, catching only a portion of engineering graduates in a somewhat adhoc manner and at variable or even random places and times. As Walesh states, "Yes, we couldindividually and collectively rely on accidental creativity and innovation, those wonderful butrare out-of-the-blue events. However, why not complement accidental creativity and innovationwith the intentional kind?"11(pxviii) Making development of creativity skills a deliberate part ofengineering curricula is vital. If we do not integrate the development of these important skills
and Anxiety Best Practices in SI ProgramsThe success of the program during the fall of 2012 allowed it to expand once again for the springof 2013. At this time, the School of Engineering offered SI support in all sections ofmathematics through differential equations, all sections of chemistry, all sections of physics Iand II, all sections of CIVL 202, all sections of CIVL 309, all sections of Computer Applicationsfor Electrical Engineers (ELEC 206), and all sections of Circuits II (ELEC 202). Similarofferings were held for the fall 2013. Table 1 contains a complete listing of the number of allrelevant freshmen, sophomore, and junior courses and the number of sections that contained SIfor fall 2012 through fall 2013. Figure 4
expertise include evaluations of engineering education curricula and programs, informal education and outreach programs, STEM teacher development, and climate change education programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Assessing Student Learning of Civil Engineering InfrastructureAbstractAs part of an ongoing NSF-funded effort, materials have been developed for teaching civil engi-neering infrastructure topics to undergraduate students. These materials are currently beingadopted by members of the Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E)community of practice. CIT-E is a group of faculty from 25 universities in the U.S. and Canadaseeking to improve infrastructure
methodology, consideration of alternative solutions, and designof an optimal steel structure to meet stated functional requirements. CE483, Reinforced Concrete Design, introduces the materials and mechanical propertiesof concrete, and the design of reinforced concrete structures. Mix design and strength testing labsdevelop the concept of proportioning constituents for quality concrete and provide a background Page 15.986.13in techniques of material testing, quality control, and sound construction practices. The study ofreinforced concrete includes analysis and design of simple structures, resulting in an appreciationfor the strength and