4341synergistically assisted students in seeing the big design picture and the nuances ofteamwork, leadership and management required in the two-semester senior design(CENG 4115/4315) by analyzing and discussing solutions to leadership issues seenduring the one credit hour CENG 4115 in the fall and public policy affecting engineeringprojects in Texas, business practices that could constrain their capstone project design aswell as how well they have been managing their personnel assets within their team duringCENG 4315 in the spring. Even though some public policy is being covered inenvironmental engineering, the in-depth coverage of public policy and administrationwithin CENG 4341 along with leadership, business practices, asset management andother
Department program outcomes is measuredusing embedded indicators with the six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy 12,13 summarized as: 1.)Knowledge, 2.) Comprehension, 3.) Application, 4.) Analysis, 5.) Synthesis and 6.) Evaluation. Page 23.393.6Table 1 summarizes the 22 CEE Department program outcomes adopted for the CivilEngineering program and identifies the ten outcomes that are being used to assess leadershipdevelopment. Course embedded indicators on tests, assignments, and projects are usedsystematically to evaluate each of the 22 CEE Department program outcomes. Multiple meansof assessing each CEE Department program outcome are deployed and include
include keeping the fundamental topics (e.g.,soil classification, seepage, mechanical behavior) but limiting the theoretical derivations to allowtime to cover additional topics and incorporate active learning into the classroom. The overallgoal of the small group activities created as part of this project are to expose students to realworld concepts in geotechnical engineering and enhance student learning.The authors have both taught geology for engineers courses at their respective universities andutilized the extensive resources available for geoscience educators through the ScienceEducation Research Center (SERC website https://serc.carleton.edu/highered/index.html). Inaddition, the authors have used materials from the National Center for Case
, lifelong learning. Page 13.1338.3Illustrative Case Study – The Quebec Bridge Collapse of 1907 The 1907 collapse of the Quebec Bridge during construction represents a landmark ofboth engineering practice and forensic engineering5 6. The Quebec Bridge was the longestcantilever structure attempted until that time. In its final design, it was 1,800 ft long. Thebridge project was financially troubled from the beginning. This caused many setbacks in thedesign and construction. Construction began in October 1900. Figure 1 shows the state of construction just beforethe collapse. In August 1907, the bridge collapsed suddenly. Seventy-five
- Madison and was a Research Associate at the National Research Council of Canada before joining Nippon Koei. His expertise includes numerical modeling, rockfall analysis and mitigation, and general geomechanical analyses. Page 13.789.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 International Collaboration for Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory ExercisesAbstractThe project described in this paper is a collaborative effort between California Polytechnic StateUniversity and Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. based in Tokyo, Japan. The collaboration was establishedfor the Geotechnical
present information on how and whypractitioner involvement has been beneficial. A special topics course offering that allowedstudents access to a construction project is highlighted since it provides opportunities to describehow practitioners can assist with producing balanced and well grounded graduates. The primaryassessment of this paper is the program as described seems to be working.IntroductionOver the past few years, the materials area within the Civil and Environmental Engineering(CEE) department at Mississippi State University (MSU) has prioritized producing engineeringgraduates that are balanced and well grounded in fundamental concepts. To do so, emphasis hasbeen given to development and sustainment of a sound program at bachelors
spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Di- vision. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President, Dr. Lenox led several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engineering profession – with the overall objective of properly preparing individuals for their futures as civil engineers. An example is his staff leadership of
) hasrecently dedicated two special issues of the Journal of Professional Issues of EngineeringEducation and Practice to sustainability (ASCE, 2011 & 2015). Within these issues are reportsof case studies, course modules and entire courses dedicated to sustainability, as well as effortsto integrate sustainability throughout curricula. Cruickshank and Fenner (2012) and Bielefeldt(2013) summarize several pedagogical approaches to teaching sustainability concepts. Thefollowing paper presents a single-lesson approach to introduce the concepts of sustainability andsustainable design, at the local infrastructure project scale, to civil and environmentalengineering students. The foundation for the lesson was initially developed at the 2ndInfrastructure
Paper ID #6383Integration of Remote Major Research Instrumentation in UndergraduateCivil Engineering EducationDr. Usama El Shamy P.E., Southern Methodist University Dr. Usama El Shamy is an assistant professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Southern Methodist University. He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 2004. He is the Principal Investigator and Project Director of the NSF funded TUES-Type 1 project: ”A Multi-Institutional Classroom Learning Environment for Geotechnical Engineering Educa- tion.”Dr. Tarek Abdoun, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteDr
Paper ID #8529Critical Thinking in the Curriculum: Making Better DecisionsProf. Stephen Mattingly, University of Texas, Arlington STEPHEN MATTINGLY is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering at the University of Texas at Ar- lington. Previously, he worked at the Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Irvine and University of Alaska, Fairbanks. He has recently completed and is currently working on research projects that address a variety of topics including transportation public health performance measures, de- cision and risk analysis, airport operations, managed lane traveler behavior, high
students’ understanding. Ethics, for example, is often taught in civilengineering through the use of case studies. Further, case studies offer an opportunity forinterdisciplinary discussions centered on human dignity and justice goals [8] and likewisedevelop empathy for the users impacted by the project. Empathy is increasingly beingrecognized for the central role it may play in connecting crucial inter- and intrapersonal skillswith enhanced abilities to understand and productively work in multidisciplinary environmentswith diverse stakeholder groups [9]. Finally, some professors may not feel comfortable directlydiscussing race and related topics within an otherwise technical classroom environment; casestudies allow the emphasis to be taken off of
, hereinafter referred to as the instructor, joined this institute project with sometrepidation. As a graduate and former assistant mentor in the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE) Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) program (Estes, et al.,2005; ASCE, 2008), the instructor is an outspoken institute proponent of the tenets of ExCEEd,including appropriate use of technology in the classroom. In fact, the instructor’s campusreputation in this regard was one significant reason the project PI contacted the instructor aboutjoining the project. The adoption of this technology-based instruction process for most all of theclass meetings seemed to the instructor to be a significant departure from his ExCEEd roots.Similarly, the project PI
-changing world where values often shift rapidly? How do civil engineers safeguardthe rights of future generations while fulfilling the wants and needs of the present? How docivil engineering designs of today meet the different needs of the stakeholders in the future?How do we prioritize the current needs of the natural environment while designingconstruction projects? We contend that these are key questions related to the future that oughtto be addressed in a civil engineering curriculum.This paper describes the ongoing efforts and preliminary results of incorporating futuresthinking into a cornerstone course at the Department of Civil Engineering at National TaiwanUniversity in Taiwan. The experiment was conducted as one of the two parts of a
solutions. The exams were an individual effort; thus, giving the Instructor anopportunity to gauge each individual student’s level of understanding and competency with thepavement design concepts and MEPDG software. Because of the smaller class size, the graduate course was structured more of a project-centric course and included very few traditional problem-based homework assignments. Amajority of the homework assignments required the MEPDG software for generating solutionsand were to be completed individually. There were two exams which were take-home, open-note format and individually completed. Because the graduate students are challenged to a morerigorous level, the MEPDG software was required to solve 50 percent of the problems in
perspectivesOutcome 12 Risk and Uncertainty Outcome 21 TeamworkOutcome 13 Project Management Outcome 22 Professional Values and AttitudesOutcome 15 Technical Specialization Outcome 23 Lifelong LearningOutcome 16 Communication Outcome 24 Professional and Ethical ResponsibilityOutcome 17 Public Policy Table 1: Experiential Outcomes Page 25.1331.6The EI is expected to attain the outcomes through
Engineering Students to SustainabilityAbstractAs articulated in the Body of Knowledge for Civil Engineering, all civil engineering studentsshould be introduced to the concept of sustainability. The objective of this project was tointegrate sustainability concepts into the 1-credit Introduction to Civil Engineering course thatfirst year students are required to take at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Student attitudesabout sustainability were evaluated using a written survey and in class questions to whichstudents responded using a Course Response System (clickers). Evidence of student learning onsustainability was acquired via student performance on a homework assignment worth 12% oftheir overall course grade
Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering
Missouri Department of Transportation. He obtained his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech and worked at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center on concrete bridge research. He is currently an associate professor of Civil Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). He teaches engineering mechanics and structural engineering courses at VMI and enjoys working with the students on bridge related research projects and with the ASCE student chapter.Dr. Christopher Ryan Shearer, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Shearer is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. His research investigates the chemical
at Roger Williams University where he teaches engineering and construction management courses.He hold a Professional Engineer License from California and he is highly involved in professional societies like American Society of Civil Engineering and Construction Management As- sociation of America. Aside from teaching, he has 10 years of experience in the field of construction engineering.he was highly involved in Civil/Construction Management projects, where I performed de- sign, estimate, and schedule for various projects. Also, he assisted in the development of project proposals by securing project specifications from clients and communicating the same to design teams. c American
regards to the Tampa Bay Interstate Express project andelements of equitable transportation. Her narrative provided concrete examples of elements fromthe ASCE Code of Ethics Canon 1 and Canon 8. Students’ written comments provided evidenceof effectiveness and impact. In a senior professional issues course, shorter clips from multiplemembers of the ASEE community panel were shown during class as part of both the ethicsmodule and sustainability module. However, it was unclear that the seniors gained any insightsor abilities from these activities. In an elective/graduate level course focused on site remediation,clips from Sydney Brown discussing Tonawanda Coke and from a community meetingdiscussing a proposed remedy at a Superfund site were
(PEHE), and the Legislative and Government Affairs Committee in spring 2012; and Confirm the value of preparing an EBOK and schedule its preparation for, at minimum, a two-year 2012-2013 process.As indicated by the previously discussed reasons to develop the EBOK, and by thespecific charge, the EBOK project was, from the outset, to be about the future, not thepresent. This aspirational initiative is about tomorrow’s engineering practitioners, notnecessarily about today’s. The EBOK is future-oriented in that, while current engineeringpractice may require many of the EBOK capabilities and some engineers exhibit thosecapabilities, many more engineers will need to acquire more capabilities or be more adeptat those they already
impacts (selected from among 18 potentialtopics listed on the survey): professional practice issues, ethical failures, engineering code ofethics, societal impacts of engineering and technology, ethics in design projects, ethical theories,risk and liability, sustainability, safety, and engineering decisions in the face of uncertainty.Among the professional issues courses described on the survey, 23 were undergraduate coursesrequired within civil engineering (and 8 also in environmental engineering). Four were coursesalready identified at institutions that graduate the largest number of civil engineeringundergraduate students (described previously). Online information that was found on theadditional professional issues courses was added to Table 2A
Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA), West Point for 7.5 years, teaching courses in engineering mechanics, structural analysis and Home Brewing.Farid Momand, Kabul University Farid Ahmad Momand holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Kabul University in Kabul, Afghanistan. He has served as an Assistant Professor (Pohialay) at Kabul University for two years, an adjunct instructor at the National Military Academy of Afghanistan for one semester, and a practicing structural engineer for 14 months at United Infrastructure Projects, a private company. He is currently enrolled in the master’s degree program in civil
be made more truthful and productive. He is the leader of the NSF funded project KredibleNet, whose goal is to set the agenda for computational social science analysis of authorship, leadership, trust and credibility in knowledge markets. He has published papers and developed software that aim to make this into a reality. Among the tools he has created are: KredibleNet: kredible.net Visible Effort: veffort.us Alterpode: alterpode.net Visible Past: visiblepast.net Ubimark: ubimark.com/inDr. Esteban Garcia Page 26.127.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
Responding Knowledge Receiving Independent Study Guest Speakers Enrichment ASCE Student Projects Summer Chapter Relevant Faculty Field Trips Experience
(PEO) “Graduates” are defined as civil engineering alumni within 3-5 years of graduation Objective 1: Graduates will be actively engaged in a professional career as a civil engineer or pursuing advanced study. Objective 2: Graduates will understand professional practice issues and demonstrate a commitment to professional licensure and continuing education. Objective 3: Graduates, guided by the principles of sustainable development and global interconnectedness, will understand how civil engineering projects affect society and the environment.Web-based Alumni SurveysPaper-based alumni
(L3) 6. Risk and Uncertainty (L3) 7. Project Management (L3) 8. Communication (L4) 9. Leadership (L3) 10. Teamwork (L3) 11. Attitudes (L2) 12. Professional & Ethical Responsibility (L2)This structure utilizes the cognitive domain of Bloom’s Taxonomy to enable students whocomprehend the fundamental concepts of soil mechanics. Each laboratory workshop will guidestudents through the cycle of learning by starting at stage 1, knowledge, where students begin toexplore the concepts of the topic and building up to stage 6, evaluation, where students are ableto grasp the larger picture by being able to communicate what
2006-792: SATISFYING FUTURE BODY OF KNOWLEDGE OUTCOMESEnno Koehn, Lamar University Enno "Ed" Koehn is Professor of Civil Engineering at Lamar University. Professor Koehn has served as the principal investigator for several research and development projects dealing with various aspects of construction and has experience in the design, scheduling and estimating of facilities. In addition, he has authored/co-authored over 200 papers in engineering education and the general areas of civil and construction engineering. Dr. Koehn is a member of ASEE, AACE International, ASCE, NSPE, Chi Epsilon, Tau Beta Pi, and Sigma Xi and is a registered Professional Engineer and surveyor.James Koehn, Chadron
existing engineering programs, we identified five key points ofdistinction for the program:Entrepreneurial Graduates. Despite consistent demand from industry for graduates withbetter business skills, there is no Australian Engineering School that makes this their key focus.CSU Engineering is housed within the Faculty of Business, and one of the research strengthsof the Faculty is entrepreneurship. This allows these skills to be made part of the core businessof the degree, rather than an add-on elective, or projects serviced by a central university unit.4 x 1 year work placements. A key driver of our program was to help solve a workforce needin regional Australia. Many engineering organisations are already employing cadet engineerson an ad hoc
less aware of the personal and societalvalue of their engineering activities. Simply requiring one or two courses on sustainability ormodules within courses may not change student perception of sustainability. However, problemoriented and project-based engineering coursework applied horizontally throughout thecurriculum is an approach that can facilitate deeper understanding of sustainable developmentand design concepts.16- 19 A national level review of the sixty ABET accredited environmental engineeringprograms showed that few programs exhibit significant curriculum transformation or redesignassociated with sustainability concepts.20 A significant number of programs either do not includeany sustainability methodology in their programs