asked tocontribute to the presentation of material through briefing of course readings via lottery andthrough scheduled Two Minute Follies, described later. Student accomplishment is evaluatedthrough the course project or portfolio, their in-class presentations, five homework sets and threeexaminations. This is described in more detail later under “Assessment”.INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING COURSE SUMMARY In our curriculum, Infrastructure Engineering is numbered CE350 and is generally taken Page 22.188.4during the first semester of the junior year. For our CE majors, it follows, but is not dependenton, MC300 Fundamentals of Engineering
Page 15.547.2determine the level of interest for an ExCEEd II workshop. Motivated by the overall positiveresults, the CFD began its planning of ExCEEd II in the fall of 2008 for a pilot delivery in thesummer of 2009 at Northern Arizona University. Never before has a second, more advancedworkshop in teaching and learning been offered that is built upon the principles and skillsdeveloped in the earlier workshop. This paper describes this novel project - the day and a halfExCEEd II workshop - and gives insights into the interests and reasons that would motivatefaculty to attend additional training on teaching and learning. This paper also includes a briefdescription of the originating ETW, relates results from the longitudinal survey of
1995. His research interests are in the areas of knowledge modeling, water and energy sustainability, engineering learning modules for freshmen, and international collaboration. He leads a major curriculum reform project (2004-09), funded under the department-level reform program of the NSF, at Virginia Tech. A spiral curriculum approach is adopted to reformulate engineering curriculum in bioprocess engineering in this project. He co-authored an award winning paper with his PhD student at the 2007 annual conference of ASEE. He received the College of Engineering Faculty Fellow award in 2008.Chelsea Green, Virginia Tech Chelsea Green is a graduate student in the Department of Civil and
civil engineering.2. Innovative in the integrated design of civil engineering projects.3. Adept at using modern engineering tools and software to support engineering design.Similar to the University of Louisville program, the ABET accredited Master of ArchitecturalEngineering (MAE) degree at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln is a one-year addition to theaccredited BS architectural engineering degree where students specialize in one of three optionareas (building structural systems, building mechanical systems and acoustics, or buildinglighting and electrical systems) and learn “professional practice topics that architecturalengineers need later in their careers” [35]. The MAE program did not specify additional learningoutcomes beyond the
Assessing Competencies in an Undergraduate Reinforced Concrete Design CourseAbstract:Traditional grading can be a common source of frustration for engineering faculty. Allocatingpoints consistently for partially correct work is a constant struggle and leaves something to bedesired. The lines between different grades certainly become grayed, and it seems possible that astudent can receive a passing grade in a course without ever answering a single problemcorrectly. Specification grading is a novel approach to grading that provides solutions to some ofthe common frustrations with traditional grading. Specification grading requires instructors todefine assignment, project, test, or even course level specifications. These
mightvolunteer as a judge for a local science fair competition, serve as a mentor for a communityimprovement project, and maintain the more traditional activities of teaching and research inengineering classroom, yet participate in each activity as a separate event instead ofincorporating these programs and activities to other areas of application. Our paper examines theopportunities to forge connections between college outreach programs and the processes of“continuous improvement” as professional engineering educators through the example of onesuch program in our own institution.Our experiences with the 2007 Canstruction® competition are included as a model applicable tomultiple concepts of civil engineering courses. We begin by discussing the “live
editing books including “MicroStation for AutoCAD Users”, “Managing and Networking MicroStation” among several others. In 1995, Frank was hired by Bentley Systems to spearhead the development of Bentley’s own commercial training operation (MicroStation Institute now known as the Bentley Institute). Recently, Frank was senior project manager for the development and deployment of the Bentley LEARN Server, a robust learning management system designed for use by all of Bentley’s commercial and academic users. Frank is currently the Learning Technologies Manager for the Be Careers Network, the organization within Bentley that works with academic institutions to educate faculty and students alike
from the cycle one surveys. Table I. Cycle One Student Confidence Questions from the Senior Professions Course Pre- Post- Statement Survey Survey As a civil engineer, I can describe how my work contributes 4.6 4.5 to society. I can explain how my senior design project impacts the 4.4 4.3 society in which I live. I have taken other classes that require me to consider how
professional development throughout their careers, and shall provide opportunities for the professional development of those engineers under their supervision.”Engineers shall uphold and advance the integrity, honor, and dignity of the engineeringprofession and shall promote the most effective use of financial resources through honest andimpartial service and fidelity to the public, employers, associates, and clients. 1. Engineers shall be scrupulously honest in their control and spending of monies intended for the projects on which they work. 2. Engineers shall adopt a zero-tolerance approach to bribery, fraud, deception, and corruption in any design or construction work in which they are engaged. 3. Engineers
works… for sustainable[3] Design a system… to meet desired needs within such performance realistic constraints as… sustainability.EnvE BOK Explain the need for and ethics of integrating sustainability Design a complex system, process,AAEE 2009 throughout all engineering disciplines and the role [of] or project to perform sustainably[5] environmental engineers…. Evaluate the sustainability of Quantify environmental releases or resources consumed complex systems…. for a given engineered processABET Criterion 3, c: design a system… within realistic2015 constraints such as … sustainability.[4] CE: Include principles
Assistants (UTAs). In order tostrengthen retention of STEM majors, the mutually reinforcing benefits of focusing on thesethree groups simultaneously guide this project. The UTAs are a primary focus of this project’swork.Substantial numbers of STEM-intending students choose to leave STEM degree programs1 aftercompleting only the introductory coursework. The effective implementation of peer learning andother tutorials within the introductory coursework can play a significant role in preventing earlydepartures from STEM programs2,3. To enhance retention of STEM-intending students at theUniversity of Louisville, PRIMES’ focus is centered on select introductory courses for STEMmajors in order to help retain students in the programs.The Colorado Learning
Paper ID #23798Understanding the Expectations of Writing Skills in Engineering Design Coursesand Professional PracticeDr. Veera Gnaneswar Gude P.E., Mississippi State University Veera Gnaneswar Gude is a faculty member of civil and environmental engineering department at Mis- sissippi State University. He has degrees in chemical (B.S.) and environmental engineering (M.S., Ph.D.) disciplines with over 15 years of academic, industrial, and research experiences on various chemical and environmental engineering projects. He is a licensed professional engineer and a board certified environ- mental engineer. His passion for
paper come from theauthors’ experiences associated with developing and teaching a design-based hydraulicstructures course over the last six years at Utah State University.Engineering design projects, in practice, can include a large variety of activities. Tullis1identifies key aspects of project feasibility studies, which include: a preliminary design,legal aspects, social aspects, and environmental concerns. The skill set required forengineers to master all of these areas cannot be acquired in a single engineering designcourse. In addition to academic experience, real-world, professional engineeringexperience is also required. As such, most hydraulic structure design courses focus onthe system design itself through the use of example problems
structures, computational geo-mechanics, con- stitutive modeling, pavement design, characterization and prediction of behavior of pavement materials, linear and non-linear finite element applications in geotechnical engineering, geo-structural systems anal- ysis, structural mechanics, sustainable infrastructure development, and material model development. He had been actively involved in planning, designing, supervising, and constructing many civil engineering projects, such as roads, storm drain systems, a $70 million water supply scheme which is comprised of treatment works, hydraulic mains, access roads, and auxiliary civil works. He had developed and opti- mized many highway design schemes and models. For example, his
students that enrolled in both requiredcourses and 12 students that enrolled in the elective construction management course and therequired engineering economics course. The required construction management course examinedstudent performance in engineering economics through a quiz, an assignment and midtermexamination. The quiz covered cash flow diagrams, determination of present worth, andassessing the feasibility of two projects using net present values and benefit-cost ratios. Theassignment covered the comparison of two projects using net present values and benefit-costratios as well as the determination of present, future and annual worth. The engineeringeconomics portion of the midterm exam covered the topics of the time value of money
betweeninformation about our programs, the profession, members of the profession and students bycreating a significant presence for the department on a popular social networking site. Thispaper presents the outreach goals of the initiative, the nuts-and-bolts of how it was executed, theeffect on recruiting and student excitement and, lastly, the author’s observations andrecommendations for similar efforts.IntroductionIn the summer and early fall of 2009, recognizing the growth of social networking within thedaily lives of our students, we initiated a project to improve the visibility and profile of the WestPoint civil and mechanical engineering programs through the use of a Facebook fan site. Thisproject aligns with earlier efforts by the authors to reach
☐Yes ☐Yes ☐Yes ☐presentation mechanicsPlease note possible data collection items (i.e. lectures, assignments, projects, test questions)that may be used by the department in the annual assessment: Figure 1- SO Map for ABET SO 3Simplified Definitions for Levels of Coverage • Indicator Explicit (IE) o This specific KPI is very important for student success in the course and is emphasized by the instructor; multiple assessments are conducted in the course to support that specific KPI; frequent feedback on assessments is provided so students have the opportunity to improve; many of the course-level outcomes support this
clear in The Engineer of 2020 and it is also a central part ofthe Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge, 3rd Edition. Many programs provide an opportunityfor students to demonstrate creativity and innovation in their capstone projects but few providefoundational instruction or opportunities to hone creativity skills throughout the curriculum.Inspired by the need to develop creative and innovative engineers and encouraged by theliterature about how the necessary skills and attitudes can be developed through education, thispaper describes how creativity has been deliberately and explicitly integrated in a requiredsenior-level civil engineering course. Although early in implementation and assessment, the datasuggests that integrating creativity into
control, decision analysis, and optimization. • T4 (Level 3): Explain the impact of historical and contemporary issues on civil or construction engineering. • T5 (Level 3): Develop solutions to well-defined project management problems within civil or construction engineering. • T6 (Level 5): Develop a system or process in more than one program-relevant civil or construction engineering specialty field to meet desired needs, including sustainability and within other realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, and constructability. • T7 (Level 2
curriculum and holds HU core designation. The importance of the humanities to the practice of civil engineering is discussed in several courses, including the concept of form and function – that is consideration of civil works as both art and engineering – within the context of design. The program outcome, however, requires students to “explain” versus “demonstrate.” How one “demonstrates the importance” was a concern of the faculty, but “explaining the importance” seemed more assessable. While many students may be able to “demonstrate” the importance through, for example, integration with certain design projects, most may not be exposed to such a broad experience
positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox also spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Soci- ety of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President, Dr. Lenox led several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engineering profession – with the overall
on conservation of energy, momentum, and manyother relevant concepts. This course transformation focused on engaging students both inside andoutside of the classroom by incorporating elements of a flipped class and allotting dedicated in-class time for daily group activities. Additionally, a hands-on group project in which studentsdesigned, built, and tested a popsicle stick bridge was implemented in this course offering. Thecourse transformation also included implementation and analysis of exam wrappers. PDTF B collaborated with instructors on ME 320, a junior-level Dynamics course andEECS 140, a freshman-level Digital Logic Design course. For the Dynamics course, the PDTFworked with an experienced professor who had been
Paper ID #9270Visions of the Future of Engineering Education: Sharpening the FocusMr. Mark William Killgore PE, F.ASCE, D.WRE, American Society of Civil Engineers Mark Killgore, P.E. , D.WRE, F.ASCE serves as the ASCE Director responsible for the Society’s Raise the Bar initiative. He is also a Research Fellow specializing in transboundary water and energy issues at the University of Texas at Austin. Prior to joining ASCE staff in late 2011, Killgore spent three years at Puget Sound Energy as a hydro manager, where he oversaw such functions as major capital project development related to dam safety, water management
of the groups, the differencein perceived effort was smaller, but consistently the engineers felt that the non-engineers did lesswork on the project. Non-engineers' performance as assessed by engineering students Engineers' performance as assessed by themselves 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 CATME s core 1.5 1 0.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Group NumberFigure 2 - CATME survey results for
students learn best anything that they experiencethemselves as well as normally do repetitively. Many engineering educators havehomework, design projects, and mid-term exams, and many times topics are tested againon a final exam. This process allows the student to first wrestle with the concept at theirown pace in a homework assignment where they can collaborate with others before beingasked to test their skills within a timed event such as an exam. Learning by doing is theprimary basis behind the growth of project-based learning (PBL) opportunities.4 Someprograms have been completely sold on the concept to the point of desiring PBL for alllearning activities within the program.5,6 These collaborative, team design experiencesallow even deeper
Paper ID #9178Experiences in Implementing an NSF/REU Site on Interdisciplinary WaterSciences and Engineering during 2007-13Dr. Vinod K Lohani, Virginia Tech Dr. Vinod K Lohani is a professor in the Engineering Education Department and an adjunct faculty in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research interests are in the areas of sustainability, computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, and water resources. In a major ($1M+, NSF) curriculum reform and engineering education research project from 2004 to 2009, he led a team of engineering and education faculty to reform engineering
engineering education.Abel A. Fernandez, University of the Pacific Abel Fernandez is Professor and Director of the Engineering Management Program at the University of the Pacific, Stockton, California. He holds the Ph.D. degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Central Florida, M.E. and B.S. degrees in Electric Power Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) and an M.B.A. also from RPI. Dr. Fernandez has over 13 years of system engineering and project management experience with TRW, Inc. and the Harris Corporation. His final position at Harris was Director of Product Marketing, a ex- ecutive level position in which he was responsible for all applications engineering and strategic planning
members having extensive professional practice experience can broaden theknowledge base of the entire faculty for the better advancement of the above goals in a numberof ways, including:1. Stimulating students by increasing identification with and relevance to professional practice in learning areas.2. Help students learn how to identify and understand challenges and how to conceive, evaluate and design appropriate engineering solution.3. Help students learn how to prepare effective plans, specifications and construction contract documents for design projects.4. Contributing to research by increasing the understanding of future societal challenges and implementation factors for potential solutions.5. Contributing to curricula and course
.” These terms describe the relative degree to which a given course contributes to an outcome based upon the breadth and depth of relevant subjects covered in the course. The following guidelines are used in determining the ratings.∀ ≠ minor: The topic is introduced in course lectures, laboratories, homework assignments, Page 15.653.4 projects, etc. Lecture time devoted to the topic is on the order of one week during the 3 semester. The topic is covered on tests and exams, but
. The underlying theories are then taught after thestudent has established a need for the subsequent theory.13 Use of an inductive approach mayprovide opportunities to introduce more creative thinking into engineering courses. Examples ofinductive teaching methods with growing popularity include: inquiry learning, problem basedlearning, project based learning, and discovery learning. 13 One of the most common inductivetechniques employed by engineering instructors is project based learning.Project based learning is an inductive technique that is widely used in engineering courses withprojects such as lab experiments. There are three types of projects based on the degree ofautonomy which as student is allowed: Task Project, in which the scope