Krathwohl, D. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York, NY. 13. ASCE. 2011. Program Criteria for Civil and Similarly Named Engineering Programs. (https://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Education_and_Careers/University_Curriculum_Development/Conte nt_Pieces/criteria-for-accrediting-civil-engineering-programs.pdf). 14. Estes, A.C. and Lenox, T.A. 2014. “New Civil Engineering Program Criteria: How the Sausage is Being Made.” Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN. 15. Ressler, S. J. 2008. “Influence of the New Civil Engineering Body
. American Society for Engineering Education.3. Jecker, J., N. Maccoby, and H. Breitrose, Improving accuracy in interpreting non verbal cues of comprehension. Psychology in the Schools, 1965. 2(3): p. 239-244.4. Neill, S., Classroom Nonverbal Communication. 1991, London: Routledge. 191.5. Gregersen, T.S., Nonverbal cues: Clues to the detection of foreign language anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 2005. 38(3): p. 388-400.6. Hartley, G. and M. Karinch, I can read you like a book: how to spot the messages and emotions people are really sending with their body language. 2007: Career Press.7. Fisher, D. and N. Frey, Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. 2007: ASCD.8
Page 26.1599.13licensing board Supplementary Experience Record form typically used for PE applications, (2) asurvey for students to provide likert-style evaluation of progress in achieving the BOK2 programoutcomes, and (3) a reflective writing document focusing on the student’s choice of outcomes tohave students consider what she/he learned in the experience, the importance of this learning,and how this learning is important for the future.Cooperation Outside the DepartmentMany of the BOK2’s foundational outcomes are necessarily met through university corecurriculum classes (a.k.a., “general education requirements” at other institutions). Texas statelaw and Texas A&M policies combined lead to a curriculum where 50 out of 128 credit
). How big can a community of practice become? Retrieved fromhttp://wenger-trayner.com/resources/size/[6] Roberts, M. & Haden, C. (2014). Assessment of systems learning in an undergraduate civil engineering courseusing concept maps, Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June.[7] Penn, M. & Parker, P. (2011). Introduction to infrastructure: An introduction to civil and environmentalengineering. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.[8] Parker, P., Penn, M., Roberts, M., Hart, S., Haden, C. & Thompson, K. (2016). Crowdsourcing an outline for amodel introductory infrastructure course using a modified Delphi process. Proceeding of the 2016 ASEE AnnualConference, New Orleans, LA, June (Submitted
iscontacted to determine if they want to work with more than one team. If not, the teams presenttheir ideas and why they are the best qualified team for the project to the faculty advisor and theoriginator who then select the team. The other team(s) must then apply to work on other projects.In the case of larger development project, the faculty generate partners with municipalities anddesign engineers to provide relevant site specific data to include survey data, utility locations,and wetland delineations to list some examples. Students are broken into multiple teams.Industry partners (i.e. state and municipal engineers, state and federal regulators, andmultidisciplinary consulting engineers) provide input and feedback to the student groups to
Learning in a STEM Classroom Author ( s ): Andrew C . Butler , Elizabeth J . Marsh , J . P . Slavinsky and Richard G . Baraniuk Source : Educational Psychology Review , Vol . 26 , No . 2 , Special Issu. 2018;26(2):331-340.16. Wambeke B, Barry BE, Bruhl JC. Teaching Model as a Living Document. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Columbus, OH: American Society for Engineering Education; 2017. https://peer.asee.org/28924.17. McGuire SY. Teach Students How to Learn: Strategies You Can Incorporate Into Any Course to Improve Student Metacognition, Study Skills, and Motivation. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing; 2015.
students’ attainment Page 12.1335.2of the outcome. If it is possible to pass a course while not accomplishing the associatedoutcome(s), then the course grade cannot possibly be a valid measure of outcome achievement.Furthermore, if your professors grade on a curve, then the course grades have no absolutemeaning and cannot be used as the basis for measuring performance against a standard.Program: Okay, then I will administer surveys to my students with questions as to how wellthey feel they can meet specific outcomes.Expert: Student self-assessment surveys are indirect measures of performance. They tell ushow well students think they are learning
, June 18-21, 2006, Chicago, IL.4. Rooney, D. and Puerzer, R., (2002) “The Smaller Engineering School and its Industrial Advisory Board: An Effective Partnership.” 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 6-9, 2002, Boston, MA.5. Genheimer, S. and Shahab, R. (2007) “The Effective Industry Advisory Board in Engineering Education - A Model and Case Study.” 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 10 – 13, 2007, Milwaukee, WI.6. ABET (2007), Engineering Accreditation Commission, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.7. Sanoff, A. (2001) “Under the magnifying glass”, ASEE Prism, 11:2.8. Kramer, K. (2004), “Achieving EC2000 Outcomes in the Capstone Design Via Structured Industry
Engineering Current Status: Needs Design Comparison of Desired End State: Analysi s Alternatives What is? What should be? Value System Decision Design Implementation
to develop the site plans (contours and cross sections), drainagepipes and inlets, roadway plans for all components of the circulation system (plan/profiles,typical sections, intersection geometry and traffic design, and detail elevations for paving),utilities plan (sewer main, water lines, underground electrical, telephone, data, and gas), andright of way and set-back requirements for facilities. Each plan shall also include the significantstructural design of a design element, such as a retaining wall, parking deck, small building ormajor component(s) of larger structures, etc. The plan must also include a cost-effectivedrainage system to accommodate the ultimate development of the site. “Green Facility”concepts should be considered in the
Page 23.142.9Introduction20. Ample motivation for the experiment stated 20A. Yours 20B. Whirlwind's21. Sufficient information to orient reader to the substance of experiment22. Sufficient information to excite reader23. Sections to follow mentionedGeneral Lab Observations and Results guidelines (specifics follow)Equations: 24. Equations are numbered 25. Punctuation with equations (: with follow/s/ing only) 26. Equations have spaceFigures/Tables: 27. Figure/Table labels correct. (Figure 1. Title) 28. Figures oriented correctly, clearly labeled and referencedLab ObservationsAnalysis29. Mathematical model used to predict system behavior presented with ample explanation and lead in.Experimental
” teams met by telephone to review the ratingprocess, the assigned student outcome, and the rating rubric to be used. The teams thenproceeded with rating student work, meeting by phone and email regularly to address inter-raterreliability conflicts and to complete the rating by preparing guidance for the department and thefaculty member(s) associated with the work submitted. Rating sessions generally proceeded overseveral weeks, with both raters choosing to work on their assigned rating when convenient totheir schedules.The overall distance assessment effort, including rater training, was facilitated by departmentadministration and the staff of the RHIT’s institutional research and program assessment office.FindingsProgram educational objectives
it looked the way it did. This study set out to not only educate people about thestructure, but to see if that education would influence their impressions. The results of thissurvey suggest that knowing more about the structure did in fact make it more appealing in anumber of ways.In the future, the researchers are interested in using various aspects of the sculpture in a numberof different courses to determine if the sculpture, as a learning tool, can not only improve thedegree to which people think about technical, social, and environmental issues, but the degree towhich they can actually learn more about these issues. References1. Chou, K. & Moaveni, S. (2008). “Enhancing Global
?”Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 20-23 Page 22.1294.12June, 2010.22 Meyer, K., Bert, S., 2007, “A Technique for Program-Wide Direct Assessment of Student Performance,”Proceedings of ASEE Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.23 Marin, J.A., Armstrong, J.E. Jr., Kays, J.L., “Elements of an Optimal Capstone Design Experience,”Journal of Engineering Education, January 1999, pp.19-22.24 Welch, R.W., “Addressing Professional Practice Issues within the Curriculum,” Proceedings of theAmerican Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 26-29 June, 2011.25 http
for the Controls Division of the Harris Corporation, a Division with over U$S 60 million (then dollars) in annual sales. He joined the University of the Pacific in 2000 and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas. His present research interests are principally in multidisciplinary engineering education and enginering economic analysis.Elizabeth A. Basha, University of the Pacific Elizabeth A. Basha is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of the Pacific. She received a S.M. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as well as a B.S. degree in Computer Engineering from the University of the
Achievement Subcommittee of CAP^3. 2005. Levels of Achievement Applicable to the Body of Knowledge Required for Entry Into the Practice of Civil Engineering at the Professional Level, Reston, VA, September. (http://www.asce.org/raisethebar)4. Bloom. B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst. E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York, NY.5. Fridley, K.J., et al., 2009. “Educating the Future Civil Engineering for the New Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge,” Proceeding of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, June 2009, Austin, TX
commensurate with those specific tasks. A person working as a CE Technician works under the direct control and personal supervision of a CE Professional or direction of a CE Technologist. A person initially obtains status as a CE Technician through the completion of requisite formal education, technical experiences, examination(s), and/or other requirements as specified by an appropriate credentialing body. A person working as a CE Technician is expected to comprehend and apply knowledge of engineering principles toward the solution of well-defined problems. Civil Engineering Intern (EI) – An individual who has met the “Civil Engineering Intern” or “Engineer-in-Training” requirements of a State
engineer, and (5) potential to assume managerial responsibilities.Based on the results of the survey data, informed observations are made concerning the readinessof one group of civil engineering technology graduates to pursue careers in civil designcompared to their engineering counterparts. These observations may, in turn, shed some light onwhether there can be parallel pathways for becoming a civil engineering designer and a licensedprofessional engineer.BackgroundEver since the split of the “engineering” discipline in the mid-1950’s into engineeringtechnology and engineering, there has been debate concerning the place and purpose to be filledwithin the engineering profession by graduates of Bachelor of Science (B.S.) engineeringtechnology
planning.” “I want to learn about current sustainable transportation systems, and what is being done in transportation that will help or is hurting our environment.” “[I want to learn about s]ustainable transportation and highway transportation.” “I want to learn about challenges in sustainable transportation projects.” “[I want to learn more about t]he current technologies and methods used to best deal with [t]he population and transportation needs of our society.”In the initial class meeting session, all group members appeared to have had a thoroughdiscussion of their interests, as is evident from the very detailed list of potential topics that theyhanded in to the instructor (as part of the GIA). They mentioned
, Mechanical Properties of Materials Mechanical Properties of Materials/ Stress4 MM-4 26-Jan Transformation 27-Jan Audit or Pass/Fail5 MM-5 28-Jan Stress Transformation (Mohr ‘s Circle)6 MM-6 2-Feb Strain Transformation7 MM-7 4-Feb Strain Trans/ Thin Walled Pressure Vessels8 MM-8 9-Feb Working Session9 MM-9 11-Feb Exam 1, Fatigue10 MM-10 16-Feb Axial Deformation11 MM-11 18-Feb Axial Deformation/ Stress Concentrations12 MM-12 23-Feb Elastic Torsion13 MM-13 25-Feb Elastic/Inelastic Torsion14 MM-14 1-Mar
most classes and made the course exceptional. Getting to road trip up Hwy 101 with classmates and knowledgeable professors during beautiful weather was an experience I will not forget. I have a much greater appreciation for the history of Oregon bridges that really can't be conveyed in a typical classroom setting. In that sense, the idea of the class REALLY works.Table 2. Student responses regarding areas for improvement. Please identify area(s) where you think the course could be improved. I think the class could improve with more technical learning in the field. Dr. Riley used a model of an arch in the classroom portion to demonstrate the concept of horizontal thrust, and I think this type of demonstration in the field would help students
. Shrinking undergraduate credit hours in engineering programs at most public institutions that simply cannot teach this ever-expanding body of knowledge in a four-year degree program. Commoditization of the engineering profession – the buying and selling of engineering services based on price, not qualifications, along with outsourcing of engineering tasks to project team members from disparate regions with no “local knowledge” of the problem(s) they are working to address. Advances in software and modeling that seemingly apply engineering standards and codes to derive solutions that sidestep engineering judgement and infer to some the PE is obsolete or unnecessary. State