population of college-level instructors have been identified.An Introduction to Nonverbal CommunicationThis paper focuses on the nonverbal communication occurring within a classroom, specificallythe nonverbal messages sent by students and received by the teacher. When student verbalfeedback during a lesson is minimal, due to either lesson presentation method or student personalcommunication preference, the teacher must rely on nonverbal cues to determine the effect of Page 26.76.2their communication[1]. From Barry et al.[2], nonverbal communication generally falls within oneof ten categories:1. Chronemics – The timing of verbalizations and
additional project features to the site to meetthe students’ learning objectives. The site, building, and some of the student learning objectivesmay vary each time the course is taught. Figure 1 below shows a plan of the building’s roof usedin the development of modules for the structural portion of the DSL course.The desired student goals for this course are: (1) gaining additional knowledge in a specific CivilEngineering sub-discipline, (2) performing experiments and exercises in a sequence thatillustrate the multi sub-disciplinary interaction that typically occurs on Civil Engineeringprojects, (3) developing a better understanding of the role of each Civil Engineering sub-discipline in the practice of Civil Engineering and (4) emphasizing the
Paper ID #11920STEM Collaboration Assessment Leading to Curriculum Changes and GreaterLong-Term STEM EngagementDr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He became the Dean of Engineering at The Citadel on 1 July 2011. Prior to his current position, he was the Department Head of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler from Jan 2007 to June 2011 as well as served in
in terms of mandatedmaximum units in an undergraduate program and additional requirements imposed by a stategovernment or a university. Conversely, the ABET accreditation criteria (general plus program)define the minimum requirements for a program to receive accreditation. There will naturally bea gap between those two standards.For the cycle of change to be successful, the insights and lessons learned from the developmentof the CEPC should be communicated with the BOKTC and vice versa. This paper attempts todo that. The paper will define the gap between (1) the BOK2 and (2) EAC/ABET accreditationcriteria (General Criteria plus proposed CEPC as well as newly revised General Criteria plusproposed CEPC) and make recommendations for closing the
to fulfill the BOK is to achieve the outcomesrelated to the baccalaureate level of formal education. However, civil engineering programs areaccredited based on criteria defined by ABET2. These criteria are influenced, but not defined, bythe BOK. Finally, in addition to earning an ABET-accredited engineering degree, the first steptowards professional licensure is to pass the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam3, which isadministered by the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES).The relationships between the BOK, ABET accreditation and the FE lead to several questions:(1) Does the BOK adequately emphasize the knowledge, skills and attitudes required for successful preparation for the FE exam?(2) Similarly
,and to promote knowledge synthesis in students (1). The University of Waterloo’s Centre forTeaching Excellence and the Engineering Ideas Clinic advocate the “intentional and reflectivelearning from experience” by students in lectures. This is commonly known as experientiallearning (2; 3; 4).This paper presents the findings of a pilot study into the use of bending beam models in a second-year engineering course. The activity was conceived with the intention of improving theunderstanding of the second-year engineering students in the area of beam bending. This includeddrawing connections between physical deflections and their corresponding internal bendingmoments and shear forces. The study used the models as a means to incorporate inductive
least 42”, the wall which would serve as both temporary and permanent fallprotection, thereby reducing the fall from height hazard for workers installing the finish roofingsystem and rooftop HVAC equipment, as well for workers performing roofing and HVACequipment maintenance over the lifetime of the building.The empirical data that ties design with construction worker safety supports the Hierarchy ofControl model, which is one of the theoretical frameworks of occupational safety. As depictedin Figure 1, the Hierarchy of Control suggests that safety management techniques that are higheron the hierarchy are inherently more effective.20 36 When envisioning construction safetyequipment, some civil engineering faculty think of hard hats, safety
andfeedback in the adoption and refinement of these teaching methods and materials18.Motivated by these findings, a group of faculty at Princeton University, University ofMassachusetts Amherst, and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University were awarded anNSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education Award to advance the dissemination of theCreative Art of Structural/Civil Engineering. The aim of the proposal is to transform anintroductory course on civil engineering with research-based pedagogical techniques, and tosupport the dissemination of this course for STEM and non-STEM students at other colleges anduniversities.Our main goals are to 1. Transform an introductory engineering course with dramatically improved interactivity and
civil engineering and writing studies faculty. The final sectionpresents assessment data from courses before the writing guide’s implementation. Once thewriting guide is implemented across the civil engineering department’s courses, this data will becompared to writing assessments from the same classes to quantify the impact of the writingguide, if any, on student performance. Page 26.658.2BackgroundStrong communication skills, both written and verbal, are critical for newly graduated engineers,especially those seeking jobs in firms where interdisciplinary teamwork is the norm.1, 2 TheAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) document titled
the engineering curriculum. After over 100 years of debate and experimentation,however, we are faced with the paradox we confronted at the outset: broad agreement about theimportance of communication in engineering and a lack of consensus about how communicationcompetency should be developed in the curriculum.To be sure, technical writing instruction continues to be, as Robert J. Connors described it in his1982 landmark essay, “The Rise of Technical Writing Instruction in America,”1 “a center of vitalscholarly and pedagogic activity” (p. 173). We have not seen, however, the fruition of theprogress narrative he uses to frame his essay, a narrative that begins “in a few schools ofengineering [goes] through its lean times, when it was a poor
case studies to give the technical content appropriate context.This paper is intended to stimulate discussion in an innovative approach to the development ofskeleton notes that incorporate the following key characteristics: 1. The handouts consolidate the technical material into a single unified and concise message. Multiple streams of information (lecture, supplementary handouts, slides, reading assignments) are avoided; the handouts are complementary with and integrated into the oral lecture. Discussion of the underlying concepts accompanies the detailed technical content. 2. The handouts are hand-written (on a tablet computer), highly graphic, colorful, and even “cartoonish” in
,tacticsIntroductionThe Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBOK) is defined 1 as "the necessary depthand breadth of knowledge, skills, and attitudes required of an individual entering thepractice of civil engineering at the professional level in the 21st century." The premise ofthis paper is that, going forward, the CEBOK should include creativity/innovation Page 26.421.2knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs).The reasons for this premise are presented elsewhere2,3,4 and summarized here. Verybriefly, creativity/innovation will be increasingly important for U.S. engineers because offorces such as the Grand Challenges for Engineering; the coming of the Conceptual Age
development, as shown in Table 1. Whereas ABET does not provide anyadditional explanation on the Criterion 3 a – k student outcomes, the ASCE 2nd Edition BOKprovides considerable detail. IPENZ provides additional detail as well, with a number ofexplanatory bullet points under each of the 12 competency profiles.Table 1: Comparison of ABET Student Outcomes, ASCE BOK2 Outcomes, and IPENZCompetency Profiles ABET Student Outcome3 ASCE BOK2 Outcome5 IPENZ Competency Profile12 (f) an understanding of Professional and ethical Conduct engineering professional and ethical responsibility activities to an ethical responsibility standard at least
-professional setting can also improvecommunication and help students connect key concepts of their principled knowledge. Thus,many engineering senior design courses have investigated collaboration with local industry tosponsor team- and problem-based student design projects.Lessons from capstone industry projectsThere is a wealth of knowledge about challenges and best practices for industry-sponsoredcapstone design courses. These studies evaluate courses that include industry-supervised work,international projects, and multidisciplinary projects. Table 1 shows a compilation of industry-sponsored capstone design courses that include Civil Engineering students, either separately or ina multidisciplinary project. The authors note that this compilation is
pre-labeled binders forportfolio building.Evolving the Graduation PortfolioIn order to understand choices that were made in the evolution of the use of the portfolios withinthis department, it is very important to place them within the overall context of the department’shistory and growth. In 2005, a ten year period of rapid growth started in the department’sstudent population. The department doubled in number of undergraduate students in five yearsand increased another 30% from 2010-2015, as shown in Figure 1. Additionally, a new degreeprogram was added in 2007. However, the second degree plan was constructed with the sameProgram Educational Outcomes (PEO’s) as the Civil Engineering degree. Moreover, the twodegrees used an integrated set of
evaluation ingeotechnical engineering instruction. Specifically, we summarize the results of a laboratory testprogram designed to assess the "engineering behavior" of different foods. For example, asshown on Figure 1, part of our investigation focused on the consistency of different cheeses. Wepresent our test results with interesting graphics, photographs, and illustrations ready for use asprops by other instructors, in either the classroom or laboratory. The food analogies presented inthis paper can serve as a lighthearted yet engaging introduction to soil mechanics and soilproperty evaluation in a first-class on geotechnical engineering. Student testing of soil samplesand in-depth discussions of actual soil behavior would presumably follow such
of the TCP/IP, a mobile remote shake tablelaboratory is further proposed to meet the learning style of the new generation. In this paper, thedeveloped interactive remote shake table laboratories will be discussed in detail and acorresponding teaching module for the proposed mobile shake table laboratory is demonstrated.IntroductionHistory frequently reminds us how destructive earthquakes can be. For example, the Loma Prietaearthquake (magnitude 6.9) in 1989 caused an estimated $6 billion in property damage and tookaway 63 human lives.1 The Northridge earthquake (magnitude 6.7) in 1994 brought an estimatedof $20 billion property damage and claimed the lives of 57 people with more than 5,000 injured.2To design and build safer and more
of a structure; • conduct a simple analysis of risk; and • write a geotechnical report in standard format.To have students achieve these outcomes as well as the general course outcomes, the authordeveloped the schedule shown in Table 1. Week Topics Covered/Activities Conducted 1 Introduction to course; design thinking exercise developed by Stanford’s Design School (http://dschool.stanford.edu/use-our-methods/) 2 Engineering communication (memos, reports, presentations); introduction to civil engineering and design/construction in the urban environment; graphics
courses. Other applications have included constructing structuralmodels for structural design and capstone courses. This paper takes this use of classroomtechnology even further by demonstrating how K’nex pieces can be used effectively in an upper-division, highly technical structural dynamics / seismic design course.K’nex pieces consist of various rods and connectors as shown in Figure 1. The rods areingeniously sized such that right triangles are naturally formed. While one size of rod forms thesides of a triangle, the next size up forms the hypotenuse. The pattern continues as the rodschange colors and triangles get progressively larger. The connectors allow rods to be joined at45 and 90 degree angles in various configurations. Some connectors
affiliates. A list of advantages and disadvantages of theproposed solution, and a cost estimate for the construction of the project was presented.Each course session began with specific topics to be applied in project design. The topicsare summarized as follows:1. Civil Engineering in today's world2. Civil Engineering Specialty Fields3. The Design Process4. Contour Lines5. Topographic Maps6. Topographic Surveying7. Introduction to water demand analysis8. Introduction to water storage reservoir design9. Horizontal and Vertical Alignments10. Longitudinal Profiles11. Cross Sections12. Area and Volumes Page 26.1035.713. Site Investigations14. Design
accommodatedwithin the context of the traditional four-year baccalaureate degree”1. An earlier NAE reportconcluded that “...if the engineering profession is to take the initiative in defining its own future,it must ... agree on an exciting vision for the future; transform engineering education to helpachieve the vision”2….Recently the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) organized a task committee to studythe “equivalent 30” concept. Meanwhile, the Education Committee of the National Council ofExaminers for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) has been actively working on a conceptwhereby a practice-oriented pathway could be an acceptable alternative to the “equivalent 30”.Initially it was considered that a master’s degree in engineering could compensate
proposed new CEPC being approved on first reading by ABET/EAC (July 12,2014) and the ABET Board of Directors (November 1, 2014). Following ABET/EACprocedures, the proposed CEPC were published and open for public comment through June 15, Page 26.1626.22015 and, once approved on second reading by the ABET/EAC (July 2015) and ABET Board ofDirectors (October 2015), would go into effect for the 2016/2017-accreditation cycle.In the fall of 2014, the CEPCTC initiated a comprehensive effort to revise and update thecommentary for the CEPC. In December 2014, the CEPCTC released a draft of the newCommentary on the ABET Engineering Criteria for Civil and
existing engineering programs, we identified five key points ofdistinction for the program:Entrepreneurial Graduates. Despite consistent demand from industry for graduates withbetter business skills, there is no Australian Engineering School that makes this their key focus.CSU Engineering is housed within the Faculty of Business, and one of the research strengthsof the Faculty is entrepreneurship. This allows these skills to be made part of the core businessof the degree, rather than an add-on elective, or projects serviced by a central university unit.4 x 1 year work placements. A key driver of our program was to help solve a workforce needin regional Australia. Many engineering organisations are already employing cadet engineerson an ad hoc
National Council of Examinersfor Engineering and Surveying (NCEES)—a national nonprofit federation that includes theengineering and surveying licensure boards from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam,Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.1 NCEES’s Model Law and Model Rules facilitateprofessional mobility, promote uniformity of licensure processes across the U.S., and advancethe qualifications for licensure to protect the public interest.State licensure boards are composed primarily of practicing licensed professional engineers, whotypically have two to five decades of practical experience. However, most board members donot have the expertise to evaluate the details of an individual candidate’s educational credentials,as reflected in
of the traditional four-year baccalaureate degree.”The National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES), is the nationalorganization that represents the state licensing boards for professional engineering and surveyingacross the U.S. In 2015, NCEES approved Position Statement 35 – Future EducationalRequirements for Engineering Licensure4 by a nearly 2:1 ratio. The preamble of the statementsays: “One of the goals of NCEES is to advance licensure standards for all professional engineers. Those standards describe the technical and professional competencies needed to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of the public. The council recognizes that the future demands for increasing technical and
rating of five implied significantproficiency or expert knowledge of the application. The collective results from theclasses are summarized in Table 1:Table 1: Student Self-Assessment With Regard to Software Proficiency Average Standard Average Standard (2014) Deviation (2015) Deviation Word 4.32 0.53 4.39 0.64 Excel 2.90 1.02 2.98 1.03 Powerpoint 4.03 0.77 3.92 1.06These results indicate that the assumed level of proficiency of these three applicationsvary. The average
) for the 25th to the 75th percentile istypically 1850 to 2100. The breakdown by area of the exam per year is shown as Figure 1.Typically, 95% of the students enrolling ranked in the top 25% of their high schools with the lowof 91% occurring in 2009 and the high of 97% occurring in 2011. Nearly all of the studentsenrolled within the program are considered “traditional,” indicating that they are full-timestudents that enrolled in college immediately after graduating high school2. Page 26.1315.2 750 730 710 690 670 SAT Score
% and 20%,respectively. Few students, only 1%, had the highest interest in materials.Survey responses of the Keirsey temperament test are displayed in Figure 1. Some 63% of therespondents were guardians, followed by idealists at 18%. Rationals and artisans were theleast common temperament types found in the survey. Figure 2 shows the Keirseytemperaments of the general population in this country.The freshman class was reasonably representative of the temperament types found in thegeneral population. But previous experience at MSU shows that many idealists, artisans, andrationals eventually leave the civil engineering program before graduation, and the share ofguardians consequently increases. The way courses are taught and the temperaments of
LEAP report, recognizing similar challenges ofglobalization and responding with a similar vision: We are committed to the liberal arts and sciences as a basis for intellectual and personal growth. The University endeavors to prepare women and men for lives of personal and professional service and leadership. The University is aware of the challenges of living in an international community and therefore adopts a global view in its programs and its vision.The University of Evansville seeks to fulfill this mission through its general education program,Enduring Foundations, which is composed of 11 student outcomes: 1. Critical reading and thinking 2. Engagement with imaginative expressions of the human
recently adopted by ASCE, and four changes that arecurrently in process or being considered in engineering licensure in the US that will impact thelicensure of civil engineers in the future: discipline-specific licensure; separate licensurerequirements for structural engineers; master’s or equivalent as a requirement for licensure in thefuture and consideration of alternate pathways to licensure; and licensure comity amongjurisdictions with respect to continuing professional development requirements. Since the CivilEngineering Program Criteria of the EAC/ABET’s Criteria for Accrediting EngineeringPrograms (1) requires that the “curriculum must prepare graduates . . . to explain the importanceof professional licensure,” it is important that civil