information can be found at the centrifuge facility website(http://nees.rpi.edu).References1. Balamuralithara, B. and Woods, P.C. (2008). Virtual Laboratories in Engineering Education: The Simulation Lab and Remote Lab, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 17, pp. 108-118.2. Budhu, M. (2002). Virtual laboratories for engineering education, In International Conference on Engineering Education, Manchester, UK.3. Caicedo, B. (2000). Geotechnical centrifuge applications to foundation engineering teaching, In 1st International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering Education and Training, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 271– 274.4. Craig, W. H. (1989). Use of a centrifuge in geotechnical engineering education, Geotechnical Testing Journal
than actual laboratory experiments or projects. An alternative approach is aninductive method, presenting existing data, a case study, or a quick problem to solve that couldpotentially summarize a general theory. Prince and Felder [1] summarize a number of theseinductive methods available for use by instructors, including inquiry learning, problem-basedlearning, project-based learning, case-based teaching, discovery learning, and just-in-timeteaching, all of which are considered to be active learning techniques and learner-centered [2].Active learning is defined as an instructional method that engages students in the learningprocess, using meaningful learning activities that require a deeper thought process [3], in whichstudents take ownership
Dr. Jonathan Hubler is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing at Villanova University, with expertise in geotechnical engineering. His research interests include geotechnical earthquake engineering, static and dynamic response of soils in the laboratory and field, soil liquefaction, and beneficial reuse of recycled materials in geotechnical engineering. Dr. Hubler teaches a number of undergraduate and graduate courses, including Soil Mechanics, Foundation Design, and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering.Dr. Kristin M. Sample-Lord P.E., Villanova University Dr. Kristin Sample-Lord is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at
as an assistant professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Ohio Northern University in Ada, Ohio. Here he devel- ops and teaches general engineering and civil engineering courses, works on transportation engineering projects, and holds membership with a number of organizations and committees. From September 2003 to August 2008 he was a research assistant in the Civil Engineering Department at the University of Akron. He worked on a number of Transportation/Pavement Engineering research projects, and Geotechnical En- gineering research projects. Then from September 2003 to August 2008, he was a teaching assistant with the Civil Engineering Department at the University of Akron. His work has been published in
research grants. We also thank Dolese Bros., Holcim, LaFargeConcrete Co., Red Resins and W.R. Grace Construction Products for their donation of materials.We thank Kyran Mish, director of Fears Laboratory, for his understanding and support and MikeSchmitz, lab facilities manager, for his help organizing the lab.Bibliography1. J. Fredricks Volkwein & D.A.Carbone, “The Impact of Departmental Research and Teaching Climates onUndergraduate Growth and Satisfaction,” The Journal of Higher Education, March – April 1994 pp. 147-1672. A.C. Schoenfeld & R. Magnan, “Mentor in a Manual” 2nd Edition, Magna Publications, Inc. Madison,Wisconsin, 1994 pp. 267
Technology, Sweden. 1Teaching of writing skills can be, arguably, the most difficult communication skill to teach.Engineering students need to master writer, genre, and reader-oriented composition, thoughnot necessarily to equal levels or at the same time. In Years 2 and 3, engineering studentsneed to master ‘genre-oriented composition’; in other words, they need to be able to matchthe expectations for diverse, yet specific, writing types: cover letters, laboratory reports,design reports, engineering drawings, and oral presentations. In Years 3 and 4, engineeringstudents, to varying degrees, need to focus more on reader-oriented composition andrecognise the
Paper ID #21295Integration of SHRP2 Solutions into Civil Engineering Curricula at Rowan,Temple, Villanova, and West Virginia UniversitiesDr. Yusuf A Mehta, Rowan University Dr. Mehta is a Professor at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rowan University. Dr. Mehta has extensive experience in teaching pavement materials and pavement systems. Dr. Mehta has published several technical and educational papers in leading professional organizations.Dr. Ayman Ali, Rowan UniversityDr. Parth Bhavsar, Rowan University Parth Bhavsar, is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
design. The University Curriculum Committee approved the request to change thecontact hours for Structural Analysis from 3 hours of lecture per week to 2 hours of lecture plus2 hours of laboratory per week to accommodate the experiential aspects of these proposedchanges. After assessing the changes to the Structural Analysis course, we will decide whether tomake similar changes in the class meeting times for the Structural Design courses.The Structural Analysis course syllabus lists the following broad goals for the course: a) Students will develop technical skills in classical methods for analysis of determinate and indeterminate structures. b) Students will gain proficiency in analysis structures comprised of trusses, beams, frames
Paper ID #13470Observations from Three Years of Implementing an Inverted (Flipped) Class-room Approach in Structural Design CoursesDr. Shawn P Gross, Villanova University Dr. Shawn P. Gross is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University. He has as M.S.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, and a B.S.E. degree from Tulane University. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses on mechanics and structural design (reinforced concrete, structural steel, masonry, and wood).Dr. Eric Musselman P.E., Villanova University Dr. Eric
students to take the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam which is inherently computational, leaving little opportunity to vary teaching methods and topics. 4. Engineering faculty have many responsibilities, including, but not limited to: teaching a heavy course load, laboratory research, writing publications, applying for funding, attending conferences, managing laboratory materials and safety, mentoring students, networking with industry, and professional development. Therefore, professors’ time is often limited, and professors may not see the value in adjusting a preexisting course. 5. Engineering education is often based on precedent; it is slow to accept change, especially relative to liberal arts
when necessary. Startedwith virtually no funding, laboratory space with 20% utilization was made available to studentsto study in during the unused 80% of the schedule. The program was initiated in the Fall 2011term. The academic performance of a targeted set of at risk students was observed during thesemester.The motivation for this program and its objectives are discussed. Data collected following thefirst semester of operation is presented and discussed. Conclusions are drawn regarding theenvironments impact on the program.IntroductionStudents at every academic level are prone to fall behind during the semester. Key to “keepingup” is having adequate prerequisite knowledge to comprehend and implement new concepts asthey are presented in
, Page 13.1043.6constructability, interaction with mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems, aestheticconsiderations, coordination with architectural layouts, and sustainability issues. ARCE 452,Concrete Structures Design and Constructability Laboratory, will be specifically examined laterin this paper.These systems design courses are typically taught in a project based studio format byprofessional practice tenure track faculty with extensive professional experience in the design ofsystems. Experience has shown that while not impossible, it is difficult for faculty to develop theexpertise required to teach a systems design course without the experience of actually designingnumerous systems in professional practice. Regarding practical
Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, June 1998.9. Rais-Rohani, M., Brown, D.T., “Development of a Virtual Laboratory for the Study of Mechanics,” Proceedings of the 2000 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, June 2000.10. Compendex Search Engine, Copyright © 2003 by Elsevier Engineering Information Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S.A.11. Lowman, Joseph, “Mastering the Techniques of Teaching,” Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1995, p. 194.12. Wankat, P.C., and F.S. Oreovicz, “Teaching Engineering,” McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1993, p. 94.13. Lowman, Joseph, “Mastering the Techniques of Teaching,” Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
undergraduate students as the main target but also admittinggraduate student. The classes were to be delivered in both in-class and virtual real-time distance-teaching/learning format. Last but not least, a 9-day trip to Istanbul during the mid-semester wasincluded to punctuate the course and give the students to observe how earthquake engineeringprinciples are used to mitigate earthquake risks in a megapolis housing over 12 million people2.The course was offered in Spring 2008 semester. 19 undergraduate and two graduate studentsfrom five academic institutes and five engineering majors took the course as a 3-credit technicalelective civil engineering study-abroad course. 17 of the students were from the LAI and theother four were from four other
Environmental Engineering (2009), and a Dr. Eng. in Civil Engineering (2013). Currently, he is an Assistant Professor of Environmental Engineering at West Texas A&M University in Canyon, Texas since August 2013. He is a registered P.E. in the state of Louisiana. His research inter- ests include biological, electrochemical, and photochemical wastewater treatment methods. He teaches courses in water and wastewater treatment, solid and hazardous waste, surveying, and programming fun- damentals.Dr. J. Arn Womble P.E., West Texas A&M University Dr. J. Arn Womble is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering (Structures) at West Texas A&M Uni- versity in Canyon, TX. He is a graduate of the wind engineering programs at
Page 24.642.2Teaching a course in environmental river mechanics / stream restoration provides an opportunityto incorporate experiential learning, as the direct experience of working in the field to collect andanalyze data is essential to a deeper understanding of stream processes. Throughout the course,we participate with the students in weekly field experiences of collecting measurements andvisual observations along Lost Creek, coupled with report submittals that analyze and reflectupon the work completed. Although the RHIT Civil Engineering department incorporateshands-on, laboratory activities in other courses, including Hydraulic Engineering, EnvironmentalEngineering, and Civil Engineering Materials, these are primarily conducted in an
now properly motivated to attack the theoryin bite size chunks (just in time) to continue working on solving the problem at hand.The author has been involved in a number of teaching workshops over the last elevenyears and sits in each department faculty member’s classes twice each semester and hasobserved the improvement in student attention, focus, and concept understanding whenfaculty gradually move to a just in time model. The entire faculty team has observed theimprovement in energy levels among the students as well as understanding during thelessons in which just in time learning has been used. The author will start with how justin time learning is applied to a Mechanics of Materials course as well as how the processis being applied
West Point and theUnited States Air Force Academy (USAFA) in Colorado have helped to create, develop andbuild an undergraduate academic program at the National Military Academy of Afghanistan(NMAA). One of the most successful parts of the program development has been the creation ofthe Civil Engineering core curriculum and major. The authors, all West Point engineeringinstructors involved with NMAA’s civil engineering development, discovered many benefitsfrom providing this academic assistance which improved their teaching abilities. While ouroriginal mission was focused on faculty, curriculum, and course development, we soonencountered numerous challenges that ultimately improved our educational skills. We quicklyfound ourselves deeply
Communication with Competition and Prizes” Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.12. Fiegel, G., and N. Derbidge, 2015. “Introducing Soil Property Evaluation in Geotechnical Engineering – Some Food for Thought,” Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.13. Durham, S., M. Hale, and S. Freyne, 2008. “Classroom Teaching Aids and Laboratory Experimentation to Engage Students in Materials Learning,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.14. Saliklis, E., 2008. "Arch Building for Kids. What did they learn? What did we learn?," Proceedings of the 2008
well-rounded process ofadjusting concepts so that they can be efficiently applied to real world situations. The use of modelsas a form of experience to teach ideas, whether theoretical or design, can serve as a conceptualbridge between life situations which aids creativity, problem solving, decision making, andscientific research (11).The theory put forward by Kolb has been implemented in various ways, with varying degrees ofsuccess. Laboratory education has been found to benefit significantly from the application ofKolb’s cycle, including hands-on activities and pre- and post-lab tests to prepare and consolidatethe knowledge of the students (12). These theories were implemented within this activity byintroducing the models, providing theory
2010 National Outstanding Teaching Medal. Dr. Klosky writes regularly about engineering education, covering topics ranging from classroom tech- niques to curricular reform. Much of this work is focused on the use of internet communications and social networks for educational purposes. Page 22.1685.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 When You Can’t Hear Me Now – Nonverbal Communication in Distance LearningAbstractGlobalization, a strong demand for continuing education and cost pressure on traditionaluniversity learning models are all
Auckland, NZ, developer of the Xorro assessment authoring tool Xorro-Q. His entrepreneurial career spans education, health, energy and gaming sectors. Pablo is an enthusiastic advocate for solutions and practices which open new learning and collaboration horizons.Mr. Wyatt Banker-Hix P.E., California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo Wyatt Banker-Hix is a licensed professional engineer in the state of California with over four years of industry experience in structural and transportation engineering. He also serves as a part-time lecturer at California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly) in the Civil Engineering department. He enjoys teaching a hands-on materials laboratory course sprinkled
posit to apply widely researched educational psychology principles and practicesto the engineering curriculum. These practices include: ‚ vignette-based instruction, ‚ embedded signature assignments, ‚ rubric judged laboratory experiences, ‚ value judged internships, and ‚ concept inventory assessments in all courses in the courses.All five of these teaching practices combine assessment to instruction and are linked tostudent performance. Vignette-based instruction is described as a provision of instructionwhere students are provided with real world vignettes or workplace problems and mustsolve these vignette based issues or problems using principles perspectives and practicesthat they have learned in courses1. These are often group
enter professional practice. Students whopursue graduate school directly upon graduation are recruited by a number of schools andhave been very successful. The department faculty is a relatively young, dedicated, and col-legial group that is regarded as exemplary throughout the university in terms of teaching ef-fectiveness and in professional development.The existing curriculum at UWP is typical of conventional CEE curricula. Students completebasic mathematics, science, and general engineering courses in the first two years followed bycivil and environmental engineering courses in the remainder of their studies. The CEE pro-gram includes a significant laboratory component and practical design projects in the upperlevel classes. The program
introduce students to qualitative and quantitative perspectives of four factorsthat affect design, construction and management of the structures we live and work in. Thesefour factors, Safety, Sustainability, Style and Society, comprised the four principle modules of thecourse. The course explores the modules separately, as well as their interconnectedness. Inaddition, the course focused on drawing as a language for communicating building design andperformance. The class was organized as a weekly 2.5 hour seminar course to allow time forfield trips, laboratory activities, and class discussion, which were designed to strengthenstudents’ ability to analyze and communicate ideas about building design across disciplines.Weekly readings shaped the focus
projects.Faculty -- Program faculty must have responsibility and sufficient authority to define, revise, implement, andachieve program objectives. The program must demonstrate that faculty teaching courses that are primarilyengineering design in content are qualified to teach the subject matter by virtue of professional licensure, or byeducation and design experience. It must also demonstrate that the majority of the faculty members teachingarchitectural design courses are qualified to teach the subject matter by virtue of professional licensure, or byeducation and design experience.There were several reasons for revising the program criteria. The ABET general criteria haveevolved over the past decade and the program criteria have not been re-examined
Surrey since 2014. Incidentally, the ArchiVision Company from Iranassisted the design of the structural components of this full-scale teaching kit and the tubularelements were manufactured in the University Workshops. Each group of students has todesign a configuration using (all or part of) the available structural components and check thepracticality of their design in the laboratory, Figure 4. To facilitate the design process, a set ofmagnetic bars together with steel balls are available for making small scale models. Also, thefull-scale structural components are available to the students for assembling the structure, orparts of it, in the lab. This would give them confidence about the practicality of the design.After the group meeting in the
Paper ID #25104Strategies to Improve Engineers’ Writing of Executive SummariesDr. Cara N. Morton P.E, Washington State University Cara is professional engineer and has three years of structural engineering design experience from the design of marine structures in the Gulf of Mexico to the design of shear walls in seven story concrete buildings governed by seismic loads in Seattle, WA. She currently serves as Clinical Professor at Wash- ington State University teaching the Integrated Civil Engineering Design class where a broad knowledge base from stormwater management to traffic engineering is required. Regarding
Paper ID #30843Introducing High School Students to Engineering Disciplines: Activitiesand AssessmentDr. Nicolas Ali Libre, Missouri University of Science and Technology Nicolas Ali Libre, PhD, is an assistant teaching professor of Civil Engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology. He received his BS (2001), MS (2003) and PhD (2009) in civil engineer- ing with emphasis in structural engineering, from University of Tehran, Iran. His research interests and experiences are in the field of computational mechanics, cement-based composite materials as well as in- novative teaching techniques. Dr. Libre is the
as Introduction to Civil Engineering; Hydraulics; Water and Wastewater Treatment; Groundwater Mechanics; Research Experience of Undergraduate Students; and Engineering Outreach Service Learning courses, among others. She is also a faculty advisor for the Cal- ifornia Water Environment Association (CWEA)- American Water Works Association (AWWA) student chapter. Additionally, Dr. Palomo is the CE Water Analysis laboratory director and coordinates all teach- ing, research and safety training activities in the engineering laboratory. Dr. Palomo conducts research in surface water quality improvement via natural treatment systems, water and wastewater treatment pro- cesses, and water education. She is involved in