the results of the anonymous student feedback surveys conducted atboth the mid-semester and end of the semester. A full assessment of Bloom’s learning objectiveswas not conducted as part of this initial and limited study.References1. G.V. Oddsson and R. Unnthorsson. (2017). “Flipped Classroom Improves the Student’s Exam Performance in a First Year Engineering Course,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(6), 1776-1785.2. L.W. Anderson, D.R. Krathwohl, P.W. Airasian, K.A. Cruikshank, R.E. Mayer, P.R. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M.C. Wittrock. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York, NY: Pearson, Allyn, & Bacon.3. S. Kiefer and S
that are probably typical of many senior design programs. These included • A process that allowed some students to assume a large portion of the project system design while others minimized their contributions, resulting in variable learning, • A system that made it difficult to evaluate individual students’ work as a team member, • Inconsistent and sometimes untimely mentoring of technical design work because this occurred only as-requested by groups or after identification by another faculty member, also resulting in widely variable learning experiences, • A very heavy mentoring load for the year-long course instructor(s) that gave the course a reputation of being a highly undesirable assignment
15.4 46.0tenured/tenure-track facultyOnce women enter an engineering program, they are likely to complete the degree, whichhighlights the importance of recruitment4. For example, Huang, et al.5 reported that female Page 26.1315.3students “were more likely than male students to complete an S&E [Science and Engineering]degree and less likely to switch to a non-S&E program." This experience is the same atVillanova University with the retention and four-year graduation rate being the same for bothmen and women. Over the past five years, the four-year graduation rate within Civil
AC 2008-46: ASCE POLICY 465 – PROGRESS AND NEXT STEPSJeffrey Russell, University of Wisconsin - Madison Gerry Galloway University of Maryland Thomas Lenox ASCE James O'Brien ASCEGerry Galloway, University of MarylandThomas Lenox, ASCEJames J. O'Brien, American Society of Civil Engineers Page 13.223.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008ASCE Policy 465 - Progress and Next StepsRussell, Galloway, Lenox and O’Brien ASCE Policy 465 – Progress and Next Steps Jeffrey S. Russell, Gerald E. Galloway, Thomas A. Lenox, and James J. O’BrienAbstractFor several decades, educators
. Assessment of Final Term Paper in GLY 2805 Geology for Engineers Outcome(s) 2009 2011Number of students 61 5318: Develop a thesis statement and formulate questions based on the information 4.8 4.8needed12: Define or modify the information need to achieve a manageable focus 4.8 4.74: Read text, select main ideas, and restate textual concepts in their own words 4.5 4.59: Demonstrate an understanding of intellectual property, copyright, and fair use ofcopyrighted material8: Communicate clearly and with a style that supports the purposes of the intended
benefit is determined using a four-parameter “S-shaped” function of bridge strength.Grades are assigned using a weighted comparison of bridge profits (82%) and the group’saccuracy in predicting the strength of their bridge (18%) according to profit and accuracy gradestandards established at the beginning of the semester. Thus, although it is considered acompetition, students do not compete for grades, as there is a fixed and predetermined standardthat determines each project’s grade. The current group design project is intended to provide a range of learning experiencesfor the freshman engineers. First being a group project it is intended to introduce freshmanengineers to collaborative design and division of labor within a project. Second
bestrepresent these data. In addition, the “Know your Watershed” worksheet included relevantinformation and references s to explore the EPA website to learn more about impaired streamsand watersheds.LabVIEW Enabled Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS)The LabVIEW Enabled Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) is developed to enhance thesustainability component of EngE1024. This system has the capability to access water qualityand quantity data in a real-time from an on-campus stream. The advantages of using a real-timeremote monitoring system over traditional sampling is discussed in10. Furthermore, using real-time monitoring technology is becoming increasingly important for evaluating water quality11.From a broader perspective, using an on-campus creek as
. Future workcould examine how students respond to this remote transition based on individual learning styles,since this could greatly impact the success of remote learning.AcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by NSF Grant CMMI-1749200.References1. Elvira Q, Beausaert S, Segers M, Imants J, Dankbaar B (2016) Development and validation ofa Supportive Learning Environment for Expertise Development Questionnaire (SLEED-Q).Learning Environments Research, 19(1):17–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9197-y2. Reck RM (2020) Advances in Engineering Education Quick Flip: A Model of a VirtualCourse in Dynamic Systems and Controls During COVID-19. Advances in EngineeringEducation, 8(4)3. Wojtowicz A (2020) Preliminary Assessment of Distance
• Global Citizenship • Sustainable Practices There are nine CSU GLOs each of which are developed as two levels of dimensions. The top level has three dimensions for each GLO expressing Knowledge (K) Skills (S) and Applications (A) giving a total of 27 dimensions, and some of these are further expanded to create a total of 90 dimensions. The GLO dimensions are intentionally aligned with the AQF categories and meet the requirements for the AQF Level 7, Bachelor’s degree.Course teams can choose to integrate the GLOs at the top level of 27 dimensions or thedetailed level of 90 dimensions. The CSU engineering course has chosen to integrate at thelevel of 27 dimensions. As stated above, each of the nine GLOs expands into learning outcomes for
Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[9] H. Zhu, “A Flipped Solid Mechanics Course Designed Based on the Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP) Framework”, Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[10] S. Gross and D. Dinehart, "Pre- and Post-Class Student Viewing Behaviors for Recorded Videos in an Inverted Sophomore Mechanics Course Paper," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016. 10.18260/p.25924.[11] S. Gross and E. Musselman, "Observations from Three Years of Implementing of an Inverted (Flipped) Classroom Approach in Structural Design Courses," in Proceedings of
designmethodology and process elements include problem definition and creativity). Page 14.1229.3Outcome 23: Lifelong learning – “Plan and execute the acquisition of required expertiseappropriate for professional practice”. Civil engineering graduates must “demonstrate the abilityfor self-directed learning, and develop their own learning plan”. “Self-directed learning is amode of lifelong learning because it is the ability to learn on one’s own with the aid of formaleducation”.In addition, the BOK2’s guidance for students and engineer interns requires them able tounderstand the vision for civil engineering, develop horizontal thinking, self-direct life
0-06-041046-9, 19922. “Ethics at Work,” Harvard Business Review, Selected Articles 1983-1991, ISBN 0-87584-286-03. Grigg, Neil S., Criswell, Marvin E, Fontane Darrell G., Siller Thomas J., “Civil Engineering Practice in the Twenty-First Century-Knowledge and Skills for Design and Management,” ASCE Press, ISBN 0-7844-0526-3, 20014. Harris JR., Charles E., Pritchard Michael S., Rabins Michael J., “Engineering Ethics-Concepts and Cases,” Wadsworth Publishing Company, ISBN 0-534-23964-1, 19955. Hitt, William D., “Ethics and Leadership-Putting Theory into Practice,” Battelle Press, ISBN 0-935470-52-2, 19906. Johnson, Deborah G., “Ethical Issues in Engineering,” Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-290578-7, 19917. Selinger, Carl, “Stuff You Don’t
System Lecture Hall Places for Teaching/ Learning on - Campus Augmented Teaching/Learning t Ta Bla On Liv Mu Mu On Ub ... lk s ckb lin eB ltip ltim lin iqu eP r o
/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/Education_Papers.html3. Felder, R. M., 2006. “Teaching Engineering in the 21st Century with a 12th-Century Teaching Model: How Bright is That?” Chemical Engineering Education, 40(2), 110-113.4. Freeman, S., S.L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M.K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. Wenderoth, 2014. “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23). http://www.pnas.org/content/111/23/8410.5. Svinicki, M. and W. J. McKeachie, 2011. McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, 13th ed., Wadswoth CENGAGE Learning, USA.6. Wankat, P.C., and F.S. Oreovicz, 2015
-solving skills by organizing a course around aseries of smaller, or one to two course-long problem(s) that add a substantial contextual elementto class assignments and activities. Typically, the PBL approach integrates the theoretical side ofeducation with the practical aspects of a profession, and involves students in not just the solvingof the problem, but also the investigating, developing, explaining, and checking of solutions [3,4]. This pedagogical approach has long been used in medical education, and has more recentlyemerged as an important approach for the undergraduate classroom [4]. Emphasizing theinvestigating and developing aspects of the PBL approach, open-ended problem (OEP)-basedlearning has roots in the constructivist
requirementpresent a barrier to completion? The MOOC will be re-offered in the summer or fall of2016, focusing more effort on the development of A/B groups to answer additionalresearch questions.Bibliography1. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/23/8410.abstract.2. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.3. Johnson, D., Johnson, R. & Smith, K., Active Learning: Cooperation in the College
shape of the structure would causelarge deflections that would compromise the connection. The weight of the structure is 0.94 lbs,resulting in a mass of 0.0023 lb/(in/s^2). Under its own weight, the structure deflected 3.38 inches,as can be seen in the image to the right in Figure 2. This testing of the structure revealed that thestructure’s stiffness was 0.27 lb/in. Following simple calculations, the natural period of thestructure was determined to be 0.56 seconds. Testing of the inverted pyramid indicated threedistinct modes of oscillation. As the structure entered its different modes, the stationary node Figure 2: A pin connected inverted pyramid is examined for modes of oscillationtranslated up the central spine of the structure. The
the basic concepts of management. 15. Explain the basic concepts of business and public policy. 16. Are leaders of character. 2 Recognizing that the Department’s mission statement includes educating and inspiring, the civilengineering faculty have sought to develop their program appropriately along a set of commonlyaccepted educational taxonomies; that is, Bloom’s Taxonomy. These widely known taxonomiesare based on the seminar work of the 1950’s educational committee chaired by Benjamin Bloom.The committee established a set of taxonomies in three domains of learning: cognitive, affectiveand psychomotor. The cognitive domain taxonomy is widely accepted in many fields and hasbeen
potential corrective action(s) that will be agreed upon by consensus. 6. For subsequent evaluation cycles: a. If the value of the metric exceeds the established threshold value, then no action is necessary, b. If the value of the metric exceeds the threshold value for three consecutive evaluations, the department will consider increasing the threshold value.Evaluation RubricThe CEE departmental faculty have established evaluation metrics for the assessment of theachievement of the outcomes for each of the eleven SOs. These metrics include a multitude ofsurvey results, laboratory and course rubrics, class assignments, interviews, and results from theFundamentals of Engineering (FE
some assumptions. Identifies context(s) when presenting a position. May be more aware of others’ assumptions than one’s own (or vice versa).By necessity the rubrics are written such that they can be applied to the broad range of topics thatfall under the FYS umbrella. Particularly relevant to the premise of the FYS Bridge course arethe rubrics that address establishing the background, exploring ambiguity, questioningassumptions, and identifying context, but applied to challenges in engineering, technology, andscience in society. With this in mind, the authors have selected tentatively the following topicsand readings for the course:The questions that science, engineering, and the humanities can answer… and those theycan’t. Selected
), whichoutlines the knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary to enter the professional practice of civilengineering. Civil engineers need experience both in the engineering and technology aspects oftheir chosen sub-discipline(s) as well as in common professional practice areas. Many of thecapabilities in these areas are attained primarily through engineering experience. The ASCEpolicy statement is presented below. The full policy, with a description of the issue andrationale, may be viewed at: http://www.asce.org/issues-and-advocacy/public-policy/policy-statement-547-engineering-experience-for-professional-licensure/ ASCE Policy Statement 547 ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE FOR PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE
both because it was thickerand heavier than a traditional Frisbee. This suggests that in future competitions it may be anadvantage for students to construct multiple Frisbees. One Frisbee will be used for the competitionand the students can use the others for practice throws to get accustomed to throwing a concreteFrisbee. Group #10’s first Frisbee broke apart while it was being thrown; as a result the distancethrown was recorded as 0 ft. Table 1: Concrete Frisbee Specifications Group Weight Diameter Density Throw #1 Throw #2 Average Throw # (lbs) (inch) (pcf) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 1.3 8.5 82 51.7 56.5
implementation of ourapproach.IntroductionEfforts to integrate the teaching of knowledge / skills across a curriculum are wide spread acrossmany institutions with efforts such as Writing Across the Curriculum being undertaken since theearly 1970’s [1]. A “pervasive method” of teaching ethics to law students was described by Link[2] where every professor in every course at the Notre Dame Law School would include ethics intheir course. Each course, thereby, served a dual purpose: the teaching of law as well as theteaching of ethics. Ethics was to be spread widely - be pervasive - throughout the lawcurriculum. Refining this pervasive approach, Davis [3] described a method called “micro-insertion” where knowledge / skills can be added to a course without
brick was to be placed in the water, the number and locationof masts, or the number, magnitude and location of weight(s). Students were told the activitywas to be summarized in a one-page paper, including testing procedure, results, and conclusionsand were allowed thirty minutes for experimental setup, testing, and clean-up. Determination ofstudent comprehension was assessed through both the summary paper, as well as an examquestion. Results showed a high level of understanding, both in the short term, as concludedwith the paper outcomes, as well as long term retention, validated with testing results.Quantitative analysis can easily be incorporated into the program by providing measuringinstruments (rulers, calipers, and a balance) if a more
mission of OIS advances two objectives of the Strategic Plan: to “[e]nrich student academicexperiences by means of…International and multicultural perspectives” and to “[s]erve as anintellectual and cultural resource for the extended local community [by promoting] to thecommunity academic, cultural, intellectual, and professional programs and service”.The guiding philosophy of the OIS always has been one of immersion. It is not enough forstudents merely to be in a foreign country, participating in what John Dewey derisively called the“spectator theory of knowledge.” They must be engaged with the “Other,” actively andexperientially learning about the culture in which they are studying. The mission of theUniversity, therefore, is an important
2. www1.villanova.edu/villanova/engineering/departments/civil/undergrad/capstone.html, accessed December 20, 2012 3. Coles, S., Hirzel, D., “CIVE 4750 Civil Engineering Capstone Project Fall 2007 – Crossroads of America – Draft Final Report” 2007 4. Pines, David S., Keshawarz, M. S., “Town Government, Industry, and University Involvement in the Capstone Design Course at the University of Hartford”, in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2001. Page 23.717.11
Paper ID #7777Connection between mathematical and visual approaches in engineering classesDr. Pyoyoon Hong P.E., Southern Polytechnic State University Dr. Pyoyoon Hong is an assistant Professor in Architecture Department at Southern Polytechnic State University. Dr. Hong earned the Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from the University of Oklahoma, the M.S. in Structural Engineering from the University of Oklahoma, the M.S. in Architectural Engineer- ing from Pusan National University in S. Korea, and the B.S. in Architectural Engineering from Pusan National University in S. Korea
frequency of the signal to be 1/10 Hz using the informationfrom the first plot. The reason given by students is that the plot clearly shows one cycle in 10seconds. 3 2 Displacement (mm) 1 0 -1 -2 -3 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time (s) Figure 1. Aliasing AL exercise - Handout
weeks in introductory soils courses. The high-techflavor of x-ray CT can be attractive to these students. Anecdotal comments from students usingthis approach have been positive and encouraging; however, the newness of this approachprecludes the presentation of statistical assessments in this paper. A more quantitativeassessment of student learning will be assembled in future semesters based on additional studentfeedback.AcknowledgementsExperimental x-ray CT analyses conducted by former students Brent Nielsen, Josh Nichols, andBryant Robbins were useful in developing the simplified approach described in this paper. Theirvaluable contributions are acknowledged and greatly appreciated by the authors.References Cited1. Alshibli, K. A., Batiste, S