analysis and design courses.Bibliography1. Smith, K., J. Morgan, S. Ledlow, P.K. Imbrie, and J. Froyd, “Engaging Faculty in Active/CooperativeLearning,” Frontiers in Education, FIE 2003, Boulder, Colorado, November 8, 2003.2. Kenimer, A. and J. Morgan, “Active Learning Exercises Requiring Higher-Order Thinking Skills,” ASEE,Nashville, TN, June, 2003.3. Morgan, J. R., "Technology in the Classroom," 9th Annual TBEEC Conference on Enhancement of CurricularContent and Structure with Technology, Nashville, TN, November 20-21, 1997.4. Everett, L., P.K. Imbrie and J.R. Morgan, "Integrated Curricula: Purpose and Design," Journal of EngineeringEducation, v. 89, no. 2, April, 2000.5. Al-Holou, N, N. M. Bilgutay, C. Corleto, J. T. Demel, R. Felder, K. Frair
software on their own, building upon the foundation of the software thatthey had previously obtained through their structural engineering courses.During the early stages of the modeling of the pedestrian bridge, the group found themselvescoming across a problem of accurately designing the cable members which support the concretedeck. After a series of unsuccessful attempts at accurately modeling the cables, the group beganto search SAP2000’s documentation in hopes of determining a method to solve this problem. Inthe SAP2000’s reference manual, the group found a tip stating that one could substitute a straightline object (i.e. an angle member) in place of a cable5. The documentation stated that this couldbe done when only the effects of the cables
, accessed 3 January 2013.2. ASCE (2008) Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century, 2nd Edition, ASCE, Reston, VA, 181 p.3. TCAP3 (2003) “ASCE’s Raise the Bar Initiative: Master Plan for Implementation,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN, June 22-25.4. Nelson, J.D., Phillips, M.L., Musselman, C.N., and Conzett, M.J. (2012) “The Raise the Bar Initiative: Charting the Future by Understanding the Path to the Present – Modifying the Model Laws and Rules for Engineering Licensure,” Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13.5. Ressler, S. (2012) “The Raise the Bar Initiative: Charting the Future by Understanding the Path to the Present
,Anytime.” Journal of Engineering Education. 131-146.2 Mackey, K. R.M. and Freyberg, D.L. (2010). “The Effect of Social Presence on Affective and CognitiveLearning in an International Engineering Course Taught via Distance Learning.” Journal of EngineeringEducation. 23-34.3 Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Pub: Australian Council for EducationalResearch, Victoria, Australia.4 Steif, P. and Dollar, A. (2007). “An Interactive Web-Based Statics Course,” Proceedings of the AnnualAmerican Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HA, June.5 Peercy, P. S. and Cramer, S. M. (2011). “Refining Quality in Engineering Education Through HybridInstruction.” Guest Editorial. Journal of
, surveying was very clearly viewed as a majorcomponent of a standard Civil Engineering curriculum. In the late 1920’s, the University ofWashington required 27 credits of surveying courses, which comprised 14% of the credits for theCivil Engineering program [3].Surveying was clearly having its heyday during this time, but by the mid-20th century, theimportance of surveying relative to other areas of Civil Engineering slowly started to diminish.As Civil Engineering broadened its purview, it began to include subdisciplines such as structuralengineering, geotechnical engineering, environmental engineering, construction science andmanagement, transportation and traffic engineering, and hydraulic engineering. In addition, CivilEngineering became a much
4.00 4.89 3.96Note: * Rates are based on 1 to 5 scales to indicate the relative importance or extent of various factors in ascendingorder; a- University of Oklahoma; b-Jackson State University; c- University of Texas- Pan American 5 80% post-scale pre-scale 70% G ain in S cale in E xten t 4 60% S c o re o f 1 to 5 3
considers these findings and discussion inrelation to their own programs of engineering. Page 14.983.13References1 Malasri, S., K. Madhavan, and J. Ventura. Should engineering faculty be registered? inMid-South Annual Engineering and Science Conference. 2000. Memphis, Tennessee:Christian Brothers University.2 Madhavan, K. and S. Malasri, Professional registration of engineering faculty. Journalof Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2003. 129(3): p. 122-124.3 Harichandran, R., Faculty hiring trends at small- to medium-sized research-intensiveCEE departments and balancing the needs of research and practice, in American Societyfor
their satisfaction with course outcomes and the UGTF(s) they worked with. For the studentsin courses with UGTF resources, the survey questions focused on their interactions withUGTFs (how often and what type), if they felt there were enough UGTFs in the classroom,and if they perceived their learning to be better supported in courses with UGTFs. Finally, thesurvey questions for UGTFs focused on their interactions with students and faculty, thepreparation and communication with the instructional team, the impact of the experience ontheir own understanding and confidence in the course material, on their connection toother students and faculty in their department, and on the development of professional skills. Inaddition, on all surveys, open-ended
Cognitive BarriersDuring Design: A Case Study Approach Using the Envision Rating System for SustainableInfrastructure” for American Society of Civil Engineers International Conference on SustainableInfrastructure 2017, New York, NY USA October 26–28, 2017.[4] J. A. Cantor, J. A., Ed. (2006). Lifelong learning and the academy: The changing nature ofcontinuing education. ASHE higher education report, volume 32, number 2. ASHE HigherEducation Report, 32(2), 1-100. doi:10.1002/aehe.3202[5] D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.2nd edition. Pearson, 2015.[6] J. Piaget, J. (1999). Judgement and reasoning in the child. London: London: Routledge.[7] L. S. Vygotskii, The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky
) MDOF Animations: Experimenting with MATLAB GUI to visualize mode shapesThree clarifications on the list presented above: 1. The activity described in the section “SDOF System: Harmonic Forced Vibration” was divided into two questions as students experimented with the shake table without recording any acceleration data and then were given an Excel file with the acceleration time histories for a range of forcing frequencies to process with Matlab. 2. The MDOF Mode Shapes for portal frame refers to two videos of frequency sweeps (conducted by Professor Oh-sung Kwon while at Missouri S&T)18-19 rather than the models described “MDOF System: Planar Frames” as there was not time to implement an
Paper ID #25531Longitudinal Integration of the Same Design Project in Multiple StructuralEngineering CoursesDr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He returned to school to obtain his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech followed by research work at the Turner- Fairbank Highway Research Center on concrete bridges. He is currently an associate professor of Civil Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). He
anincreased course passing rate. Unsurprisingly, student perception ratings also increased.Table 5. Student Perceptions of Teaching Survey (SPOTs) for online course CGN2420Course S tructure Fall 16 Spring 17 Fal l 17 Spring 18 Fall 18 Spring 19 Fall 19 1 Description of course objectives and assignments 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.6 3.8 4.4 2 Expression of expectations for performance in this class 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.3 3.8 4.4 3 Description of grading policies in the course syllabus 4.2 3.6 4.3 4.3 4.5 3.9 4.5Learning S upport 4 Consistency in following the course syllabus
‘learnedprofession’ characterized by competency and the continued pursuit knowledge and experience.”Engineering societies can work together to make this a reality for all branches of engineering.BackgroundVisualizing the future of engineering education is not a new phenomenon. During the 1920’s theSociety for the Promotion of Engineering Education developed the landmark study6,"Report of the Investigation of Engineering Education, 1923-1929", that has been popularlyreferred to as the Wickenden Report. Interestingly enough, over 80 years ago they werediscussing “the question of a longer engineering curriculum” along with programs, standards andfacilities required. We have come a long way since the late 1920’s and today are contemplating
and suggest anincrease in student self-taught learning.The national ASCE concrete canoe competition, as it is currently conducted, is based on what Page 23.314.4was initially a series of local concrete canoe races. Races were first held in the 1960’s on alocal-level as intramurals. In the 1970s the first regional competitions were held, and in 1988,ASCE with sponsorship provided by Master Builders, Inc., organized the first nationalcompetition in East Lansing, Michigan. In the last decade this competition has even expandedinto European nations.[8] With 24 consecutive years of experience at the national level, theconcrete canoe competition
. s Set positive learning belief and ie Review learning performance and U eg til compare it with goals motivation; at
Page 15.209.13 Licensure and Professional Practice,” 2007. Accessed at http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/policy_details.cfm?hdlid=15, January 7, 2010.7. ASCE. Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Reston, VA, 2004.8. Ressler, S. J. “Progress on Raising the Bar—New Civil Engineering Accreditation Criteria,” Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, June 2006.9. Levels of Achievement Subcommittee of CAP3. “Levels of Achievement Applicable to the Body of Knowledge Required for Entry into the Practice of Civil Engineering at the Professional Level,” ASCE, September 2004. Accessed at http://www.asce.org
. [Accessed 22 December 2013].[13] Materials Group, U.S. Department of Transportaiton, Federal Highway Administration, "Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag," 7 April 2011. [Online]. Available: www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/materialsgrp/ggbfs.htm. [Accessed 22 December 2013].[14] D. N. Richardson, "Strength and Durability Characteristics of a 70% Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) Concrete Mix," Missouri Transportation Institute and Missouri Department of Transportation, Rolla, 2006.[15] M. S. Imbabi, C. Carrigan and S. McKenna, "Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology," International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 194-216, 2012.[16] D. Marsh, "Carbon Leverage
topics.Dr. Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC Carol Haden is s Senior Evaluator with Magnolia Consulting, LLC. She holds a doctorate in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis on program evaluation from Northern Arizona University. Dr. Haden has extensive experience in the evaluation of formal STEM education projects across the K-20 spectrum and the evaluation of informal STEM Education and Public Outreach (E/PO) programs. She has designed and implemented evaluations of programs funded by the National Science Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Arizona Board of Regents, Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Arizona Department of Education, among others. She has
. The amount of background information available to begin the project. 4. The commitment of the client to the project. 5. The uniqueness and overall excitement of the project. Team-related criteria 6. The relationship(s) between team member(s) and the client. 7. The number and qualifications of team members with respect to the scope of work. 8. The apparent level of team commitment to the project.The fifth one, uniqueness and overall excitement, attempts to give weight to projects that aredifferent, potentially interesting to a wider public audience, or are particularly challenging. Forexample, one team did a project at Fenway Park in Boston, home of Red Sox baseball. With noprior contact, they approached the
the College of EngineeringLeonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering. Page 25.314.10Bibliography 1. Blicblau, Aaron S. and Joseph M. Steiner (1998). Fostering Creativity Through Engineering Projects. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 55-65. 2. Stouffer W. B., Jeffrey S. Russell, and Michael G. Oliva (2004). Making The Strange Familiar: Creativity and the Future of Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 3. NAE (National Academy of Engineering) (2005). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of
environments include design offices, facilitymanagement, academe, regulatory agencies, etc. While opportunities for attaining outcomes suchas Outcomes 20 to 24 in Figure 1 may be relatively common across all work environments,opportunities for attaining others such as 9 (Design) and 13 (Project Management) maybe quitedifferent from one environment to another. Nonetheless, it is the expectation of the civilengineering profession that the EI will demonstrate attainment of all of the outcomes prior toentry into the practice of civil engineering at a professional level, whatever their workenvironment(s) may have been during the early stages of their career. The Guidelines attempt torecognize these differences in offering multiple example pathways for
/2010/12/01/loyola-may-cut-graduation-requirement-to-120-hours/>.3. Macic, E. (2010). “University trims minimum graduation credits to 120.” Arbiter Online: Boise State’sIndependent Student Media, < http://arbiteronline.com/?p=55283>.4. Gray, S. (2010). “Regents reduce minimum credit hour requirement.” The University Daily Kansan,< http://www.kansan.com/news/2010/oct/21/board-regents-reduces/>.5. ASCE Body of Knowledge Committee. (2008). Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century:Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, 2E, ASCE, Reston,VA.6. ASCE Body of Knowledge Committee. (2004). Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century:Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, ASCE, Reston,VA.7. ASCE
the model to several independent study projectscompleted or on-going currently. Specifically, the model was used to evaluate 11 independentstudy projects that were authorized and completed during the 2008-2009 academic year, as wellas 8 independent study projects authorized and on-going during the 2009-2010 academic year.All independent study projects within the D-C&ME are executed under the requirements of acontract prepared collectively at the start of the academic year by the Cadets, faculty member(s)acting as the project advisor(s), and the course director responsible for oversight of allindependent study projects. The authors utilized only those contracts to evaluate the projectsusing the model. None of the authors were involved with
Paper ID #21796Implementing Civil Engineering-specific Requirements for Professional Li-censureDr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He obtained his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech and then worked at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center on concrete bridge research. He is currently an associate professor of Civil Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). He teaches engineering mechanics
Directors is empowered to accept the withdrawal, and the Board of Delegates shall be notified of the Board of Director’s decision at the next regularly scheduled meeting [6].In the 88-year history of the organization, eight Member Societies have withdrawn from ABETor its predecessor, ECPD [8].‡Background: ABET CriteriaEach ABET Commission develops, publishes, and implements accreditation criteria in two broadcategories—General Criteria, which are applicable to all programs accredited by the associatedCommission, and Program Criteria, which are applicable only to programs with a specifiedprogram name [9].Each set of Program Criteria must include two elements: • an applicability clause, which specifies the specific program name(s) to
male 44 NA NA 12.3 ± 1.82006 female 6 NA NA 12.7 ± 1.4NA = not asked in that year of the surveyThe same survey measured students “universal diverse orientation” (UDO) using the previously-validated MGUDS-S instrument.10,18 UDO is “an attitude toward all other persons which isinclusive yet differentiating in that similarities and differences are both recognized andaccepted.”18 The three constructs that comprise UDO are: seeking diversity of contact,relativistic appreciation of self and others, and comfort with differences. UDO may correlate tostudent interest and comfort in different cultures. This instrument is comprised
and polish the resulting document(s): It’s more work/takes more time to tell thestudent how to fix the writing than to just do it myself. One product of this pattern is student workon the thesis does not accurately represent the student‘s actual writing proficiency.Industry Perspectives and Performance ExpectationsAlthough technical knowledge is essential for expert performance in any domain,15 thatknowledge alone does not ensure successful performance in industry. Rather, Hart argues that―to be an engineer is to be a technical communicator. Engineering is a problem-solvingprofession and clear communication leads to effective solutions.‖16 In fact, most research inengineering education explicitly emphasizes the need to prepare students for
Paper ID #28532Implementation of a laboratory experience in reinforced concrete coursesDr. Benjamin Z. Dymond, University of Minnesota Duluth Ben Dymond obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech before obtaining his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities. Ben is currently an assistant professor of structural engineering at the University of Minnesota Duluth.Dr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the