Paper ID #27283Experiencing Failure - Recreating the Hyatt Regency Collapse to Teach Stat-ics, Ethics, and Lifelong LearningDr. Laura Doyle, Santa Clara University Dr. Laura Doyle is a lecturer in the Civil Engineering Department at Santa Clara University where she teaches undergraduate courses in civil engineers. Before coming to SCU, Laura was a post doctoral scholar for the John Muir Institute of the Environment at University of California, Davis where she used multi-dimensional models to examine water quality of the San Francisco Bay Delta system. She earned her masters and doctoral degrees at UC Davis and her
Paper ID #27057Addressing the Cognitive and Affective Domain of Ethics Across the Civil andEnvironmental Engineering CurriculumDr. Jennifer Mueller PE P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Matthew D. Lovell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Matthew Lovell is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and he currently serves as the Interim Senior Director of Institutional Research, Plan- ning, and Assessment office. He is also serving as the director of the Making Academic Change Happen (MACH) program. He received his Ph.D. from Purdue University, and he holds his
at least 50% ofaccredited civil engineering programs in the United States. The credit hour requirements are theaverage value for each course [22]. The topics in column 3 are the proposed topics for a newthree-year civil engineering program. Most three year topics remain at approximately the samenumber of credit hours as the average four year program. The CE (Civil Engineer) seminarcourse is designed to cover professional issues in engineering listed in the EAC-ABET civilengineering program criteria including business, public policy, leadership, professional ethics,licensure, and professionalism. Topics that were eliminated include dynamics, constructionmanagement, engineering economics, and computer aided drawing (CAD). The topics that
with a minor in International Relations, from the University of Texas at Tyler in 2016. She received a Master of Arts in Human Rights and Global Ethics from the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom in January 2019. Her research interests are in the area of government, policy, and international relations.Dr. James K. Nelson Jr. P.E., Texas A&M University System Dr. James K. Nelson received a Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree from the University of Dayton in 1974. He received the Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy degrees in civil engineering from the University of Houston. During his graduate study, Dr. Nelson specialized in structural engineering. He is a registered professional engineer in
, with a focus on environmental river mechanics, from Colorado State University. Dr. Mueller’s teaching and research areas focus on environmental and water resources engineering, including stream restoration, sustainable design, environmental river mechanics, and stormwater management practices for low-impact develop- ment. As graduates of Rose-Hulman typically leave with technical competency, she feels strongly that students need to understand the importance of also developing skills in non-technical areas, including sustainability, ethics, and critical thinking. Additionally, Dr. Mueller aspires to continue to provide mean- ingful experiential learning opportunities for her students. Through these experiential
the ABET GeneralCriterion 3: Student Outcomes, General Criterion 5: Curriculum, and the Program Criteria forCivil and Similarly Named Engineering Programs (CEPC). The comparisons are provided inTables 1 through 21. For those outcomes that include both the cognitive domain and theaffective domain (Tables 15 Sustainability through 21 Ethical Responsibilities), both of theoutcome statements are provided in the table. Following each table is a discussion of theCEBOK3 outcome and the relevant ABET accreditation criteria, along with a recommendationfor “closing the gap” when it is determined that the ABET criteria only partially addresses ordoes not address the CEBOK3 outcome. It should be noted that the comparisons, ratings, andrecommendations are
Ethics in the Affective Domain Level Example Receiving Individual reads a book passage and recognizes the relationship to ethical behavior. Responding Individual participates in a discussion about the book, reads another book by the same author or another book about ethical behavior, etc. Valuing The individual demonstrates acceptance of the concept by voluntarily attending a lecture on ethical behavior. Organization The individual organizes a study session for other students on topics related to ethical behavior. Characterization The individual is firmly committed to the value of
has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living- learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Kevin G. Sutterer P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kevin Sutterer is Professor and Department Head of Civil Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology in Terre
interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Pro- fessor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engi- neering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. She is a licensed P.E.Dr. Brock E. Barry P.E., U.S. Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is Professor of Engineering Educaiton in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years
) e Problems engineering problems 6. Professional/ an understanding of professional and ethical Understanding f Ethical responsibility (2) 7. Communication an ability to communicate effectively Ability (3) g 8. Engineering the broad education necessary to understand Understanding h Impact the impact of engineering solutions in a global (2) and societal context 9. Life-long a recognition of the need for, and an ability to Ability (3) i Learning engage in life-long learning 10. Contemporary a knowledge of contemporary issues Recognition j Issues
on Undergraduate Research, undergraduate research is defined as “aninquiry or investigation conducted by an undergraduate student that makes an originalintellectual or creative contribution to the discipline [1].” As stated in literature, undergraduateswho conduct research show improvements in thinking independently, thinking critically, puttingideas together, solving problems, analyzing data, analyzing literature, interpreting researchfindings, conducting ethical research, writing and communicating [2-9]. Literature also assertsthat it is rare for students to have enough opportunity to gain higher-order thinking skills fromtheir undergraduate research experiences [10].Students involved in undergraduate research also report outcomes that may
learn about and practice sustainability. Biele- feldt is a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Education for Sustainable Civil Engineering: A Case Study of Affective Outcomes among StudentsAbstractIt is important that civil engineering students are educated about sustainable and resilient design.The updated Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge Third Edition (CEBOK3) has added affectivedomain outcomes for sustainability. This acknowledges the fact that while engineers may havethe
and affective domains in the CEBOK3 [3, 5, 6, 9]. Onereason behind this was the deemed importance of civil engineers internalizing a sense of valuefor the people served by the profession and for their human experience.The CEBOK3TC initially considered including the affective domain for all of the CEBOK3outcomes. While possible, the committee ultimately felt it best to formally introduce theaffective domain into the CEBOK for a selection of outcomes only. The sustainability outcomeand all of the professional outcomes (communication, teamwork and leadership, lifelonglearning, professional attitudes, professional responsibilities, and ethical responsibilities) wereselected by the task committee as being the most appropriate to including in both
construction. As the leaders of change in fundamental civil engineeringprocesses, it is the responsibility of civil engineering departments nationwide to lead themovement toward sustainable civil engineering development through research and education oftheir students.” 1 Sustainability is one of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) fourkey programs 2. It is also part of Canon 1 of the ASCE Code of Ethics, “Engineers shall holdparamount the safety, health and welfare of the public and shall strive to comply with theprinciples of sustainable development in the performance of their professional duties.” 3Robinson and Sutterer cited as barriers to sustainability in education that many civil engineeringfaculty are not knowledgeable about
. Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects through- out the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering
UG UG ME ME Attitudes20. Professional UG UG ME ME ME Responsibilities21. Ethical UG UG UG ME ME Responsibilities 6 Table 1b. Affective Outcomes for CE-BOK3 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Outcome Receive Respond Value Organize Characterize 15. Sustainability UG UG ME SD 16. Communication UG
about and practice sustainability. Biele- feldt is a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, leadership, and diversity.Dr. Audra N. Morse P.E., Michigan Technological University Dr. Audra Morse, P.E., is a Professor and Department Chair in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan Technological University. Her professional experience is focused on water and wastewater treatment, specifically water reclamation systems, membrane filtration and the fate of personal products in treatment systems. However, she has a passion to tackle diversity and inclusion issues for students
ME Lifelong Learning UG UG UG ME ME Professional Attitudes UG UG ME ME Professional Responsibilities UG UG ME ME ME Ethical Responsibilities UG UG ME ME MELEGEND:UG = Undergraduate Education - undergraduate education leading to a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering or a closely related engineering discipline, generally from a four‐year ABET EAC‐accredited program.PG = Post‐Graduate Education - post‐graduate education equivalent to or leading to a master’s degree in civil engineering or a closely
importance of risk and resilience assessment of engineering systems, which arecritical infrastructures to ensure public health, safety, security, and commerce. According to theVision for Civil Engineering in 2025 [5], civil engineers should serve competently, collaboratively,and ethically to manage risk and uncertainty caused by natural events, accidents and other threats.The future development and the preservation and maintenance of national infrastructure willdemand a more intense focus on risk assessment to mitigate hazards and improve engineeringperformance [10]. Understanding, managing, and reducing disaster risks provide a foundation forresilience against disasters. Resilience analysis is a proactive approach to enhance the ability ofthe
from different universities,undeclared first-year students, and a few students in different majors, including students from theSustainable Urban Environments degree program who are required to take this class during theirfirst or second year,The objectives of the Introduction to Civil Engineering course are 1. List the subdisciplines of civil engineering, identify types of projects that engage each, and understand the multidisciplinary nature of most large infrastructure projects; 2. Explain the overall role of civil engineers in design and operation of urban infrastructure, with understanding of the range of typical day-to-day tasks and responsibilities; 3. Discuss the ethical responsibilities of engineers to their
* Problems Impact of Hurricanes on Geotechnical Ethical Considerations Infrastructure* Environmental/Water Resources I – Structural Infrastructure I – History Hydrology* Environmental/Water Resources II – Structural Infrastructure II – Materials and Water Treatment & Water Quality* Deflection Environmental/Water Resources III – Structural Infrastructure III and IV – Bridge Stormwater Management* Types and Inspection Environmental/Water Resources IV – Impact of Hurricanes on Structural Infrastructure
healthyapartments, affordable and market rate, along with space for local businesses, a new hotel, anautomated agriculture system and live/work spaces designed for creatives [10]. The eco-villageproject provides an opportunity for students to investigate the intersection of projectmanagement, engineering economics, sustainability and metacognition on a live project.Students directly interact with the Place team to learn about innovations in infrastructurefunding, project design challenges, development ethics and innovation in sustainability as theyconsider their own learning progression.The development of the class partnership with Place is based on the goal of giving students anin-depth and professional experiential learning opportunity that provides them
8 Project Management 15 Ethical ResponsibilityThe undergraduate curriculum focuses on application of rigorous analysis methods,comprehensive evaluation of equitable societal needs, adherence to relevant guidelines andstandards, and determination of optimal solutions to complex engineering problems. Table 2depicts an undergraduate student’s design experience across the undergraduate curriculum.Obviously, a student’s exposure to design complexities increases as the student advancestowards graduation. Typically, the freshmanexperience is limited in scope, but open-endedenough to create a context where students can begin developing an understanding of what the“design process” entails. Students undertake disciplinary
project manager on projects through- out the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, non- verbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics.Shawn Griffiths, University of Wyoming Shawn Griffiths is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Wyoming. Shawn holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Utah State University (2009), M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Arkansas (2011) and