Paper ID #7248A Documentary Project in a Civil Engineering CourseDr. Seamus F Freyne P.E., Mississippi State University On the civil engineering faculty at Mississippi State University, Dr. Seamus Freyne teaches structures courses and his research interests include engineering education. Page 23.40.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A DOCUMENTARY PROJECT IN A CIVIL ENGINEERING COURSEOverviewAn innovative documentary project in an
Paper ID #6443Student Projects in Engineering History and HeritageDr. Norb Delatte P.E., Cleveland State University Dr. Norbert J. Delatte, Jr., P.E., F.ACI, F.ASCE, is a professor and chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Cleveland State University. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering from The Citadel in 1984, a master’s degree in Civil Engineering from The Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1986, and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin in 1996
Paper ID #6575Fostering Critical Thinking Through A Service-Learning, Combined SewerAnalysis Project In An Undergraduate Course in Hydrologic EngineeringDr. Isaac W Wait, Marshall University Dr. Isaac Wait is an associate professor of Engineering in the Division of Engineering at Marshall Univer- sity in Huntington, W.Va. He conducts research and teaches courses in water resources and environmental engineering, and is a registered professional engineer in the states of Ohio and West Virginia.Prof. Jeffrey Thomas Huffman P.E., Marshall University Jeffrey T. Huffman is an assistant professor of Engineering in the Weisberg
Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). She also completed a teaching certificate and was actively involved with the Center for the En- hancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) at Georgia Tech. Her academic interests focus on two primary areas of sustainable transportation: (1) community-based design and planning and (2) strategic planning and policy development. Dr. Barrella is also interested in investigating how to best integrate these research interests into classroom and project experiences for her students.Mr. Thomas A. Wall, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Caroline R. Noyes, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Michael O. Rodgers, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Michael Rodgers is a research professor in the Georgia
“real-world” project, others continue to offer a traditional project that falls under therubric of “textbook” problems. Although there may be sound, legitimate support for offering a“textbook” capstone, including the magnitude of work involved for instructors, using a real-world project offers tremendous benefit.In order to ensure that the students’ capstone experience is true-to-life, and emulates consultingfirms, the transportation capstone program in the Department of Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering (CEE) at Northeastern University (NU) has created a program that benefits thestudents and the surrounding communities. The 14 week semester emulates a major project in aconsulting firm with project requirements, deliverables, and community
focused on undergraduateeducation with a small M.S. program in Civil Engineering. The typical cohort of full-timefunded graduate students in Civil Engineering is around 3-4 per year. In the undergraduateprogram, each student in the junior and senior years has to take two clinic credits per semester.In each of these four semesters, the students work on industry or grant funded project. Thetypical workload for a full-time faculty member is nine credits, which includes supervision ofthree to four clinic projects, with 3-4 students in each clinic project. The lack of a doctoralprogram usually could be a big limitation for faculty members to attract large research fundingthat spans over 3 to 4 years. This may be due to lack of continuity of the
Paper ID #7892National Trends in the Civil Engineering Major Design Experience: PartDeuxDr. Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University Tonya Nilsson is a full-time lecturer in the department of Civil Engineering at Santa Clara University. Previously she was on the faculty at California State University, Chico where she was a tenured associate professor. Dr. Nilsson has her professional license and has worked in industry on structural engineering projects. Dr. Nilsson worked for a number of years with ASCE’s ExCEED Teaching Workshops and served for four years on the national ASCE Committee on Faculty Development. She
presenting the material. Inaddition to the subtle changes an instructor can make in class, a number of other options existtaking the learner-centered teaching approach to another level. The most common methods areproblem and project-based learning techniques. Both provide more open-ended types ofexperiences for students, but also require more upfront organization from the instructor.Problem-based learning exercises are generally open-ended, real-world problems worked out inteams where the instructor simply facilitates and monitors progress. Project-based learningexercises are similar, but usually include more than one task that leads to a final product, alsoworked out in teams [3]. In most cases project-based learning exercises are lengthier and
complex projects after their first year of work, • Ability of graduates later in their careers to take the lead role in directing design work, as well as manage project budgets and clients, and • Ability of graduates to assume similar responsibilities at similar points in their career, as well as possess the educational and design experience needed for licensure. Table 1 – Overview of Survey StatementsCategory: Preparedness and abilities of new graduates during first year of workStatements: • Have the necessary knowledge in fundamental engineering subjects (e.g. statics, strength of materials, etc.) to start career. • Have
theprogram with the undergraduate degree, offering a non-project option, managing theprogram through continuing education, collaborating with other departments, partneringwith industry, and accommodating students who did not graduate from the Cal PolyARCE undergraduate program. This paper offers a history of this masters program,describes these various issues, presents the current state of the program and makesrecommendations for its future.IntroductionThe Cal Poly Architectural Engineering Department’s masters program was launched infall 2007 due to student demand and ASCE policy 465’s declaration of the mastersdegree as the first professional degree for the practice of civil engineering at theprofessional level1. The mission of this master’s
Corporate Higher Education program man- ager in 2004, Brown became the leader of various programs and projects for predominately domestic higher education engagements. Due to Boeing’s desire for international expansion, the responsibility of growing Boeing’s Higher Education International engagements was added to her preview. Brown devel- ops corporate policy, procedures and guidelines for international university relationships for workforce needs, continuing education requirements, potential research projects, building the Boeing brand and rep- utation. She also establishes corporate infrastructure and leads a global network of Boeing executives for implementing Higher Education engagements for the company, and works
primary areas of research are in intersection operations, traffic signal control systems, highway capacity, and transportation engineering education. Page 23.68.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A Model for Collaborative Curriculum Design in Transportation Engineering EducationAbstractThe National Transportation Curriculum Project (NTCP) has been underway for four years as anad-hoc, collaborative effort to effect changes in transportation engineering education.Specifically, the NTCP had developed a set of learning outcomes and associated
of oral presentations and bi-weekly reports. The notebook’s value is intended to beas a form of prewriting. Students beginning the process of writing a formal report find that theyhave already written extensively on every aspect of their project.A different example of informal writing is evident in another Engineering department’s capstonecourse in the form of periodic project updates in oral presentations. Student groups are requiredto show how their planned or completed tasks will meet the objectives of their senior projects.Laying out multiple tasks, complete with Gantt Charts, creates a storyboard environment inwhich the students informally write and revise their design projects.Senior Design Team Posters. One example of a visual
centered around building amodel consisting of a shallow foundation on a sand deposit utilizing the Network for EarthquakeEngineering Simulation (NEES) centrifuge facility. The project provides students at threedifferent engineering universities with new educational tools for improving their understandingof various geotechnical engineering concepts. The main goals of this project are: to develop andpilot test educational models utilizing the centrifuge facility at one of these universities; toprovide visual observation of the response of soil and soil-foundation systems; and to promotestudent-based use of instrumentation, interpretation of acquired data, and utilization of the NEES3D data viewer in order to analyze the measured response. Students
experience.After assigned to a team, each student then evaluates his or her preferred communication style.The students then investigate how their teammates' styles differ from their own. The studentsalso learn techniques for tailoring their own communication style to fit the needs of others. Theprimary objective of the exercises is to enhance communication among teammates who arepreparing to complete a group design project over a six-month period. The paper brieflydescribes how the authors incorporated the communication styles exercises into the course. Anoutcome for the civil engineering program requires that our graduates demonstrate an ability tofunction on a multidisciplinary civil engineering team. Under this outcome, the program definesa performance
management, low-impact de- velopment, green infrastructure design, storm water management, flood risk modeling, vulnerabilities and adaptation strategies for urban water systems, and the water-energy nexus. Steve’s research projects have been funded by National Laboratories, EPA, NSF, DOD, DOE, State Departments of Transportation, and Private Industry. His work has resulted in more than 50 authored or co-authored peer-reviewed publi- cations. Dr. Burian currently is an Associate Director of the Global Change and Sustainability Center and the Co-Director of Sustainability Curriculum Development at the University of Utah. He is actively involved with several professional societies including ASCE, AWRA, AWWA, WEF, AGU, AMS
as an assistant professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Ohio Northern University in Ada, Ohio. Here he devel- ops and teaches general engineering and civil engineering courses, works on transportation engineering projects, and holds membership with a number of organizations and committees. From September 2003 to August 2008 he was a research assistant in the Civil Engineering Department at the University of Akron. He worked on a number of Transportation/Pavement Engineering research projects, and Geotechnical En- gineering research projects. Then from September 2003 to August 2008, he was a teaching assistant with the Civil Engineering Department at the University of Akron. His work has been published in
Services group of Tetra Tech, Inc. in Tulsa, Okla. He has 39 years of engineering experience with most of his career focusing on municipal water and waste water projects. He has been with Tetra Tech for 28 years. He holds a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Kansas State University and a M.S. degree in Environmental Engineering from Oklahoma State University. Nelson is licensed as a professional engineer in four states and holds Class A operator licenses in Oklahoma for water works and waste water works. Nelson served on the Oklahoma State Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors for twelve years and was board chair for two years. He served as president of the National Council of Examiners for
Department program outcomes is measuredusing embedded indicators with the six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy 12,13 summarized as: 1.)Knowledge, 2.) Comprehension, 3.) Application, 4.) Analysis, 5.) Synthesis and 6.) Evaluation. Page 23.393.6Table 1 summarizes the 22 CEE Department program outcomes adopted for the CivilEngineering program and identifies the ten outcomes that are being used to assess leadershipdevelopment. Course embedded indicators on tests, assignments, and projects are usedsystematically to evaluate each of the 22 CEE Department program outcomes. Multiple meansof assessing each CEE Department program outcome are deployed and include
Paper ID #6383Integration of Remote Major Research Instrumentation in UndergraduateCivil Engineering EducationDr. Usama El Shamy P.E., Southern Methodist University Dr. Usama El Shamy is an assistant professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Southern Methodist University. He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 2004. He is the Principal Investigator and Project Director of the NSF funded TUES-Type 1 project: ”A Multi-Institutional Classroom Learning Environment for Geotechnical Engineering Educa- tion.”Dr. Tarek Abdoun, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteDr
quantify human “pressure” on theplanet with regards to resources, emissions, land consumption, etc. in comparison to the currentcarrying capacity of the Earth. 5 This metric begins to measure the problem in order to thensupport potential solutions, such as green building rating systems. Green building rating systemssuch as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) have been a popular measurefor sustainable design through applying credits and receiving points for sustainable projects.6 Asengineers continue to implement more innovative techniques, the education and awareness ofsustainable design will continue.Pedagogical TechniquesMuch has been written regarding pedagogical techniques and the benefits of active learning are
in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler. Prior to joining academia, he worked for nearly five years as a project manager and structural analyst for Electric Boar Corporation. Dr. McGin- nis’ research interests include nondestructive evaluation of structures, response of structures to extreme events such as fire and earthquake, and improving undergraduate engineering education. He has published numerous articles concerning the application of digital image correlation, a non-contact photographic method of determining deformations, to study the behavior of unique structures under various loadings. In teaching and mentoring areas, Dr. McGinnis has been recognized by his peers as the
finding an activity that challenges all butdoes not overwhelm the weakest students. However, that concern is applicable only to class-level or course-level competitions.Intercollegiate competitions are not generated by an individual instructor/course director.Beyond this obvious difference, there are many other differences that the casual observer couldidentify, which make inferring greater learning-value seem plausible. Fortunately there is amodest body of evaluative work on the intercollegiate competition approach.Cooley et al.[6], evaluated a West Virginia University (WVU) capstone project in electricalengineering, where rather than a typical project, the students chose their work with the specificintent to enter it into an intercollegiate
structures, computational geo-mechanics, con- stitutive modeling, pavement design, characterization and prediction of behavior of pavement materials, linear and non-linear finite element applications in geotechnical engineering, geo-structural systems anal- ysis, structural mechanics, sustainable infrastructure development, and material model development. He had been actively involved in planning, designing, supervising, and constructing many civil engineering projects, such as roads, storm drain systems, a $70 million water supply scheme which is comprised of treatment works, hydraulic mains, access roads, and auxiliary civil works. He had developed and opti- mized many highway design schemes and models. For example, his
three times in the student‟spreparation: after their undergraduate work, immediately after a graduate level program, or afterMasters-Level graduation and the first few years of experience. This study addresses in somedetail how well the Masters-Level structural engineering education, supplemented with theknowledge increase expected from the initial professional experience, meets the expectations ofthe structural engineering profession in the United States. The outcomes of this research project include an assessment of the competency level(using Bloom‟s taxonomy [1]) expected to be achieved by the conclusion of the Masters-Levelprogram and after the initial five years of professional practice following the graduate program ineach of the
of the experiments so thatstudents can more readily connect the results with the real world. In an effort to improve studentlearning in structural dynamics, forced vibration testing2,3,4 of buildings on the Cal Poly campushas been conducted. Page 23.628.2The Bridge House, a one-story building spanning a small seasonal creek, was constructed in19665 by undergraduate students in the Cal Poly outdoor experimental construction laboratory.The goal of the project was to create a structure that utilized the rough terrain of the nine acrecanyon (see Figure 1). The building has served many purposes over the years including housingfor the canyon
25E3. Design/Build & Other Project Methods 0 13 23 87 3 23E4. Leadership Skills/Adaptation to Changes 0 32 25 91 3 40E5. Working with Architects, Contractors, etc. 0 27 34 100 3 33E6. LEED, Green Buildings, Energy Use 0 23 19 84 3 40E7. International Design and Construction Practices 0 7 3 48 3 14 Table 2: Topic Groups and Subtopics
. Example web-based screen showing the embedded video for query building.Therefore, the instructor decided to move the GIS laboratory toward the end of the semester bylinking it to the highway design project, the major hands-on activity in the course. This newstructure of the instructional activities was implemented during the last two semesters of theperiod analyzed in this study (Fall 2010 and Spring 2011).Structure and Complexity of Instructional TasksThe structure and complexity of the instructional tasks changed over the implementation cycles.Four major task structure factors that defined the complexity of the instructional tasks throughoutthis study are presented in the following part of this section
engineering curriculum, a foundationwill be formed upon which a system for improved communication skill in engineering can bebuilt.Initial InvestigationsThere has been for a long time a concerted effort by a number of practitioners across the countryto develop programs that will help students understand the need to communicate in a manner thatwill benefit careers outside of the English world. The Writing Across the Curriculum movementhas done much to support the need to make faculty and students more conscious of theimportance of communication in life and in the workplace. The Northwest Inland Writing Projectat the University of Idaho, the National Writing Project, and the Red Mountain Writing ProjectScholarly Writing Retreat for University Faculty
Section, governing board of the Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI), vice chair of the International Activities Committee, EWRI Congress chair last year, and service on many other local and national committees. He has also been active in water resources and hydroelectric engineering association including AWRA, chairing the Waterpower Conference, and currently serves on the board of the Hydro Research Foundation. Prior to joining ASCE, Killgore spent three years at Puget Sound Energy in Washington as a hydro manager, where he oversaw such functions as major capital project development related to dam safety, water management, energy production studies, and strategic planning. He spent nearly 30 years as a