Paper ID #9997MS Projects from Partnership with City GovernmentAllison CarlsonMr. Travis Jensen, University of Minnesota DuluthMr. Andrew Frank Lund, University of Minnesota DuluthDr. Eshan V. Dave, University of Minnesota DuluthDr. David A Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth Page 24.918.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 MS Projects from Partnership with City GovernmentABSTRACTThis paper describes graduate student projects that were conducted through cooperation betweenUniversity of Minnesota Duluth
Paper ID #9137Benefits and Practical Aspects of Involving Construction Professionals in In-ternational Service-Learning ProjectsDr. John E. Greenleaf P.E., Quinnipiac University John Greenleaf received his Ph.D. from Lehigh University in 2007 and is a licensed professional en- gineer. In 2013 he joined Quinnipiac University in Hamden Connecticut to lead the development of a new Civil Engineering program within the newly established engineering school. His professional back- ground includes work in the areas of environmental engineering, construction, service learning projects and undergraduate engineering education. His
Paper ID #10734Course Enhancement by Melding the BOK2 Student Outcomes with the ProjectManagement Body of KnowledgeProf. John V Tocco JD, Lawrence Technological University Page 24.325.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Course Enhancement by Melding the BOK2 Student Outcomes with the Project Management Body of KnowledgeAbstractThe Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge, Second Edition (BOK2), promulgated by theAmerican Society of Civil Engineering, defines twenty-four student outcomes for
Paper ID #10880Use of Peer Review of Projects to Enhance Upper Level Geotechnical Engi-neering CoursesDr. James L. Hanson PE, California Polytechnic State University Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Cal Poly - San Luis Obispo Page 24.1312.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Use of Peer Review of Projects to Enhance Upper Level Geotechnical Engineering CoursesAbstractStudent peer review has been integrated to multiple upper level
Paper ID #8717Using Sponsored Design Projects to Strengthen Professional Practice Cur-riculum Components in Civil Engineering CapstoneProf. Jim Nelson, Brigham Young UniversityMr. Erick HollenbaughDr. M. Brett Borup, Brigham Young University Page 24.1344.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Using Sponsored Design Projects to Strengthen Professional Practice Curriculum Components in Civil Engineering CapstoneAbstractThe Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Brigham Young University has
Paper ID #9039A Qualitative Study to Assess the Learning Outcomes of a Civil EngineeringService Learning Project in BoliviaProf. Ann E Jeffers, University of Michigan Dr. Jeffers is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Michigan. Her research lies at the intersections between the fire sciences and structural engineering disciplines, and specifically seeks to establish novel computational methods that bridge the domains of fire science, heat transfer, and structural mechanics. She currently serves on the ASCE Fire Protection Committee and the SFPE Standards
areas of engineering education, hydraulic engineering, soil erosion and sediment transport, river engineering/stream restoration, and uncertainty and risk assessment for stream restoration design. Dr. Niezgoda recently developed a risk-benefit assessment method for use in improving the design of stream restoration projects and is actively working to develop it into a tool for practitioner use. Dr. Niezgoda is actively involved in the ASCE Environmental and Water Resources Institute, holding officer positions in committees under the Urban Water Resources Research Council (Urban Streams Committee), and the Hydraulics and Waterways Council (River Restoration Committee, Urban Stream Restoration Task Committee, River
engineeringeducation. One approach has been to use professional rating systems as a vehicle in designcourses. This paper describes such an approach using the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure(ISI) EnvisionTM rating system as part of a learning module in the capstone design course at theUniversity of Utah. In the module, students are first presented fundamental sustainabilityconcepts and tools, and in a separate seminar are introduced to the Envision rating system.Students are exposed at least two more times to brief follow-up discussions applying Envision totheir project. It was expected that the use of Envision helps students reinforce underlyingsustainability concepts and improve the learning about Envision by applying it to a project. Themodule
such as obtaining work for the firm,planning and running client meetings, and project management. Other essays introduce thestudents to technical aspects such as decision making in the schematic design phase, designingfor constructability, integrating gravity and lateral load systems, coordinating non-structuralelements, creating construction documents, responding to requests for information from the field,and the quality assurance process.The practicum requirements encourage the students to meet multiple engineers within the firm inorder to see their future career from the perspective of several different people. This papersummarizes feedback from the students and employers about the outcomes of the practicum,what worked well in the
project to develop a sustainable desalination system using solar energy and recycled concrete membranes. Page 24.168.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An Innovative Way to Teach Sustainability in a Civil Engineering Materials ClassAbstractSustainability concepts were introduced into the Civil Engineering Materials course atManhattan College by requiring students to design their own “Greencrete” using recycledmaterials for their term project. Students were allowed considerable freedom in choosing therecycled materials, and were
. Page 24.787.2Motivation and Challenges of Information Technology in Civil EngineeringThe modern civil engineer is expected to apply information technology skills to model anddesign projects. These expectations are articulated in Outcome 10 of the American Society ofCivil Engineers (ASCE) Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparingthe Civil Engineer for the Future (BOK2)3, which references Outcome 3k of ABET Inc.Proposed Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Program4. The BOK2 Levels of AchievementSubcommittee recommends that civil engineers who have earned a baccalaureate degree shouldbe able to achieve the third level (application) of the six-level cognitive domain in this outcome.At that level, graduates should be able
engineering(CEE) works is important to many civil and environmental engineers. Geotechnical and geo-environmental engineers in particular must be able to understand and apply various aspects of thegeological sciences in their practice, but many other types of engineers also need to be confidentin understanding and applying findings of geologists with respect to their projects. This includesmanaging civil or environmental aspects of foundation systems, tunneling, mining, constructionmaterials, excavation, ground water, contaminant transport, seismicity, and mass movement,among many other applications.Because of the importance of geological science to civil and environmental engineers, it is notunusual for some engineering programs to require a course
Civil Engineering CurriculumLessons learned from case studies have had a significant impact on both education and practiceof engineering and related disciplines. The history of practice in civil engineering is, in largepart, the story of failures, both imminent and actual, and ensuing changes to designs, standardsand procedures made as the result of timely interventions or forensic analyses. In addition totechnical issues, professional and ethical responsibilities are highlighted by the relevant cases.Over the past five years the project extended the work of implementing and assessing casestudies from Cleveland State University to eleven other university partners, and broadened thescope to cover engineering
Paper ID #8529Critical Thinking in the Curriculum: Making Better DecisionsProf. Stephen Mattingly, University of Texas, Arlington STEPHEN MATTINGLY is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering at the University of Texas at Ar- lington. Previously, he worked at the Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Irvine and University of Alaska, Fairbanks. He has recently completed and is currently working on research projects that address a variety of topics including transportation public health performance measures, de- cision and risk analysis, airport operations, managed lane traveler behavior, high
(PEHE), and the Legislative and Government Affairs Committee in spring 2012; and Confirm the value of preparing an EBOK and schedule its preparation for, at minimum, a two-year 2012-2013 process.As indicated by the previously discussed reasons to develop the EBOK, and by thespecific charge, the EBOK project was, from the outset, to be about the future, not thepresent. This aspirational initiative is about tomorrow’s engineering practitioners, notnecessarily about today’s. The EBOK is future-oriented in that, while current engineeringpractice may require many of the EBOK capabilities and some engineers exhibit thosecapabilities, many more engineers will need to acquire more capabilities or be more adeptat those they already
Engineering Department at Lawrence Technological University will offer a program in which our graduates have: (a) an ability to apply knowledge and principles of mathematics, science, and engineering in the solution of civil engineering problems (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze data and interpret results (c) an ability to design a civil engineering system, component, or process to meet desired project needs (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams including participation in a senior-level design project sequence (e) an ability to identify, formulate, analyze, and solve engineering problems
responsibilities, typically assigned by another studentwho functions as the leader or project manager. Most of the work is performed on anindependent basis – the student works on their component and then submits it to the team.The material is then integrated into the final product.Throughout the semester, the faculty advisor meets with the team on close to a weeklybasis. Based on the interactions in the weekly meetings, the advisor has an appreciationfor what students the students are working on – those that are doing the work and thosethat are not contributing. As a result, the advisor was often required to grade the studenton the work that was submitted by the team and participation at weekly meetings.Although this approach was objective, it was not the
Transportation Subcommittee under President’s Environmental Sustainability Committee. In addition to those duties at Villanova University, she is also Panel Member of various re- search projects sponsored by The National Academies and University Representative of Transportation research Board. Her teaching and research area include various aspects of transportation engineering, traffic safety, and sustainable infrastructure.Dr. Susan B. Mackey-Kallis, Villanova University SUSAN MACKEY-KALLIS, an Associate Professor in the Communication Department at Villanova Uni- versity in Pennsylvania and is currently serving as the chair of Villanova’s International Leadership Team, which is focused on developing a comprehensive and
positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox also spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Soci- ety of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President, Dr. Lenox led several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engineering profession – with the overall
Paper ID #9270Visions of the Future of Engineering Education: Sharpening the FocusMr. Mark William Killgore PE, F.ASCE, D.WRE, American Society of Civil Engineers Mark Killgore, P.E. , D.WRE, F.ASCE serves as the ASCE Director responsible for the Society’s Raise the Bar initiative. He is also a Research Fellow specializing in transboundary water and energy issues at the University of Texas at Austin. Prior to joining ASCE staff in late 2011, Killgore spent three years at Puget Sound Energy as a hydro manager, where he oversaw such functions as major capital project development related to dam safety, water management
Paper ID #9178Experiences in Implementing an NSF/REU Site on Interdisciplinary WaterSciences and Engineering during 2007-13Dr. Vinod K Lohani, Virginia Tech Dr. Vinod K Lohani is a professor in the Engineering Education Department and an adjunct faculty in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research interests are in the areas of sustainability, computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, and water resources. In a major ($1M+, NSF) curriculum reform and engineering education research project from 2004 to 2009, he led a team of engineering and education faculty to reform engineering
method known as the flipped classroom is gaining consideration andimplementation in engineering classes as well as in classrooms of many levels and disciplines.In a flipped classroom, live class lectures are moved out of classroom and replaced with on-linevideos, and active, project-based learning activities are done in their place. At the University ofPittsburgh and Pennsylvania State University two sustainable engineering courses focused onresidential energy efficiency were flipped, and the impact this method had on the students wasinvestigated.For this study, data was collected using pre- and post-confidence tests, a final course reflectionsurvey, and the College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI). This datawas then
Education, College of Engineering, at the Pennsylvania State University, USA. She has a Master of Arts Degree in Education and Human Development specializing in Educational Technology Leadership. Her work focuses on projects assess student perceptions of learning related to their experi- ences with engineering course innovations. She has worked extensively in the design of assessment tools for course methods and activities. She is a faculty development consultant with previous experience in in- structional design, and the instructor of the Graduate Teaching Assistant Seminar for engineering teaching assistants at Penn State
closer to internal motivation whenwe have the ability to work autonomously. 8 Mastery is becoming proficient at ones’ chosencraft. In the same way that a basketball player shoots the same shot hundreds of thousands oftimes in practice for the opportunity to shoot one time at the end of a game, so too do allprofessionals seek to become masters within their domain. Allowing professionals and studentsthe opportunity to work towards mastery helps move us beyond Motivation 2.0. 9 Finally,Purpose allows a person to see the reason why their efforts are important. Most people want tobe functional members of a team and have their efforts used as part of a larger project, or theentire project. This purpose means something more than just their current
has been involved in research projects to develop, refine, and apply innovative assessment tools for characterizing student knowledge of sustainability. Her ultimate goal is to use this assessment data to guide the design and evaluation of educational interventions to improve undergraduate sustainability education. In the area of bioprocessing, Dr. Watson has experience using bacteria and algae to convert waste materials into high-value products, such as biofuels.Mr. Joshua Pelkey, AirWatch Joshua Pelkey is currently a product manager at AirWatch in Atlanta, GA. He completed his MS in Elec- trical and Computer Engineering at GT and his BS in Computer Engineering from Clemson University. He has conducted
Page 24.764.7Figure 3: Student Assessment of Course Form and Analysis Tool Page 24.764.8 Table 1 Sample of the faculty comments and recommendations for improvement, spring 20124 Course Faculty Comments Recommendation for Continuous Improvement ENGR The students are at many different levels of Have less homework problems and smaller projects. 120 independence. Some students are ready for This will keep the amount of work the same but college engineering; some still want their high place more importance more spread out. school teacher to walk them through
in Geotechnical Engineering with and emphasis on dam and levee projects. He is currently an assistant professor of Civil Engineering at Oregon Institute of Technology. Page 24.336.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Creation of a Co-Terminal BS/MS Civil Engineering Degree ProgramAbstractA civil engineering department at a small teaching-focused polytechnic university recentlyoverhauled its undergraduate program to develop a practice-focused, co-terminal,bachelor’s/master’s degree program. The department, staffed with five faculty
] For example, Wankat & Oreovicz [9] discuss preparation for aperformance in the classroom. They make vivid comparisons between stage directions andlecture notes, between a dress rehearsal and classroom preparation, between voice projection in atheatre and voice projection in a classroom, and the list goes on. Lowman[5] also draws similarparallels. In fact Lowman makes the statement that, “college classrooms are fundamentallydramatic arenas in which the teacher is the focal point, like the actor or orator on stage.” In hisjournal article titled “The Teacher as Actor,” Harris[10] explores speech, pantomime, andcharacterization and shows how these traditional acting concepts are applicable to college
, computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, and water resources. In a major ($1M+, NSF) curriculum reform and engineering education research project from 2004 to 2009, he led a team of engineering and education faculty to reform engineering curriculum of an engineering department (Biological Systems Engineering) using Jerome Bruner’s spiral curriculum theory. Currently, Dr. Lohani leads an NSF/REU Site on ”interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering” which has already graduated 56 excellent undergraduate researchers since 2007. This Site is renewed for the third cycle which will be implemented during 2014-16. He also leads an NSF/TUES type I project in which a real-time environmental monitoring lab
lot of valuable experience when conducting field surveysof stream geometry and sediment characteristics. During summer 2014, a restoration design willbe implemented along Lost Creek, and future courses will continue to monitor the effectivenessof the restoration project with respect to stream stability. An analysis of the Index of LearningStyles and student evaluation comments will continue to be examined to determine the impactexperiential learning activities have on the student learning. This has been and will continue tobe a unique opportunity for students to be involved in a pre- and post-restoration monitoringprogram of a real world project.Introduction to Experiential Learning ActivitiesAs defined by the Association for Experiential