to perform the calculations accurately.Finally, through the work the instructor has done focused on improving course equity outcomes inSTEM for underrepresented minorities, specifically Latinx students, it has become apparent thatinfrequent, high stakes assessments of student learning is not a culturally responsive practice. Inorder to place learning (and not evaluating) at the forefront of any assessment, it was necessary torethink student assessments in undergraduate courses.In response to the observations outlined, the instructor chose to implement a mastery basedassessment scheme for a senior level reinforced concrete design course.BackgroundMastery based grading approaches have seen growing use in engineering [1]-[5]. While the nameused
and ASEE has established a diversity recognition program to recognize Schoolsthat have incorporated these aspects into their mission, a piece of which is the curricula [1]. Inaddition, the revisions to ABET criterion 5 (curriculum) now include the need to address DEI [2].To accomplish part of the curricular component, we have been working on hands-on activities thatare scalable from a first-year program to upper level courses in the Fred DeMatteis School ofEngineering and Applied Science (SEAS) at Hofstra University, a midsized, private universitylocated in Hempstead, NY. Hofstra is situated in a region that represents a very diverse communityand the students in our engineering programs mirror this diversity. For example, SEAS boasts a63.7
added design considerations to a finalJamboard for each of the stakeholders that could address some of the potential harms and benefits.Results The instructors worked through this activity step-by-step, explaining the relevantdefinitions and giving the students time to think to themselves and with their group before addingtheir ideas to the Jamboard. One full class session, approximately one hour, was devoted to thisactivity and surrounding discussions. After a Jamboard was populated, the class discussed theresponses and then moved on to the next step. Figure 1 shows the general flow of the Jamboards.Figure 1: Outline of Jamboard flow. Note: Stakeholder 1 is used as an example, but the processwas completed for stakeholders 1, 2, 3, and 4
curricula.IntroductionCivil infrastructure forms the physical foundation for our society. Therefore, civil engineers areethically obligated to consider issues of diversity, equity, inclusion, and social justice (DEIJ), asacknowledged in the most recent revisions to the American Society of Civil Engineers Code ofEthics [1]. This professional responsibility is shared among those who practice engineeringcurrently – the engineers of today – and those who educate the engineers of tomorrow. There isevidence that engineering faculty increasingly recognize the importance of educating students toapproach problems through a socio-technical lens. However, institutional and professionalsociety efforts around DEIJ continue to focus primarily on issues of representation and
future of civil and environmental engineering (CEE) requires the ability to adaptinfrastructure to changing demands. Intelligent application of sensors will allow civil engineersto improve the performance of infrastructure by automatically measuring real-time responses andinterpreting the data to control the systems. Although sensing technologies now proliferate inCEE practice, few undergraduate CEE curricula prepare graduates to work with sensors [1].Experts in civil engineering information technology and computing have long emphasized theimportance of incorporating sensing into CEE curricula (e.g., [2]-[6]). The 2019 ASCE CivilEngineering Education Summit highlighted the need for academic programs to provide educationon emerging technologies
transfer toward bachelor’s degrees in engineering. This article is based on her 2022 dissertation [1]. Joan’s experience includes 15 years working profession- ally as a structural engineer and 15 years teaching college-level courses. She holds the following degrees: Doctorate in Education from Minnesota State University, Mankato; M.S. in Civil/Structural Engineering from the University of Colorado, Boulder; and M.S. in Mathematics with Emphasis in Education from Bemidji State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 In Their Own Words: The Community College Experience Toward an Engineering Baccalaureate DegreeAbstractWomen and underrepresented
aneight-year cycle.In May 2019, ASCE published the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge, 3rd Edition(CEBOK3). ASCE then convened a Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee(CEPCTC) in January 2020 to review the current ABET Civil Engineering Program Criteria andpropose revisions, if needed, based on (1) the publication of the CEBOK3, (2) a major revisionto the EAC/ABET General Criteria which became effective for reviews during the 2019-2020accreditation cycle, and (3) compliance with guidance from EAC/ABET on curricular topics andfaculty qualifications.This paper is the third in a series to describe the efforts by ASCE and the CEPCTC in reviewingand revising the Civil Engineering Program Criteria. The first paper, presented at the 2021
an Introduction to Design course. These modules enabled students to experience and practice effective teaming skills through role- playing. The modules focused on how to act and how to respond to promote psychological safety on design projects. Each module was tailored to a different phase of the design process. The themes of the three modules are (1) treating every idea as having potential to contribute to a positive outcome, (2) questioning an idea to obtain valuable insight, and (3) applying the brake to improve a decision. To explore the impact of the modules, we deployed a post-course survey to measure students’ perceptions of psychological safety on their project teams. Compared to control sections of freshman design in
knowledge depends on a student’shigh school experience as well as college coursework that may take the form of compositioncourses, technical writing courses, writing-intensive courses (WICs), or courses based on abroader curriculum with writing included in many courses (writing across the curriculum, orWAC). The authors of this paper have investigated student laboratory report writing performanceand the influence of each of these prior writing contexts. In prior work, we have described theinitial development of instructional modules that support engineering laboratory report writingwith a particular focus on instructors [1]. In this paper, we describe the process of refining thesemodules using a community of practice (CoP) approach. Thus, this
engaging and relevant. As such, it hasthe potential to modernize STEM curricula and advance the fundamental understanding at theintersection of technology and environment. 1. IntroductionGeophysical methods are useful in subsurface explorations as they are sensitive to contrast inphysical properties of soils over continuous coverage. Electrical Resistivity (ER) surveys havebeen used to investigate soils for over a century and rely on the fact that varying geologicconditions alter the distribution of electrical potential in the ground [1]. Based on this principle,ER methods have a wide array of practical and research applications related to Civil Engineeringsuch as geological and hydrogeological investigations of the subsoil (including testing
, and its synergy with the existing curriculum, this paper provides guidance for datascience curriculum development, implementation, and evaluation in civil engineering.IntroductionThe need to manage, analyze, and extract knowledge from data is becoming a necessity for everysector of society including industry, government, and academia. Engineers routinely encountermassive amounts of data, and new techniques and tools are emerging to create knowledge out ofthese data [1]. The compounded accessibility of data has considerably altered the civilengineering and the construction profession, and data analysis skill is recognized as a crucialexperience desired in engineering graduates [2-4]. Data science in civil engineering has a verywide scope. Data
Engineering at San Diego State University (SDSU), where he directs the Safe WaTER Lab (safewater.sdsu.edu) and teaches courses on the introduction to environmental engineering, water and wastewater treatment systems, and microbiological processes of environmental engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Improving STEM and social science students’ research efficacy and career motivation through international transdisciplinary research experiences Bettina J. Casad1, Monica Palomo2, Erika Larkins3, Natalie Mladenov4, Matthew E. Verbyla4*1 Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, USA2 Civil Engineering Department, California State Polytechnic
students’ learning experience as well as their overall learning outcomes.Introduction and BackgroundProject-Based Learning (PBL) is a learner-centered pedagogical approach used to engagestudents in authentic projects [1]. In PBL, students work collaboratively or individually toaccomplish the project tasks that require content knowledge and skills and produce a product toshow their knowledge of the content [2]. The assignments in PBL require students to acquire andapply information, concepts, and principles and they have the potential to improve students’competence in thinking (learning and metacognition) [3]. Moreover, working on real-worldprojects helps students realize the impact of those projects, which in turn, gives them a sense ofagency and
instructors for the same courses over the same period, asthere were not rigorous controls for uniformity to ensure that an even comparison could be made.Our Flipped ClassroomsThe flipped classroom approach has been well studied as a pedagogical tool since the mid-2000s[1-9], with many rigorous and observational studies published from faculty researchers andscholars a like from around the world. Although implementation and particulars of the flippedclassroom format vary, the primary concepts generally accepted in the literature [1-9] are asfollows for the engineering, and particularly civil engineering education community:1. In contrast to conventional learning classrooms, which feature a lecture followed by working of examples, the flipped
without any real thoughtabout why. Any participant in an ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop can report that homeworkprovides practice in an unfamiliar context [1]. At the same time, the rise of crowd-sourcedhomework solution services makes finding and copying homework solutions (commonly referredto as “cheating”) exceptionally tempting for even the best students [2]. Clearly, the unquestionedrole of homework in engineering coursework should be re-evaluated, clearly defined, and refinedto accomplish its intended end.Fortunately, ASEE’s active educator community has not been silent on this topic. For thepurpose of this discussion, homework pursues a “three-fold goal… practice, instructor feedback,and self-assessment” while simultaneously considering
fall semester of theirsecond year. One of the first courses that students take when majoring in the civil engineeringprogram is CE201, Introduction to Civil Engineering. CE201 is a required 1-credit hour course inthe civil engineering curriculum. Other than students that transfer into the major late, all studentstake it as part of their first semester in the program.major. The collected data has been evaluated to look for trends in major selection reasoning, aswell as differences between genders.This study will be of interest to faculty and administrators with a desire to understand themotivation behind their students’ major selection. The results of this study have the potential tosignificantly impact the activities and areas of emphasis used
. Since then, there have beennumerous adapted definitions proposed and used by various researchers and educators [1]. Thedefinition used in this paper was proposed by Bringle, et al. in 2006: Service learning is a credit-bearing educational experience in which students (a) participate in an organized service activity that meets identified community needs and (b) reflect on the service activity in such a way as to gain further understanding of course content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, and an enhanced sense of personal values and civic responsibilityThis definition of service learning works well for engineering classes because it explicitlydescribes the goal of students both identifying and working
engineering design course. Eventhough numerous studies have shown a positive correlation between mindfulness activities andstudent focus and attention, intervention studies focused on specific student groups inengineering still need to be included [1-3].Twenty-one upper-level civil engineering students in the Structural Steel Design courseparticipated in this study. Students were offered 3-5-minute mindfulness practices at thebeginning of each 50-min class period, including mindful breathing, awareness, observation,listening, and meditations such as lovingkindness and gratitude. Once a week, othercontemplative activities labeled 'Nuggets of Wisdom,' which included a variety of reflectivewriting, deep listening, insight mediations, and mindful
optimizations, traffic ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Improving Academic Success with Distraction MethodAbstract:Thinking capabilities can be affected significantly (negatively) with excessive focus exhaust. Itis particularly important to make sure your brain is not exhausted and not losing its thinkingcapabilities. It has been found that both focus, and un-focus are vital for efficiency, thinking,and learning. When the brain is unfocused, it uses the energy to activate old memories, goesback and forth between past, present, and future, and reinforces imaginative and creativethinking [1].A study conducted at the University of British Columbia [2] suggests that people who arestruggling to
wreak more havoc. WD have the potential to (1) cause substantial property damageand destroy infrastructure systems, including power, transportation, and communications; (2)impact significantly the economy of countries by causing significant economic losses due toinfrastructure systems and property damage, power failure, evacuation, debris removal, andbusiness interruption; (3) cause injury as well as aggravate respiratory conditions includingallergy and asthma; and (4) threaten people’s lives and well-being [1]–[3].From 1960 until 2019, 11,360 natural disasters, where more than ten people died or more than100 people were affected, were registered globally. From those, 8,781 were weather and climaterelated, 2,638 due to storms, including
, coursesexisted to teach students how to identify, assess, protect, rebuild, or maintain infrastructure [1].Electrical power infrastructure – ubiquitous, complex, and essential to meeting sustainabilitygoals – is particularly essential to the infrastructure landscape, and early civil engineeringstudents broadly lack a basic understanding of the functioning of this critical element.Over the past ten years, there has been a growth of broad-based infrastructure survey courses atthe college level, especially within civil engineering programs. Early coursework oninfrastructure focused on the history behind the development of modern-day industries andengineering [2]. This evolved into infrastructure courses focused on engineering for thefundamental needs of
) that provide studentswith the skills necessary to complete an integrated core project (ICP). This semester long ICP isa group project that thematically ties together CEE concepts, guiding students through thesequence of a residential site development project. Part 1 of the ICP requires a comprehensiveassessment of the existing site, including topography, slopes, land use, soils, and zoningcalculations, which provide real constraints and regulations for the students to adhere to whendeveloping a conceptual site plan layout. Once provided with a final site plan design for Part 2,students apply spatial analysis tools to evaluate drainage patterns and earthwork volumes, extractprofiles from existing and proposed surfaces, calculate quantities for
. It is one of the mosturgent issues our global community is facing. According to the UNEP 2022 Global Status Reportfor Buildings and Construction [1], the buildings and construction sector consumes about 34percent of global energy use and accounts for 37 percent of global energy and process-relatedcarbon emissions in 2021. Civil engineers who are responsible for the design and construction ofthese physical systems play an essential role in reducing carbon emissions, thereby mitigatingclimate change. In terms of resilience, the infrastructure systems civil engineers design andconstruct typically have long service lives. That said, the increasing severity of hazardsattributable to climate change places these systems at significant risk, where
organizational management, this paper discusses how the use of practitioners supports the“leadership” aspect of the fifth ABET student outcome. The seven ABET student outcomes and nineUSAFA institutional outcomes are shown in Figure 1: Figure 1: ABET Student Outcomes and USAFA Institutional OutcomesLiterature Review on Utilization of Practitioners in Education:Academic partnerships with industry provide many learning benefits that include opportunitiesfor field trips (Welch et al. 2018), service-learning experiences (Oakes 2011), and internships(Tener 1996, Saviz et al. 2011, Weatherton 2012, Welch et al. 2018). Partnerships with industryfor realistic projects in capstone courses is quite common (Akili 2010, McGinnis and Welch2010, Aktan et
that all private and public infrastructure and engineered products are designed bya licensed engineer is not true due to the number of exemptions in the laws and rules in alljurisdictions. Civil engineering programs should include content on engineering licensure laws intheir curriculum to enable graduates to understand professional responsibilities and howlimitations in licensure laws can affect public safety and an engineer’s career path.IntroductionForty-nine of fifty state professional engineering licensure laws (referred to as licensure laws inthis paper) include language that the purpose of professional engineering (PE) licensure is toprotect and enhance the health, safety and welfare of the public [1]. Licensure is especiallyimportant
silica fume. Thefirst mix was a control group consisting of concrete with typical ingredients (Test A), while theother four mixes were Test B, Test C, Test D, and Test E. Test B consisted of mix in Test A +flyash (1/3rd the weight of cement in the mix), Test C involved replacing 1/3rd of the weight ofcement in Test A with an equivalent weight of fly ash, Test D consisted of mix in Test A +silicafume (1/3rd the weight of cement in the mix), and Test E involved replacing 1/3rd of the weightof cement in Test A with an equivalent weight of silica fume. The addition of pozzolan affects the properties of fresh and hardened concrete such astemperature, workability, density, air content, compressive strength etc. Therefore, studentsconducted
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Comparison of Civil Engineering Curriculums and EAC-ABET Civil Engineering Program CriteriaAbstractAccredited civil engineering programs use a variety of methods to meet the EAC-ABET GeneralCriteria and the Civil Engineering Program Criteria (CEPC). Since the authors conducted aprogram study in 2018, three external changes have affected civil engineering programs [1]. Thisincludes an updated version of the ASCE Body of Knowledge (BOK3), changes to the NCEESFundamentals of Engineering (FE) Civil Engineering exam, and changes to the CEPC that willbecome effective during the 2024-2025 ABET accreditation cycle. Data for this study weregathered during the 2023-2024 academic
toengineering educators looking to continuously improve their assessment and evaluation to whichstudent outcomes are being obtained within the capstone course. This paper is a work-in-progressthat presents a literature review, a proposed research methodology, and hypothesized resultsregarding the andragogical value of using employee appraisal forms to assess attainment ofstudent outcomes within engineering capstone courses.IntroductionPerformance appraisals are defined as “a process involving deliberate stock taking of the success,which an individual or organization has achieved in performing assigned tasks or meeting setgoals over a period of time” [1]. A performance appraisal can be used for various reasons toinclude communicating employee strengths
have shifted along with advances intechnology used in both engineering practice and education. A brief but comprehensive historyof civil engineering education including the 18th and 19th centuries is given by Aparicio andRuiz-Teran [1]. Civil engineering education in the U.S., starting around the late 18th century,followed two European traditions of British and French origins. The former placed emphasis onpractical application of scientific principles, while the latter put more emphasis on soundtheoretical understanding as a basis of engineering practice. However, many civil engineers werestill trained through apprenticeships and so they received a great deal of practical training.With the technological and economic advancements of the mid and